Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

TPWD 1969 F-6-R-16 #1250: Fisheries Investigations - Region 5-B: Experimental Aging Study, Job Progress Report, Lake Corpus Christi, 1968

Open PDF
tpwd_1969_f-6-r-16_1250_experimental_ag.txt completed 43 entities

Extracted Text

Marion Toole D-J Coordinator JOB PROGRESS REPORT As required by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT TEXAS Federal Aid Project No. F-6-Rul6 FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS - REGION S-B Job No. E-7 Experimental AgingStudy Project Leader: Roger L. McCabe J. Ra Singleton Executive.Director Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Eugene A. Walker Director, Wildlife Services April 17, 1969' JOB PROGRESS REPORT State . . Texas Project No, F-6~R~16 Project Title: Eisheries Investigations - Region 5~B m“ Job Noe EH7 Job Title: Experimental Aging Study Period Covered: January 1, 1968 to December 31, 1968 __ I, SUMMARY: Aging fishes in areas having mild winters and consequent moderately fluctuating water temperatures, is generally considered difficult and inexact, The reasons for these assumptions are based on standard methods of age deter- mination, but there is a lack of documentation based on valid experimentationa It is the purpose of this job to determine whether or not a method or combination of methods can be used to accurately age fishes from South Texas waters and to document findings resulting from the study: Literature research and acquisition were employed this segmento A bibliography has been prepared on pertinent publications and this reference will be augmented by further literature researcha Data and samples were obtained at Lake Corpus Christi throughout 19689 Morphological structures (scales, opercular bones, vertebrae and otoliths} and physical data were acquired from 1,092 fisheso Additional length—frequency data were also collected to supplement aging criteriao Sampling resulted in rather unbalanced yieldsa Therefore, some degree of selectivity will be practiced during 1969 collecting.proceduresa ,Age determination activities will commence when adequate samples have been processed and needed equipment items acquired, II, BACKGROUND: Age determination is an important factor in fishery management and research. Unfortunately, accurate age estimates are, in many instances, difficult to attain; Due to geographical variation and anatomical difference, no set method for aging all fishes has been established, Throughout most of the Temperate Zones, year marks on scales and bony parts are useful in aging. Annuli, or year marks, are formed due to a slowing down of temperaturemdependent processes during winter months and resumption of rapid metabolism in the spring. Project F-6 encompasses an area in southern Texas lying near the transition area between the Temperate and Tropical Zones. This being the case, year marks are not always plainly evident in scales and bones due to mild winters of short duration, which result in only moderate fluctuations in fish growth rates. From these circumstances has arisen a common belief that fishes in this area cannot be accurately aged, but there seems to be little or no documentation on this presumption. It is the purpose of this job to determine whether or not a method or combination of methods can be used to age fishes from South Texas waters and to document the procedures and findings resulting from the study. III. OBJECTIVES; 1. To prepare a bibliography of aging studies with emphasis on fishes from mild climates. 2. To collect aging data of fishes from Lake Corpus Christi. 3. To determine if an efficient method or combination of methods can be established for aging South Texas fishes. IV. PROCEDURES: Literature research and compilation of a bibliography on publications pertaining to age and growth determination have been done throughout the segment. New research developments and avenues of information occur fre- quently which necessitate further investigation and literature research. Therefore, this objective will be continued. Monthly field trips to Lake Corpus Christi were made throughout 1968. Gill nets provided the primary means of procuring specimens for analysis. These varied from uniform mesh nets having 1- to 4-inch bar measurements, to standard and experimental gill nets having bar measurements of l-3%-inch and l-3winch graduated mesh, respectively. Four days per month were normally spent at the lake for netting and specimen dissection. Net sets, usually consisting of three nets each, were made two nights during the stay in most instances. Areas of collection were varied in regard to map location and habitat types. Netting yields were supplemented by wire fish trap catches during the last quarter of the segment. Two traps, one of V-mouth design and the other a cloverwleaf type, were used in conjunction with another job on the project. These traps were utilized to increase the number of sunfishes and Rio Grande perch captured. Once obtained, fishes were placed on ice to retard spoilage, as con— siderable time is needed to process an entire catch, As each fish was worked, all data regarding that particular specimen was recorded on a collection envelope, Species, locality, date of capture, length (standard and total), weight, sex and gonadal condition, collector's name and pertinent remarks were noted for each fish worked, After measuring and weighing, scale samples were removed from those specimens having scales by scraping free with a knife in an area below or above the lateral line (depending on species) directly beneath the dorsal fin, Approximately 25 scales were taken from each individual and placed in the collection envelope, The specimen was then examined internally to determine sex and gonadal condition, The examiner noted whether the fish was mature or immature and sex distinguishable, Mature specimens were examined to determine stage of development w spent, approaching ripeness, or flowing, ' The left opercular bone was removed from all specimens dissected, This was done by cutting with scissors through skin and bone above the opercle, across to the eye orbit, down to the mouth, and back along the branchiostegal rays below the opercle, Although additional bones and parts of bones were also removed in this way, it provided the fastest and surest means of obtaining the opercular bone without damage to it, Three to five of the anterior trunk vertebrae were then removed by dissection and placed in a container for further processing, Obtaining at least two otoliths, or inner ear stones, from every fish has been the most time consuming portion of the dissection procedures, Removal of the entire mandible allows unrestricted access to the_pockets 'which house the inner ear, These pockets appear as a small bulbous enlarge- ment on the midline of the neurocranium floor, slightly posterior to the brain area, To reach the otoliths one must cut into the region of the neurocranium the stones occupy, They are less conspicuous in some species than in others and can easily be misplaced or destroyed, There are three otoliths on each side of the head, Once removed these hard white stones were wrapped in Saran Wrap and placed in the collection envelope, The left pectoral spine was removed from all catfishes for cross- sectioning and examination in the laboratory, To insure getting the basal portion of the spine, the ventral cleithrum portion of the pectoral girdle was severed and the left side of the girdle was removed, Structures having excess flesh, bone, and connective tissue intact, i,e,, opercular bones, pectoral elements, and vertebrae, were boiled and cleaned at the lake, They were then added to the respective collection envelopes, which were filed by species, Lengthmfrequency methods are included in this study to provide yet another criteria for determining ages, Length data obtained during regular Location Date Gear Species 0 I I ..-_..__... —-— 10 i . . ' 5 _— 20 —-— I "I" _— 30 ——— i _— 40 —-—?-¥_ " _ 50 _-——— ' ' _— 60 j . . I . . r . .' 7 0 __— I —=—— 80 ———— ' ' _— 90 _3—'—_- I I — 100 —_ . _ 1— ' — 1 1 0 '—I__—-— — 120 . . . , . . i . 1 3 0 —— _— — ._ _ . 140 —— ' ' 9 " 150 . _ __ ; . . . .I 160 _'- '- ' - ' ' " 1 70 _ .— ' ' _ 180 _ . . I .. , . 5 .. I 190 I __I— I _I I ‘ 2 00 _ —I I . ._ ' . III“ I— I ' 210 I . . . _ .. . _ I _ I . . 220 — II" II— III IIIIIIIII" ' ' ‘ '" ' 230 _—- _ I. i ' ' III- ; 240 —— f ' ' L ‘ ' ' . 260 —.—— I .' I' 'I I 2 7o ———: ' = I 280 _-__ _- 290 ——— _—: aoo —— — _ ' 310 _ ;_ __..._. '-. ' I 320 . '—; a . — '_.— 330 -_ — ._— 340 — ' 350 . . .. . . _ . i _______. I . 360 .-I I I I I . _II 370 —3 I 1— I __— 380 —__ ~—- 390 -—_ _- 400 — _——; ' < ‘“ :— 410 —— "‘ ' _— 420 L_—f ; III—III" I _— ' 430 —_= IIIII ' _— 440 I ; —_ IIIIIIIIIII—IIII ' _ I 460 _ __—= I _— 470 _-_ ' ' “'“—'” _- 480 —_ ' = IIIII 1—— 490 _—=— _- soo ——— I I - I — 510 ——'_ ' "—— 520 . . . . 1 . I i. . . . 1 Figure 1 Sample of Bangth-Frequency Data Sheet LENGTH-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION Table 1 Species and Number of Fishes Dissected, 1968* . t - wanna-1'”. Per Cent of Total S ecies r P aawm_a___mmw_u_flm_._ '7" I Id g Threadfin shad 1 0,09 5 I Gizzard shad ! ‘ 15,29 i Smallmouth buffalo 9,16 - Carp ‘ l .4.95 l Golden shiner 0,09 ? 5 Channel catfish , l 8,06 g g Blue catfish 10,26 § i‘rellsw bullhead catfish l l 0,09 1 i Flathead catfish g I 0,46 ; gIWhite bass ! 118 3 10,80 3 j Largemouth bass i 37 f 3,39 E i Warmonth i 9 i 0,82 i Redear sunfish l 87 2 7,97 ' Bluegill ; 54 l 4,95 Redbreast sunfish i 8 0,73 I Longear sunfish l 14 l 1,28 White crappie g 113 g 10 35 Black crappie ? l2 5 1,10 , Freshwater drum 104 9,52 3 i Rio Grande perch 7 " 0,64 3 Total 1092 f 100 00 i 1 ”I‘m—:4; m We mun-“rm a; Mum‘s-mm mm 3-— 'fm' % Does not include gar species, as these were omitted from the Study. monthly field trips were supplemented by those recorded during_eight additional trips designed solely for gathering length-frequency data. Collecting equip- ment on these days consisted of a variety of seines ranging from 20 to 375 feet in length with mesh sizes ranging from one-eighth to one-half inch. Fishes were measured to determine standard length; these data were recorded separately for each species on a length—frequency distribution form graduated in 10 mil— limeter intervals from 0 to 520 mm. (Figure 1). Modes will be determined for suspected year groups for each species and these will be incorporated in the laboratory aging process. V. FINDINGS: During the first year of this study a bibliography of approximately 125 related publications has been prepared. Annotations and procurement of literature were initiated on materials readily obtainable. A total of 1,092 specimens were dissected during the year (Table 1). As can be seen in Table 1, an unbalanced sample has been obtained, with abundant species more prevalent. During the next segment, habitat and col- lecting gear will be used to selectivily round out the sampling yield. Fish trapping will be continued, as selectivity for Rio Grande perch and sunfishes was exhibited during the short period this method was used. Lengthwfrequency sampling also resulted in a strongly unbalanced Gizzard and threadfin shad greatly outnumbered all other species. Some species_were represented by such a meager number that no-definite year modes could be distinguished. Selectivity will also be employed to some degree in length—frequency sampling during the coming year in order to achieve some uniformity. yield. No aging methods were actually tested this segment. Necessary items of equipment such as scale projector, scale press, and sectioning equipment will be acquired during the next segment. Preliminary aging trials will be made to develop optimum techniques before actual age determinations are begun. VI. RECOMMENDATIONS: The first segment of this study has been devoted to gathering morphological samples and data. More of this type work will be needed during the 17th and possibly the 18th segments. This job is scheduled to run through 1971, at which time a manuscript will be prepared for publication. Findings could provide-extremely useful tools for management and research. VII. Prepared by: Ro er L. McCabe Approved by ’ _/é;d”fi5¢”V¢*~// Project Leader I Coordinator Date April 17, 1969 E1 in M.C. Die 2 Fisheries Supervisor

Detected Entities

location (4)

Austin 0.900 p.1 Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas
Lake Corpus Christi 0.900 p.2 Data and samples were obtained at Lake Corpus Christi throughout 1968
Texas 0.900 p.1 JOB PROGRESS REPORT Texas
Rio Grande 0.850 p.1 ...traps were utilized to increase the number of sunfishes and Rio Grande perch captured. Once obtained, fishes were pl…

organization (2)

Federal Aid in Fisheries Restoration Act 0.900 p.1 As required by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT
Parks and Wildlife Department 0.900 p.1 Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas

person (4)

Eugene A. Walker 0.900 p.1 Eugene A. Walker Director, Wildlife Services
J. Ra Singleton 0.900 p.1 J. Ra Singleton Executive.Director
Marion Toole 0.900 p.1 Marion Toole D-J Coordinator
Roger L. McCabe 0.900 p.1 Project Leader: Roger L. McCabe
Ameiurus natalis 0.900 p.5 Yellow bullhead catfish 0.09
Aplodinotus grunniens 0.900 p.5 Freshwater drum 9.52
Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum 0.900 p.5 Rio Grande perch 0.64
Cyprinidae 0.900 p.5 Carp 4.95
Cyprinus carpio 0.900 p.5 Carp 4.95
Dorosoma cepedianum 0.900 p.5 Gizzard shad 15.29
Dorosoma petenense 0.900 p.5 Threadfin shad 1 0.09 5
Ictalurus furcatus 0.900 p.5 Blue catfish 10.26
Ictalurus punctatus 0.900 p.5 Channel catfish 8.06
Ictiobus bubalus 0.900 p.5 Smallmouth buffalo 9.16
Lepomis gulosus 0.900 p.5 Warmouth 0.82
Lepomis megalotis 0.900 p.5 Longear sunfish 1.28
Lepomis microlophus 0.900 p.5 Redbreast sunfish 0.73
Micropterus salmoides 0.900 p.5 Largemouth bass 3.39
Morone chrysops 0.900 p.5 White bass 10.80
Notemigonus crysoleucas 0.900 p.5 Golden shiner 0.09
Pomoxis annularis 0.900 p.5 White crappie 10.35
Pomoxis nigromaculatus 0.900 p.5 Black crappie 1.10
Pylodictis olivaris 0.900 p.5 Flathead catfish 0.46
Black Crappie 0.850 p.1 ...3 I Longear sunfish l 14 l 1,28 White crappie g 113 g 10 35 Black crappie ? l2 5 1,10 , Freshwater drum 104 9,52 3 i…
Blue Catfish 0.850 p.1 ....4.95 l Golden shiner 0,09 ? 5 Channel catfish , l 8,06 g g Blue catfish 10,26 § i‘rellsw bullhead catfish l l 0,09 …
Channel Catfish 0.850 p.1 ...outh buffalo 9,16 - Carp ‘ l .4.95 l Golden shiner 0,09 ? 5 Channel catfish , l 8,06 g g Blue catfish 10,26 § i‘rell…
Flathead Catfish 0.850 p.1 ...Blue catfish 10,26 § i‘rellsw bullhead catfish l l 0,09 1 i Flathead catfish g I 0,46 ; gIWhite bass ! 118 3 10,80 3…
Freshwater Drum 0.850 p.1 ...,28 White crappie g 113 g 10 35 Black crappie ? l2 5 1,10 , Freshwater drum 104 9,52 3 i Rio Grande perch 7 " 0,64 3…
Gizzard Shad 0.850 p.1 ...P aawm_a___mmw_u_flm_._ '7" I Id g Threadfin shad 1 0,09 5 I Gizzard shad ! ‘ 15,29 i Smallmouth buffalo 9,16 - Carp …
Golden Shiner 0.850 p.1 ...shad ! ‘ 15,29 i Smallmouth buffalo 9,16 - Carp ‘ l .4.95 l Golden shiner 0,09 ? 5 Channel catfish , l 8,06 g g Blue…
Largemouth Bass 0.850 p.1 ...Flathead catfish g I 0,46 ; gIWhite bass ! 118 3 10,80 3 j Largemouth bass i 37 f 3,39 E i Warmonth i 9 i 0,82 i Red…
Longear Sunfish 0.850 p.1 ...2 7,97 ' Bluegill ; 54 l 4,95 Redbreast sunfish i 8 0,73 I Longear sunfish l 14 l 1,28 White crappie g 113 g 10 35 B…
Redbreast Sunfish 0.850 p.1 ...i 0,82 i Redear sunfish l 87 2 7,97 ' Bluegill ; 54 l 4,95 Redbreast sunfish i 8 0,73 I Longear sunfish l 14 l 1,28 …
Redear Sunfish 0.850 p.1 ...0 3 j Largemouth bass i 37 f 3,39 E i Warmonth i 9 i 0,82 i Redear sunfish l 87 2 7,97 ' Bluegill ; 54 l 4,95 Redbre…
Smallmouth Buffalo 0.850 p.1 ..." I Id g Threadfin shad 1 0,09 5 I Gizzard shad ! ‘ 15,29 i Smallmouth buffalo 9,16 - Carp ‘ l .4.95 l Golden shiner…
Threadfin Shad 0.850 p.1 ...tal S ecies r P aawm_a___mmw_u_flm_._ '7" I Id g Threadfin shad 1 0,09 5 I Gizzard shad ! ‘ 15,29 i Smallmouth buffal…
White Crappie 0.850 p.1 ...95 Redbreast sunfish i 8 0,73 I Longear sunfish l 14 l 1,28 White crappie g 113 g 10 35 Black crappie ? l2 5 1,10 , …