TPWD 1955 F-4-R-2 #157: Inventory of Species Present in Benbrook Lake, Benbrook, Texas
Open PDFExtracted Text
STATE Texas
PROJECT NO. Fun-.34 Job 35
PERIOD June 1,1955 ~ Oct. 31, 1955
SEGMENT COMPLETION REPORT
BY
ROBERT N. HAMBRIC
ASSISTANT PROJECT IEADER
TITLE
Inventory of Species Present in Benbrook Lake, Benbrook, Texas.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the species present and their relative abundance as well as the
ecological factors influencing their distribution.
HISTORY OF LAKE
Benbrook Lake is located in Tarrant County about 15 miles southwest of Fort
Worth, Texas. Closure of the dam was made September 29, 1952. The lake will
impound 3,769 surface acres of water at top of conservation pool which is 69h feet
above sea level. Rainfall has been light during the last few years over the entire
drainage area, which permitted the lake to fill to only about onemfcurth or one«
third of its normal capacity. The lake was stocked with 550,000 fish during 1953,
of which 370,000 were largemouth bass. Table 1 lists all fish that have been
stocked in Benbrook Lake by State and Federal Hatcheries. The impoundment was
closed to fishing in September 1953 and remained closed until June 1, I954.
Fishing pressure was extremely heavy the first few days of the span season, but not
so intensive theremafter.
COIIECTING METHODS
The fish population was sampled each month by gill nets with meshes of i to 3
inches Square measure. Periodic checks were also made with minnow seines measuring
30 by 6 feet with % inch mesh. The seined samples were preserved in 6 percent
formalin and taken to the laboratory for identification. The fish collected by gill
nets were worked to obtain their length, weight, gonadal development, and stomach
contents. A checklist of the fishes collected frcm Benbrook Lake is recorded in
Table 2.
RESULTS OF SEINING COLLECTIONS
Seven seine collections were made to catch 621 specimens of fish numbering
19 species. Table 3 records the number of each species collected and the percentage
of the total number that it represents. Minnows and other forage fish were scarce
during the time that the predaceous species, mainly largemouth bass, were abundant.
(The beginning of the present survey coincided with the initial large bass harvest
from the lake, but work done immediately preceding the present study corroborates
the above statement.)
Only two small shad were caught in the sei.ne samples taken in July 195%,
indica.ti.ng the spawn of that species had been heavily prayed upon and adequately
”“RbellPd when largemouth base were abundant in the lake. It was further noticed
that fry and fingerling bass were also absent from the seine collections taken
during the summer and fall of l95h. If hatching had been successful the spawn
evidently had fallen prey to the larger fish. As the forage fish in the lake began
to multiply they were naturally taken in larger quantities in the seine collections.
Shad became so abundant during the fall of 1954 and in 1955 they accounted for
53.h8 percent of all the specimens collected. This was a very high increase over
the 1.58 percent that they represented in the seine samples of the previous survey.
RESUITS OF NETTING COLLECTIONS
A total of 79 gill net sets were made from June 195h through October 1955 to
produce 981 specimens representing 19 species. A tabulation of data from the net
collections is given in Table A. The fish population in Benbrook Lake changed
from predominately game fish to mostly rough fish during the 17 month period of this
study. Table 5 offers a comparison of the present game fish and rough fish
odpulations of the lake with those of the previous survey.
The rapid increase in the rough fish population in Benbrook Lake has been an
interesting development and is due, in part, to the unique history of the lake
which immediately preceded this survey. A better understanding of the problem may-
be had by a study of Table 6 which compares the results of the present ahd last
segments net collections by species, showing the percentage of the total catch by
both number and weight and the average ”K” factor for each period. During the
time that the lake was closed to fishing the overcrowded bass were continuously
hunting for food. Nearly all types of animal life were heavily prayed upon, ins
eluding other base. Although, they could not have existed forever under such
starvation conditions the base were quite effective in devouring the spawn of all
fish before it had a chance to grow off. Then when some 250, 000 base, plus many
f.ish of oth.er species, were harvested from the lake during the first part of dune
l95t it left the impoundment with insufficient predators to adequately control
the spaw.o of the remaining species. It was during the summer and fall of 195a
that the spawning of carp, shed and spotted sucker was so successful. The writer
believes it is worthy of note that three of our better predators are not found
in the lake. These are the gars, flathead catfish, and white bass.
Sim gill net sets made during June and mideuly, following the heavy fishm
ing pressure in early June, produced only 9% specimens of which onemhalf were
large mature shad. Inspection of last segmentis records revealed that each set
' averaged 75 fi.sh per net duri.ng that period of inventory. Large carp and shed
accounted for 30 percent or more of the few fish caught from June to October. A
great many unmolested schools of small shad were seen on the surface for the first
time in October denoting a build up of food and a scarcity of predatory fish at
that time. Adequate samples of fish were caught in the nets from October 195%
through October 1955. Shad were the most abundant species captured, followed by
base, carp, and spotted sucker. Many of the bass caught were probably those
stocked during the fall of 195M as little evidence of a successful bass spawn was
found for that year. Internal inspection revealed that malnutrition had caused
many of the mature bass to reabsorb their eggs.
Carp and spotted suckers have multiplied fast and at various times each has
composed a major part of the net catch- White crappie were collected in limited
numbers from October until July. Most of them were small. Good catches of crappie
that weighed more than 8 ounces each were taken in August and September. There
was no previous indication that this sizengroup of crappie were in the lake in
appreciable numbers. The crappie has increased from almost nothing to better than
8 percent of the total net catch.
The bullhead catfish population is stillghigh and during the last 17
months has more than doubled in representative percentage of the total fish-netted.
The yellow bullhead was slightly the mCre abundant of the two species during the
previous study but was outnumbered 2 to l by the black bullhead in the present
survey. It seems possible that the yellow bullhead may disappear from the lake in
the future. The channel catfish population has remained relatively stable during
the past three years.
One of the more interesting developments of the lake has been a marked
change in the largemouth bass population. This species has decreased from a former
85 percent to the present 16 percent of the total net catch. Such a drop would
seem natural when one considers the large harvest of bass taken from the lake in
195M. It is apparently better to have a smaller number of healthy bass in an
impoundment than to crowd the water with more fish than it can support. An
examination of the past records of the lake revealed some interesting changes in
the health and general condition of the bass. The extensive parasitism, malu
nutrition, slow growth, and predation upon like species that was present during the
crowded condition was noticeably lacking in the present study. Neither was there
any indication of reabsorption of eggs by base during the last spawning season,
and the increase in growth rate was accelerated when forage fish became abundant in
the lake. Bass that averaged 10% ounces when the lake was closed to'fishing in Sept~
ember averaged only 11% ounces when the lake was reopened to fishing the following
June. During the next 17 months, while the lake was opened to fishing, the bass more
than doubled in weight for an average of 1.58 pounds for all fish netted.
The stomachs of the fishes were examined to note all conspicuous food
present. Many of the food items listed as unidentifiable fish remains were quite
possibly shad. Table 7 records the food items found and the frequency of their
-occurrence for each species of fish studied.
By an inspection of the data collected during the past and present surveys
on Benbrook Lake it is noted that a rapid change in fish population, either in
types or numbers, may upset the lake balance causing it to fluctuate from one
extreme to another. It is recommended that further study be made of Benbrook Lake
in order to follow the development of that impoundment.
SUMMARY
1. Benbrook Lake was sampled with minnow seines and gill nets from June 1,
19st to October 31, 1955.
2. A total of 621 specimens were collected by seines and 981 fish were taken
with nets.
3. Shad accounted for 22 percent of the total net catch as compared with less
than 3 percent found in the previous study.
4. Largemouth bass represented 16 percent of the fish netted as compared with
85 percent found in the previous survey.
5. The fish population changed from predominately game fish to mostly rough
fish during the 17 month period of this survey. '
6. Bass grew much faster after the lake was opened to fishing.
7. Malnutrition, parasitism, and the reabsorption of eggs was not present
after the crowded game fish population of the lake was alleviated.
8. A rapid change in fish pepulation, either in types or numbers, may upset
the lake balance causing it to fluctuate from one extreme to another.
HmaHe H. mmdoweew maooWHom om Wear so woodeoow wemmeeowec Zm% we Hmmw a Qmaoaee my“ mem.
memosmm mew Hemp swam eoamsm
QWmBSmH omdwwmr flHodeGWCm sooamdomv
Howmmeoodw wmmm AZHowowdewom mmHEOMmemv
flmwaooaw wemm mowmeooee dam noeoomchmv
wemmee msowwmw He.oewm awoeowo wow“
mwoomHHH moowwmr Hewoswm smoHoowMHomv
Hofimmmw msowwmw Abewoewm aemmHOdem
MeHHosdewww mcomew memoewm mswwdomv
SWwae mewmwm Awoeoxwm mooswmwwmw
wwmmw oemwwwe Avosoxwm owmeosmoowmdva
Table 2. Checklist of Fish Species from Benbrook Lake, Texas, 195h-55.
Common Name Scientific Name
1 Gizzard Shad Dorosoma cepedianum
2. River Carpsucker Carpiodes carpio
3. Grey Redhorse .Moxostoma mcongestum
M Spotted Sucker Minytrema. melanops
5. Carp Cyprinus carpio
6. Redfin Shiner NotroEis umbratilis
7. Brazos River Shiner Notropis brazosensis
8. Blacktail Shiner (Spottail) Notropis venustus
9. Red Shiner (Redhorse) Notropis lutrensis
10. Parrot Minnow Pimephales vigilax
-11. Fathead Minnow Pimephales promelas
12. Southern Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus
13. Black Bullhead Ameiurus melas
1H. Yellow Bullhead Ameiurus natalis
15. Blackstripe Topminnow Fundulus notatus
16. Gambusia Gambusia affinis
‘7. Largemouth Black Bass Micropterus salmoides
3. warmouth Chaenobryttus coronarius
19. Green Sunfish Lepomis cyanellus
20. Redear Sunfish Lepomis microlophus
21. Bluegill Sunfish Lepomis macrochirus
22. Yellowbelly Sunfish Lepomis auritus
23. White Crappie Pomoxis annularis
2H. Dusky Barty Hadropterus scierus
25. Logperch Percina caprodes
4.
Hedwe w. wmmswam ow mewswsm oowwmodwoom 5% zeswme ow weer mweowemc wmodwoow hens» Hesse. mersmm.
mweowem . asswme OOHHmOdem wewaeod 0% Hoamw
QHNNmHm moan mac rw.:m
anew mambowme H O.Hm
mwoadmm mGnWms H O.Hm
wemwwo mowoms Hm .m.rm
wHeNOm wwdee mowoee m H.m©
womowamae messes Ameoaamasv : o.m:
was messes Assasosaav Hos Ha.mw
passes Ewooofi mw _ w.40
Wmafimmm Zwoooa m o.wm
meondswwe Howswssoa mm Ho.mw
omsdcmwe H O.Hm
beameEOde meow meme ma r.wm
memes msowwmo 4 H.Hw
wmmems mSBmMmo H O.Hm
aHzmmaHH messes: mm m.mo
amoooaamHHe mesaams :w m.em
asses osmeeam H o.Hm
ezmwe sesame H o.~m
Homwmeor 4 H.Hw
eoamw mmw Hoo.oo
.J—vn— -.
edem :.
I.
memswm mfima
omswmsowew
Qwew mambowmm
meowamm moowme
omen
owmooeH omdwwmfi
%. WGHHUme
w. wsHHUmmm
H. E. wmmm
Emesosdr
memes msswwmw
K. w. msomew
stemHHH msomemw
szam meUwHe
Hede
MHm
mH
me
mmH
fineness ow
Hede EmeGmH
HO0.00
wosoom
ommmfid
am.wm
mm. as
.am
am. ma
Hma.wo
:m.0m
mm. om
we. as
mam mm
H.wo
.ws.
mo. .rm
rm.OH
moa.wr
m.
mewoeod ow
HoamH.£eHmfid
m.mw
m.mw
.om
m so
He. :m
m. mm
w. HH
r :m
we. mm
. Hm
.Om
m. .m:
m.ao
HO0.00
new. EmHmUd
Ho wessmm
HedsHmeHoo ow Uses wees QHHH Zed OOHHeodHesm wees wandeoow been» ages mer afiwosmw Ooaodee mem.
20. 0% mew
wee H00.
m.4w
.mm
.op
H.mm
H.mm
_.wH
.mm
H.Hr
.ow
.OH
.ow
.mm
H. om
Zea
m.
emvHe m. b ooEUmHHmob ow ave mesa mom wosmw WHmU omsmwd 6% QHHH Zmdm HS meodsoow Hme.
Hose Hmmm msom me: meeoeodmme armomm
ZmddHom ooHHeodHoom awsosmw aweoomw
Bow me: Ooaodee Hmmm Homememe weesmeme
HoamH 20. em mweowseom.omsmww ...muHu4: ::-..:_.;i_:t:wHu.:r..:s :.::_:;:.E2-.:.:..:::.:;:..-.::munom:
*.HoamH as. ow mweoHseom cosmos Hsmmm woe . mH.Hw
bdewmmm 2d. pew mweoHSeo 0.4m o.mm H4.mo
saaoamH assess 0a mass ease H.smo wmm . ss.mo
HoamH 2w. ow wosmw Memo Hmm rrH Hmm.mm
soamH 20. as mass was: H.msm wmo . mw.ma
Hede 20. ow mocmw me5 www mmH H4m.m4
paw. 2a. was mesa seas 0.4m H.Hw mm.ma
sea. as. was moses same o.mo o.ma Hm.mw
mewomsa mesa WHmw w% zssdmw m©.o& wm.mm mw.wm
wmeomoa wosmw me5 ma zsewew Ho.ww m4.wm mHm.:4
emaomsa mesa same we assess mm.wm :m.wm sm.mw
emsomsa moses same wa.zmsmsa. Hs.mm m:.mp wma.Hm
* :mHmUa H5 possum
** owamewems HooHsaem H5 mesa meS
Ho.
adee m. wmmSHdm ow are oneness Zeddwbm ooHHmodHoom wees wmoasoow.HmWe ma mosmmwem flHaw ooHHmodHoom ow ave
wwmoemHUm macaw.
acne Hmmr a Onaodme mem
Hebe mew n.2mw Hmmr
Weeoaodeme ow HoemH Qeanfi
weeomodemo ow andeH omens
mweoHem ma acadew ww EmHmwd hem. 2%: wooden mw zoswme mw SeHmwd .bdm.:mz @moaon
maasmsa meme m.4m m.mo H.4m mm.mm wwmw H.4m
deew omemmsoWee o.wm 0.4m m.rr m.H¥ m.mw m.mm
anew weawoemm 0.0m 0.0m m.or o.Ho Grow m.40
meoaama menses H.0m H.mm m.oa Hw.sm e.;o m.-
ease o.wm o.mm m.mm H:.am ow.:m m.mo
assesses osmssmH omaaams H.:m m.m4 p.44 m.mm m.wm H.a:
assoc: ecHHsmma w.w: m.qm m.w~ m.so w.HH m.wm
aHmow esHHsmma w.om w.WH m.m4 m.mm :.sm m.wm
emsmmaocas memos ammm m:.44 mH.er m.mm om.mo wo.mm m.mm
seasosas o.eo 0.0m w.w: o.mo o.~m w.ma
memos mcsasms o.ma o.Hw w.w: o.~o o.ow w.am
amHHoaamHHe manages o.mw o.H4 s.wo o.mo 0.0m w.4:
mHzmmaHH mesaaas H.mH o.mm :.Hm m.:o m.m: p.04
eases oameeam o.ma o.mo w.oa m.mm m.ao m.mm