TPWD 1956 F-5-R-3 #219: Creel Census of San Angelo Reservoir, Tom Green County, Texas

JOb Completion Report STATE OF TEXAS Project Noe F533 Name Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region 3~Bo JOb Noe B~9 Title Creel Census of San Angelo Reservoir, Tom Green County! Texaco Period Covered: September 12 1951:, through April 302 1956 ABSTRACT 10 Fishing was first Opened on may 1, 195% with a calculated 81, 355 fishermen _ for the first three dayso vAt this time the lake contained about 59,000 acre feet of water but has shown a general decline in the volume since that timea . 20 The average length of the fish vary somewhat by the month with only the black bass showing a general increase in lengtha 30 The percent of catch by weight shows channel catfish 32°3l%, crappie 31°68%, sunfish lTOll%, and black bass 12°65%o The other five species account for only 6u25%a he The calculated fish per man hour shows the cooler months high with a tendency to drop in the hot months and rise again in the fall but with an overall decreaseo 5D The proximity'of the lake to the city and ease of access gives a tendency of short fishing trips and a difficulty in contacting the boat fishermen This is also a factor in the small percentage of overnight fishing 60 The numerically predominant species in order were: crappie 3,9037%3 sunfish 37°05%3 channel catfish 13075%3 and black bass 853%o All of the other five species of fish caught accounted for only 1030% of the totals The average fish per man hour was uTllho To The calculated total number of fish was 116,188 l9 with a calculated total weight of 5:3 3323 59 pounds and average weight of HMThT 80 Still fishing was by far the most popular and profitableo Trotline fishing was second in popularity and effectiveness with trolling the third most popular but only the fourth most effectiveo Casting was the least popular but was the third most profitableo OBJECTIVES To estimate the total catch by species and to obtain data indicating the relative abundance and size of each species in the catch as well as the success of different methods of fishingo METHODS San Angelo Reservoir lies adjacent to the northwest residential section of F l Angelo and 702 miles fnmn“mnsFederal Courthouses The lake was constructed by the So Army Corps of Engineers as a flood control structure, being completed in l953o 2, The gates were closed early in 1953 and in any and June of that year the lake filled to 59,000 acre feeto Since that time it has generally decreased in volume and has not reach?" its capacity of 90,000 acre feeto Creel census on this lake covers a period from September l95h through April 1956, Although the first five months of the period was established on the basis of seven creel census days for each month and the latter fifteen months established on a basis of eight creel census days for the month there were enough extra days worked to make a total of 158 creel census days with an average of 7,9 days for each month, At the beginning of this period there was only one established fishing camp on the lake and at the end of this time there were two public dock areas as well as numerous privately owned boat houses and docks, The land surrounding the lake is public land and access roads allow bank fishing around its entire perimeter (except at the dam where fishing is prOhibited) and boat launching for most of its shoreline. The easy access to the lake by the fishermen made it most difficult in checking the fishermen but made the total count relatively simple, Indicative of the ease of access is the average time of the fishermen on the lake, which was 3,32 hours per trip with an average of 2.36 fish, For taking the creel census, the lake was divided into four sections or stationso Two of these were on each side of the lake, One man was stationed on each side of the lake for the day and the lake proper was divided in such a.manner that each man would r count the fishermen-on his;shoreline and a portion of the lake without duplication. During the first five months of this project the total count was made in the midrmorning and midmafternoon with the time between counts spent in contacting the fishermen as they fishedo The total count was started at one end of the lake and taken as rapidly as poss- ible to the other end, covering all of the shoreline and the lake propero The use of bin~ oculars made this portion of the work.more accuratea As soon as the total count was SON! pleted the return trip was started to the original station, stopping to check the creel of the fishermen on the way, For this period the creel census was taken on seven consecu- tive days during a different week of each month to include each day of the week and to vary the time of the month for a morerandomsampleo For the last fifteen months of the project the time of day for the total counts was varied to give a more random sample by dividing the day into quarters aocording:to the daylight hours for each day of that montha It was found that an average of one hour was needed to make a total count and the mid-hour of each quarter was established and used for this purposea The creel census for this period was planned on the basis of eight days for each month, four of these days being weekwdays and four of them being weekends and holidays, only one day per week was used and the weekwdays'were alternated so that no-day of the week-was used twice in one month, The weekwend days were used alternately, interspersed with holidays whenever possibleo 0n alternate days, alternate quarters were used: ioeo, quarters l and three; quarters 2 and h, To maintain random sampling the weekmdays and weekuend days and holidays were consid» ered separately in this matter, EXPLANATION OF TABLES Table 1 shows the rate of catch for the successful fishermen and for all fisher- men covered by this creel census for each month, The table contains the number of suc- cessful fishermen and unsuccessful fishermen for each month as well as a total for each, It gives the breakdown of successful hours fished and a total of these hours for each month, Also, it shows the fish per man hour for successful fishermen, fish per man hour for all fishermen, and the percent of all fishermen successful for each month, Table 2 gives the average length of the fish caught by the month and species and the overall average by species, This information was obtained by averaging the length of all fish caught in each month by species, Table 3 reports the approximate total weight for each species, the average weight in pounds for each Species, and the percent of the total weight for each Specieso The weights in this table were derived from the gill net records of the lake for this period, The average weight of all fish caught was obtained by dividing the total number of pounds of fish caught by the total number of fish caught, Table h shows the calculated number of fish caught, number of fishermen, total man hours, hours per fisherman day, fish per man hour for each month, and the calculated totals for each of the above mentioned items, For the first five months of this period the number total fishermen was calculated by taking the total count for each day and aver- aging them.and multiplying by the days of the month, The number of fish caught and the hours fished were obtained by finding the fish per fishermen and the hours per fisherman and multiplying these by the total fishermen for the dayo This gives the total fish caught and the total hours fished for the day. These were averaged and multiplied by the number of days in the month for the final totals, The final fifteen months were treat- ed the same way with the exception that the weekuday and the week-end day and holiday data were calculated separately and added for the final totals, The fish per fishermen was obtained by dividing the calculated number of fish by the calculated number of fishermen, The hours per fishermean was obtained by dividing the calculated hours fished by the calm culated number of fishermen, The fish per*man hour was obtained by dividing the calculated number of fish by the calculated hours fished, The totals for each month was used to calculate the final totalso Table 5 presents the calculated rate of catch, total catch, percent of catch, and fish per man hour by species, This information was obtained by finding the persona tages of catch and the percentage of man hours for each Species for the month and multiu plying the totals from Table h by this number, This gives the total fish for each species and the total,jman hours fished for each species; fiTherishflperfmanThour was calculated from this information. [Table 6 shows the calculated number and weight of the various species caught during this periodcu? the projecto These calculations are based on Tables 2, 3, and to The calculated weight was arrived at by multiplying the calculated number of each species caught (Table h) by the average weight (Table 3), Table ? shows the results of fishing by different methods, The number of each species caught by the various methods was tabulated and the percentage calculated from thiso . DISCUSSION Fishing was first opened on may 1, 195h with a calculated 81,355 fishermen for the first three days, The creel census was started September 1, l95h and the months imw mediately following this show the greatest percent of all fishermen successful through the cooler months and show a general decline through the warmer months until cooler weather, when the tendency is generally up but never as high as the first cool.months of the creel census, 'During this time the lake continued hormflmsa general decline in volume, The average length of the fish over this period shows that the white crappie, sunfish, white bass, channel catfish, carp, and drum vary from month to month but gens orally remain close to the average for the entire period, The only species showing a trend to increase in length near the end of this period was the black bass. The last four months average length being all above the average for the entire time and the great- est average length being in three of the last four months. (Table 2). The average weight for these fish was taken from the gill not samples of this lake for the same period. These gill net samples were taken over a longer period of time than the creel census so data for the gill net samples used was only that portion that coincided with the creel census. The percent of catch by weight was predominately channel catfish with 32. 31% and crappie a close second with 31. 68%, sunfish third with 17.11% and black bass fourth with 12. 65%. Five other species accounted for only 6. 25% of the total catch. (Table 3). The calculated fish per man hour shows a general tendency to be higher through. the early months of the project and to be generally lower through the warm months and rise again in the cooler weather. The average length of time spent fishing by the individual fishermen shows a tendency to lengthen with the days and/or the warmer more comfortable days allows longer trips to the lake. The final average of 3.32 hours per fisherman trip indicates that the lake is used predominately by the local fishermen with short periods of time for fishing. The habit of trotline fishermen to drive out to the lake and run their lines before work in the mornings and after work in the afternoons using private docks or easily launched trailer boats, made it difficult to contact as many as was desir- able. All other boat fishermen were difficult to contact for they seldom returned to the public fishing camps. Night fishing appeared to be at a minimum as spot checks through the warm months when night fishing would be expected, showed a comparison of MO. 06% of the total count to be for the morning count, #9. 67% for the afternoon, and 10. 27% for thr night. The creel data for the night counts that it was possible to obtain was negligible The predominant species caught, calculated on a numerical basis was crappie with 39.37% a close second with 37.05% was the sunfish group, mostly bluegill and green sun- fish, with some marmouthed bass, yellowbellies, and western longear, third was the channel catfish with 13.75%, leaving fourth place to the black bass with a 8.53%. The other five species caught white bass, drum, carp, flathead catfish, and yellow bullhead catfish, accounted for only 1.30% (Table 5).' The overall fish per man hour catch was .711h. The calculated total number of fish caught during the period covered was 116, 188.19 with a calculated total weight of 53,323.59 pounds (Table 6). The most popular and profitable method of fishing was still fishing. A total of 5,328.25 man hourstmfimmgspent in this manner with a result of .7588 fish per man hour. The second most popular and profitable method was trotline fishing with 2,525.50 man hours resulting in a fish per man hour catch Of .2692. The third most popular was trolling with 186 man hours, but it was less profitable than casting, having only .1989 fish per man hour compared to the .2305 fish per man hour for the 12h.50 man hours spent casting. Prepared by W. G. McClellan Approved by 222% Jfl'fl‘é/ Chief Aquatic Biologist Date ' Ma 2h 1957 Hm.sa meme. amam. Has Om.smm Om.mwm oo.m mm.sm meme. mmom. sea oo.mw: oo.ss oo.m sa.ss smsm. case. mm Om.maa 0m.mm oo.a sa.ms mmsw. mama. moa oo.waa Om.aa om.m mend» wmmmta mmmm.a mm mm.em ms.aa om.: am.sm mmosd. mama. so Om.sma oo.mm Om.m mm mm mama. mesa. ooa mm.waH om.o: as.» modem macs. wees. mam 0m.mmm oo.ms oo.a as op mowed owes. was 0m.:om om.sm oo.» madam seam. ammo. mow oo.amaa oo.swm oo.m am so Hasmd mama. _mww mm.ewm Om.mma ms-m madam Hana. moms. mmm 0m.mae oo.wma om.e madms Hams. masa.a mom Om.mmm 0m.moa oo.m madms meme, mama. Hem me.wms mm.sm Om.a me we Odom. msso.a mmm mm.mmm ms.ms Om.m endow mafia. mama. mm oo.am oo.m oo.l mm.os seam. Hmao.a ow Om.mw 00.: . on w. mmdmm memo H sema.a awe oo.maa oo.sa oo._ wa.mm seam.a oasm.a .awm om.mam om.m oo.al macaw mama. memo.a Ham mm.mam ms.oa Om.a. Hammmsoosm schemes schemes peasao enemas seam. flag wflm Fm HHG .Hom 2m m muofim gm firm mafiom Umflm HM mhfiom when Has no & .MQ sos\£mfih .HQ ssSX£mHh Hosea Hence HsmmmooUSmnD HSMmmooon :mmH sonsepmom season Hoono swossomom oaomnd new «nosnogmfim . Table 2. Average Length of Fish by Mbnth and Species, Creel Census San Angelo Reservoir September 195h through April 1956. Mbnth B. Bass Crappie Sunfish ' 0. Cat. W. Bass Carp Drum Eh. Cat. YB Cat. W Sept. 8.58 5.58 9.90 11.55 7.00 18.00 12.00 061. 7.90 6.83 9.95 12.25 6.00 8.00 Nov. 10.25 7.15 5.27 13.80 Dec. 10.90 6.29 5.29 12.33 16.00 Jan. 9.23 7.23 n.68 12.11 10.00 Feb. 11.35 6.22 --h.h2 11.9% 6.00 17.00 March 10.03 6.20 9.65 15.10 6.20 12.00 10.67 . 7.00 April 11.77 6.77 5.29 11.81 8.20 1h.67 may 8.69 8.11 5.67 12.78 7.00 8.00 June 10.00 6.30 5.35 13.53 7.00 Ju1y 9.hh 7.80 h.28 12.h6 7.00 3h.00 Aug. 11.85 7.h5 h.33 13.88 Sept. 9.80 7.h8 h.80 12.38 . Oct. 10.20 7.83 9.95 15.95 19.50 22.00 Nov. 8.00 6.20 n.6h 19.00 17.00 Dee. 9.00 6.73 9.50 9.00 7.00 Jan. 12.80 6.51 5.50 10.80 Feb. 12.00 6.87 8.00 March 10.73 8.00 8.30 11.62 April 11.28 6.92 1.52 13.53 17.00 12.00 .__1_______1_____________________1__________1____1____________1______________1.____________ Avg. 10.17 7.09 4.79 12.60 6.90 15.69 9.61 28.00 7.00 W Table 3. Weight of Fish Species Caught, San Angelo Reservoir Creel Census, September 1959 through April 1956. _Fish Species No. Fish Total Wt. Average'Wt. Percent by Caught Pounds Pounds Weight Black Bass 336 283.38 0.8939 12.65 White crappie 1622 709.63 0.9375 31.68 Sunfieh 1800 383.22 0.2129 17.11 Channel catfish 905 723.73 0.7997 32.31 White base 22 11.10 0.5093 0.50 Carp 19 86.92 9.5985 3.86 Drum. 10 7.36 0.7363 0.33 Flathead catfish 2 39.99 17.22 1.59 Yellow Bullhead Catfish 1 0.91 0.9063 0.02 Totals 9,718 2,239.69 100.00 Average 0.9797 m. edew r. omHQSHmdem wmee ow osdow mum HOdWH omeow 6%.zobawm mes bbmeHo wwemssows awash Qmomsme mewdmsoee Hem: eseoeme seeep Homo. Oofiowmfl me desUsH zedesves beowsumw mmssmww wedssme% ZWHQU thHH 26. assess _ m.m44 m.m4m.mm m.eqo w.rmm.em H.mmm.mo m.omm.oo Hm.mmm.eo Hm.meo.em so. eemseeaes m.moq m.Ho: H.woo v.0:r.qo 4wm.m4 m.mmo.oo m.p:o.oo :.9wo.mm eases ass moses m.w4w . m.mom.mo e.mom.:o m.omm.wq H.mmm.po m.:ew.wm Hm.wmw.mm H:.:mw.mo ewes the eweseeses m.em e.mm w.mo w.mm m.op m.w: m.4m m.mm mouse wee seeseeaes m.mn m.mm w.mo m.oo m.:w_ m.ew m.<o w.ow. ewes wee ass moss H.Hmm9 H.mpwo H.2wmo w.mmoo o.mmmm o.mHmw H.0Hm: o.m:mm 29% aces unpw bsmsme mmpemsvos Codedee Zodeevms wmomsUmH arIIIII11iIIa1i1iiIIIIiIIII11iIIIiIisI1iIIiaIIIiaIaIIaIIrtIIaIiiII1iiIIiisiIIiii1Iiii11niist1:1::::::::::::::::|:ilaa 26..omcmse pw.mmm.4: m.mmw.mm 4.mwm.wm 2w.mme.4e :emre.mm H.mew.wm _ wem.mm www.mm 26. eweseeses m.s<o.mo w.www.mo w.mmm.rm w.mmm.mm m.mom.mo H.0me.oo mHm.oo woe.mo geese ass mocee mo.mww.mm Hm.owo.oe Hw.rmw.oo He.mwp.om Hm.qpm.or w.HHw.mm www.mw Htpwp.ww ewew.eee eweseesms . m.om H.4m m.wm m.:e H.mH H.:m H.mo H.mm moswm was wwewenamb r.wH r.mo F.0m r.Hm m.o4 m.m4 H.mm m.mw wees wee ems mess ._ 0.:9m4 o.wmmw o.mmqq o.mmwm o.wmer 6.2mm: H.0HHe o.m244 mmusmww wavesmew assay bwsww . QsPosHmdsm eoemwm mam beesmmmm if; :6. cheese H.mp:.4: m.mmw.mm 4rp.eo m.mmw.mo HH®.H@®.H® so. weeseeses mmm.m0_ mam.oom H.4mm.oo m.4:m.oo :w.pem.pm geese gee mouse aoo.mm H.wmm.m4n.m.wmw.oo «.mwe.mo . How.wmm.mm wees wee eweseeehs m.pe w.mm 0.:w o.mm Aseee.aev m.wm moses wee weeeeeams p.00 m.w~ p.40 m.mo Aseeeemev w.wm sees wee ewe mess m.~m~o m.:mmm o.mmwo o.mmw4 Aseeemmev 6.4HH: .... lg}; _ I... 9. Table 5. Calculated Rate of Catch, Total Catch and Percent of Catch by Species, San Angelo Reservoir Creel Census Septehber 1959 through April 1956. Largemouth Black Bass White Crappie No. Caught 9,908.01 95,790.29 Total Mhn Hours 19,519.38 59,276.96 Fish Per Man Hour 0.6826 0.8928 Percent of Catch 8.53 39.37 Sunfish (All Species) Channel Catfish No. Caught 93,095.88 15,976.89 Total Mhn Hours 37,898.99 59,613.70 Fish Per Man Hour 1.1373 0.2925 Percent of Catch 37.05 13.75 White Bass Carp No. Caught 593.20 353089 motal Nan Hours 859.96 998.51 sh Per Man HOur 0.6902 0.7099 Percent of Catch 0.51 0.30 Drum . Flathead Catfish No. Caught 951.03 93.19 Total Man Hours 586 97 113.52 Fish Per man Hour 0.7691 - 0.3800 Percent of Catch 0.39 0.09 Yellow bullhead Catfish Totals No. Caught 75.91 116,188.19 Total man Hours 19.90 163,326.89 Fish Per Wan Hour 5.0996 0.7119 Percent of Catch 0.06 10. Fish Species Calculated Number Caught Calculated Weight in Pounds _________________1_______________1____________________1____1_1______________________________ Black Bass 9,908.01 8,356.92 White Crappie 95,790.29 20,011.36 Sunfish 93,095.88 9,169.97 Channel Catfish 15,976.89 12,776.72 White Bass 593.20 299.15 Carp 353.89 1,609.67 Drum 951.03 332.09 Flathead Catfish - 93.19 792.87 Yellow Bullhead Catfish 75.91 30.89 W Totals 116,188.19 53,323.59 .1________________1__1________1___________1_____1__________1__________1___________.1________