TPWD 1966 F-4-R-13 #1034: Evaluation of Pre-impoundment Rotenone Treatment: Region 2-A Fisheries Studies
Open PDFExtracted Text
Job No.
Marion Toole
D-J Coordinator
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
As required by
FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT
D—3:
TEXAS
Federal Aid Project No. F—A-R—IB
REGION 2-A FISHERIES STUDIES
Evaluation of Pre-impoundment Rotenone Treatment
Project Leader: Charles T. Menn
J. R. Singleton
Executive Director
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Austin, Texas
Eugene A. walker
Director, Wildlife Services
November 21, 1966
ABSTRACT
During this segment, 48 netting collections were made on both Hubbard Creek
and Proctor Lakes.
job will be presented in a
The results of three segments of work under this
tment Inland Fisheries Series.
paper published in the Texas Parks and Wildlife Depar
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
State of Texas
Project No. Fwd—R—13 Name: Region 2-A Fisheries Studies
Job No. D—3 Title: Evaluation of Prewimpoundment Rotenone
Treatment ' ____
.Period Covered:_fl_ November 1, 1965 ~ October 31,1966
Objectives:
1. To determine the fish species present, their relative abundance and the
factors influencing their distribution.
2. To compare the fish population in Hubbard Creek Lake (pre—impoundment
rotenone treatment of watershed) with that of Proctor Lake (untreated
watershed) to determine the following:
a. Rough fishfigame fish ratio.
b. Growth rates (based on length of time since stocking).
c. Coefficient of condition of game species.
d. Reproduction of game species.
Procedures:
Experimental gill nets were set at eight permanent stations on both Hubbard
Creek and Proctor Lakes on a bimonthly basis. Original plans called for quarterly
visits to each lake, but after some additional thought, it was felt that bimonthly
visits would yield more data.
Since no seining data were available for the previous segments, it was decided
that such information would be of little value for the current segment. Therefore,
no seining collections were made.
Water analyses were made on each lake at an established station. Tests were
made to determine dissolved oxygen, carbon dioxide, pH, and alkalinity.
Results:
During this segment, 48 netting collections were made on both Hubbard Creek
and Proctor Lakes. Briefly, the results of the netting were as follows:
-2-
Hubbard Creek Proctor
Per Cent Per Cent Per Cent Per Cent
of of of of
disease... Weight... mass... Vie—ism...
Rough Species: 45.15 62.84 54.34 57.43
Game Species: 34.41 35.21 37.90 41.48
Miscellaneous Species: 20.44 1.95 _ 7.76 1.09
TOTAL: 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Table 1 lists the fish species included in the various categories of ”rough
Species, game species and miscellaneous species”.
A detailed analysis of all data obtained during three segments of this job will
be prepared and submitted for publication in the Inland Fisheries Series (F-4~R-l4,
JOb B‘36).
Prepared by Qharles_T. Menn Approved by zifgggtgfizzn:./(2513é:;;m__
{C
Project Leader oordinator)
Date November 21 1966 GARY WOOD
Fisheries Supervisor
-3-
Table 1. Checklist of fishes mentioned in this report and arranged within categories
designated for reporting purposes.
._____ _..._ ._ .__.._... fl"_.fl.“_—__—.M
.n...—.—.———.——————_a__-u— n—“wmm.—m.fl.m_—_.H—w#—um——_———fl -——--————- “mu-a— -—-I “-4-
BEEgh—Eiih
Spotted gar
Longnose gar
Gizzard shad
Smallmouth buffalo
River carpsucker
Carp
Black bullhead
Yellow bullhead
Freshwater drum
gees -Eish
Channel catfish
Blue catfish
Flathead catfish
Largemouth bass
White crappie
Miscellaneous sunfish
fl"fl_—H#fl._—q ._...._._...._..
Warmouth
Green sunfish
Redear sunfish
Bluegill
Longear sunfish
Lgpisosteus oculatus
w."— -—--——.-—-.._»—..—._———..——
L. gs eus
__.__....
Dorosoma cgpedianum
muu‘m ..— “flu—M
Ictiobus bgbalus
-.—a__ flu..—
Carpiodes cagpig
Cyprinus carpio
lctalurus melas
I. natalis
-.-—:.
Aplodinotus grunniens
Ictalurus punctatus
I. furcatus
—.. “mm—flu
Pylodictig olivaris
Microptergs galmoides
Poxomis annularis
Chaenobryttus gglosus
_...____.-—.___.n_._._-__ -"I-I—t-
Lepomig gyanellus
WM—
15*
microlophug
macrochirug
“F"
‘5”
mggalotis
....... #W—-w Wflflfl._im ...—.—_—.—- fi—“Mfl—I—h—M—“m‘ mm —————-—_