Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

TPWD 1957 F-5-R-4 #321: Inventory of Species Present in Lake Fort Phantom Hill near Abilene, Texas

Open PDF
tpwd_1957_f-5-r-4_321_inventory_of_sp.txt completed 38 entities

Extracted Text

w-F“ T Report of Fisheries Investigations Inventory of Species Present in Lake Fort Phantom Hill near Abilene, Texas by Lawrence Da Campbell Project Leader Dingelleohnson Project Fwfimeh, Job BulB April 16, 1956 a April 15, 1957 Ho D. Dodgen m Executive Secretary Texas Game and Fish Commission Austin, Texas Marion Toole William Ho Brown Coordinator Assto Coordinator SEGMENT COMPLETION REPORT State of TEXAS Project No. FSRH Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the waters of Region 3-3. JOb No. B—18 Title: Inventory of Species Present in Lake Fort Phantom Hill near Abilene, Texas. Period Covered: April 16, 1956 to April 152 1957 ABSTRACT: Unanticipated difficulties encountered on other jobs limited the extent'of work acne on Fort Phantom Hill during this segment. Six gill net collections yielded only six different species with gizzard shad and river carpsuckers being the dominant rough species taken and white crappie being the prevalent game species taken. Seining col—‘ lections yielded seven additional species with redhorSe shiners being the most numerous species collected. This job is to be continued during the next segment. OBJECTIVES: To determine the species present and their relative abundance as well as to determine the ecological factors influencing their distribution. PROCEDURE: Netting collections were made at six locations in Lake Fort Phantom Hill. Experi- mental nylon gill nets, measuring 125 feet long by 8 feet in depth and made up in five, 25 foot sections were used. Mesh size of these nets increased progressively in each following section at one-half inch intervals, beginning with one-inch mesh and terminat- ing-with a three-inch mesh section. Seining collections were made at five locations on the lake. Commonsense seines with one—fourth inch mesh were used for these collections. To estimate relative abundance a count was made of all individuals taken. Samples from netting collections were weighed and measured in the field. Stomach contents and sexual maturity were also observed in an effort to obtain ecological infor- mation. FINDINGS: . Limitations - Because of unanticipated difficulties encountered in work on the river surveys, primarily that for the Upper Colorado System and for the Pecos River, inventory work on Fort Phantom Hill Reservoir and on Horde Creek Reservoir was not begun until the latter months of the year. For this reason insufficient data was obtained for a compre» hensive evaluation, and it is proposed that these studies be continued during the l957~58 "ariod. Description n Lake Fort Phantom Hill is located on Elm Creek, twelve miles north- east of Abilene in Janos County. It is one of three water supply lakes for the City of Abilene. Built in 1938 by the Freeze and Nichols Construction Co. of Fort Worth, this lake has a dam 3,639 feet long with a height of 85 feet. '“ Besides receiving water from Elm Creek, Fort Phantom Hillaiso Ines Cedar Creek, Little Elm Creek, Bull Creek, DeadmanVS Creek, and Rainy Creek in its watershed. 'These creeks compose a watershed of 38h square miles. There is a pumping station on the Clearhknt: of the Brazos River which supplies the lake with additional water. The drainage area of the Clear Erma of the Brazos ab0ve the pumping station is approximately 1,500 square miles. 1 ' The lake has a capacity of 76,680 acre feet (24 billion gallons) and during the period covered by this report was approximately 62% full. At maximum capacity it covers an area of 3,950 acres, with a maximum depth of 65 feet and an average depth of 36 feet. ‘The water is slightly turbid and also slightly alkaline, having a pH recorded as 8.5. Host of the inundated area was not cleared of mesquite prior to the impoundment of water and the siltywsand bottom is covered with concentrations of these woody plants in various phases of decay. The lake shore is irregularly shaped. The bottom slopes gradually to the old stream bed which runs an erratic path through the lake. No oxygen deficiencies or assessive dissolved carbon dioxide content were recorded during inventory work. Temper- atures of the water were not greater than 8% degrees F. nor less than 5 degrees F. Netting Results ~ As this reservoir was netted on only two occasions during the periOd for a total sampling effort of six gillgnet collections the following data is frag- mentary. more complete data will be obtained and presented during the year as this Jab is to be continued. Largemouth bass 2 2.1 22.6 White bass 9 9.t 22.0 1t.1t 2.16 Channel catfish 5 5.2 28.0 10.00 2.00 White crappie in 1b.? 9.0 9.00 3.26 cirrard shad ' 38 no.0 5.0 13.50 1.86 River Carpsuckers 27 28.6 26.0 50.10 2.26 Seining Results m Because of high winds and other extreme weather conditions, the difficulty in locating suitable locations for seining, and the limited time available for this method of population sampling; data collected by seining is meager and at present completely inadequate. However, a number of species not taken in gill net cola lections were captured. The following is in a general sense an evaluation of that work. Cyprinids and other forage species m Redhorse shiners {Notropis lutrensis) were numerous in all seining collections and were probably the dominant species of this group. Parrot minnows (Pimephales vigilax) were also abundant and with Mosquitofish (Gambusia 32.) were probably subdominant dependent upon locality. Others of this group that were collected but were of a lesser importance were: Plains shiner (Notropis _ercobromus), River carpsucker (Carpiodes carpio), Carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Gizzard shad {Dorosoma cepedianum). - Game fish- Green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus) and Bluegill sunfish (Lepomisdmacrochirus) were numerous. \ Prepared by: Lawrence D. Campbell Approved by: 2 ;:W riflé : Project Leader Chief Aquatic Biologist Date: April 2h, 1958 “I? r.

Detected Entities

Abilene 0.900 p.1 Lake Fort Phantom Hill near Abilene, Texas
Bull Creek 0.900 p.3 Little Elm Creek, Bull Creek, Deadman's Creek, and Rainy Creek
Cedar Creek 0.900 p.3 Besides receiving water from Elm Creek, Fort Phantom Hill also receives Cedar Creek
Clear Fork of the Brazos River 0.900 p.3 There is a pumping station on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River
Deadman's Creek 0.900 p.3 Little Elm Creek, Bull Creek, Deadman's Creek, and Rainy Creek
Elm Creek 0.900 p.3 Lake Fort Phantom Hill is located on Elm Creek
Lake Fort Phantom Hill 0.900 p.1 Inventory of Species Present in Lake Fort Phantom Hill near Abilene, Texas
Little Elm Creek 0.900 p.3 Little Elm Creek, Bull Creek, Deadman's Creek, and Rainy Creek
Rainy Creek 0.900 p.3 Little Elm Creek, Bull Creek, Deadman's Creek, and Rainy Creek
Texas 0.900 p.1 near Abilene, Texas
Pecos River 0.850 p.1 ...s, primarily that for the Upper Colorado System and for the Pecos River, inventory work on Fort Phantom Hill Reservo…
Brazos County 0.800 p.1 ...miles. There is a pumping station on the Clearhknt: of the Brazos River which supplies the lake with additional wate…
Brazos River 0.800 p.3 Clear Fork of the Brazos River
Colorado County 0.800 p.1 ...in work on the river surveys, primarily that for the Upper Colorado System and for the Pecos River, inventory work o…
Janos County 0.800 p.3 twelve miles north-east of Abilene in Janos County
Pecos County 0.800 p.1 ...s, primarily that for the Upper Colorado System and for the Pecos River, inventory work on Fort Phantom Hill Reservo…

organization (1)

Texas Game and Fish Commission 0.900 p.1 Texas Game and Fish Commission Austin, Texas

person (4)

Ho D. Dodgen 0.900 p.1 Ho D. Dodgen Executive Secretary
Lawrence D. Campbell 0.900 p.1 by Lawrence D. Campbell Project Leader
Marion Toole 0.900 p.1 Marion Toole Coordinator
William H. Brown 0.900 p.1 William H. Brown Assto Coordinator
Carpiodes carpio 0.900 p.5 River carpsucker (Carpiodes carpio)
Channel catfish 0.900 p.4 Channel catfish 5 5.2 28.0 10.00 2.00
Cyprinus carpio 0.900 p.5 Carp (Cyprinus carpio)
Dorosoma cepedianum 0.900 p.5 Gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum)
Gambusia 0.900 p.5 Mosquitofish (Gambusia) were probably subdominant
Gizzard shad 0.900 p.4 Gizzard shad 38 39.0 5.0 13.50 1.86
Largemouth bass 0.900 p.4 Largemouth bass 2 2.1 22.6
Lepomis cyanellus 0.900 p.5 Green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus)
Lepomis macrochirus 0.900 p.5 Bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus)
Notropis lutrensis 0.900 p.5 Redhorse shiners (Notropis lutrensis) were numerous
Notropis percobromus 0.900 p.5 Plains shiner (Notropis percobromus)
Pimephales vigilax 0.900 p.5 Parrot minnows (Pimephales vigilax) were also abundant
River Carpsuckers 0.900 p.4 River Carpsuckers 27 28.6 26.0 50.10 2.26
White bass 0.900 p.4 White bass 9 9.1 22.0 14.14 2.16
White crappie 0.900 p.4 White crappie 16 16.7 9.0 9.00 3.26
Green Sunfish 0.850 p.1 ...pio) and Gizzard shad {Dorosoma cepedianum). - Game fish- Green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus) and Bluegill sunfish (Le…
Cyprinidae 0.800 p.5 Cyprinids and other forage species