TPWD 1973 F-4-R-20 #1527: Region 2-A Fisheries Studies: Fishery Management Recommendations, Project F-4-R-20
Open PDFExtracted Text
PERFORMANCE REPORT
As Required By
FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT
TEXAS
Federal Aid Project F-4-R-20
Region 2-A Fisheries Studies
Objective B-37: Fishery Management Recommendations
Project Leader: Allen Forshage
Assistant Project Leader: Robert Gamble
Clayton T. Garrison
Executive Director
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Austin, Texas
Robert J. Kemp
Lonnie J. Peters
Director, Fish and Wildlife
Chief, Inland Fisheries
December 17, 1973
ABSTRACT
Quarterly surveys were conducted on Lakes Benbrook, Diversion, Garza Little
Elm, and Hubbard Creek during this segment. Walleye evaluations were also made
on Lakes Diversion and Garza-Little Elm.
Rough fish species, primarily smallmouth buffalo, river carpsucker, and
gizzard shad, were predominant in all lakes except Hubbard Creek. White bass,
white crappie, and channel catfish were the prevalent game fishes collected
in all lakes. Six walleye were collected from Garza-Little Elm and four from
Lake Diversion.
Stocking of four to six inch fingerling largemouth bass is recommended for
Lake Benbrook. Walleye stockings should be continued on Garza-Little Elm
Reservoir and discontinued on Lake Diversion in 1974.
PERFORMANCE REPORT
m... .__... .. .,_. =W‘—-~—__—
State: Texas Project Number: F-4-R-20
Project Title: Region 2—A Fisheries Studies
Project Section: Research and Surveys
Study Title: Fishery Management Recommendations
Contract Period: From January 1 1973 To December 312 1973
Program Narrative Objective Number: B-37
Objective: To determine the need for changes in fish harvest regulations, stock-
ing population control, vegetation control, and contract fishing in
Region 2-A waters.
I.” Segment Objective
To determine the need for changes in fish harvest regulations,
stocking, population control, vegetation control, and contract fishing
in Region 2-A waters.
II. Summary of Progress
Proposed changes in fishing regulations for the Possum Kingdom
Regulatory District were presented at public hearings in each county under
Regulatory Authority in Region 2-A. The results of these hearings were
presented to the Commissioners of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
for consideration. The changes made in the fishing laws which affected
_ Region 2-A are as follows:
Section 7.02 (c) iii The eight inch size limit on rainbow
and brown trout was removed. The bag limit remained five in the
aggregate with no possession limit.
_ Management surveys on Lakes Benbrook, Diversion, Garza—Little Elm,
and Hubbard Creek were conducted quarterly during this segment. Walleye
evaluations were also made on a quarterly basis on Lakes Diversion and
Garza-Little Elm. From 5 to 15 gill nets, depending on_reservoir size,
were set overnight on each survey. Frame nets were added to survey methods
on lakes being surveyed for walleye. Seine and water samples were also
taken. ‘
Fish collections were made primarily with standard experimental gill
nets and minnow seines. Selection of stations for sampling were made as
randomly as possible. Sites representing various habitat types were chosen.
Experimental gill nets were 150 feet long, 6 feet deep, and had varying
mesh_sizes, in 25 foot sections, from 1 to 3% inches. A representative
sample of all fishes collected in gill nets were weighed and measured with
the remainder being_counted and bulk weighed. The same procedures were used
for fishes caught in frame nets. Seining collectiOns were made with a 20-
foot common seine with 3/16-inch square mesh. Two 50 foot drags were made
at each station. Fishes from.both drags at each station were combined,
sorted as to species, and counted.
-2-
Water quality information was taken in conjunction with each netting
trip. Two stations,at the dam and near the upper end, were sampled on each
lake. Samples were taken at 10 foot intervals from the surface to the
bottom. Water analyses for temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, specific
conductivity, and turbidity were made using the following meters: oxygen
and temperature-YSI dissolved oxygen meter; specific conductivity- YSI
S-C-T meter; pH-IBC trophy pH meter. TUrbidity was determined by means of
a Hach colorimeter. Analyses for total alkalinity and hardness were made
according to standard methods (A.P.H.A., 1971).
Observations were made on each survey to determine if aquatic vegetation
was present in such quantities as to hamper access or fishability of fishing
areas. Vegetation was not considered a problem on any of the reservoirs
surveyed this segment.
Assistance was given hatchery personnel with stocking walleye fry and
fingerlings in Lakes Diversion, Eagle Mountain, Garza-Little Elm, and
Possum Kingdom. Fishes were tempered and released in open water areas.
Table l is a checklist of all fishes taken in the netting and seining
collections in Region 2-A waters this segment. Common and scientific names
are based on American Fisheries Society, Special Publication No. 6, A List
of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States and Canada
(Third Edition, 1970). Only common names are used in this report.
Lake Benbrook
Lake Benbrook, impounded in 1952, is a 3,770 surface acre lake located
on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River drainage in Tarrant County. At
normal pool level the mean depth is 23.4 feet with a maximum depth of 75
feet. Controlled by the Corps of Engineers, the lake is used for flood
control, municipal water supply, and recreation. Most of the 40 miles of
shoreline is accessable and provides maximum usage by fishermen, e3pecially
in the spring and summer months.
Five gill nets were set overnight on each survey (Figure 2).' Rough
fishes were the predominant species caught by number (57.74%) and by weight
(80.93%) with spotted sucker, river carpsucker, and gizzard shad prevailing
(Table 3). This was the trend until the last survey (Figure 1). In Nov-'
ember, numbers and weights of game fishes increased. White bass, bluegill,
and white crappie were caught in good numbers. Game or rough fishes were
not predominant at any one station, except for station No. l where a much
larger percentage of rough fishes were usually caught. A point noted on
netting data was that smallmouth buffalo and gar were not caught. This is
quite different from other Region 2—A lakes.
Seining collections were made during each survey at five stations.
Seining efforts produced large numbers of forage with 13 Species being
collected (Table 2). Mississippi silverside, blacktail Shiner, bullhead
minnow, and red Shiner were caught in largest quantities. There was a
noted scarcity of young-of-the-year game fishes in seine collections.
Water samples were taken during each survey (Table 4). Water temper-
ature,dissolved oxygen, and pH profiles in the June and September sampling
indicated the lake stratifies to some degree.
-3-
Lake Diversion
Impounded in 1924, Lake Diversion is a 3,419 surface acre lake on
the Wichita River drainage in Archer County. It is rather shallow with a
mean depth of 12 feet and maximum depth of 35 feet with poor access to its
28 miles of shoreline. Controlled by the Wichita County Water Improvement
District No. 2, and the City of Wichita Falls, the lake serves primarily
as a source for irrigation water for Wichita County farmers and ranchers
and as a water supply for area municipalities with some recreational uses.
Six gill nets were set overnight on each survey (Figure 3). Rough
fish species were predominant on all surveys by number (75.55%) and by
weight (87.98%) (Table 5). This trend can be easily seen on Figure l.
Fishes most abundant were gizzard shad, smallmouth buffalo, and river carp-
sucker. Three walleye, the largest weighing 2 pounds 12 ounces, were re-
covered in gill nets.
Frame nets were set on the last three surveys of the year to collect
walleye. One walleye weighing .75 pounds was recovered. Game fish greatly
outnumbered (91.73%) rough fish caught in the frame nets (Table 6).
Seine collections were attempted at 10 stations on each survey. Due to
large fluctuation in water level, stumps, and large rocks, seining was
nearly impossible. In the samples that were collected, a total of 19 species
were represented (Table 2). Very low numbers of all species were collected.
No walleye were recovered in night seining.
Water samples were taken on each survey (Table 7). Chloride (1599 mg/l)
and specific conductivity (4150 umoh/cm) readings were high when compared to
other lakes surveyed. On all surveys the water was quite turbid (Secchi
disc average 12-24 inches). Due to its shallow nature and wind action,
physicochemical stratification is doubtful. This is also indicated from
temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles during summer sampling.
Garza-Little Elm Reservoir
Garza-Little Elm, impounded in 1955, is the largest reservoir (39,080
surface acres), in Region 2-A.I Located in Denton County, the lake draws
Sportsmen from a large area due to good access to its 183 miles of shore-
line and fine outdoor facilities. Maximum depth is 67 feet with a mean
depth of 25 feet. Controlled by the Corps of Engineers, the lake is used
for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, and recreation.
Walleye have been stocked in the lake for the past two years.
A total of 15 gill nets were set on each quarterly survey. Stations
were selected to provide maximum diversity of fishes collected (Figure 5).
Rough fishes were predominant by number (64.22%) and be weight (86.08%)
with river carpsucker, smallmouth buffalo, and longnose gar most abundant
(Table 8). See Figure 4 for game fish percentages for each survey. White
bass and white crappie were the prevalent game fishes caught. Six walleye,
weighing a total of 5.78 pounds, were also caught in gill nets. Four of
these fish were caught at station No. 4, off the dam.
Frame nets were also set on the last three surveys in an attempt to
recover walleye, but none were taken. Game fishes were prevalent by
III.
IV.
-4-
number(74.30%) and by weight (83.55%). White crappie and bluegill were
caught in largest numbers with threadfin shad accounting for the majority
of the rough fishes (Table 9).
Seine collections were attempted at 15 stations during each survey.
High water on two of the surveys hampered efforts and had a varying effect
on catch at a few stations. Eighteen species were represented with Missi-
ssippi silverside and threadfin shad being caught in largest numbers
(Table 2). No walleye were recovered from night time seining.
DissolVed oxygen profiles for the August survey indicated the lake did
chemically stratify. As also indicated by the readings of other parameters
measured, the middle of the thermocline was about 25-30 feet deep (Table 10).
Temperature readings did not drop off as quickly as would be expected in the
area of the thermocline.
Hubbard Creek Reservoir
Hubbard Creek Reservoir, located in Stephens County, is a 15,250 surface
acre lake on the Big Sandy Creek tributary of the Brazos River. At normal
pool level, the maximum depth is 70 feet with a mean depth of 20.84 feet.
During this segment the lake level was five to twelve feet below normal.
Fishermen access to the 130 miles of shoreline is limited. Impounded in 1962,
the lake is controlled by the West Central Texas Municipal Water District and
used primarily for industrial, mining, and municipal water supply.
A total of 15 gill nets were set during two nights, on each survey
(Figure 6). Station positions changed slightly each survey due to decreasing
water levels. Game fish were caught in largest numbers (56.27%) but rough
fishes in greater poundage (73.70%). The percentage of game fishes collected
was consistently greater with each survey (Figure 4). Species caught in
greatest numbers were white crappie, smallmouth buffalo, channel catfish,
river carpsucker, and gizzard shad, respectively (Table 11). White bass,
common to most other Region 2-A reservoirs were not collected in Hubbard
' Creek.
Seining collections were made at 10 stations on each survey (Figure 6).
Stations were in close proximity to each other due to the rough weather
encountered on each survey. Fish species caught at each station were relat-
ively the same with red shiners and gizzard shad being prevalent. Seventeen
species were represented in seining samples (Table 2).
Water samples were taken near the dam and at the Highway 180 bridge.
Profiles of dissolved oxygen and water temperature in the warm summer months
indicated the lake did not stratify (Table 12). This was possibly due to
large water level fluctuations and prevailing strong winds.
Significant Deviation:
There was no deviation from the planned schedule this segment.
Conclusions and Recommendations:
From netting results this segment, it is fairly evident that Lake
-5-
Benbrook has good populations of white bass, white crappie, and bluegill.
Fishermen using the lake primarily fish for these species. Trotline fish-
ermen also have good success fishing for flathead and channel catfish.
Comparing this Year's results with surveys of 1970, game fish percen-
tages have increased from 21% to 42%. But there is an obvious deficiency of
both adult and young-of—the year largemouth bass. Evidently some factor in
the aquatic community is inhibiting a successful largemouth bass spawn to
any degree. Due to the small recoveries in this year's survey and in the
survey in 1970, it is recommended that largemouth bass be stocked. This
should be accomplished when hatchery supplies are adequate to supply 4 to 6
inch fingerlings that could be marked to evaluate the success of such a
stocking.
In surveys the last three years Lake Diversion has had a declining per-
centage of game fish captures. Due to drastic water level fluctuations
this year and previous years, fish populations may have moved out of the
stable state common to old lakes and is now more cyclic. Surveys in 1974
may see an increase in game fish captures.
Walleye stocking in Lake Diversion has been pursued since 1969. In
1972 and 1973 a total of 1,807,475 fry and fingerlings, a rate of 529/acre,
With this many walleye being stocked more should have been
were stocked.
Based
recovered. Only four were recovered this year and none last year.
on recovery data on gill nets, frame nets, and seining, it is recommended
that walleye stockings should not be undertaken in 1974. Walleye surveys
will be conducted on the lake in 1974. If netting and seining efforts
produce young-of—the—year walleye, a limited stocking is suggested to
possibly provide a nursery stock for the Dundee State Fish Hatchery. The
walleye planned for this year's stocking of Lake Diversion could be better
utilized in a lake with better fishermen appeal and access.
As indicated by netting results, Garza-Little Elm Reservoir had a good
white bass and white crappie population. From surveys the last three years
game fish percentages have been in the 35-45% range. This is good when the
selectivity of gill nets is taken into consideration. Numbers of largemouth
bass captured have been low in past years, but fishermen still have relat-
ively good luck catching them. Most people fish primarily for the two
species in greatest abundance, white bass and white crappie.
Walleye have been stocked in Garza-Little Elm Reservoir for the past
two years. A total of_743,550 fingerlings, a rate of l9/acre, have been
stocked. Six walleye were recovered this year with all fish being in
excellent shape. There have also been reported catches by fishermen. The
lake is highly utilized by fishermen and shows promise as being a good walleye
lake. It is recommended that walleye stockings be continued in 1974.
As in the 1971 survey of Hubbard Creek Reservoir, the percentage of
game fishes captured was greater than that of rough fishes. From this year's
data, largemouth bass, channel catfish, and white crappie seem to be well
established in the lake. Fishermen have had good success catching all three
fish, but have been hampered this year as far as access to the lake because
of low water levels. Water level fluctutations this year possibly helped
control the numbers of rough fishes. The lowering water levels concentrated
prey species enabling predators to crop them easier. Due to the favorable
-6-
game fish-rough fish ratio, no management practices are recommended.
In 1974, surveys will be conducted on lakes in Region 2-A that have
been stocked with walleye. These are Lakes Diversion, Eagle Mountain,
Garza-Little Elm, and Possum Kingdom. Standardized walleye evaluation
procedures will be used on all lakes.
Prepared by: Robert B. Gamble
Assistant Project Leader
Date: December 17, 1973 Robert L. Bounds
; / -”) Region 2 Inland Fisheries
i - ,f f; D'rector
Approved by:
Dingell-Johnson Coordinator
-7-
Table 1
Checklist for Fish Species Collected in Region 2—A in 1973
Common Name Scientific Name
Spotted gar Lepisosteus oculatus
Longnose gar L. osseus
Shortnose gar E. platostomus
Gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum
Threadfin shad 57—53t53efige"_———__
Carp Cyprinus carpio
Silvery minnow Hybognathus nuchalis
Golden Shiner Notemigonus crysoleucas
Pugnose minnow Notropis emiliae
Red shiner N. lutrensis
Sharpnose Shiner N1 oxyrhynchus
Silverband Shiner NZ shumardi
Blacktail Shiner N1 FEhustus
Mimic Shiner E. volucellus
Suckermouth minnow Phenacobius mirabilis
Fathead minnow Pimephales promelas
Bullhead minnow P. vigilax
River carpsucker Carpiodes carpio
Smallmouth buffalo Ictiobus bubalus
Spotted sucker Minytrema melanops
Gray redhorse Moxostoma congestum
Blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus
Channel catfish I. punctatus
Flathead catfish PyISdictis olivaris
Red River pupfish Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis
Mosquitofish Gambusia affinis
Mississsppi silverside Menidia audens
White bass Morone chrysops
Green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus
Warmouth L. gulosus
Orangespotted sunfish LL humilis
Bluegill L; macrochirus
Longear sunfish f3 megalotis
Redear sunfish L} microlophus
Spotted bass Mficropterus punctulatus
Largemouth bass M. salmoides
White crappie ' Pomoxis annularis
Black crappie P. nigromaculatus
Bluntnose darter Etheostoma chlorosomum
Logperch Percina caprodes
Walleye Stizostedion vitreum vitreum
Freshwater drum. Aplodinotus grunniens
-8-
Table 2
Catch Per Unit Effort for Seine Samples Collected in 1973
for Region 2-A Waters
mum—mm
Garza
Little Hubbard
Lake Lake Elm Creek
Species . Benbrook Diversion Reservoir Reservoir
Number of 50 foot drags . 40 72 96 ‘ 80
Gizzard shad — 1.51 0.49 8.88
Threadfin shad 0.50 - 16.51 -
Carp _ - 0.01 0.03 —
Silvery minnow — 0.08 - -
Golden shiner 0.12 - 0.14 —
Pugnose minnow ' — — 0.33 0.14
Red shiner 5.18 1.85 3.77 35.04
Sharpnose shiner _ 0,28 _ _
Silverband shiner ' 0.10 - - —
Blacktail shiner 6.38 — - 2.10
Mimic shiner — — - 0.03
Suckermouth minnow — 0.04 — 1
Fathead minnow — — — 0.08
Bullhead minnow 6.08 0.75 0.91 2.45
River carpsucker - - - 0.02
Smallmouth buffalo — 0.08 — . —
Channel catfish - — 0.06 -
Red River Pupfish - 0.01 - -
Mosquitofish 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.81
Mississippi silverside 59.50 0.60 34.90 —
White bass — 0.08 0.18 —
Green sunfish — 0.03 - 0.03
Warmouth - - - 0.03
Orangespotted sunfish — 0.07 0.02 ' 0.08
Bluegill 0.80 , 1.94 0.35 1.63
Longear.sunfish . 0.35 0.53 0.14 0.10
Redear sunfish 0.12 0.04 — -
Largemouth bass '0.17 0.42 0.21 0.10
White crappie - — 0.07 0.06
Bluntnose darter - — 0.01 —
Logperch 0.05 0.36 0 05 0.14
}_1
Total 79.43 8.71 58: 8 51.72
Catch Per Unit Effort — catch/one 50 foot drag with a 20—foot common seine
(3/16—inch square mesh measure)