TPWD 1973 F-4-R-20 #1507: Effects of Gravel Dredging and Washing Operations on the Fishery of a Portion of the Brazos River: Performance Report, Federal Aid Project F-4-R-20
Open PDFExtracted Text
PERFORMANCE REPORT
As Required By
FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT
TEXAS
Federal Aid Project F-4-R-20
Region 2~A Fisheries Studies
Objective 9: Effects of Gravel Dredging and Washing
Operation on the Fisheries of a Portion
of the Brazos River
Project Leader: Allen Forshage
Clayton T. Garrison
Executive Director
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Austin, Texas
Lonnie J. Peters Robert J. Kemp
Chief, Inland Fisheries Director, Fish and'Wildlife
December 14, 1973
ABSTRACT
A study of the physicochemical and biological conditions of the Brazos
River in HDod and Somerville Counties, Texas was made in 1973 to determine the
effects of a gravel dredging operation on river fauna. Physical damages
resulting from dredging caused a change in the river course, depth, and sub-
strate. Turbidity and settleable solids were increased. Dredging was respon—
sible for major changes in benthic macroinvertebrate populations and fish
populations in the immediate area of activity, as well as in areas further
downstream.
PERFORMANCE REPORT
State: Texas Project Number: F-4-R-20
Project Title: Region 2-A Fisheries Studies
Project Section: Research and Surveys
Study Title: Effects of Gravel Dredging and Washing Operations on the
Fishery of a Portion of the Brazos River
Contract Period: From January 12 1973 To December 312 1973
Program Narrative Objective Number: 9
Objective: To determine the effects of a gravel dredging and washing operation
on the fishery of a portion of the Brazos River.
I. Segment Objective:
To monitor the chemical, physical and biological conditions in the Brazos
River which are altered by gravel dredging and washing operations.
II. Summary of Progress:
Methods:
Monthly sampling of the water quality, benthic organisms, fish population
and physical characteristics of the Brazos River was conducted. Location
of the gravel plant, island, settling pit and sampling stations are shown
at river miles (R.M.) in Figure 1. Sampling procedures and methods employed
are described by Forshage and Carter (1973).
Results:
The gravel dredging plant under study terminated its operation in
February, 1973. Consequently, most of the data collected during this
segment is post-operational.
Measurements of chemical variates taken from R. M. 522 were compared to
corresponding ones taken from R. M; 519, 518.9, 518.7, 518, 517 and
511.5. No significant changes were observed during the segment in the
variability of measurements taken for water temperature, pH, alkalinity,
specific conductance, dissolved oxygen, free carbon dioxide and hardness
(EfTest; 0.05 level).
-----~~*---------“"(5210)
a N
(519£)*'*‘— “ "'
(518.9) ““““““
(518.01 ———————————————————————— (524.0)
(518.0) -------- .
(517.0)— “““““
_ - - Extent of Island
(516-0) (5132, x. - -— - - - --——(522.0)
(515'0) —————— I Extent of Island
/ (519.8)
(514_o) ____________ ‘\ \\ I " _ — "“— “-"(520.0)
\ "‘““‘"’““’““""“"‘Settling Pit
‘—~——— —— — — —— -- -— — — -'-Gravel Plant
(513.0) ---------------
LEGEND
' Sample Station
( ) River "files (511.5)
“0‘”
o 1 2 I
.——_-_-_l—._-_’
NHles
Figure 1. Brazos River in Hood and Somervell Counties, Texas showing gravel
plant and sample station sites, 1973 (* = R.M. 518.1 to 518.7).
III.
IV.
The dredging operation caused an increase in turbidity and settleable
solids below the washing site (R.M. 518.9) during February. Comparable values
to those found above the operation (R.M. 522) had returned by the time the
water reached a station less than one mile downstream (R.M. 518). After the
dredging operations ceased, turbidity and settleable solids returned to pre—
dredging levels.
In 1972 the average depth of the station in the dredged area (R.M. 519)
was increased to 3 feet. The maximum depth at this station reached 7 feet
while maximum depths at other stations never exceeded 2.5 feet (depth measure-
ments taken at water flow under 1,000 cfs). In the post-dredging period the
average depth of this station was reduced to 1.1 feet. This decrease was
caused by large amounts of sand washed into the area from upstream and from
portions of the island left in the river.
Dredging had an adverse effect on the benthic community (Figure 2). River
Mile 519 had an abundant, and diverse population of benthic macroinvertebrates
before dredging. After dredging began, large reduction in number of organisms
and number of genera occurred. This reduction was due to physical damage of
the stream bottom caused by dredging activity. After dredging had st0pped,
populations did not recover before the end of the study period.
Figure 2 also shows diversity indices(d). Values were calculated by using
equations derived from Patten (1962). No statistical difference between mean
d values for before, during and after dredging time periods occurred (fiftest;
0.05 level). Apparently the probability of collecting a specific genus of
macroinvertebrates remained fairly constant throughout the study. In other
words, all kinds of organisms and their numbers appeared to be affected in
a proportional manner at the dredged site. Multiple-plate samplers indicated
benthic macroinvertebrates were affected after dredging operations ceased.
Number of organisms was reduced 63% in the dredged area (R.M. 518.7) as
compared to an upstream site (R.M. 520). The stream recovered rapidly from
this point on, and samples from.RJ M. 518 indicated normal conditions. Number
of genera decreased only slightly in the dredged area.
Sport fishes, rough fishes and minnow populations at the dredged site
(RJM. 519) were compared to those of an upstream station at R. M. 524 (Figure
3). See Figure 4 for separation of fishes to sport, rough and minnow groups.
Rough fish decreased in number and species in the dredged area. Game fish
also decreased in number but no change was seen in species composition. Minnows
appeared to be affected more than other fishes since a decrease in both number
of individuals and species occurred.
Significant Deviation:
There were no deviations from the planned schedule.
Conclusions, Evaluations, and Recommendations:
There would appear to be sufficient evidence that the gravel operation on
the Brazos River had a limiting effect on benthic organisms. Physical damage
to the habitat that caused a change in substrate from a gravel to a sand-silt
bottom was mainly responsible.
0