Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

TPWD 1973 F-4-R-20 #1507: Effects of Gravel Dredging and Washing Operations on the Fishery of a Portion of the Brazos River: Performance Report, Federal Aid Project F-4-R-20

Open PDF
tpwd_1973_f-4-r-20_1507_effects_of_grav.txt completed 15 entities

Extracted Text

PERFORMANCE REPORT As Required By FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT TEXAS Federal Aid Project F-4-R-20 Region 2~A Fisheries Studies Objective 9: Effects of Gravel Dredging and Washing Operation on the Fisheries of a Portion of the Brazos River Project Leader: Allen Forshage Clayton T. Garrison Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Lonnie J. Peters Robert J. Kemp Chief, Inland Fisheries Director, Fish and'Wildlife December 14, 1973 ABSTRACT A study of the physicochemical and biological conditions of the Brazos River in HDod and Somerville Counties, Texas was made in 1973 to determine the effects of a gravel dredging operation on river fauna. Physical damages resulting from dredging caused a change in the river course, depth, and sub- strate. Turbidity and settleable solids were increased. Dredging was respon— sible for major changes in benthic macroinvertebrate populations and fish populations in the immediate area of activity, as well as in areas further downstream. PERFORMANCE REPORT State: Texas Project Number: F-4-R-20 Project Title: Region 2-A Fisheries Studies Project Section: Research and Surveys Study Title: Effects of Gravel Dredging and Washing Operations on the Fishery of a Portion of the Brazos River Contract Period: From January 12 1973 To December 312 1973 Program Narrative Objective Number: 9 Objective: To determine the effects of a gravel dredging and washing operation on the fishery of a portion of the Brazos River. I. Segment Objective: To monitor the chemical, physical and biological conditions in the Brazos River which are altered by gravel dredging and washing operations. II. Summary of Progress: Methods: Monthly sampling of the water quality, benthic organisms, fish population and physical characteristics of the Brazos River was conducted. Location of the gravel plant, island, settling pit and sampling stations are shown at river miles (R.M.) in Figure 1. Sampling procedures and methods employed are described by Forshage and Carter (1973). Results: The gravel dredging plant under study terminated its operation in February, 1973. Consequently, most of the data collected during this segment is post-operational. Measurements of chemical variates taken from R. M. 522 were compared to corresponding ones taken from R. M; 519, 518.9, 518.7, 518, 517 and 511.5. No significant changes were observed during the segment in the variability of measurements taken for water temperature, pH, alkalinity, specific conductance, dissolved oxygen, free carbon dioxide and hardness (EfTest; 0.05 level). -----~~*---------“"(5210) a N (519£)*'*‘— “ "' (518.9) ““““““ (518.01 ———————————————————————— (524.0) (518.0) -------- . (517.0)— “““““ _ - - Extent of Island (516-0) (5132, x. - -— - - - --——(522.0) (515'0) —————— I Extent of Island / (519.8) (514_o) ____________ ‘\ \\ I " _ — "“— “-"(520.0) \ "‘““‘"’““’““""“"‘Settling Pit ‘—~——— —— — — —— -- -— — — -'-Gravel Plant (513.0) --------------- LEGEND ' Sample Station ( ) River "files (511.5) “0‘” o 1 2 I .——_-_-_l—._-_’ NHles Figure 1. Brazos River in Hood and Somervell Counties, Texas showing gravel plant and sample station sites, 1973 (* = R.M. 518.1 to 518.7). III. IV. The dredging operation caused an increase in turbidity and settleable solids below the washing site (R.M. 518.9) during February. Comparable values to those found above the operation (R.M. 522) had returned by the time the water reached a station less than one mile downstream (R.M. 518). After the dredging operations ceased, turbidity and settleable solids returned to pre— dredging levels. In 1972 the average depth of the station in the dredged area (R.M. 519) was increased to 3 feet. The maximum depth at this station reached 7 feet while maximum depths at other stations never exceeded 2.5 feet (depth measure- ments taken at water flow under 1,000 cfs). In the post-dredging period the average depth of this station was reduced to 1.1 feet. This decrease was caused by large amounts of sand washed into the area from upstream and from portions of the island left in the river. Dredging had an adverse effect on the benthic community (Figure 2). River Mile 519 had an abundant, and diverse population of benthic macroinvertebrates before dredging. After dredging began, large reduction in number of organisms and number of genera occurred. This reduction was due to physical damage of the stream bottom caused by dredging activity. After dredging had st0pped, populations did not recover before the end of the study period. Figure 2 also shows diversity indices(d). Values were calculated by using equations derived from Patten (1962). No statistical difference between mean d values for before, during and after dredging time periods occurred (fiftest; 0.05 level). Apparently the probability of collecting a specific genus of macroinvertebrates remained fairly constant throughout the study. In other words, all kinds of organisms and their numbers appeared to be affected in a proportional manner at the dredged site. Multiple-plate samplers indicated benthic macroinvertebrates were affected after dredging operations ceased. Number of organisms was reduced 63% in the dredged area (R.M. 518.7) as compared to an upstream site (R.M. 520). The stream recovered rapidly from this point on, and samples from.RJ M. 518 indicated normal conditions. Number of genera decreased only slightly in the dredged area. Sport fishes, rough fishes and minnow populations at the dredged site (RJM. 519) were compared to those of an upstream station at R. M. 524 (Figure 3). See Figure 4 for separation of fishes to sport, rough and minnow groups. Rough fish decreased in number and species in the dredged area. Game fish also decreased in number but no change was seen in species composition. Minnows appeared to be affected more than other fishes since a decrease in both number of individuals and species occurred. Significant Deviation: There were no deviations from the planned schedule. Conclusions, Evaluations, and Recommendations: There would appear to be sufficient evidence that the gravel operation on the Brazos River had a limiting effect on benthic organisms. Physical damage to the habitat that caused a change in substrate from a gravel to a sand-silt bottom was mainly responsible. 0

Detected Entities

location (7)

Brazos River 0.950 p.1 study of the physicochemical and biological conditions of the Brazos River in Hood and Somerville Counties
Texas 0.950 p.1 State: Texas Project Number: F-4-R-20
Hood County 0.900 p.1 Brazos River in Hood and Somerville Counties, Texas
Somerville County 0.900 p.1 Brazos River in Hood and Somerville Counties, Texas
Austin 0.800 p.1 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas
Brazos County 0.800 p.1 ...and Washing Operation on the Fisheries of a Portion of the Brazos River Project Leader: Allen Forshage Clayton T. Ga…
Somervell County 0.800 p.1 ...I .——_-_-_l—._-_’ NHles Figure 1. Brazos River in Hood and Somervell Counties, Texas showing gravel plant and sample…

organization (2)

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 0.950 p.1 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas
Federal Aid in Fisheries Restoration Act 0.900 p.1 As Required By Federal Aid in Fisheries Restoration Act

person (6)

Allen Forshage 0.900 p.1 Project Leader: Allen Forshage
Clayton T. Garrison 0.900 p.1 Clayton T. Garrison Executive Director
Lonnie J. Peters 0.900 p.1 Lonnie J. Peters Robert J. Kemp Chief, Inland Fisheries Director
Robert J. Kemp 0.900 p.1 Lonnie J. Peters Robert J. Kemp Chief, Inland Fisheries Director
Forshage and Carter 0.800 p.3 described by Forshage and Carter (1973)
Patten 0.800 p.4 equations derived from Patten (1962)