TPWD 1966 F-5-R-13 #1098: Region I-B Fisheries Studies: Warden Creel Census, Texas, March 1965–February 1966

. J-QE- CQMPLETLGN REPORT As requireé by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATEON ACT TEXAS Federal Aid Project N6, F-5~R-13 REGION I-B FISHERIES STUDIES Job New 7 Warden Creel Census Project Leader: Jamea Wilcnx J; Weldon.Watson Executive Director Parks and Wildlife Department Augtinv Texas Marion ’Iaole Eugene Ag Walker D-J Coordinator Directora Wildlife Services March 30, 1966 ABSTRACT Four Parks and Wildlife Department employees interviewed and completed creel census cards on 84 fishing parties. These interviews were conducted at five public lakes. Represented by these 84 census cards are 189 anglers who fished an average of 5092 hours each. Total man hours of fishing was 1,118.,59 Fishing success ranged from “28 fish per man hour at Twin Buttes Reser- voir to .84 fish per man hour at New Winters Lakea It was concluded that the sample collected during this segment was too small to be statistically significant. A recommendation was made that the job be temporarily discontinued until ample manpower is available to obtain a more reliable sample” JOB COMPLETION REPORT State of _fi______l§§a§_________ Project Non _____E;§:E:l§______. Name: Region I-B Fisheries Studies Job Noe ______ ? __ Title: Warden greel Census Period Covered: fMarch la l96§_£h£9ugh Februarv 28- 1966 Objective: To determine gross changes in fishing success; Procedures: Creel census cards were designed and printed (Appendix Alt These were placed in small loose leaf binders and distributed to the six Region lnB game wardens with major public reservoirs in their disrricrso They were asked to fill out as many cards as possible during routine fishing license checks. These COOperators were instructed to interview fishing parties at ramdomfl and not to select only those fishermen who were seen to have good catcheso Findings: Response was erratico One warden returned 29 cards processed within an eight day periodc Another interviewed l0 fishing parties within nine days“ A warden working two different lakes returned 28 cards filled out over a period of four monthso Three wardens returned no cardso Of these three; one was transferred to another district soon after the cards were issued? one quit working for the Department and the third filled out some cards but misplaced theme The regional chemist cooperated by filling out 17 cards at Lake Winters on September 14; 19655 This was the Opening date for fishing at that lake following a renovation and restocking programo One warden complained that manv of the boats left the area while he was interviewing his initial party° These may have been people without fishing licenseso Supposedly? the additional time necessary to check the creel along with the licenses enabled these alleged violators to fleeo The four employees returning completed cards interviewed 84 fishing parties} representing 189 anglerso There were lgll805 man hours of fishing sampledo This averaged 5092 hours per fishermana Fishing success ranged from 028 fish per man hour to 084 fish per man houro These extremes represented Tw1n Buttes Reservoir“ which has had a very low water level since its creation; and New Winters Lake resPectivelya The findings for individual lakes are presented in Tables 1. 2" 3_ 4 and 50 Table 1: Results of Creel Checks Made at Twin Buttes Reservoir and Its Tribu- taries from March 1, 1965 to February 28: 1966: Dates fishing parties checked: 8 on 4-10-65; 7 on 4-11—65; l on 4-14—65 and 13 on 4~18-65: Total parties checked: 29 Number of parties catching fish: 23 Number of fishermen involved: 77 Man hours of fishing: 498:5 Average Length Length Range Game Species Caught Number (inche§l_ (inches Sunfish 87 5:65 4-9 White crappie 0 -— - - Largemouth bass 24 7:79 5-10 White bass 1 7.00 7 Channel catfish 4 11:25 9-14 Flathead catfish 2 9.00 9 Rough Species Caught Bullhead catfish l9 7:89 7-10 Carp 2 10:50 9-12 Number of game fish caught per man hour of fishing: .24 Number of rough fish caught per man hour of fishing: 004 Number of all species caught per man hour of fishing: :28 Table 2: Results of Creel Checks at New Winters Lake from March 1‘.;} 1965 to February 283 1966: Dates fishing parties checked: 17 on 9-14-65 Total parties checked: 17 Number of parties catching fish: l7 Number of fishermen involved: 30 Man hours of fishing; 140 (Table 2 cont.) Average Length Length Range Game Species Caughtfl .Numbep \__H’ipgp§§2hmfi ‘ finches)_ Sunfish 8 4.88 4-6 White crappie 5 7.80 7-8 Largemouth bass 18 7.94 6-10 White bass 0 - - - — Channel catfish 72 12.51 7-18 Flathead catfish 0 - - — - Rough Species Caughp Bullhead catfish 14 10.00 8—12 Carp 0 - - - - Number of game fish caught per man hour of fishing: .74 Number of rough fish caught per man hour of fishing: .10 Number of all species caught per man hour of fishing: .84 Table 3. Results of Creel Checks Made at Lake Abilene from March 1; 1965 to February 283 1966. Dates fishing parties checked: 1 on 5wlw65: 4 on 5-2-65 and 5 on 5-9-65 Total parties checked: 10 Number of parties catching fish: 9 Number of fishermen involved: 23 Man hours of fishing: 49.5 Average Length Length Range Game Species Caughp _Npmpgp (ipches) __ _(inphes)_ Sunfish 12 3.00 3 White crappie 7 8.28 6-10 Largemouth bass 1 14.00 14 White bass 0 e - - - Channel catfish 6 9.33 6-14 Flathead catfish 0 — - u - .R-0_su D_§P§£l§§_§§£8££ Bullhead catfish 0 - - — w Carp 6 10.33 9—14 (Table 3 cont.) Number of game fish caught per man hour of fishing: .53 Number of rough fish caught per man hour of fishing: .12 Number of all species caught per man hour of fishing: .65 Table 4. Results of Creel Checks Made at Champion Creek Lake from March 13 1965 to February 28. 1966. Dates fishing parties checked: 1 on 8 on Total parties checked: 19 Number of parties catching fish: 17 Number of fishermen involved: 39 Man hours of fishing: 258.5 4—27-65; 1 on 6-25-65; 1 on 6-26-65; 5 on 6-27-65; 2 on 7-2-65; 1 on 7—4-65 and . 8-5-65 ‘Game Species Capgpp Number Sunfish 125 White crappie 0 Largemouth bass 38 White bass 0 Channel catfish 2 Flathead catfish 0 Rough Species Caughp Bullhead catfish 4 Carp 0 Average Length (inches) _.—I¢-—I—-(——r- 7.06 11.47 24.00 10.00 Number of game fish caught per man hour of fishing: .64 Number of rough fish caught per man hour of fishing: .02 Number of all species caught per man hour of fishing: .66 10 Table 5. Results of Creel Checks Made at Lake Colorado City from March 1. 1965 to February 28. 1966. Dates fishing parties checked: 1 on 5-18-65; 5 on 5~l9—65 and 3 on 8—8~65 Total parties checked: 9 Number of parties catching fish: 5 Number of fishermen involved: 20 Man hours of fishing; 172 Average Length Length Range Game Species_Caught Numbeg _m_£ipphes} _ _ (inches) Sunfish 4 4.00 4 White crappie 61 6.48 5-16 Largemouth bass 3 20.00 16—24 White bass 0 — - - - Channel catfish 6 9.50 5-12 Flathead catfish 0 - - - — Rough Species Capghp Bullhead catfish 0 - - - — Carp 0 - - - — Number of game fish caught per man hour of fishing: .43 Number of rough fish caught per man hour of fishing: 0 Number of all species caught per man hour of fishing; .43 Discussion: Data collecred were insufficient to project a yearly fishing product for any of the lakes involved. The continuance of this program for several yearsl with the same annual volume of cards obtained during this segment, would probably still not be statistically significant. Samples need to be collected in greater volumes and on a wider range of census dates. With the assistance of statistical consultation. expanded data could probably be used to estimate gross changes in fiShing success. Statistical counsel would be necessary because there are inherent variables that need to be weighted. As an example. if one lake’s fishing product could be compared with that of another. it would be possible to make a wise decision on the expendi- ture of limited management funds. However- varying fishing regulations between the two lakes would influence the creel findings. if trorlines were permitted in one lake but not in the other, a comparison of the fish per man hour indices would be disrorted. lrotline fishermen would be reporting 30 or 40 hours of fishing for three or four fish. Panfish anglers might catch 25 fish in only two hours. This type of distortion was nored in the small sample collected during this segment. Although the data collected under this segment are insufficient the idea of having game wardens collect creel information is still feasible under more ideal conditions. if the census were established on a regional or state-wide basis. and supervised by enforcement personnel. it would pro- bably work. The department's limited warden force is occupied with many miscellaneous duties. They currently have little time for additional responsibilities. However, if the wardens considered the collection of creel data cards part of their regular duties. rather than personal aid to the biologists. a greater volume of census reports could probably be expected. Another solution to the problem would be to have fishery crews travel from lake to lake. on a regular schedule. and collect the data. The costs of such an undertaking would be much greater than the almost nil costs of the procedure used during this segment. The advantages of having larger samples obtained on a scheduled basis might outweigh this increased expense. Recommendations: This job should be temporarily discontinued. When ample manpower is available. either in the enforcement or the fisheries divisions. consideration should be given to resuming the program. Prepared by Jamg§_Wilcox Approved by :59 friv in HM p,:.rr Project Leader ' Inland Fisheries Supervisor Date .March 30 1966 Leo D. Lewis _ _ __-.._—'_=_.u____q—a—n—W—_— APPENDIX A Creel Census Card Lake ___.___Da+e No. in par+y_____Names .___ Wmflfl .__.___........__...____ L__ -“Homeiowns HOUI'S fished [/2 l [/2 2 V2 3 V2 4 V2 5 V2 6 V2 7 [/2 8 V2 9 [/2 '0 (circle) '3 V2 '4 V2 '5 V2 '6 V2 '7 V2 '8 V; '9 V2 20 /2 2' Species (wrife number under esfimaied leng’rh) _ caughf 3n 4” 5” 6H 7H 8H 9!! [on '2” l4" _ l6" '8" 20!! . sunfish crappie |.m. bass (bass ' Eifish f; buflheads Type of fishing: boaf______..i_.. shore___._,___ docL._l____l. he}. basic-m1... ar’ri'. be“ I 2 3 p 5 l ‘_ --—u——-.. .mm' m_—.! i: 22” ll I/2 I2 22 v2 23 24" seiline 6 ‘1: n—__.l——._-._____.._._H_..._..—p