TPWD 1958 F-4-R-5 #399: Inventory of the Species Present in Lake Halbert and Lake Corsicana
Open PDFExtracted Text
".6,
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
State of TEXAS
Project No“ Fae-Rw5 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the
waters of Region E-B.
Job No. B~19 Title: Inventory of the Species Present in Lake
Halbert and Lake Corsicanao
Period Covered: November 1, 1957 through September 302 l958
ABSTRACT:
Lakes Halbert and Corsicana are located on the watershed of Chambers Creek and
serve as water supplies for Corsicana, Texaso Lake Halbert is centained by a dam
on Elm Creek while Lake Corsicana has an earthen embankment along three sides and ob”
tains water by pumping from Chambers Creek.
Black and yellow bullhead, together with redear sunfish and warmeuthy were present
only in Lake Halbert while spotted gar, longnose gar, blackstripe topminnow and spotged
bass were present in Lake Corsicana but not in Lake Halberto This was probably due
to the pumping of water from Chambers Creek into Lake Corsicanao
Game fish species made up 6&978 percent of the Lake Halbert pepulation and 55023
percent of the Lake Corsicana total. Rough fish accounted for 68026 percent of the
weight of Lake Halbert net collections but comprised 80055 percent of the Lake Corsieana
totalo This was due to the gar present in Lake CorSicana but not present in Lake
Halberto
OBJECTIVES:
To determine the species present and their abundance as well as te determine the
ecological factors influencing their distributiono
METHODS:
Net and seine collections were started in Lake Halbert in November lQEY and in
March 1958 collections were begun in Lake Corsicanat These lakes are only five miles
apart and both are located on the Chambers Creek watershedo
The specimens taken in gill nets were weighed, measured and examined fer sexual
maturity, food habits, parasites and disease“ This data was recerded on forms pram
pared for this purpose and filed for future reference.
Net collections were made at established netting stations at menthly intervals
in both lakes and seine stations were established and run at suitable timese The
specimens taken by seining were identified and tabulateda
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS:
Lake Halbert is the primary water supply for the City of Corsicana, Teresa
It is located on Elm Creek and is a watershed lake of some 7,600 acre foot capacity“
This is a shallow mud bottom lake that is heavily infested with lotus (Nelumbo
pentapetala) in the upper end. The shoreline is fairly regular with shallow margins
that become muddy with rainso The flat terrain offers little protection from high
winds which keep the water murky by stirring up the silto
Lake Corsicana is located alongside Chambers-Creek about six miles east of
Corsicana and is a secondary water supplya This lake has very little watershed and
obtains water by pumping from Chambers Creeko There is no dam and an earthen ems
bankment forms three sides of the lake with water deeper along the side nearest to
Chambers Creeko Lake Corsicana contains some h,000 acre feet of water and has a
bottom compOSed of clay with some gravelo There is little vegetation present in this
lakeo
RESULTS:
The checklist of species (Table 1) shows 2h species representing l8 genera and
ll families. Lake Halbert contained four species that were not found in Lake Corsicana
but did not have a genus not present in the other lakeo Black bullhead, yellow bull“
head, warmouth and redear sunfish were the species limited to the Lake Halbert cola
lectionsg Lake Corsicana contained five species, two genera and two families not
taken from Lake Halberto Spotted gar, longnose gar, blackstripe topminnow, spotted
bass, and green sunfish were taken only in Lake Corsicanau The presence of gar in
lake Corsicana may be explained in the fact that water for this reservoir is pumped
from Chambers Creek while that for Lake Halbert is from a limited watersheda
Four seine stations were established in each lake. The predominant species taken
by seining was bluegill sunfish with 7907 percent of the Lake Halbert catch and £309
percent of the Lake Corsicana sample (Table 2)0 Gizsard shad and yellow bullheada
were collected from Lake Halbert but were not found in Lake Corsicana while blackm
stripe topminnow and green sunfish appeared only in the seine samples from Lake
Corsicanaa
Table 3 presents a comparison of the rough species and game species in both
lakeso The average weight per specimen was much higher in Lake Corsicana with 1,08
pounds while Lake Halbert fish averaged only “55 poundso This no doubt due to the
gar that were present only in Lake Corsicanaa Game fish exceeded the rough species
in numbers taken in both lakes but the average weight per rough fish was much higher
than that of game species in Lake Corsicana while the game species held a slight
advantage in Lake Halbertu The comparison of the population of the two lakes shows
Lake Halbert to have 3lo7h percent rough fish by weight and 3§022 percent by number
while Lake Corsicana has 80355 percent rough fish by weight and has?? percent by
numbero
The average lengths and weights (Table A and 5) offer some interesting contrasts
since except for the gizzard shad all rough species common to both lakes are decidely
larger in Lake Corsicanao The opposite is true of the game species where Lake
Halbert provides the larger specimens in each species found in both lakeso
Tables 6 and 7 present the comparison of the populations of the two lakes in
terms of numbers and percentage of the catch represented by each species taken in
gill netso White crappie dominated the catch in both lakes with £6032 percent in
Lake Halbert and 33901 percent in Lake Corsicanao This dominance by white creppie
in Lake Halbert is also indicated in the total weights where 33¢Oh percent were of
this species. White crappie provided only 3.82 percent of the total weight in Lake
Corsicana {Tables 8 and 9)o Gizzard shad were negligible in the catch from Lake
Corsicana in both number and weight but comprised 27 75 peroen.t of the number and
19 89 percent of the weight of all fish taken from Lake Halbert {_ables 6 and 8}”
The channel catfish make up 6 16 percent of the total number and lQ¢8T percen+ of
the total weight in Lake Halbert and largemouth bass provide 6 26 percent and 2OQTT
percent of the number and weight respectively (tables 6 and 833 These same rDP-lefi
taken from Lake Gorsicana show rather different results since the channel tfia
mak.e up 16 59 percent of the number and 11 83 percent of the weight “hile lergemouth
bass with 1 6l pe:rcent of the number provided 2 03 percent of the new“L {Tables T
and 9‘0 -potted gar and longnose gar accounted for a small percentage of the oumtor
taken from Lake Corsicana with 33 percent a13dfi66 perzett Teena +ively but produced
055 percent and hsnl6 percent of the total weight {Tables 7 and 5}; Lerpsucksrs were
of no importance in the net catch from Lake Halbert as they represented only lrfil
percent of the number and 1.010 percent of the total weight but in Lake Corsicana this
species comprised 3To37 percent of the number and 3L 60 para ent oi ins wei.gh_t to
rank second to white crappie as the most numerous species and second to the longnose
gar in tot:s l weight
The productivities of Lakes Halbert and Gorsicana are compared in Tables 16 and
ll, where the catch per lOO feet of gill not set overnight is giweno A total of
fourtymfour gill nets were set in Lake Halbert and nineteen in Lake dorsicsneo These
net sets totaled hph75 feet in Lake Halbert and 1,975 feet in Lake T3r loans The
99l fish caught from Lake Halbert weighed a total of 566 pounds which was an average
of 12 22 pounds per lOO feet of net set overnighto This is somewhat less '3en the
average from Lake Corsicena when 621. fish weighed 668 67 pounds and are a.ge ed 33.85
pounds per 100 feet of net on an overnight setc' The difference in number“ dug
was not so pronounced for Lake Halbert produced 2201s fish per iOQ feet of net w6iie
Lake Corsicana produced 3l¢hs fishe
Table 12 presents data concerning the frequency of ocou.rrence of the series;
food organisms in the stomachs of fish collected from both latest TLe 315 fish. frzm
lake Halbert, that contained food showed a preference for 3'"3 and algae with wiiiv
orappie and channel c3atfish accounting for the majority of these preferenretu Tre
same preference is to be noted among the 75 fish.from Lake florsioena irat onteined
foodu or
/
Prepared by, Leonard D. Lamb Approved by /2%%;;prtrfi?hmnfiaéné52::é§;mnml
Project leader Director M is“‘ ‘i For as division
Date_ "_ December 30, l958
n-ng Aflw mun mWWfl-Wmmwm .msmm ._:r:a.:;a....'.'_;.'_._‘... _..;. ___..'_'.:‘.::; .__.:......... -'.:..'.:;:.7:5.....“: .. man”; 3: _ J
Table 1. Checklist of Species Taken from Lake Halbert and Lake Corsicena,
November 1, 1957 to October 31, 1958 -
%
Scientific Name Common Name Lake Halbert Lake Gorsicsnn
uwlH_i_ii_l__i_____l_______i_ili__________________________“__li__fl__mmi_ml_inwi
Lepisostus productus spotted gar x
Lepisostns osseus longnose gar n
Dorosoma cepedianum gizzard shad x x
Ictiobus bubalus smallmouth buffalo x x
Cerpiodes carpio river carpsucker X x
Ciprinus carpio European carp X x
Notropis lutrensis plains red shiner x x
Pimphales vigilax parrot minnow X x
Ictslurus punctatus channel catfish x X
Ictslurus melee black bullhead x
Ictslurus_natalis yellow bullhead X
Pylodictus olivsris flathead catfish x X
Fundulus notatus blackstripe topminnow x
Gambusia affinis common mosquitofish x x
Micropterus punctulatus spotted bass x
Micropterus salmoides largemouth bass X X
Chsenobryttn gnlosus 'wsrmouth x
Lepomis czsnellus green sunfish X
Lepomis microlophus redear sunfish X
Lepomis macrochirus bluegill sunfish X X
Lepomis megalotis longear sunfish x X
Pomoxis annularis white crappie x X
Porcine caprodes logperch x x
Aplodinotus grunniens freshwater drum X X
Table 2. Number and Percentage of Each Species Taken by Seining from Lake
Halbert and Lake Corsicana, November 1, l957-October 31, 1958.
Species Lake Halbert Lake Corsicana
N0. ' No.
2;,cepediannm l .5
E: intrensis h 2.2 ' M7 2h.9
E; vigilax 2h 12.9 17 9.0
E; natalis l .5
E; notatus 2 l.l
g; affinis 5 2.7 26 13.7
E; salmoides l .5 h 2.1
Lgicyanellus 7 3.7
L;_macrochirus 1&9 79.7 83 #3.9
E; annularis l .5 l .5
§;_caprodes l .5 2 1.1
“53.7.:
Totals 187 100.0 189 100.0
Table 3. A Comparison of the Rough and Game Species Taken in Gill Nets from
Lake Halbert and Lake Corsicana, November 1, 1957-Oct0ber 31, 1958.
Lake Halbert
Lake Corsicana
Total number specimens caught
Total weight of specimens caught
Average weight per specimen
Total weight of rough fish
tTotal weight of game fish
Total number of rough fish
iiTotal number of game fish
Average weight per rough fish
Average weight per game fish
Percent rough fish (by weight)
Percent game fish (by weight)
Percent rough fish (by number)
Percent game fish (by number)
991
5M6.95
-55
173.58
373.37
349
6A2
tflatfish and drum are included in the game fish.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
lbs.
621
668.67
1.08
538.61
130.06
278
3&3
1.9h
.38
lbs.
lbs.
fimdwm r. Hemmewc Sewefiac men Qmewwwewmne aw mommwaHen aw mean meaweeamw aw mwww wees mace
Heme mmwemesczosmswmm H. wmmqsmewameoew moc wmmm
than
. . I.
measamu Hosea mam. Azaw fleav Haemaa mmsveaamea mass amnaes a. wmsmm e._eaaamma
26. remade aemamma macaw aaaasaa
wmeme
we amesassszs mam Hymgmmm mo: so-wmm ems H.mo-w.eo m.oa
mp.scemwem mo Hmo-:Ho mmm mmmtm.mwm mam w.mo-:.mo m.me
mp.omseao Ho moo-wmm mpm Hmo-w.ome mew m.wo-m.wm m.wm
mam.nmaeao Hm Hmm-:oo mom Hamsw.www mm: m.Ho-w.mo m.mm
we essnamaem my Hmm-eoo we: mm-w.pmm ram H.mo-m.mm H.mm
mu.mmwmmi. H: Hem-mwm mam moo-wew mac m.mm-w.po m.4m
ms.smsmwsm Hm H:O-mmo mmo. mm-wmo mmm H.mm-w.wo m.rm
Wt.opa<maam H wmr-wm: we: H.m~e H.mwe H.mm H.mm
mp.mmwsoaamm mm Hmo-:mm we: . Hmm-w.wea was H.mouw.mo m.em
o. msHOmem H Hmo-wmo pee pee wee r.mo :.mo
mu.saoaopoeeem m Hom-Hmo wa :4-Heo mm w.:o-e.mo m.mo
a. assessesaem we mm-~rm Hem wo-~mo 4m w.mo-m.mo :.ro
mn.smmewoasm H Howssow How as an r.:o . :.ro
mp.sesewmesm ewe mo-wom Hm: HmaH.omH Ham H.oo-m.mo m.mm
wv.masssnmsm we ametmrm mow Hecawwo moo m.~o-m.no m.mw
Hmch m. Hammers sewmfidc mum momwwwcwmsd ow mofimwawom ow mwmm.mowwmcamm W% QHHH Emma macs Haas eomawcmee
Emacs H. memabsmSmd wwc Hmmm
i
messamm ecaeH mac. Agav Azaw eccmse Amcv aaHmca Magi amHmea a. macaw a. memecmm
ac. Haemac. bamammm wmcmm seaemma
macaw
mu.eaccccscm m rcc-m4c mwc mac-H.c44 mam c.:myc.mm c.:m
mp.cmmmcm cc mmc-cmm ems H.mmm-m.ch m.mw: c.:m-c.mm c.mm
wv.omemcwmcca c mc-Hmc Hem Hc-Hrc m4 H.mm-m.:c H.mc
mp.ccachm m wmmurmm wcc H.4cH-m.mmm m.Hew m.mc-:.mc w.mm
mp.csacao- mcH mcHgmcc mac mmm-mmw sac H.mn-w.cc m.:m
me... E H mm as Heme Hume mew mew
mp.mcscssacm How Hmc-eHc mac cm-H.wwm mam H.mw-m.:c H.mm
_wv_cHHamaHm H rmc :mc H.mmm H.mmm H.4c . H.4c
EV eccsschscm H mHm mHm mac mac m.4H m.4H
m».mmHschmm Hc mHmiwmc mac mam-H.cmm mmm m.Hc-w.mm m.mc
ww.cmcecocwacm. m HcmuHmc HHw er-Hcc 4m w.mc-m.mc p.4c
mu.samchaHm H Hcm Hcm cm :m :.wc :.wc
wn.mccchaHm mom amamcm How Holmac m4 H.mc-:.mc m.mm
mu.meccsamcm mc Hrc-mwc Hem cc-mem Has H.w:-m.cm m.m4
IE2
e.em we Ema macaw aw Emewmm mum Weemeneeme Hm meme mmHemee. fleeeecme Hm medg
emcee m. mmmsaaa.caagssec_a
meudmecme woe wmmm
. .I .DIE . Hfitfifl.Eflf§% I...-
mcmchm zoemscms bmcescme mmosmem Mmceseew Essen beeHH
mp.csemchcca Hm mc.cc w w.ce Hm mc.cm 4w cm.wc Hc Hm.Hm
ms.ecschm H m.cw m m.cm w m.eH H .mm
mh.cmeecc_ H m.mw c Hw.m:
mHh.aceeHc . H .mm m w.cw
mu.eccosmscm : Hc.mw m m.cm H H.H: m H.mm
mu.amHmm _ m m.mm m w.HH H H.mH
mu.scaeHHa H m.mw : :.Hw m m.HH w :.mm
WP.OHH<mch
mammchcham . m w.mm m :c.cc Hc Hc.wH mc mm.4m HH c.mw m , ;.mm
mh.mcHOmSm H H.mH
mu.che0HocU:m
ww.amoeoowwwsm H H.Hr 4 :.mm H H.mH
ww.smmmHoeHm
ms.mccchaHm Hc mm.wm w cc.cc 4m 44.wm we rr.wH mm wr.Hm we mH.mm
b. mesanmom H H.0m H H.Hr m w.ow
-Hcc.cc c4..Hcc.cc .- .., .Hcc.cc _H.H Hcc.cc. _ Hcc.cc
acaeHm ._ m, .Hcc.cc. : w
HmcHe m. accawnsmm. mwmmHme mHedeHanHos HS Ema macaw 5% fleeces mam Wmecessmme He Heme mmwcssac 2.emsdme as
Hmmdsmmcdmecec woe Hmmm.
mmecwmm 3mm Home acHw bemem. macdeecmm HeamHm
so. a so. a._ as. _s ; .: _ ecu . .s_ 20.. :a ,.. 26.. ._»;
wn.aacmcHeccs mm HH mm Hm HH.mm we Hm.m4 mm mm.m mm mH.Hm mam ma.am
Hh.ccceHcm Hm m.Hm H H.cm mc m.cm
lh.cmccHo Ho H.OH
mmh.omaccc . m m.mm H .nm w :.mm m w.cm Hm H.mH
:w.cccosmscm Hc «.mw m a.mH Hc H:.mc H e.cm mH mc.Hm mH m.Hm
Mb.smHmm w m.mw. Hr H.rH.
we.cmamHHc H .4m H H.rm Hm H.mH
Wk OHHdmsHm H .mm . H O.Ho
mp.mmHschmm r m.cm r w.cH w H.mc H H.cm m H.cm cm m.mm
mh.m5H0m:m H o.Ho
ww.eHcc0HocWSm H .4m H .4m m o.mo
mu.sccacocHscm m m.HH Hm c.4m m m.mm m m.c; w: m.Hm
Wh.3mmmHode H .dm H o.Ho
wh.mcccheHm m4 mc.mH cH cm.:m Hm Hm.ma mm mm.Hw ma m:.mH :mc Hm.wm
.iw msccchcm m w.mm : m.NH m m.Hm. m H.cm mH m.Hm
.1IIIII1s1aII11iiIIIIiIIIIIaaIiIIIIIiIIiaIIIIui11u1I1IIiII1IIIII111II111i1IIIIIa1111I1I1II11:11:11111111111111111:
ecaeHm HmH Hcc.cc wa Hcc.cc ac Hcc.cc cm Hcc.cc Hoe Hcc.cc cmH Hcc.cc
Elli):