TPWD 1963 F-6-R-10 #887: Resurvey of Resaca de la Guerra: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region 5-B
Open PDFExtracted Text
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
As required by
FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION.ACT
TEXAS
Federal-Aid Project No¢.F-6-R—10
.FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS OF THE WATERS 0F REGION.5-B
Job No. B-Zi _Resurvey of Resaca de la Guerra
. Project Leader: Charles T. Menn
H. D. Dodgen
Executive Secretary
Texas Game and Fish Commission
Austin, Texas
Marion Toole Eugene A. Walker
. D-J Coordinator Director, Program Planning
March 16, 1963
ABSTRACT
The resurvey of Resaca de la Guerra, near Brownsville in Cameron
County, Texas, revealed that catfishes and crappies are the most abundant
game fishes presenta In netting collections, rough fish species, including
alligator, spotted and longnose gars, gizzard shad, smallmouth buffalo,
river carpsucker, carp, striped mullet, bluegill, freshwater drum and Rio
Grande perch, comprised 73.5 per cent of the tOtal fish taken, Smallmouth
buffalo and spotted gar were the first and second most abundant species both
by numbers and weighta
Over the years, siltation has caused the resaca to become
progressively shallower, This has prevented the production of a substantial
largemouth bass pOpulation, Furthermore, the abundance of bottom feeding
rough fishes keeps the water murky, This makes bass feeding difficult or
impossible and is reflected in the poor physical condition of largemouth bass,
No evidence of the reproduction of largemouth bass was found,
Water quality studies of the resaca indicate a suitable habitat
for the survival and rapid growth of red drum (redfish)o One specimen of
this species, captured in netting, weighed 15 pounds 2 ouncesa Apparently
it entered the resaca as a juvenile in water pumped from the Rio Grande and
grew to its large size within the resaca,
Chemical renovation of the resaca is not recommended since it is
presently impossible to prevent the entry of rough fishes from the Rio
Grande. Efforts should be made to develOp biological controls for these
fishes, In addition, fishermen should be encouraged to harvest more catfish
and crappie,
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
State of Texas
Project No, Fm6~Rm10 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys
of the Waters of Region S-B
Job No, B~22 Title: Resurvey of Resaca de la Guerra
Period Covered: June 15, 1962 through December 31, 1962
Objectives:
To determine the relative abundance of the fish species present
in the Resaca de la Guerra in order to formulate plans for fisheries
development,
Techniques Used:
Fish populations in the Resaca de la Guerra were sampled with
nets and seines from 24 netting and 24 seining stations (Figure 1), Net
samples were collected with standard, 125~foot long gill nets constructed
of nylon webbing, 8 feet deep, in five, 25~foot long sections of 1m, 1%-, 2-,
2%»,and 3-inch square mesh, The nylon seines measured 4— by 20~feet, with
%-inch mesh,
Netting and seining stations were visited monthly except that
only 12 netting and 12 seining collections were made during June and
December, Specimens taken from overnight net sets were weighed in grams
and measured in millimeters, In addition to length and weight, sex, stage
of gonadal development and incidence of parasites were recorded for each
specimen, Seined specimens were preserved in 10 per cent formalin and were
later identified and counted in the project laboratory, The common and
scientific names of fish Species collected are listed in Table 1,
Chemical analyses of surface water samples were not made each
month as planned, however, twelve sampling stations were set up and analyses
were made whenever possible,
Two conferences were held with the Director, Water and Sewerage
Division, and the General Manager, Municipal Public Utilities, City of
Brownsville during the course of the study to obtain additional information
concerning the resaca, Also, a number of informal discussions were held
with interested persons owning land fronting on the resaca, as well as with
sports fishermen,
Findings:
Introduction
Resaca de la Guerra, also known as Resaca de las Palmas, is an
enema n
.cmw
o mwmhmnsmv
we Nm
“seam consannaaa
. afloenwmcm \\
weflflwbmnscnm mo humorAmv
mxmunfi Hmeflm
. [lastly
we 0
mflmom
: q:1:sj ..:;;Hmcmo ammo xxx
HM Hmnmo momwnnmflnm gas
AHV mnflwmono uecnum WM
nowumum mflmmamn< acumz AW“
noH umum wanna,” cm H
me
.mHHmwSU NH @U monummm
noflumum wnfluuwz @ avfiwwwfl
G
H canmwm
Table 1a A List of Fish Species Recorded from Resaca de la Guerra
Common Name : Scientific Name
Alligator gar f Lepisosteus spatula Racépéde)
Spotted gar : L, oculatus (Winchell)
Longnose gar f L, osseu.s (Linnaeus)
Threadfin shad ‘ Dorosoma pntenense (Gunt.her)
Gizzard shad ? Q, cepediangm'CLeSueur)
Mexican tetra i Astyanax mexicanus (Filippi)
Smallmouth buffalo . .[ctiobus bubalus 1’Rafinesque)
River carpsucker Ca.rpiodes c.a.rpio (Rafinesque)
Carp _ Cyprinus carpgorLinnaeuE
Tamaulipas Shiner ' NotroEis braytoniiJordan and Evermann}
Channel catfish . Ictalurus punttatus (Rafinesque)
Blue catfish - I, furcatus (LeSueur)
Longnose killifish . Eggoulus ;ifliii§ (Baird and Girard)
Gulf killifish 3 grandis Baird. and Gira:rd;
Sheepshead minnow ' %yprinod.on variegatusiLacepede,
Mosquitofish _ Gambugii‘gffinis (Baird and Girard)
Sailfin molly Z Mollienesia‘lati inna~LeSueurE
Amazon molly ; M fornrosa {Girardl
Striped mullet ; Mugil cepha.lusl Linnaeus
Tidewater silverside Menidia EEEXLABEE (COpe)
White bass Roccus chrysops CRafinesqueE
Largemouth bass - Microgteru.s salmoides (Lacepede)
Warmouth Chaenobryttus gulosus (Cuvier)
Redear sunfish : Lepomis micro lthus (Gunther)
Bluegill L macrochlrus‘RafinesqueE
White crappie Pomoxis annularis Refinesquej
Black crappie P ni romaculatus (LeSueur)
Freshwater drum . Aplodi 1.n.otus grunn1enisaf1nesqueE
Red drum ; Sciaenogs ocellata (Linnaeus)
Rio Grande perch 3 Gichlasoma cvano uttatum (Baird & Girard)
Naked goby Gobiosoma DoscifiLacEpEdeE
old stream bed of the Rio Grande which skirts a portion of the northern edge
of the City of Brownsville,
A limited survey and inventory of fish Species present in the
resaca was made in 1958, The recent resurvey, however, is of broader scope
in that more biological, Chemical and physical data were obtained,
Physical Description
The resaca heads northwest of the City of Brownsville where water,
from two city owned pumps on the Rio Grande, enters the resaca.after flowing
for about five miles in Open and underground canals, The Blemile long resaca
-4-
follows a winding, easterly course, north of the city, through virtually flat
terrain and eventually flows into other resacas to the east of Brownsville.
Because of the flat terrain, runoff is negligible.
In the 12 miles of Resaca de la Guerra intensively studied during
the resurvey (Figure l), the average width is approximately 60 feet and the
average depth is less than 4 feeto Virtually all of the shoreline is
privately owned, but the City of Brownsville has flooding easements for water
storage, In addition to municipal and industrial use of water, home owners
along the resaca are permitted to use water for their lawns, Consequently,
water level fluctuations of 2 or 3 feet in 24_hours are not uncommon,
Since the resaca is comparatively narrow and divided by road fills
into short sections which are connected by one or two concrete pipes (Figure 2),
it appears the high turbidity is due to the activity of bottom feeding
fishes rather than wave actions Wave action due to wind is reduced by thick
stands of huisache, retama, mesquite, palm and ebony trees along the shore-
line (Figure 3)o Furthermore, the banks are sharply cut and rise about two
feet on the average above normal water levelo
In recent years, the production of citrus fruit and cotton in
fields adjacent to the resaca has given way to private home develoPments,
This, in turn, has limited public access to the resaca to road crossings.
Fish Collections
Netting m All told, 144 netting collections were made at 24 stations
during the studyo All nets were set overnight at established stations, in
water depths ranging from 1 to 6% feet, and were picked up the following
morningo A total of 2,158 fish of 20 species, weighing 3,10906 pounds, was
taken in the netting collections (Tables 2 and 3)o
Rough fish including alligator, spotted and longnose gars, gizzard
shad, smallmouth buffalo, river carpsucker, carp, striped mullet, bluegill,
freshwater drum and Rio Grande perch accounted for 73.5 per cent of the fish
collected and 8794 per cent of their weight, Smallmouth buffalos and spotted
gars were the first and second most abundant species both by numbers and
weightso
Gizzard shad comprised only 403 per cent of fish taken in netting
collections, and carp comprised only 208 per cent (Table 2)o .The relatively
small numbers of gizzard shad may in part be attributed to the predation by
gars and catfish,
Surprisingly, gizzard shad, river carpsucker and carp comprise a
relatively lower percentage of the fish population in the resaca than is
normal for these species in waters of this area, It appears that this
resaca is a more suitable habitat for smallmouth buffalo than for either
the gizzard shad, river carpsucker or carpo Recent food habit studies by
Dro W, W, Dalquest, of Midwestern University, reveal that the diet of the
smallmouth buffalo consists mostly of animal life, whereas the diet of
gizzard shad, river carpsucker and carp consists mostly of plankton and plant
materialo
Game fish species, including channel and blue catfish, white bass,
F
ig. 2.
Drain pipes connect sections of Resaca de la Guerra.
___ - _-
Fig.
3. A typical section of Resaca de la Guerra near
Netting Station 3.
“NIH
wo.m
mm.w
@H.H
@w.m
mo.o
mo.o
mo.H
mo.o
mH.m
nq.m
o¢.HH
mm.N
mo.o
mm.om
0N.¢
mw.o
oo.ma
Nm.o
Monasz ha
use
Hw-
m~¢uOH
swan amuse
swam mama swam wfimm wmuwownaH as mane muesfiafiw NH.moumofiwnH #
«Hmnfioomn
.NoaH
umnfiw>oz Monouoo umnfiwumom umsmsm mash snow
......
uwnaooon smacks“ mosh .muuwsu ma mp mowmom .nmuwnfinnv mofiuuos Haww mo mufismwm
manuOH.
seesaw mom
fiuuom mpfiwuw OHM
Baum Houwaammnm
**mfimmwno xumHm
«romanwuo mums:
Haammsam
ssnmfimanw uwovom
ssausofiuma
#«mmwn susofiowumn
«swamp songs
uofiasa poaflnum
«samwmumo mofim
«anmfiwuwo Hoscwao
memo
Hoxoowaumo HmPHm
oflwmmnn nusoaafimam
moan pumnumw
new wmoawcog
new pwuuonm
new nouwwfiafi¢
mowumnm
i
.N oHan
isa.hm . o.aas.~ amam amsom
. . .... ma mam memo mmumofl.nH rs %.Go moon
was
oo.oo~ o.moHnm m.MMH o.oo¢ «.mmm
_ “.ma
unou Ham
mama Hmnamomn amaouau scam .muuoww ma on sawmom .mwfiwon aw .mfiwuuon HHHm mo muHSmwm
meumoH.GH «
meuOH
Ennm mom
sauna undone owm
snap Hmumaamwnm
#«owmnmno xowam
snowmmmuo moans
Haammaam
sasmfimanm Hmopwm
#«JuooEumB
«smmmn auooawmumg
«smmmn wanna
umfiana pmafiuum
«ssmwmuwu moan
«aamuwuao assuage
name
waoswnumo Ho>wm
onmmon ausoaafiwfim
pmsm puwnuflw
now omOGmmOA
Hum uwuuomm
How HouwmeH<
mofiomnw
.m magma
~8-
largemouth bass, warmouth, redear sunfish, white crappie, black crappie and
red drum comprised 26.6 per cent by number and 12.7 per cent by weight of
the fish taken in-the nets.
Since largemouth bass comprised only 1.4 per cent of the total
number of fish taken in netting collections, and 0.7 per cent of their
weight, it is apparent that the stocking of 1,500,000 largemouth bass in the
.resaca since 1954 has not established a good pepulation. Collectively,
channel and blue catfish comprised 14.9 per cent by number and 9.5 per cent
by weight of the total netting_collections. Thus, catfish are the chief
game fish species in the resaca. However, there is also a good crappie
population in the resaca. Both white and black crappies were found.
Collectively, they comprised 9.5 per cent of the total number of fish
taken in netting collections.
It is interesting to note that one red drum, or redfiSh, and one
white bass were taken in the resaca. Apparently both fish entered the
resaca via the canal system from the Rio Grande River. This belief is based
on the fact that these fish were taken near the inlet from the river. If
the red drum did come from the Rio Grande River, it is an almost certain
.fact that the fish grew to its large size in the freshwater resaca.
Table 4 shows the length and weight statistics for fish from the
resaca.
Table 5 shows the monthly results of gill_netting in terms of
fish caught per net and per_foot of net.
Seining _ Results of seining at the 24 stations are shown in Table
6. In all, 11,864 fish of 23 species were seined during the resurvey.
Threadfin shad, bluegill and mosquitofish, in that order, were the
most abundant and best distributed.species.
The seining stations were selected with respect to habitat and
were spaced as uniformly as possible along the resaca. Figure 1 shows the
locations of the seining stations.
Annotated Species List
Alligator gag - Seven specimens, weighing a total of 56 pounds,
were taken in gill nets during the resurvey. Based on the limited number
caught and that they were taken at only four stations, it is apparent that
the Species is not abundant in the resaca (Table 7).
Analysis of stomach contents revealed unidentifiable fish remains
in two stomachs and the remains of a snake in another. One of the specimens
examined was parasitized with visceral round worms.
Spotted gar w A total of-38l spotted gars was caught in gill net
collections. Seven-others were taken in seines. The species was taken at
23 of the 24 netting stations and is the most abundant gar species in the
resaca.
Food items were found in spotted gar stomachs_in the following
frequencies: unidentified sunfish remains - l3 stomachs, shad remains - 3