TPWD 1955 F-4-R-2 #198: Segment Completion Report: To Check on Commercial Catch of Rough Fish from Lake Whitney, Texas

§:62E: STATE Texas ‘~~ PROJECT NO. FmEuR—E Job. Bm3 PERIOD June 1! 195E - Oct. 312 1955 SEGMENT COMPLETION REPORT BY Robert N. Hambric Assistant Project Leader TITLE To check on Commercial Catch of Rough Fish from Lake Whitney, Texaso OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of commercial fishing on the control of rough fish and predatory species and the value of the local fishery as well as the relative abundance and seasonal Variation by species in the commercial catcho The commercial fishermen were supplied forms to be filled out on which they recorded the amount and weight of_each species that were nettedo The forms were collected each month by mail or by personal contact with the fishermeno ' DISCUSSION contracto The operator is bonded and compelled to submit a monthly report of his catcho He is limited to specific devices which may be used and the contract states which species of fish that may he taken from the lakeo There have been only two commercial fishermen on Lake Whitneya Hoop nets are the only gear allowedo Buffalo, carp, suckers, gary and shad are the rough fish that can be taken, Gar and shad are seldom, if ever, caught in hoop nets in this lakeo All other fish must be released immediately and without harm if possiblee Neither fisherman worked the lake throughout the entire perioda One fisherman began netting the lower end of the lake in July, 1954 and continued through May, l955; He did no more netting until October of that yearn Another fisherman began netting Bear Creek Area, located about midmlake, in November of 1954 and continued through June of 19559 The flooded fields and lowlands located in the mid—lake region produced the most fish per net set. Both fishermen set between 10 and l5 hoop nets baited with cottonseed cake, The percentage that each species represents in the net catch is not necessarily a true representation of the abundance of that species in the lake as carp are apparently more susceptible to baiting than the other two species” The seasonal variation in the percentage of each type of fish caught by the commercial fishermen was not conclusive as neither fisherman netted the lake for a continuous 12 month periodo But the data collected indicated that smallmouth buffalo were caught in the greatest numbers during the colder months of the year. Conversely carp were taken in larger quantities during the warmer monthsa E A total of 93,t91 pounds of rough fish was harvested, worth $16,521 on the retail market. The amount of harvest and the value of each species is given in Table l. Carp were the most abundant species caught representing 91.26 percent by number and 91.42 percent by weight of the total harvest. The number of each species caught is given in Table 2. The type of nets to be used in the harvest of rough fish by commercial fishermen is a topic that is widely, and sometimes heatedly, discussed in some localities. Fishing and boating traffic on Lake Whitney is quite heavy. The local feeling toward the use of gill nets in that area, other than for biological surveys, is far from sympathetic. Any commercial fishing gear need in that lake has to be well hidden and inconspicuously run. The hoop nets are well adapted to such use and also return a high harvest per manmhour used in working them. It is recommended that this study he continued, and that a larger harvest of rough fish be netted if it is practical. SUMMARY 2. About 93,000 pounds of rough fish were taken from the lake by the use of hoop nets. 3. The retail market value of the harvest was $l6,52l.39. H. Carp composed 9l percent and smallmouth buffalo 8 percent of the catch. Table 1. Pounds of Harvest and Market Value of Fish Caught by Commercial Fishermen, Lake Whitney, Texas, July 1, 1954 Through October 31, 1955. Species Total Pounds Avg. Retail Price Per Total Caught Lb. Not Dressed value Carp 85,t68 17% $1t,956.9o Smallmouth Buffalo 7,778 ' 19% 1,516 71 Carpsucker 2M5 17% t7.78 TOTALS 93,491 $16,521.39 Table 2. Numbers of each Species Caught ,and the Percentage of the Entire Catch that they Represent. Species Total Number Caught Percent By No. Percent By Wt. Carp 36,98h 9l.26 91.n2 Smallmouth Buffalo 3,u27 8.u6 8.32 Garpsucker llh 0.28 0.26 TOTALS t0,525 100.00 100.00