(1954) Job Completion Report: Inventory of species present and their distribution in those portions of the Lampasas and Little Rivers within Region 6-B

--- Page 1 --- AAm PasAs kVER STATE Texas PROJECT F-2-R-2, Job B-9 PERIOD June 1 1954 through Novem- ber 30, 1954 Job Completion Report by Billy D. Cooper TITLE Inventory of species present and their distribution in those portions of the Lampasas and Little Rivers within Region 6-B, which were not covered in Job B-6, Project F-2-R-l. OBJECTIVES To continue and complete the study of these riv ers begun under Job B-6, Project F-2-R-1. METHODS Seine, gill net and rotenone collections were made in the following waters of Lampasas, Burnet and Milam Counties, Texas: The Lampasas River in Lam- pasas County, 5 collections; Sulphur Creek, a tributary of the Lampasas River in Lampasas County, 3 collections; the Lampasas River in Burnet County, 1 collect- ion; Rocky Creek, a tributary of the Lampasas River in Burnet County, 3 collec- tions and the Little River in Milam County, 9 collections. The locations of the stations at which collections were made are shown on the attached map, and in Table 1. All seine collections were made with 6' x 4' and 10' x 4' common sense seines and/or with a 26' x 6' bag seine with a d" mesh. Rotenone and gill net collections were made at Station Nos. 5 and 6 on the Little River in Milem Coun- ty. The nets used were 125 feet in length with square mesh sizes ranging from one to three inches in 25 foot sections. Seined and rotenoned specimens were preserved with ten percent formalin and taken to the laboratory for identifica- tion and counting,. Larger specimens taken from gill nets and in rotenone collections were identified in the field. Thermal, chemical and ecological conditions were recorded in conjunc- tion with Job A-3, Project F-2-R-2. RESULTS A total of 35 fish species were found to occur in the waters under study. Of these, 21 species were found in the Lampasas River and its tributaries, in Lampasas and Burnet Counties, 29 species were found in the Little River, in Milam County, and 15 species were found to be common to both rivers. The relative abundance and distribution of these species are shown in Table ITI. ~~ The Lampasas River (Lampasas and Burnet Counties): - Since the Lampasas River was not flowing at the time of the collections, except in a few scattered localities, where a slight flow from pool to pool was discovered, most of the fish --- Page 2 --- 2. in this river were restricted to small pools, the larger pools being few and far between. Therefore, several species which are known to occur in this portion of the Lampasas River were not collected, and of the species collected, other than a statement to the effect that they were taken in pools, little can be said as to their habitet preferences. This is essentially true of those species which are normally known to inhabit the riffles under normal conditions. Low water con- ditions also tend to reduce the relative abundance of the predator and rough species. The species which are known to occur here but which were not collected are the yellow or flathead catfish, the shortnose gar and the blue catfish. The blue catfish has been stocked in the river, according to the reports from local fishermen. The species collected in the Lampasas River and its tributaries, in Lampasas and Burnet Counties, are divided into five categories on the basis of their frequency in the total number of collections. Those species which were most frequently collected and therefore most widely distributed, are the black+ tail shiner, the red shiner, the parrot minnow, the stoneroller, the common mosquitofish, the largemouth bass, the green sunfish, the bluegill and the long- ear sunfish. They were taken in 50 or more percent of the collections. Of this group, the largemouth bass has been stocked in many of the more permanent pools and is present in relatively large numbers. The group of species collected next more frequently, in 33 to 50 per- cent of the collections, includes the warmouth and the orangespotted sunfish. The Rio Grande tetra, along with the river carpsucker, the grey red- horse, the blackstripe topminnow, the spotted black bass and the logperch were collected in from 7 to 17 percent of the collections. The Rio Grande tetra is not native to this area and the specimens collected probably represent escaped or introduced bait minnows. Since all of the pools encountered on trips to the Lampasas River were easily collected with seines, none were treated with rotenone and no gill nets were set, The Little River (Milam County): - Two of the nine collections made on the Little River in Milam County were rotenone collections and of the other seven, two were made with gill nets and five with seines. In the basic survey of the Little River, in Milam County, Job A+3, Project P-2=R-2, it was stated that the Little River flows through two ecolog- deal regions, the Blackland Prairie and the Post Oak Belt. No such division was apparent in the collection data for the fish taken in these portions of the river. Tt was found that certain species, including: ‘the shortnose gar, the gizzard shed, the smallmouth buffalo, the blue sucker, the river carpsucker, the European carp, the channel catfish, the flathead catfish, the lergemouth bass and the parrot minnow were frequently collected from medium to large pools with bottoms of gravel and silt and limited cover in the form of aquatic vegetation along the edges of the pools. Sunfish were also taken in the pools, with smaller Ndividuals being more abundant in the shallower pools and on the riffles. The tadpole madtom was in all cases collected in association with sub- merged aquatic vegetation in both the pools and on the riffles, whereas most of the cyprinid species collected were taken from the riffle area where there as at least some current and the common mosquitofish or Gambusia was almost always --- Page 3 --- 3. found along the edges of the pools or the edges of the riffles. The 29 species of fish taken from the Little River have also been di~ vided, on the basis of their frequency in the collections, into five groups. The most frequentiy collected species were the gizzard shad, the river carpsucker, the blacktail shiner, the red shiner, the parrot minnow, the channel catfish, the common mosquitofish and the longear sunfish. They were taken in 50 or more per- cent of the collections. Next most frequently collected, in from 33 to 50percent of the collec~ tions, re the shortnose ger, the blue sucker, the stoneroller, the flathead catfish, the tadpole madtom, the largemouth bass and the bluegill. In the third most frequently collected group of species, present in from 18 to 32 percent of the collections, were the spotted black bass,the warmouth, the green sunfish, the dusky darter and the freshwater drum. The smallmouth buffalo, European carp, speckled dace, ghost shiner, broadhead shiner, mimic shiner, yellow bullhead, spotted sunfish and orangethroat darter were present in from 7 to 17 percent of the collections. In the collections made at Station No. 5, on the Little River in Milam County, 12 species were collected when using a seine and later, when checking with rotenone, 17 species were proved to be present. Similarly, Station No. 6 produc- ed nine species when seined and 10 species when treated with rotenone. The seine collection at Station No. 5 was made slightly above the area treated with rotennne while the seine collection for Station No. 6 was made in and below the treated area. A primary objection to the use of rotenone as a collection tool in streams is the danger of killing fish over a long distance downstream from the area to be collected. This was successfully avoided in both of the rotenone collections made as a part of this study by the following method: 1. An area was selected where there was a small pool with a riffle below and a larger pool just below the riffle. 2. Rotenone, calculated to be half enough for a complete kill ina standing body of water of the same size as the upper pool, was applied to the upper pool. 3. A bag seine was then placed below the second pool to collect the fish washed down by the current. 4, All surfacing fish were then collected and 30 to 45 minutes were allowed to pass before the second application of rotenone of the same strength. 5. As before, all fish were collected and 30 to 45 minutes allowed to pass before a final application of rotenone, again of the same strength. it is noteworthy to mention that fish continued to surface with the second and third applications of rotenone and that the larger catfish did not surface until after the third application. Furthermore, the rotenone was suffic- jently diluted by the water in the larger, lower pool so that the only fish of consequence to be killed outside of the test area were gizzard shad and a few carpsuckers. --- Page 4 --- SUMMARY 1. The field work done for this job was done in conjunction with Job A-3 and is the completion of the work begun under Job B-6, Project F-2-R-1. 2. In all a total of 11 collections were made on the Lampasas River and its tributaries in Lampasas and Burnet Counties and nine collections were made on the Little River in Milam County. 3. <A total of 21 species was collected in the Lampasas and its tribu- taries and 29 species were collected from the Little River. kh. Rotenone was used as a collection method after a technique was developed for its use where the chemical was applied in such a manner that very few fish outside of the test area were killed. 5. Since the fishes of the Larpasas were restricted to the pools, because of drouth, no habitat preferences could be discovered. 6. Ecologically the fishes collected in the Little River were divided into groups: a. Those species most frequently found in medium to deep pools. b. Those species most frequently found in shallow pools and on the riffles. c. Those species most frequently found on the riffles. ad. Those species most frequently found in association with sub- merged vegetation. e. Those found almost always along the edges of the pools on riffles. --- Page 5 --- Stream Survey Stations Lampasas River (Lampasas and Burnet Counties) Station No. Location Lampasas River, 11 mi. N Adamsville Lampasas River, 6 mi. N Adamsville Lampasas River, 1 mi. S. Adamsville Lampasas River, 7 mi. S. E. Adamsville Lampasas River, Rumely crossing - Donaldson Creek, 5 mi. W. Lampasas, on Farm Road 580 Donaldson Creek, 5 mi. W. Lampasas on Farm Road 1494 8. Burleson Creek, 1 mi. N. W. Lampasas 9 Sulphur Creek, 3 blocks W. Lampasas Golf Course e AWN FWP ~] 10. Sulphur Creek, 2 mi. E. Lampasas in City Municipal Park Ls Lampasas River, at mouth of Sulphur Creek Lae Lampasas River, 1 mi. N. Oakalla 13. Rocky Creek, 1 mi. N. Watson on Farm Road 74 1h. Rocky Creek, 2 mi. S. Watson 15. Rocky Creek, 3 mi. N. BE. Watson Little River (Milam County) 5 Little River, 4 mi. W. Buckholts 2. Little River, 6 mi. W. Cameron 3. Little River, 6 mi. S. W. Cameron h. Little River, 12 mi. E. Cameron Bs Little River, 45 mi. N. E. of Station 4 6. Little River, 3 mi. N. W. Gause Table 1. Locations of survey stations used during s,udy period for Job B-9, Project F-2-R-2, Basic Survey ov the kemaining Portion of the Leon, Lampasas and Little Rivers Within Region 6-B, waich were not covered in Job B-6, Project F-2-R-1. --- Page 6 --- Name of Species Scientific Lepisosteus platostomus Dorosoma cepedianum ictiobus bubalus Astyanax fasciatus Cycleptus elongatus Carpiodes carpio Moxostoma_ congestum Cyprinus « carpio Hybopsis aestivalus Notropis potteri Notropis venustus Notropis lutrensis Notropis volucellus Notropis tuchanani Pimephales vigilax Pimephales promelas Campostoma anomalum Ictalurus ‘punctatus Pilodictus olivaiis Schilbeodes gyrinus Ameiurus natalis Fundulus notatus Gambusia affinis Micropterus punctulatus Micropterus salmoides Chaenobryttus coronarius Lepomis cyanellus Lepomis macrochirus Lepomis punctatus Lepomis humilis Lepomis megalotis Hadropterus scierus Percina caprodes Etheostoma spectabile Aplodinotus grunniens Table 11. Distribution Checklist Lampasas River Little River Lampasas and Milam Co. Burnet Co. Common (12 collections) (9 collections ) shortnose gar - A gizzard shad - VA smallmouth buffalo - F Rio Grande tetra F ~ blue sucker ~ A river carpsucker F VA gray redhorse F ~ Kuropean carp - F speckled dace F broadhead shiner ~ . FF blacktail shiner VA VA red shiner VA VA mimic shiner A F ghost shiner - F parrot minnow VA VA fathead minnow A “ stoneroller VA southern channel catfish A VA flathead catfish - A tadpole madtom - A yellow bullhead ~ F blackstripe topminnow F common mosquitofish VA VA spotted black bass F C Largemouth black bass VA A warmouth C Cc green sunfish VA Cc bluegill sunfish VA A spotted sunfish ~ F orangespotted sunfish C - longear sunfish VA VA dusky darter - C logperch F . orangethroat darter A F freshwater drum - C Distribution of species collected in the Lampasas and Little Rivers. The distribution figure is based on the number of times each species was found in relation to the number of collections made as follows: VA - very abundant (over 504%),. 2 abundant (33 - 50%), C - common (18 ~ 32%), F - frequent (7 - 17%), R - rare (64 or less). --- Page 7 --- Legend: Survey Stations - EI Survey and Collection Stations - ® Towns - @® and O \ art LS cae wl wor0re pee t \ pod dre LITTLE RIVER DRAINAGE Region 6-B River Basic Surveys Inventories of Species Lampasas River (Lampasas and Burnet Counties) Job A-3 Job B-9 Little River (Milam County) Job A-3 Job B-9 North San Gabriel River (Burnet County) Job A-4 Job B-10 San Gabriel River (Milam County) Job A-l Job B-10 Brushy Creek (Milam County) Job A-) Job B~1O Note: For work done in Bell County, see Jobs A-1 and B-6, Project F-2-R-1 For work done in Williamson County, see Jobs A-2 and B-7, Project F-2-R-1