(1976) Intensive Surface Water Monitoring Survey for Segment No. 1903 Medina River, Report No. IMS-46
Open PDFExtracted Text
--- Page 1 ---
INTENSIVE SURFACE WATER MONITORING SURVEY
FOR
SEGMENT No. 1903 {J
MEDINA RIVER
REPORT NO. IMS-46
PREPARED BY
STEVE R. TWIDWELL
SPECIAL STUDIES SECTION
FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION
TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD
Authorization for use or reproduction of original material
contained in this publication is freely granted. The Board
would appreciate acknowledgement. Single copies available
free of charge from: Texas Water Quality Board, P.O. Box
13246 Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711.
--- Page 2 ---
TABLE
INTRODUCTION: «0: a: s & ww %
DIRECTIVE « & «© © «@ &@
PURPOSE .... .
SUMMARY. . . . «© « « « «
WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS . .
METHODS. . . 2. 2 « «
DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY AREA
OF CONTENTS
WASTE SOURCES IN SURVEY AREA .....
POINT SOURCES ....
NON-POINT SOURCES .
PRESENTATION OF DATA...
HYDROLOGICAL. . .. .
FIELD MEASUREMENTS. .
WATER ANALYSES. .. .
SEDIMENT ANALYSES . .
BIOLOGICAL. .....
Chlorophyll a...
Phytoplankton. .
Zooplankton. ..
Benthic Macroinvertebrates .
Bacteria ....
RELATED TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD ACTIVITIES
WASTE LOAD EVALUATION
Li
. . .
10
10
12
13
13
13
17
20
21
21
21
23
“24
28
29
29
--- Page 3 ---
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT. )
TWQB PERMITS AND REGISTRATIONS; NPDES PERMITS .
COMPLIANCE MONITORING . ....... 2.68484
STREAM MONITORING . . . «2... 2 1 ee ew ew we
REFERENCES: CITED « « «i s s i @ #@ @ Few He eS DS GD
APPENDIX A. FIELD AND LABORATORY PROCEDURES
3d:
--- Page 4 ---
Tables
10.
LIST OF TABLES
Medina River Sampling Stations
Wastewater Dischargers ....
Hydrological Data ......
Medina River Stream Quality. .
Laboratory Water Analyses. . .
Chlorophyll a Data ......
Phytoplankton Data ......
Zooplankton Data .......
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Data
Fecal Coliform Data. .....
iv
L3
14
18
21
22
23
25
28
--- Page 5 ---
Figures
l.
2.
LIST OF FIGURES
Map of Survey Area .....
Dissolved Oxygen Data. ....
--- Page 6 ---
INTENSIVE SURFACE WATER MONITORING SURVEY
FOR
SEGMENT NO. 1903
MEDINA RIVER
INTRODUCTION
DIRECTIVE
This intensive survey was accomplished in accordance with
the Texas Water Quality Act, Section 21.257, as amended in
1973. The report is to be used in developing and maintaining
the State Water Quality Strategy required by regulations
published in 40 CFR 130.40 pursuant to Section 303(e) of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended on October 18,
1972:
PURPOSE
The purpose of this intensive survey was to provide the
Texas Water Quality Board with a valid information source:
1) to determine quantitative cause and effect
relationships of water quality;
2) to obtain data for updating water quality
management plans, setting effluent limits,
and where appropriate, verifying the clas-
sifications of segments;
3) to set priorities for establishing or improving
pollution controls; and
4) to determine any additional water quality
management actions required.
--- Page 7 ---
SUMMARY
An intensive monitoring survey was conducted August 23-25,
1976 on Segment 1903 of the Medina River. The Medina River
within Segment 1903 begins downstream of the Medina Diversion
Reservoir and flows in a southeasterly direction approximately
72 miles through Medina and Bexar Counties to its confluence
with the San Antonio River. In the upper portion of the
segment the Medina River is characterized by clear water,
swift velocity, steep banks, and a stream channel in which
large pool and riffle areas predominate morphometry. The
lower portion of the segment is deeper and slower moving and
the water is more turbid. This survey included sampling
stations in the main body of the Medina River throughout the
segment, at selected locations on all significantly flowing
tributaries, and at the major wastewater dischargers.
Municipal sewage treatment plants are the most common facili-
ties from which wastewater is discharged to the segment. The
City of San Antonio's Leon Creek Plant is the largest and
discharged an effluent that contained 1455 lbs/day of BODs
and 4925 lbs/day of nutrient compounds (ammonia, nitrite, and
nitrate nitrogen and ortho-phosphorus). The discharge from
this plant actually enters Leon Creek (Segment 1906) approxi-
mately one mile upstream from its confluence with the Medina
River.
A total of four flowing tributaries was sampled during this
survey. Hydrological data collected from these tributaries
indicated the majority of the inflow to the Medina River is
supplied by Medio Creek and Leon Creek. The two remaining
tributaries, Elm Creek and San Geronimo Creek, were small
and contributed less than 3 cfs each.
Temperature and pH values varied from station to station
within the Medina River, but none were in violation of the
respective 90°F and 7-9 stream standards. The slightly
alkaline pH values observed at all the Medina River stations
may be partially explained by the underlying limestone forma-
tions. Total alkalinity values within the segment were high
and, with the exception of one value from Medio Creek, were
due totally to bicarbonates. Conductivity values in the
Medina River generally increased downstream. This downstream
increase is common in rivers, such as the Medina, that are
utilized for irrigation.
The field dissolved oxygen data collected at the Medina River
stations indicated generally good water quality conditions
existed throughout much of Segment 1903. Mean dissolved
oxygen levels remained above the 5.0 mg/l segment standard
at all stations. The City of San Antonio's Leon Creek Sewage
--- Page 8 ---
Treatment Plant discharge, which enters the Medina River via
Leon Creek immediately upstream from Station 16, caused a
Slight depression in dissolved oxygen levels. The carbon-
aceous and nitrogenous oxygen demand of this wastewater
reduced the natural oxygen content from approximately 90
percent saturation to less than 80 percent saturation at
Stations 17, 18, and 19 downstream. Station 17 had the lowest
minimum dissolved oxygen level (4.9 mg/l) of any Medina River
station sampled.
Levels of BODS5 and ammonia nitrogen were higher downstream
from the discharge of the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant
(Stations 16, 17, 18, and 19) than upstream. Ammonia nitrogen
levels in this lower reach ranged from 0.2 mg/l to 0.7 mg/l.
High nitrite nitrogen levels (above 0.5 mg/l) were also ob-
served in the area between Stations 16 and 19. The presence
of ammonia and nitrite nitrogen in such concentrations
provides evidence that nitrification was occurring within
this reach of the Medina River. Since nitrification is an
oxygen consuming process, its occurrence may partially account
for the slight depression in dissolved oxygen noted in the
lower reach.
The same general area that had higher BODs and ammonia nit-
rogen levels attributable to discharges of treated sewage
effluents also had the highest phosphorus levels. Ortho and
total phosphorus levels in the Medina River were less than
0.1 mg/l at Stations 1 through 14. Further downstream, at
stations influenced by the Leon Creek Treatment Plant dis-
charge, levels for both parameters exceeded 1 mg/l
Dissolved oxygen levels in the tributary streams were generally
high. Only Medio Creek (Station 10) had dissolved oxygen
levels that were considered low (less than 5 mg/l). This
creek also had elevated levels of nutrient compounds (ammonia
nitrogen and ortho-phosphorus). Flow in this tributary is
dominated by the treated sewage effluents from five small
plants located in the upper portion of the basin. Discharge
from Medio Creek had no noticeable effects on the various
field physico-chemical parameters from the Medina River.
The swift velocity and limestone bedrock underlying the
Medina River within the segment are factors that combine to
prohibit accumulation of sediment. For this reason, sediment
samples were not collected for analysis of pesticides and
heavy metals.
Chlorophyll a levels from the Medina River and tributary
stations were generally below the detection limit (0.004 mg/1).
Only Stations 10 (Medio Creek), 15 (Leon Creek), and 19 had
detectable levels of chlorophyll a and they were only slightly
above the detection limit. 7
--- Page 9 ---
Phytoplankton assemblages were generally diverse at most
Medina River stations. Only diatoms and green algae were
observed at Stations 1 through 14. Farther downstream in
the area influenced by Leon Creek Treatment Plant discharge,
the phytoplankton communities were less diverse and dominated
by the pollution-tolerant blue-green alga, Aphanizomenon.
The low standing crops, as estimated by numerical counts at
all stations, correlated well with the chlorophyll a data and
indicate that planktonic algae growth and proliferation was
not stimulated anywhere within the segment. Apparently, the
swift velocity of the Medina River prohibits a buildup of
algal biomass.
Zooplankton occurrence and distribution within the segment
was restricted to the three lowermost Medina River stations.
The zooplankton communities were dominated by rotifers.
Standing crop and diversity values were low, reflecting the
low number of individuals and different taxa collected at
each station. The restricted distribution of zooplankton
correlates well with the area of the Medina River that is
known to receive organic enrichment from the Leon Creek
Sewage Treatment Plant.
Benthic macroinvertebrate communities within the segment
were very diverse. A total of 70 different taxa of benthic
organisms was encountered in the study. Composition of the
benthos at the various Medina River stations indicated a
definite relationship among organism type, diversity, and water
quality. Community structure of the benthos from stations
upstream from the influence of the Leon Creek Plant discharge
was composed of a very high diversity of primarily clean
water organisms considered intolerant to organic enrichment.
The benthic macroinvertebrate communities downstream from
the waste discharge were markedly different and characterized
by pollution tolerant organisms. Diversity of the communities
in this lower reach was lower, reflecting the fewer total
individuals and smaller number of different taxa.
Fecal coliform bacteria levels were generally low throughout
the segment. None of the stations sampled had fecal coliform
densities that exceeded the segment standard of 200/100 ml.
The Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant effluent did not contain
fecal coliform bacteria.
--- Page 10 ---
WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS
Chemical and biological parameters evaluated during this
survey indicate that excellent water quality conditions
prevail throughout most of Segment 1903 of the Medina River.
In the upper portion (65 miles) of the Segment, dissolved
oxygen levels are generally near saturation, oxygen demanding
materials and nutrient compounds are low in concentration,
and biological communities are diverse and composed of
organisms indicative of clean water.
The water quality conditions of the lower portion (7 miles)
of the Medina River are influenced by the treated sewage dis-
charge from the City of San Antonio's Leon Creek Plant.
This discharge tends to reduce natural dissolved oxygen
levels and increase the concentrations of nutrient compounds
in the river. Biological communities sampled from similar
habitats throughout the segment were less diverse and stable
in the lower portion than those located farther upstream and
were composed of organisms that favor organically enriched
waters. Degradation of biological communities in the lower
portion of the Medina River, as shown by this study, occurred
even though the dissolved oxygen levels were in excess of
the 5 mg/l stream standard. This indicates the waste discharge
apparently contained constituents, other than those analyzed
during this survey, that affected the aquatic organisms in
the lower reach of the Medina River.
Additional studies of the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant
effluent and the lower portion of the Medina River will be
conducted by the Special Studies Section. Parametric coverage
during these studies will be expanded to include pesticides,
metals, chlorine, chloramines and other suspected contaminants.
Data from such monitoring efforts will indicate if these
contaminants are routinely found in the waste discharge and
the Medina River at levels considered toxic to aquatic
organisms.
All of the existing water quality studies of the Medina River
and San Antonio River were conducted during periods when Mitchell
Lake was not discharging. Mitchell Lake is utilized by the City
of San Antonio as an oxidation pond to treat domestic wastes which
are diverted to the lake during mechanical or operational
failures at the City's Rilling Road and Leon Creek Sewage Treat-
ment Plants. The wastewater discharged from this lake typically
has a BODs in excess of 30 mg/l. A study of both river systems
should be conducted by the Special Studies Section during a
time when a discharge from Mitchell Lake is made. Existing
information indicates that this discharge may further aggrevate
water quality problems associated with both river systems.
--- Page 11 ---
METHODS
Field and laboratory procedures used during this survey are
described in Appendix A. The data were collected August 23-25,
1976, by the Special Studies Section, assisted by Texas Water
Quality Board District 8. Laboratory analyses of water samples
were conducted by the Texas Department of Health Resources,
Chemistry Laboratory in Austin, Texas. Parametric coverage,
sampling frequencies, and spatial relationships of sampling
stations are consistent with the particular objectives of this
survey and with known or suspected forms and variability of
pollution occurring in the area.
--- Page 12 ---
DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY AREA
The Medina River within Segment 1903 begins downstream of the
Medina Diversion Reservoir and flows in a southeasterly
direction approximately 72 miles through Medina and Bexar
counties to its confluence with the San Antonio River. Natural
stream flow within the segment is dependent upon the amount
of water released from Medina Lake, and that discharged from
numerous springs. In the upper portion of the segment, the
Medina River is characterized by clear water, swift velocity,
steep banks, and a stream channel in which large pool and
riffle areas predominate morphometry. The lower portion of
the Medina River is deeper, and slower moving, and the water
is more turbid.
Leon Creek and Medio Creek are the two largest tributaries
feeding the Medina River. Leon Creek is listed as a separate
segment (1906) by the Texas Water Quality Board. Other tri-
butaries of significance include San Geronimo Creek and Elm
Creek.
The land adjacent to the Medina River is utilized extensively
for cultivation of various agricultural crops. Many of the
farming operations along the segment withdraw water from the
Medina for irrigation purposes.
This survey included sampling stations in the mainstem of the
Medina River and on each flowing tributary. Figure 1 is a map
of the area which shows the locations of the sampling stations
and Table 1 provides descriptions of their locations.
--- Page 13 ---
A
a ae
ie Sed
*
‘\
--- Page 14 ---
Table 1
Medina River Sampling Stations
Station ; ;
Number Location
River at county road 6 miles NW of Riomedina
River at county road 2 miles NW of Riomedina
San Geronimo Creek at FM 1937
River at county road 2 miles NW of Castro-
ville
River at county road 2 miles SE of Castro-
ville
River at county road 1 mile E of La Coste
River at county road 3 miles E of La Coste
River at FM 1604 near Macdonna
River at FM 2536 3 miles SE of Macdonna
Medio Creek at IH-30
River at county road 4 miles NE of Sommerset
River at SH 16
Elm Creek at SH 16
River at Applewhite Road
Leon Creek at SH 16
River at Cassin Road
River at US 281
River at FM 1937
River on private property 1/2 mile upstream
from confluence with San Antonio River
--- Page 15 ---
WASTE SOURCES IN SURVEY AREA
POINT SOURCES
Table 2 contains a summary of all Texas Water Quality Board
permitted wastewater dischargers in the survey area (see
Figure 1 for locations). The values in Table 2 represent
estimates of average quantities discharged and were obtained
from Texas Water Quality Board self-reporting (1) and municipal
return flow (2) data.
Sewage treatment plants are the most common facilities from
which wastewater is discharged to this segment. Of the sewage
treatment plants that discharge, the City of San Antonio's
Leon Creek plant is the largest. The effluent from this
facility actually enters Leon Creek (Segment 1906) approximately
one mile above its confluence with the Medina River. Effluent
discharged from the Leon Creek sewage treatment plant contained
approximately 1455 lbs/day of BODs5 and 4925 lbs/day of nutrient
compounds (ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate nitrogen and ortho-
phosphorus).
Medio Creek receives the permitted wastewater discharges from
four small treatment plants (Bexar County WCID #16, Community
Treatment-Medio Creek Plant, Community Treatment-Hunt Lane
Plant, Lackland City Water Co.). In addition, a sewage treat-
ment plant (Station N, Figure 1) that treats a portion of
the domestic wastes generated at Lackland Air Force Base
discharges to Medio Creek. Since this is a federal installation,
no historical effluent data are available to the Texas Water
Quality Board.
10
--- Page 16 ---
Table 2
Wastewater Dischargers
Ortho- Ammonia+nitritet+
BODs Phosphate | nitrate nitrogen
lbs/day lbs/da lbs/days
te
Luckey, E. G.
Mitchell, O. R. Ranch
Knowlton Milk Farms
Harlach, Harold R.
Melcher Brothers
Bexar County WCID #16 36.8
Lackland City Water Co. 30.7
Community Treatment Inc. - 25.1
Community Treatment Inc. ‘i 9.6
Medina County WCID #1
City of Castroville STP
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
City of San Antonio, Leon 1786.4
Creek STP
City of San Antonio,
Mitchell Lake
ND - No discharge made from facilities during the survey.
All five of these plants serve various subdivisions in and
around the Lackland Air Force Base complex located near Medio
Creek.
The City of San Antonio also is allowed to periodically dis-
charge wastewater from Mitchell Lake to Cottonmouth creek which
enters the Medina River. Mitchell Lake is utilized by the
City of San Antonio as an oxidation pond to treat domestic
wastes which are diverted to the lake during mechanical or
operational failures at the City of San Antonio's Rilling Road
and Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plants. Wastewater is also
discharged to Mitchell Lake from the two plants following
periods of heavy rainfall when excessive infiltration upsets
operation. The City of San Antonio is permitted to discharge
from Mitchell Lake only when the water level in the lake is
high and the flow in the Medina River is sufficient. to provide
adequate dilution.
11
--- Page 17 ---
Approximately 18 discharges from Mitchell Lake have occurred
since 1970. Average duration of these discharges is 4 days
(range = 1-8 days) and average flow rate is 223 cubic feet
per second (range 14-900 cfs). The water in the lake typically
has a BODs5 in excess of 30 mg/l. Water quality data were
collected by the San Antonio River Authority from the Medina
and San Antonio Rivers during most of these discharges. These
data indicate that low dissolved oxygen levels (less than 5
mg/l) occurred in the San Antonio River during and following
the time some of the discharges were made from Mitchell Lake.
The dissolved oxygen levels in the river were lowest near Falls
City and may have been caused by the Mitchell Lake effluent. (3)
The Texas Water Quality Board permit for Mitchell Lake has
recently undergone revision. The new discharge guidelines
contained in the permit issued in January 1977 are based on
the water elevation in Mitchell Lake, the flow rate, water
temperature, and existing dissolved oxygen levels in the Medina
River. These guidelines were established from the modeling
efforts and waste load evaluation conducted by the Texas Water
Quality Board. Discharges made under the new guidelines should
not cause violations of the Texas Water Quality Standards.
Two additional permit holders farther upstream also operate
sewage treatment plants. The City of Castroville and Medina
County WCID #1 utilize their treated effluents for irrigation
purposes with no discharge made to the Medina River.
Two cattle feedlots, one swine feeding operation, and two
dairies are also located along the segment. Wastewater is
retained at these facilities and utilized for irrigation of
adjacent farmland with no discharge made to the Medina River.
NON-POINT SOURCES
There exists the possibility that varying amounts of wastewater
may enter the segment from non-point agricultural runoff since
most of the land along the Medina River is utilized for cul-
tivation of various farm crops. Additional sources such as
irrigation tailwaters, nonconfined livestock operations, and
malfunctioning rural septic tank systems have the potential
for wastewater contribution to the segment.
Non-point source studies are to be conducted in the lower
portion of the Medina River by the Alamo Area Council of
Governments as part of 208 planning activities. When these
studies are complete, the non-point source waste load contri-
bution to Segment 1903 will be computed.
12
--- Page 18 ---
PRESENTATION OF DATA
The raw hydrological, physico-chemical, and biological data
are available in the Texas Water Quality Board Central Office
files.
HYDROLOGICAL
Hydrological data shown in Table 3 represent discharge measure-
ments of the Medina River and tributary streams which were
flowing at the time of the survey. Flow data from Stations
12 and 17 were taken from United States Geological Survey
(USGS) records.
Table 3
Hydrological Data
Station Discharge
Location Numbe Method | Time Date cfs
San Geronimo Creek 08/23/76
Medio Creek 08/23/76
Medina River 08/23/76
Elm Creek 08/23/76
Leon Creek 08/23/76
Medina River 08/23/76
PM - Pygmy Current Meter
The majority of inflow to the Medina River within the segment
is supplied by Medio Creek and Leon Creek. The remaining
tributaries are small and contributed less than 3 cfs each.
All other tributaries feeding the Medina River were observed
in a non-discharging condition or at a level considered not
Significant. The increase in flow in the Medina River between
Stations 12 and 17 can be accounted for by the flow from Elm
Creek, Leon Creek, and the effluent from the Leon Creek Sewage
Treatment Plant which enter this reach.
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Table 4 contains a summary of diurnal field measurements made
at the appropriate Medina River stations on August 24, 1976.
Tributary Stations 10 (Medio Creek) and 15 (Leon Creek) were
also sampled on a diurnal basis. San Geronimo and Elm Creeks
were sampled once.
L3
--- Page 19 ---
OPE
a O14
(axa
os2 Ove » ppe
“PES “977 | “9EC
cee SEZ B89T | Gee
pee
“pce
Te?
ae |
vez OS pez
-S Te “FTE -O0ce “p0d
£2z ete lara Ete
"9
9
098 088 see
-0S8 -0SB -0z28
so| oe [oe
T's
“9°L
67k |
SEL
B8°L
s*Le
a A
T79e
6r
c98
G° Lz
“8° Pe
or9g
8
9Te
“pod
60
TOE 96T
“Pet ~98T
S°Le
“8° PE
ca
6L | eve | 6.| ore
S*L2 S"OE o°9e $°9¢
“GPE eLE PRG RS! LAB PS
T° 92 6° Be o*cz B°Se 92
z WY PT ET
dbs "aaj X2e820 ysorD
uos'T uo0e'Ty wta
ZaqUMN USTIEIS
AWTTenO weerqyg testy ePUuTpEW
Pp STUeL
fazouered
--- Page 20 ---
Temperature and pH values for Medina River and tributary sta-
tions, shown in Table 4, indicate some station to station
variation, but none were in violation of the respective segment
standards of 90°F and 7.0 - 9.0 standard pH units (4). The
slightly alkaline pH values for all the Medina River stations
may be partially explained by the underlying limestone for-
mations. With the exception of Medio Creek, alkalinity within
Segment 1903 was due totally to bicarbonates. The total
alkalinity values for the Medina River stations were similar
to those observed in the nearby San Antonio River (5) and
indicate the river has excellent buffering capacity. Conduc-
tivity values in the Medina River generally increased downstream.
Such downstream increases in conductivity are common in rivers,
like the Medina, that are utilized for irrigation (6). Repeated
irrigation and subsequent runoff tends to increase concentrations
of salts in the Medina River Basin.
The field dissolved oxygen data collected at the Medina River
stations indicated generally good water quality conditions
existed throughout most of the segment. Mean dissolved oxygen
levels remained above the 5.0 mg/l segment standard throughout the
diurnal sampling period. The City of San Antonio's Leon Creek
Sewage Treatment Plant discharge, which enters the Medina River
via Leon Creek immediately upstream from Station 16, caused
a slight depression in dissolved oxygen levels. The carbon-
aceous and nitrogenous oxygen demand of this wastewater reduced
the natural oxygen content from approximately 90 percent
saturation to less than 80 percent saturation at Stations 17,
18, and 19. Station 17 had the lowest minimum dissolved oxygen
level (4.9 mg/l) of any Medina River station sampled during the
survey.
Water quality data collected by the San Antonio River Authority
in November, 1975 from the Medina River shows the same trend
noted in the present study (7). According to their work, the
Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant waste discharge was observed
to reduce the oxygen content from a natural level of more than
90% dissolved oxygen saturation down to about 68% dissolved oxygen
saturation in the lower portion of the river. The lowest
dissolved oxygen level of 5.4 mg/l was observed at the U.S.
281 bridge location (Station 17 of this study).
Historical dissolved oxygen data collected by the Texas Water
Quality Board at Station 17 (US 281) indicate a seasonal trend
(Figure 2) (8). Dissolved oxygen levels at this station are
generally lowest in the dry summer months when low flows in
the river retard dilution of oxygen demanding material. Con-
versely, in the wetter winter months when the river flow is
higher, adequate dilution and oxygenation are provided and
dissolved oxygen levels remain near saturation. Although
several of the historical dissolved oxygen levels approach the
Texas Water Quality Standard of 5.0 mg/l, none fall below it.
L5
--- Page 21 ---
Dissolved Oxygen, mg/1
10
Stream Standard
MIJAS ONDJFMAMJ JASOND \FMAMJJ ASOND® FMAMJJASOND FMAMJJ
1973 1974 1975 1976
YEAR
Figure 2. Dissolved oxygen data collected at Station 17 on the Medina
River, May, 1972 through July, 1976.
Violations of the dissolved oxygen stream standard, although
not shown in the present study or historical data, have occurred
in the past. According to results of an earlier Intensive
Monitoring Survey of the San Antonio River in which Station
17 of the Medina River was sampled during low flow conditions,
the dissolved oxygen levels ranged between 3.6 mg/l and 4.0
mg/l during the 18-hour study (5).
16
--- Page 22 ---
Measured dissolved oxygen levels in the tributary streams are
also shown in Table 4. Water quality characteristics of San
Geronimo Creek, Medio Creek, Elm Creek, and Leon Creek upstream
from the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant discharge were
generally good where sampled.
Medio Creek was sampled just upstream from its confluence with
the Medina River. At this location, dissolved oxygen levels
were generally lower than those observed in the Medina River
and other tributaries. Medio Creek had the lowest minimum
dissolved oxygen level (4.6 mg/l) measured during the survey.
Flow in this creek is dominated by the treated sewage effluents
from five small plants located in the upper portion of the
basin. Medio Creek is dammed in the lower portion (2 miles
upstream from Medina River confluence) to form a small reser-
voir with an estimated 30 day detention time (9). A recent
water quality study of Medio Creek by Texas Water Quality
Board District 8 personnel indicated that upstream from the
reservoir, the stream is stressed from domination by treated
sewage effluents (9). The stream in this reach typically has
low dissolved oxygen levels, high BOD5 levels, and is enriched
with excessive nutrient compounds. The District 8 study
indicated that the reservoir functions similar to an oxi-
dation pond and that the creek downstream has generally good
water quality. Water quality data collected from Medio Creek
downstream from the reservoir in the District 8 study are
parallel to data collected during this Intensive Monitoring
Survey and indicate that the creek had recovered somewhat prior
to its confluence with the Medina River. The Medio Creek
discharge had no noticeable effects on the various field
physico-chemical parameters from the Medina River downstream
at Station 1l.
Leon Creek at Station 15 had generally good water quality
characteristics during this survey. Data collected ona
previous Intensive Monitoring Survey of Leon Creek in July
1974 indicated poor water quality conditions (low dissolved
oxygen, high BOD5 and ammonia nitrogen levels, etc.) existed
at the same location (10). Since the time of the earlier
study, two small sewage treatment plants (Southwest Utilities,
Inc., and Community Treatment, Inc.) have connected to the
City of San Antonio's sewage collection system. Presumably,
this reduction in organic load to Leon Creek has resulted in
the improved water quality observed during this survey.
WATER ANALYSES
Laboratory analyses of diurnally composited water samples
collected at the Medina River stations are shown in Table 5.
Medio Creek, Leon Creek, and the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment
Plant were also sampled on a diurnal basis. Grab water samples
were collected for analyses from the two other tributaries.
L7
--- Page 23 ---
'
wn on
ia
1
!
ea
=
airy
= ‘ usbos3TtN
OT E*T TueptTels
a ‘ usbor4TtN
L’v cP P'S P'Z s*e | S070 | a’? vr | PT'O € oe
@qeIIN
~~} —___|—- ueboz4TN
—- | Be"o £°O0 | LO'O T°O | z0"O> [z0"G> | zo°O>]z0°O> |! zo"o>| zo'o> | zo"O>| zo*O> |zo’o> | zo‘o>| zo'o>| zo"O>
ee eee = Ht 2 ee =i SITAIIN
z°0 £"0 : re ee ee : = z uesbOl231N
T°O>|] T"O> H T*O> z°0 T°O> T*O> T*O0> T'0> eTuoumry
s t— +—-— {—
UT 8070 |g0°O 60°O | OT"T | To"O | To*O |TO°O | ToO*O nazoydsoyd-a
1 + }- } eS
9T°T | 80°T so°o {g0°O | go*oO | 90°T es To*o> |To*o>| To-O>| To*o>| To‘o naoydsoyg-o
aa een eae = al a” sere ees
i] |
== T6 zst | 94 | SL TS 09 LS ap 6P ts | st aqeyTns
‘ ; a t
| | 89 | so | So SOT Le 6P Le | 96 | ad 6£ 96 | Ze SpTzoTYD
6t BT 4t | 8t | “WT St tT ° €T ed po EE oT; 6 | 8 € T/ou
dis ysarD yee! i ' yeerD | ; yeerD ‘zajouered
yeerid uoa'T wTta | | oTpeaw | owt uoUza
uoeT | } |
zequMN “uoTIeIS
sasATeuy Jaqjem Azoqeroqey
S 8T4PL
--- Page 24 ---
Chloride and sulfate levels for all the Medina River stations
were generally low and below the segment standard of 120 mg/l
(annual averages) for both parameters (4). Levels for these
two parameters, like the conductivity data, increased downstream
from Station 1. Historical Texas Water Quality Board Stream
Monitoring data indicate the observed downstream increase in
chloride and sulfate levels is common, particularly during
summertime conditions (8). In the Medina River, some of the
added volume is return flow from irrigation which has an in-
creased mineral content due to evaporation. Leon Creek, the
Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant discharge, and Elm Creek
also contributed significant quantities of sulfate and chloride
to the Medina River.
Ortho-phosphorus levels were low (less than 0.02 mg/l) in the
upper portion of the Medina River upstream from the influence
of treated sewage effluents. Medio Creek which receives the
treated sewage effluents from five small plants discharged
water high in phosphorus (1.06 mg/l O-PO4 and 1.1 mg/l T-POqg)
to the Medina River. This discharge increased phosphorus
concentrations in the Medina River downstream at Stations ll,
12, and 14. The largest source of phosphorus input to the
Medina River was the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant effluent.
This discharge contained high levels of ortho (5.8 mg/l) and
total (6.0 mg/l) phosphorus. The highest phosphorus levels
in the Medina River were observed at Stations 16, 17, 18, and
19, and were obviously influenced by the introduction of the
treated sewage effluent from the City of San Antonio's Leon
Creek plant via Leon Creek. The high levels observed at these
lower four stations were considerably above the 0.9 mg/l ortho
phosphorus level considered by Connell to cause excessive bio-
growth and decay in Texas streams (11).
The same general areas that had high nutrient phosphorus loads
attributable to discharges of treated sewage effluents also
had high nitrogen levels. Since ammonia nitrogen is a common
constituent of most treated municipal sewage effluents, its
occurrence within the segment correlated well with areas that
receive effluents. Ammonia nitrogen levels were low and not
detectable in samples from Medina River Stations 1 through 14.
Ammonia nitrogen concentration was highest at Station 16 (0.7
mg/l); however, Stations 17, 18, and 19 also had detectable
levels. These ammonia nitrogen levels were obviously influenced
by the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant effluent which was
high in ammonia (4.2 mg/l). The downstream gradual decrease
in ammonia from Station 16 may be attributed to nitrification
in the river. The oxidation of ammonia to nitrite and on to
nitrate may partially explain the lower dissolved oxygen levels
in the lower portion of the Medina River since nitrification
is an oxygen consuming process.
19
--- Page 25 ---
The occurrence of nitrite nitrogen in the segment was restricted
to the lower four stations. The presence of nitrite nitrogen
indicates recent sewage pollution (12). These nitrite nitrogen
levels may be attributed to nitrification of ammonia nitrogen
in the treated sewage effluent which enters the river in this
area.
Of the tributaries sampled, only Medio Creek (Station 10) con-
tained a detectable level of ammonia nitrogen. This tributary
receives the treated sewage effluents from five small plants.
The presence of ammonia nitrogen in this creek suggests that
nitrification was occurring and may partially account for the
lower dissolved oxygen level observed at this station.
Nitrate nitrogen levels in the Medina River generally increased
downstream from Station 1. Nitrate nitrogen levels in the
river were apparently influenced by return flow from irrigation
and from spring water sources. San Geronimo Creek (Station 3),
a small spring fed stream, had the highest nitrate concentration
(14.2 mg/l). High nitrate levels (above 4.0 mg/l) were ob-
served at Medina River Stations 16, 17, 18, and 19 -- the area
where nitrification was occurring. It is in this form that
nitrogen is most easily assimilated by green plants rooted in
the substrate or floating in the water (13).
Levels for BODs throughout the segment were generally low.
The introduction of the Leon Creek Plant's treated sewage
effluent increased the BOD of the Medina River only slightly.
Nonetheless, this slight increase in biochemical oxygen demand
may partially explain the somewhat lower dissolved oxygen
levels observed in this reach.
During an intensive monitoring survey of the San Antonio River
in September, 1975, the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant was
discharging an effluent which contained high levels of oxygen
demanding materials (NH3-N of 18 mg/l and BODs5 of 30 mg/1).
The carbonaceous and nitrogenous oxygen demand of this effluent
depressed dissolved oxygen levels in the lower portion of the
Medina River below 4 mg/l throughout the study. During the
present study, the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant discharged
an effluent containing ‘much lower concentrations of ammonia
nitrogen (4.2 mg/l) and BOD, (5 mg/l). This large decrease
in load of oxygen demanding materials to the Medina River was
partially responsible for the significant increase in dissolved
oxygen levels noted between the studies.
SEDIMENT ANALYSES
The swift velocity and limestone bedrock underlying the Medina
River within the segment are factors that combine to prohibit
accumulation of sediment. The bottom of the stream channel at
each sampling station consisted of solid rock or gravel. For
this reason, sediment samples were not collected.
20
--- Page 26 ---
BIOLOGICAL
Chlorophyll a
a)
Chlorophyll a analyses were utilized to provide an estimate
of the relative amount of algal standing crop that was present
at all stations sampled. Chlorophyll a levels from the Medina
River and tributary stations were generally below the detec-
tion limit (Table 6). Only Stations 10 (Medio Creek), 15 (Leon
Creek), and 19 had detectable levels of chlorophyll a and they
were slightly above the detection limit. The chlorophyll a
data indicate that planktonic algae growth and proliferation
was not stimulated anywhere within the segment. Apparently,
the swift velocity of the Medina River prohibits a buildup
of algal biomass.
Table 6
Chlorophyll a Data
Station Chlorophyll a,
Number mg/1
<0.004
San Geronimo Creek
Medio Creek
-
Elm Creek
Leon Creek
Phytoplankton
Phytoplankton assemblages were generally diverse at most Medina
River stations (Table 7). A total of 11 taxa was encountered
from samples collected between Stations 1 and 19. Diatoms
were the only type of phytoplankton observed in samples from
Stations 1, 4, and 6 in the extreme headwaters of the segment.
21
--- Page 27 ---
The phytoplankton communities at Stations 8, 11, and 14 were
also dominated by various diatom taxa. Four diatom phytoplank-
ters (Achnanthes, Synedra, Navicula, and Cymbella) were
prevalent at most stream stations.
The phytoplankton communities downstream (Stations 16 ,- 18;
19) from the City of San Antonio's Leon Creek Sewage Treatment
Plant discharge, as shown by diversity index (d) values, were
less diverse than those upstream. Although various diatom
genera were observed at these stations, Aphanizomenon dominated
the communities. The distribution of this pollution-tolerant
blue-green alga was restricted to the lower three stations.
The discharge of treated sewage effluent high in nutrient
compounds from the City of San Antonio's Leon Creek Plant
apparently was responsible for the occurrence of this organism
within this reach of the river.
Standing crop values were low at all stations and correlated
well with chlorophyll a levels observed at the Medina River
stations. Only Station 19 had a standing crop value over 200
individuals/ml.
Table 7
Phytoplankton Data
Station Number
cpepe pe [ul wpa pepe
Total Number of 91 | 117 | 169 1130 |143| 143 | 143 }182 | 260
Individuals/ml
Diversity Index (d) 2.5|2.5]2.5 |2.5 2-5 2.5 [1-8 1.8 |2.0
_ eS eee
CHLOROPHYTA (Green Algae
39 26 13
13 26
Scenedesmus 26
Pandorina
CHRYSOPHYTA (Diatoms)
13 13 13 13 13
39 26 13 1.3
13 13 26 26
i3 39 13 26
26 26
Achnanthes 26 13 13
Synedra . 13 39 39 26
Navicula 13 26 39 26
Cymbella 13 13 39 | 26
Ammoneis 26 26 13
Gomphonema : 13
Diatoma
Pleurosigma
13 ,
13
CYANOPHYTA (Blue-green
Algae)
Aphanizomenon
22
--- Page 28 ---
In the upper portion of the segment where the water is very
‘clear, phytoplankton growth and proliferation is apparently
limited by very low concentrations of phosphorus (nitrate is
abundant throughout the segment) and swift velocity of the
river. Further downstream in the middle and lower portions
of the segment where the water is influenced by treated sewage
effluents, phosphorus and turbidity levels are much higher.
Even though adequate nutrients are available, the turbidity
and swift velocity of the Medina River apparently act together
to limit accumulation of phytoplankton in these areas.
Zooplankton
Zooplankton occurrence and distribution was restricted to the
three lowermost Medina River stations sampled (Table 8).
Standing crop values for these three stations were low.
Diversity within the zooplankton communities, as shown by
diversity index values (d), was low reflecting the small numbers
of different taxa collected at each station.
The two genera of rotifers encountered during this study feed
principally on periphyton, small plankton organisms, and det-
ritus; however, they ingest all organic particles of appropriate
size (14). Their restricted distribution correlates well with
the area of the Medina River that is known to receive organic
enrichment from the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant.
Table 8
Zooplankton Data
cmmmr [2] + fe) e[=fe[=[™[ =
Standing Crop
[aeteat mar/ucer| | ¢ [> | o | of of 97 fos | se
vest meer @ ||| ||| oa eas [a |
Organisms as
Ind. /Liter
ROTIFER
Keratella a 24 114 17
Keratella b 3
Brachionus 10 32 ll
COPEPODA
Immature copepods 3 8 8
a3
--- Page 29 ---
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
A total of 70 different benthic macroinvertebrate taxa was
identified from samples collected from similar habitats at
the appropriate Medina River stations during this study
(Table 9). This assemblage of benthic fauna from the Medina
River is the most diverse of any Texas stream studied as part
of the Intensive Surface Water Monitoring Survey Program to
data (30 different streams have been studied under this pro-
gram).
The results of the benthic macroinvertebrate identifications
and counts from samples collected at the appropriate Medina
River stations show a definite relationship among organism
type, diversity, and water quality. Composition of the benthos
consisted predominately of mayflies, caddisflies, dragonflies,
dobsonflies, and clams at Stations 1 through 14 upstream from
the influence of the City of San Antonio's Leon Creek Plant
discharge. Such organisms are generally considered intolerant
to organic enrichment (15). Diversity within the benthic
macroinvertebrate communities of Stations 1 through 14 was
generally high. Stations 1, 4, 5, and 11 had diversity index
values (d) above 3.0, which is the level considered indicative
of clean water (16). Diversity at Station 14 was depressed
by large numbers of Paraleptophlebia, a mayfly which is
generally associated with clean water.
The community structure of the benthos observed from samples
collected from Stations 16, 18, and 19, which were influenced
by the City of San Antonio's treated sewage effluent, was
markedly different from that upstream. At these downstream
stations, the benthic macroinvertebrate communities were
dominated by oligochaete worms and fly larvae which are con-
sidered pollution tolerant (15). The benthic communities
at the three lowermost stations were characterized by fewer
total individuals and number of different taxa than those
located upstream. Many of the benthic fauna associated with
the clean water upstream stations were virtually absent from
those located in the lower portion of the river. Diversity
index values were lower (2.0 - 2.2) and considered indicative
of moderately polluted water (16).
--- Page 30 ---
Station Raber Petey
Number of Taxa
Number of Individuals/ft?
Diversity Index (4d)
TURBELLARIA (Planarians)
Dugesia
NEMATODA (Roundworms)
Plectidae
Table 9
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Data
25
373
s.1
OLIGOCHAETA (Aquatic earthworms)
Oligochaeta A
Oligochaeta B
Tubificidae
EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies)
Isonychia
Centroptilum
Habrophelbiodes
Caneis
Paraleptophlebia
Baetis
Habrophlebia
Emphemerella
Choroterpes
Heptagenia
Leptohyphes
Tricorythodes
ODONATA (Dragonflies)
Nannothemis
Agrion
Coenagrionidae
Gomphus
Nannothemis bella
Libelludidae
Octogomphus
Peltodytes
Erythrodiplax
Libellula
Dromogomphus
Erythemis
42
16
TL
PHN Bb
ace
3.4
22
24
f9
46
25
203
3.5
13
159 158
2,5 3.1
2
51
58 9 132
2 A
12 13
6
6
1
5
2
1
1
10 8 7 6
--- Page 31 ---
Table 9 (Cont.)
Organisms
HEMIPTERA (True bugs)
Cryphocricos 10 3
Rhagouelia 18
Ambrysus
Pelocoris
MEGALOPTERA (Dobsonflies)
Corydalus cornutus 5 22 13 12
TRICOPTERA (Caddis flies)
Hydropsyche 146 aa 18 5
Rhyacophila 6 |
Hydropsychidae 15 |
Parapsyche 3 2
Ptilostomis 1
Smicridea
|
LEPIDOPTERA (Aquatic catapillars)
Elophila 4 3 Z
COLEOPTERA (beetles)
Stenelmis 4 5 6
Gerris 1
Limnius 1
Elsianus
Narpus 5
Ancyronxx
Brychius |
Psephenus 4
Dineutus
Lara
Elmidae 1
=
Rw oO
DIPTERA (flies)
N
=
Simulium 7
Metriocnemus 61
Tabanus 2
Tedipes tentans
Tendipididae A
Tendipididae B
Procladius
Coelotanypus
Pelopiinae
tN
--- Page 32 ---
Station Number
Organisms
GASTROPODA (Snails)
Horatia nicra
Cochliopa
Hydrobia
Amnicolidae
PELECYPODA (Clams)
Corbicula
Atoperla
Amblema
Sphaerium
Table 9 (Cont.)
--- Page 33 ---
Bacteria
A summary of analyses for fecal coliform bacteria is shown
in Table 10. The Texas Water Quality Board's permissible and
desirable fecal coliform levels are based on not less than
five samples collected over not more than 30 days (4). Since
the data collected during this survey are based on grab samples,
direct comparison of these data cannot be made with the Texas
Water Quality Board Standards. However, none of the stations
sampled had fecal coliform densities that exceeded the segment
standard of 200/100 ml. The absence of fecal coliform bacteria
in the effluent from the Leon Creek Sewage Treatment Plant
indicates chlorine application was sufficient to be bactericidal.
Table 10
Fecal Coliform Data
Fecal Coliform
#/100 ml
Station Number
San Geronimo Creek
wort nubWNE
Medio Creek
Elm Creek
Leon Creek
28
--- Page 34 ---
RELATED TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD ACTIVITIES
Several activities presently underway by the Texas Water
Quality Board have direct influence on the protection of the
water quality of this portion of the Medina River.
WASTE LOAD EVALUATION
A waste load evaluation was developed for the San Antonio
River (Segment 1901) by the Modeling and Engineering Analyses
Section of the Texas Water Quality Board on June 25, 1974.
This evaluation also included water quality data from Segments
1906 (Leon Creek) and 1903 (Medina River). This evaluation was
developed to show the relationships among various municipal
and industrial organic loadings, stream assimilative capacity,
and affect on stream standards of these three segments. This
evaluation applies only to oxygen consuming substances being
discharged from the various treatment plants and does not
consider the effect of eutrophication caused by the introduction
of nutrients. The waste load evaluation recommended that the
City of San Antonio's three large plants should be required
to provide a treatment process with the following effluent
limits and monthly averages to assure compliance with the
Texas Water Quality Standards:
BODS
NH3-N
5 mg/l
3 mg/l
Wil
Based on these recommendations, the effluent requirements (BOD5,
TSS = 20 mg/l) of the existing discharge permit for the Leon
Creek Plant have been changed to a BOD5 and total suspended
solids level of 5 mg/l and an ammonia nitrogen level of 3 mg/l.
The permit indicates that these new requirements will become
effective in November, 1977.
TWOB PERMITS AND REGISTRATIONS; NPDES PERMITS
All wastewater dischargers and confined feeding operations are
required to have a permit or registration from the Texas Water
Quality Board, as well as an NPDES Permit (National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System) Permit from the Environmental
Protection Agency. These documents place restrictions on the
quantity and quality of wastewater that can be released to the
receiving stream.
COMPLIANCE MONITORING
Personnel from the Texas Water Quality Board District 8 Office
in San Antonio will make periodic inspections of all waste sources
29
--- Page 35 ---
in the segment to confirm that the quality of effluent and
retention facilities are in compliance with the Texas Water
Quality Board Permits and the NPDES Permits.
STREAM MONITORING
Personnel from the Texas Water Quality Board District 8 Office
will continue to monitor water quality of Segment 1903 at Station
17 and at US 90 in Castroville, on a quarterly basis. These
are Texas Water Quality Board stream monitoring Stations 1903.01
and 1903.02, respectively.
30
--- Page 36 ---
10.
Ld
12.
13.
REFERENCES CITED
Texas Water Quality Board. 1975. Self reporting data.
Texas Water Quality Board Central Files, Austin, Texas.
Texas Water Quality Board. 1975. Municipal and industrial
return flow data. Texas Water Quality Board Central Files,
Austin, Texas.
San Antonio River Authority. 1976. Unpublished water quality
data from the Medina and San Antonio Rivers. San Antonio
River Authority, San Antonio, Texas.
Texas Water Quality Board. 1975. Texas water quality
standards. Texas Water Quality Board Central Files, Austin,
Texas.
Texas Water Quality Board. 1975. Intensive surface water
monitoring survey of the San Antonio River (Segment 1901).
Texas Water Quality Board, Central Files, Austin, Texas.
Whittington, Dick and Steve Twidwell. 1975. Raw water
quality management. In Manual of Water Utility Operations.
Texas Water Utilities, Austin, Texas.
San Antonio River Authority. 1976. Water quality modeling
data. Part 3 - Segment 1903 - Medina River Survey. San
Antonio River Authority, San Antonio, Texas.
Texas Water Quality Board. 1975. Stream monitoring data.
Texas Water Quality Board Central Files, Austin, Texas.
Texas Water Quality Board. 1975. Medio Creek survey -
Bexar County. Texas Water Quality Board Central Files,
Austin, Texas.
Texas Water Quality Board. 1976. Intensive surface water
monitoring survey of Leon Creek (Segment 1906). Texas
Water Quality Board Central Fiels, Austin, Texas.
Connell, C. H. 1972. Phosphates in Texas rivers. Environ-
mental Health Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch,
Galveston, Texas.
Hann, Roy W. Jr. 1972. Fundamental aspects of water quality
Management. Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M
University, College Station, Austin.
Reid, G. K. 1961. Ecology of inland waters and estuaries.
Reinhold Book Corporation, New York. 375 p.
32
--- Page 37 ---
H Bo
16.
Kemp. L. W., W. M. Ingram, and K. M. Mackenthun. 1966.
The role of bottom-dwelling macrofauna in water pollution
investigations. U.S. Public Health Service Publ…