(1958) Fisheries Survey of Buffalo Lakes, Lubbock, Texas
Open PDFExtracted Text
--- Page 1 ---
Marion Toole
Coordinator
Report of Fisheries Investigations
Fisheries Survey of Buffalo Lakes, Lubbock, Texas
by
Leo D. Lewis
Project Leader
H. D. Dodgen - Executive Secretary
Texas Game and Fish Commission
Austin, Texas
Kenneth C. Jurgens & William H. Brown
Assistant Coordinators
--- Page 3 ---
Supplemental Report
State of TEXAS
Name; Fisheries Investigations and Surveys
of the Waters of Region I-B.
Title: Fisheries Survey of Buffalo Lakes,
Lubbock, Texas.
Abstract:
A total of 13 species, representing five families of freshwater fish, was collected
from Buffalo Lakes for study. Data concerning relative abundance, food habits, sexual
development, coefficient of condition and pathological conditions were recorded, and,
as far as possible, reduced to tabular form.
Though all species present were found to be in good condition, Buffalo Lakes contain
an excessive population of carpsucker and black bullhead catfish.
Remedial recommendations included complete eradication of the existing fish popula-
tion in all three lakes as well as their headwater stream and impoundments, and restocking
with a balanced ratio of game and forage fishes. It was also recommended to drop water
leveIs as low as possible prior to treatment to permit reduction in cost of treatments,
conditioning of the lake bottoms, and construction of fishing piers, boat docks, fish
shelters, spawning beds for bottom-nesting game fishes, and seining beaches for future
surveys and rough fish controls.
Fishing should be prohibited for at least one year after restocking. Another fish-
eries survey will be conducted prior to continuation of fishing to determine growth and
condition of the stocked fish, and to determine future requirements to maintain good
fishing in Buffalo Lakes.
Ob jectives:
To conduct a fisheries investigation in an effort to determine species present,
their relative abundance, condition, stage of gonadal development, and other data upon
which to base recommendations for improving the fishery of the lake.
Techniques:
Field work on this job was done on April 21 and 22, 1958. Approximately 2400
feet of gill nets were set ranging in size from one inch to three inch square mesh for
a single night set. Each fish taken in these nets was measured, weighed, and the stage
of gonadal development recorded. Filled stomachs of predacious species were saved in
formalin and their contents later identified in the laboratory. Check seining was done
— 20 foot minnow seine (1/8 inch mesh), and a 100 foot nylon drag seine (1/2 inch
mesh).
--- Page 4 ---
Physical data, including air temperature, water temperature and turbidity were
recorded at the lake. Water samples were saved for a chemical analysis in the laboratory.
Findings:
The waters under study consist of three lakes in a series, situated on the Double
Mountain Fork of the Brazos River, approximately twelve miles southeast of Lubbock,
Lubbock County, Texas. Buffalo Lakes are under operating control of the Lubbock County
Water Control and Improvement District Number 1. The three lakes and the surrounding
land comprise a recreation area for fishing, boating, swimming and camping. Fees charged
for use of this recreational area are as follows;
General admission = = = -===-s-s2-s-ee2e6 $ .25 per person
Daily fishing permit \-= == 22ss-s+2-e58 6 1.00 per day
Boat admission = = === 22-22 = 2 22 =] 1.00 per day
Annual fishing permit = - - = = -=-2s-2-+e-. 20.00 per person
Physical Characteristics
The upper lake, No. 1, is the larger with an estimated volume of 630 acre feet. It
has an uncontrolled spillway 63 feet long at the right end of the dam and a 6-inch pipe
with valve at the left end. The middle lake, No. 2, contains an estimated 140 acre feet
of water. It has an uncontrolled spillway 25 feet long at the right end of the dam, an
18-inch corrugated iron culvert pipe with valve at the right end, and a 10-inch cast-
iron pipe and valve at the left end of the dam. The third lake, No. 3, is the smaller
with an estimated volume of 133 acre feet. Controlled releases are permitted through the
dam by a as inch cast-iron pipe and valve and a 12-inch corrugated iron pipe with valve.
An uncontrolled service spillway 50 feet long has been excavated in rock on the right
bank, and an uncontrolled emergency spillway, 60 feet long, has been excavated in earth
on the left bank.
Figure 1. (aerial photograph) shows the lakes as they now exist. Dotted lines
indicate a proposed new development which will incorporate the three lakes into one large
lake. The main purpose of this survey is to determine the status of the fishery of the
three lakes so that remedial recommendations can be carried out before impounding the
larger lake.
According to a study made by the U. S. Geological Survey between March 4, 1952,
and March 18, 1954, the lakes store enough flood water to remain practically full most
of the time. Measurements of inflow to the upper Buffalo Lake indicate a fairly de-
pendable supply of about 2 c.f.s. from headwater springs and seeps. According to the
conclusions of their study, it appears that the inflow from springs and seeps is suffi-
cient to offset evaporation and transpiration losses under conditions existing during
the two year period of their investigation.
In addition to headwater seeps and springs, there are several springs and seep
areas along the banks and in the beds of the lakes. Engineers have estimated the flow
of springs at the rock house (Lake No. 2) at 350 gallons per ‘minute. Estimates on flow
of the other springs and seeps are not available, but they probably contribute greatly
to the water supply of Buffalo Lakes.
--- Page 5 ---
Water Quality
The collecting bottle containing Buffalo Lake water was broken in transit, and
the sample was lost before it could be analyzed. However, records of complete chemical
analysis of Buffaio Lake water were maintained by the U. S. Geological Survey during
their two year investigation. This information is given in Table l.
Fish Collections
A total of 13 species, representing five families of fresh-water fish, was taken
from Buffalo Lakes during the survey. Gill nets collected 567 fish, totaling 590.7
pounds, which included eight species. Seine drags with a 20-foot minnow seine and a
100-foot drag seine, produced five species that were not present in gill nets. Fishes
taken by seining were too numerous to save and work into the data, however, field
counts were made and relative abundance of species noted. Table 2 shows the percentage
composition by numbers and weights of fish collected by gill nets. Table 3 shows the
relative abundance of species collected by both netting and seining. Table 4 shows the
number and percent of number of fish taken by gill nets in each of the three lakes, as
well as the combined total. The check list of species present in Buffalo Lakes is as
follows:
Catostomidae (suckers and buffalofishes)
Carpiodes carpio = river carpsucker. This species presents a serious problem to the
fishery of Buffalo Lakes, and the reduction of its numbers would be highly beneficial.
It made up 37.9 percent of the total number and 95.28 percent of the total weight of
fishes taken in gill nets and processed for data.
Cyprinidae (shiners and minnows)
Notemigonus crysoleucas = golden shiner. This large minnow is common in the lakes. Not
only was it taken in seine collections, but it comprised 6.1 percent of the total taken
by gill nets.
Notropis lutrensis ~ redhorse shiner. This very common minnow of Texas waters is very
abundant in Buffalo Lakes and was represented in every seine drag made during the survey.
Pimephales promelas ~ fathead minnow. This species was taken in seine collections, but
is considered rare in Buffalo Lakes.
Ameiuridae (freshwater catfishes)
Ictalurus punctatus - channel catfish. This was the most abundant game fish found in
the lakes. It constituted only 2.3 percent of the total collected by gill nets.
Ictalurus melas = black bullhead. Comprising 42.5 percent of the total, this is the
most abundant species taken by gill nets. Control measures to reduce the bullhead popu-
lation is needed to improve the fishery of Buffalo Lakes.
Poeciliidae (mosquitofish)
Gambusia affinis » common mosquitofish. Rare in Buffalo Lakes.
--- Page 6 ---
Centrarchidae (black basses and sunfishes)
Micropterus salmoides ~- largemouth black bass. Fingerlings of this very popular game
fish were common in seine collections, however, only five were taken in gill nets,
comprising 0.9 percent of the total.
Lepomis cyanellus - green sunfish. Considered as rare in Buffalo Lakes. Only one was
taken in gill nets, very few in seine collections.
Lepomis microlophus - redear sunfish. Rare.
Lepomis macrochirus - bluegill sunfish. The most abundant sunfish present in seine
collections and the third most abundant species taken in gill nets.
Lepomis humilis ~ orangespotted sunfish. Common.
Pomoxis annularis = white crappie. Rare. Only two were taken in gill nets and very few
in seine collections.
Coefficient of Condition
"K" factors were determined for all carpsucker, channel catfish, black bass and
crappie collected in gill nets. Each fish was measured, weighed, and the stage of gonadal
development recorded, in an effort to determine condition of fishes present in Buffalo
Lakes as compared to those in other lakes in the region. Table 5 shows the comparison
of "K" factors for fishes collected from Buffalo Lakes with those collected from Lake
Eddleman, Lake Diversion and Buffalo Lake (near Umbarger). All species collected from
Buffalo Lakes were found to be in good condition.
Food Habits
Food remains were found in stomachs of six specimens; 2 black bass, 2 channel
catfish and 2 black bullhead. Table 6 presents a complete analysis on food remains
of all stomachs taken. Black bass and channel catfish fed exclusively on fish. Stomachs
of black bullhead contained snails, freshwater shrimp, insect larva, fish eggs, algae,
and plant fiber.
Sexual Development
Gonads of all channel catfish collected were immature. The only other immature
individuals recorded were two carpsuckers. One female carpsucker was found to be
half-spent, apparently being captured during the process of spawning. All other carp-
suckers, as well as black bass and crappie were ripe and in spawning condition.
Pathological Conditions
No evidence of disease, parasites or other abnormalities was found on any of the
fishes collected and examined during the survey. However, one crappie possessed rather
--- Page 7 ---
peculiar markings. A black band approximately 1/8 inch starting under its lower lip
and continuing up over the head and back to the dorsal fin, terminating on the last of
the spiny rays of that fin. It was taken from the lower lake.
Discussion and Recommendations:
The primary purpose of this survey was to determine condition of the fishery at
Buffalo Lakes, and what, if anything, should be done before impounding the larger lake.
Results of the survey disclosed an overpopulation of rough fish (80.4 percent).
Carpsucker and black bullhead represented 37.9 percent and 42.5 percent, respectively,
of the total number taken in gill nets. Game fish, including channel catfish, black
bass and crappie, comprised only 3.5 percent of the total. Forage species, including
golden shiner and sunfishes, made up the remaining 16.1 percent.
The most outstanding problems at Buffalo Lakes are the over-abundant carpsucker
and bullhead populations, which should definitely be eliminated before impounding the
new lake. At the present time, there is no selective-control for these species. There-
fore, it follows that the entire fish population must be removed and the lake restocked
with a proper ratio of game and forage fishes.
In order to increase the possibility of eliminating the undesirable species in
Buffalo Lakes, it will be necessary to treat the tributary stream and its impoundments
on the V8 Ranch. The lake on the Johnson Rancr, located below the proposed new dam,
should also be treated if permission can be obtsined to do so.
Dropping the water levels of all three lakes as low as possible prior to treatment
will be highly beneficial. Not only will it reduce cost of treatment, but exposing the
lake bottom to sunlight and fresh air will condition and increase its fertility. Drop-
ping the water level, especially in the upper lake, will also provide opportunities to
construct fishing piers, boat docks, fish shelters, spawning beds for bottom-nesting game
fishes, and to clean seining beaches for future surveys and rough fish controls.
If the lakes are treated and restocked, as recommended, fishing should be prohibited
for one year. After the stocked fish nave had an opportunity to spawn during the spring
following stocking, another fisheries survey will be conducted to determine the most
feasible time to resume fishing in Buffalo Lakes.
Prepared by _ Leo D. Lewis _... Approved by Cpt ew Sf ge ;
Project Leader Director Inland Fisheries Division
Date July 8, 1959.
--- Page 8 ---
Table 1. Water Quality of Buffalo Lakes, Lubbock, Texas.
Pe o _ Hardness
& =~ i . a - as CaCo3
8 & & 3 8 => 8 DR 3
- ~ 8 22 g@27 288 > 8SGe Fr 3 :
ra @o rl lomm®) Oo 09] ~ —“~ — oO oO oO Fy Oo n p
(2) u ie) oO & pal oO oS hd wn ~~ ~ Bi ow
oO | oe wa ~ § a+ 3) oO — ~ Le] Sg
ae) on Ori © ~ Oo ~ gd oO o o °
3 4 yO ‘nal © 5 Of go g a Pc) a — ~p bi q
oO So va tN ro) Da! (9) s ) & {‘s) u uu <3) oO ec oO
@ Qu m4 oon ae oO S A 8 Q w w Oo ce) Ba 79) oO oO
Pp =| @O ° oo ca a tet) Oo SD hy 3) ca co 3 ~P na Pp g
[a] o (ORS) is ad p al ow g 0 ed ( oa 3 a co oo a (e) ie}
A A a fon Qo @ un o na oO AQ io) o Fes ze A ca =
Mar. 4, 1952 46 2.35 8.2 2,320 2.6 63 132 250 0 390 421 335 5.0 2.0 1,400 700 380
Apr. 3, 1952 58 1.88 8.5 2,940 10.0 84 lke 321 14 363 503 458 1.0 1,710 794 472
Apr. 30, 1952 69 22.5 8.6 2,230 7.4 ho 131 248 17 307 430 318 2.0 1,340 638 358
June 10, 1952 81 0.12
July 2, 1952 73 0.22
Aug. 5, 1952 83 0.18 8.5 2,200 43.0 40 12h 2h7 17 324 371 328 4.8 1,330 610 316
Sept. 3, 1952 75 0.29 8.4 2,170 38.0 42 123 245 13 367 352 320 5.8 1,320 611 289
Oct. 6, 1952 64 0.50 8.4 2,240 29.0 62 127 2h8 14 423 375 320 5.6 1,390 676 306
Nov. 5, 1952 58 0.61 8.4 2,230 30.0 62 128 247 16 426 373 318 5.8 1,390 681 306
Dec. 2, 1952 iz 3.20 8.5 2,400 12.0 ko bh 282 18 344 475 355 4.8 1,500 697 385
Mar. 4, 1953 50 4.37 8.6 2,560 6.0 48 153 290 22 367 494 370 9.0 1,570 749 412
Apr. 14, 1953 60 2.02 8.5 2,620 7.7 50 158 296 22 375 516 375 11.0 1,620 774 430
June 10, 1953 0.25 8.4 2,570 129 266 17 473 430 372 =~ 4.5 1,590 812 396
Aug. 3, 1953 88 0.21 8.5 3,040 19.0 52 189 371 24 406 645 460 6.4 5.8 1,970 906 534
Sept. 10, 1953 64 0.13 8.4 2,490 36.0 58 147 287 18 471 371 388 5.2 12.0 1,550 7Th9 333
Nov. 30, 1953. 52 1.96 1,850 14.0 324 238 1.5
Jan. 21, 1954 38 1.83 8.4 2,050 8.6 47 114 227 14 327 372 282 4.8 1,230 586 294
Mar. 18, 1954 47 1.88 8.5 2,350 6.8 49 138 279 17 371 483 325 3.5 1,480 690 358
Percent sodium
--- Page 9 ---
Table 2. Percentage Composition by Numbers and Weights of Fish Collected by
Gill Nets from Buffalo Lakes, Inc.
Species
Carpsucker
Golden shiner
Channel catfish
Black bullhead
Black bass
Green sunfish
Bluegill sunfish
White crappie
Totals
Number
215
a8
13
241
99
567
% of Number
37-9
6.1
2.3
42.5
0.9
0.2
9-7
0.4
100.0
Weight (lbs.)
562.8
Not worked up
9.7
Not worked up
17.7
Not worked up
Not worked up
0.5
990.7
% of Weight
95.28
0.08
100.00
--- Page 10 ---
Table 3. Relative Abundance of Species Taken by Seine
Common Name
Carpsucker
Black bass
Black bullhead
Bluegill sunfish
Green sunfish
Orangespotted sunfish
Redear sunfish
Redhorse shiner
Fathead minnow
Golden shiner
Mosquitofish
Channel catfish
Crappie
Buffalo Lakes, Inc.
Scientific Name
Carpiodes carpio
Micropterus salmoides
Ameiurus melas
Lepomis macrochirus
Lepomis cyanellus
Lepomis humilis
Lepomis microlophus
Notropis lutrensis
Pimephales promelas
Notemigonus crysoleucas
Gambusia
Ictalurus punctatus
Pomoxis annularis
s and Gill Nets in the
Relative Abundance
abundant
common
abundant
abundant
rare
common
rare
very abundant
rare
common
rare
rare
rare
--- Page 11 ---
%0° OOT 19S sTeqor
“re Oe = YstZ omen
T°OT T6 UsTy eBe10g
%t° OR 9St usts ysnoy
0°O0T 19S 00° O0T OLT 00°O0T HET 00° O0OT E92 STBqOT,
t°O Z QT°T 27 - fe) - re) etddero aqtyM
L°6 GS 62° ST 92 €2°2 € 69°6 92 yustjuns [TTSentg
Z°0 T - ) $L°0 T - fe) ystguns useip
6°0 G - @) - fo) 06°T G sseq yoeTg
G°eH THz 99° SE 19 LE*SL TOT 40° 0€ 6L peeyting yoeTg
€°2% €T Ge°2 4 GL°O T O°’ g UsTs7e89 Toauueyy
T°9 GE LL°T € - fe) LT°eT Ze tautTys ueptop
6° LE Gt2 €S°oh tL 06°02 92 96° sh Cir tayonsdize9
Taqunyt Jo % zequny qaquny Jo % qequnyy aaqumy jo % iaqunyy arequngy Jo % zaquny satoedg
SoyeT saeTGL Te Jo Teqo], eye] PATUL aye] puodsag axel 4SItq
"@S6T “ee Ttady ‘sqtnsey BurqqeN TITD ‘our ‘sayey oTeying ° 4 eTaBy
°6
--- Page 12 ---
“OAV aesuey
LG. ‘TE SeW-95. ‘T eune
(aeS1equn) eyeT oTesjng
oyeT ULIM pezedm0g se ‘out ‘sayey oTeyyng ut yueserg seftosdg fo uoTYTpUOD jo yUSTOTJJE09
g9°2
49°2
° SAY
LG. ‘TE £eW-9S, ‘T sung
O2°€ = 09°T
O2°€ - OT’?
09°Z - O2°2
0S°2 - O¢’a
Og°T - OT°T
OT’S - OS°T
One - 02°?
O£°€ = OO°S
esuey
UOTSIOAT oyeT
eo’ =OOLE = 09°2
Ge-E =— «OEE =-—«OOG°S
eL°s = OTE = “ONS
06°2 OO0°E - Og'Z
LL°T 09°S = OS°T
G9°T O06°T - OS°T
€o°€ os - 00°2?
H9°S =OETE = “OFS
"OAV esuey
Q@S6T Ttady
UBUETPPH SYST
Gee Ss «OLE = OBE
GT°E §=—OHE ~~ COE
OAV esuey
QgS6T TTady
‘our ‘sexey oTesing
"aye OTeyIng pue uoTsreaTqd eye] ‘ueMeTppT
“OT
ar MN
6eT
98
“ON
soTemeg
SoTeN
aftddero aqtym
solT ema
SseTen
sseq yoReTg
soT Bulag
SoTeW
ystgqeo Teuueyy
soTeneg
SoTeW
adayonsdzey
gsatoada
°G aTaBL
--- Page 13 ---
die
Table 6, Buffalo Lakes, Inc. - Stomach Analysis.
Total
Food Item No. Times of Occurrence No. Identified
Black Bass
Golden shiner 1 1
Black bullhead 1 1
Channel Cat
Sunfish 1 2
Fish remains 2 3 7
Black Bullhead
Snails 2 7
‘Freshwater shrimp 2 2
Insect larva 2 9 #
Fish eggs 1 ad rs
Algae and plant fiber 2 27
--- Page 15 ---
OPTION BOUNDARY
OWNERSHIP BOUNDARY
TRACT BOUNDARIES
PROPOSED BOUNDARY
PRoposEr
RE LINE
RODGERS § ETZ- 172
oF
HUNDREDS
4
Ya MILE
SCALE
LEGEND
VWVITIVTITITT
13 ACRES
FEEr
10
N
AREA - ACRES AERIAL MAP - BUFFALO LAKES
RODGERS & ETZ 1395.3 LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
GEORGE ETZ 497.5 BUFFALO RECREATION LAKE COMMITTEE
TOTAL 1892.8 LUBBOCK, TEXAS
FOR RESALE 884.6 PARKHILL, SMITH COOPER, CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
NET ACREAGE 1008.2