TPWD 1954 F-5-R-1 #61: Inventory of Species in San Angelo Reservoir, Segment Completion Report, Project No. F-5-R-1, Job B-3
Open PDFExtracted Text
--- Page 1 ---
® ~ STATE Texas
PROJECT NO. F-5-R-1, Job B-3
PERIOD June 22, 1953 - June 22, 195
wa ID Ne ce, 1F0t
Segment Completion Report
Lawrence Campbell
Project Leader
TITLE
Inventory of Species in San Angelo Reservoir.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the species present and their relative abundance as well as to deter-
mine the ecological factors influencing their distribution.
PROCEDURE
Fifty-four gill net collections were made at 23 netting stations in the San Ange-
lo Reservoir. Experimental nylon gill nets measuring 125 ft. long x 8 ft. in depth and
made up in five, 25 ft. sections, were used. Mesh size for these nets increased progres-
sively in each following section at one-haif inch intervals beginning with one-inch mesh
and terminating with a three inch mesh section.
Nineteen seining collections were made at fourteen localities along the lake shore.
Ta nearly all colle ctions both 26 ft. 4" mesh bag seines and 15 ft. 7" mesh common sense
ines were used. To estimate relative abundance a count was made of all individuals tak-
en in two hauls with a 26 ft. +" mesh bag seine for each collection. In addition, sein-
ing where abundance data was not taken, a faur ft. common sense seine with a 1/16" mesh
was used to collect fry after the Spring spawning by fishes.
Water analysis for dissolved earbon dioxide and oxygen content was taken each month
and surface temperature, pH and the climatic conditions were recorded for each netting and
seining collection. Turbidity was recorded on four occasions,
To make a detailed study of the largemouth black bass population, 2,237 individuals
of that species were tagged and released at eight localities in the reservoir.
In net collections, most fish were identified, counted, weighed, measured and sex-
ed in the field. A sample number of each species were examined for stomach content and a
scale sample taken. On occasion it was necessary to preserve an individual, its stomach
or some other organ for more detailed examination in the laboratory. When this was re-
quired, the speciment was preserved in 10% formalin.
FINDING
San Angelo Reservoir is adjacent to much of north and western San Angelo. The
37,500 ft. rolled earth dam was constructed in 1951-52 by the U. S. Corp of Engineers and
is located approximately 6.5 miles above the confluence of the South ana North Concho
Rivers. Because the dam is primarily for flood control, the maximum lake elevation prac-
*ical for permanent water conservation is 1,908 feet above mean sea level. At that ele-
tion, the lake would have 5,441 surface acres and contain about90,000 acre feet of
water. Elevation 1,886 is designated as dead storage, the area allocated for siltation.
The water rights for the area between 1,886 and 1,908 are owned by the City. The water,
--- Page 2 ---
nN
*
r¢ ty
wher available, is to be used primarily for municipal and industrial purposes. However,
gation is a future possibility. At elevation 1,936 emergency spillway level, the
reservoir would contain about 391,000 acre feet and have 12,696 surface acres. Maximum
‘sign for the dam is 691,000 acre feet. In June 1954, the lake level was at 1,891.
The contributing watershed of 1,677 sauare miles is predominately San Angelo sand-
stone formation and top soils are usually Abeliene sands and Frio silts and loams. Vege-
tative cover is primarily mesquite-grassland association and the area is used almost ex-
clusively for farming and ranching. Climate for the watershed is semi-arid, having an
average annual rainfall of 19.83 inches. The average annual discharge of the North Con-
cho River is 47.4 c. f. s.; however, a maximum discharge of 94,600 c. f. s. was recorded
in September of 1936 and recent discharges have averaged 1.67 ¢. f. s. in 1952 and 39.3
e. f. s. in 1953.
The lake's water is usually clear and no recordable turbidity was observed except
following floods. Maximum surface temperature recorded was 79 degrees F. and a minimum
was 40 degrees F. pH was 8.3 - 8.4. A maximum carbon dioxide content of 14 ppm was re-
corded and the minimum dissolved oxygen, taken at that time, was 4 ppm. Dissolved carbon
dioxide is usually about 11 - 12 ppm and oxygen usually about 5 - 8 ppm.
Excepting algae and small pleagic forms, there is no aquatic vegetation in the San
Avgelo Reservoir. The areas north of the river channel to elevation 1,886 and south of
the channel to elevation 1,908 were cleared of all woody vegetation prior to inundation.
NETTING COLLECTIONS
As shown in Tables 1 and 11, fifty-four experimental gill net sets resulted in the
capture of 1,741 individuals of Pifteen species, an average of .257 fish per ft. of net
set. In Table 1, collection data shows a marked increase in the numerical percentages of
rp (Cyprinus carpio), carp suckers (Carpiodes carpio) and drum (Aplodinotus grunniens)
and a corresponding decrease in largemouth black bass (Micropterus salmoides). In Table
ll, the over all average percentages are believed to be somewhat misleading for that rea-
son. However, it is possible that percentages fr river carp suckers, largemouth bass
and southern channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) may be excessive. Drum and white
crappie (Pomoxis annularis) are probably more numerous than indicated. In all instances
‘except three) four experimental gill nets were set at established netting stations. In
Jane and July 1953, insufficient equipment prevented setting a standard for sampling and
two experimental nets were set for each of those collections. In January, six experi-
mental nets were used. The January collection is also known to be biased because three
nets were set in the upper lake where water was confined to the old river bed. The usual
nuaber of nets set in that station is one. Of 212 river carp suckers taken in the collec-
tion, 168 were from the three nets set in the upper lake and advanced sexual development
in that species indicated a pre-spawning concentration.
SEINING COLLECTIONS
Suitable permanent seining stations were difficult to locate and because of lake
level fluctuation (from 7,736 acre feet in June 1953 to a maximum of 47,372 acre feet in
June of 1954.), changes in the location of all seining stations were necessary. For that
reason, the numerical percentages for several species shown in Table 111 are believed to
bein error. The bias induced by the required relocation of seining sites makes the reli-
ability cf all seining data questionable. However, this data appears to be a more re-
liable indicator of the actual numerical percentage of some of the smaller forage species
‘notably Notropis) and for sunfishes (Lepomis). The selectivity of this method is dem-
istrated by its failure to capture any southern channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus),
smallmouth buffalo (Ictiobus bubalus) carp (Cyprinus carpio), freshwater drum (Aplodinctus
grunniens) or several other species known to occur in the lake.
--- Page 3 ---
(oe)
REMARKS
Both netting and seining collections produced a greater number of individuals
i
and species in the third and fourth quarters than were taken during the first half of
the period. For the named reasnns, inconsistency in data for the period because the
8
lake is increasing but is seventeen feet below conservation pool elevation and because
it is believed much can be determined by a continued study of population trends, it is
coneluded that at least another year's work is necessary before this inventory can be
completed.
--- Page 4 ---
t or?
6E G
O° aT C°Tt
ese 61
S°Qt lyee
Tee ‘
61T bér "
ETE ce
92° i}:
H T
oy" 0
Ob fe)
ST? fe)
co ie)
ot" th
dL ZL
46" 1
OT 6
9c" fe)
t 0
L0° 9°
T T
T° 4
o£ 6
0°62 ‘ag
SOS 9S
C* HT QT
L412 TE
% "OM |% con
soustjune
STaeptnuue stxomog
SepTOMTes snzeqdozotw
snyejzound snumpejoy
STIBATTO snqoTpoTtd
ON
ST[eYeU snaintony
ON
sdosAryo suotoN
sueTuunds snjoutpotTdy
mnjsesuoos smorsoxoW
snessc sneisostdey
snTeqnaq snaorqoT
oftdzeo snutadéa
otdaes sapotdae
6° ET
unuetpedss eiicso.tog
.
setoedg
yquoW Aq sqtnsey Sut yap
T 8Taeh
--- Page 5 ---
i
iy
a)
oe
wy
—_
OF
Te"?
“SAY
0
nL * €-00°E
69°E-ET°S
4S°H-ZT°S
rd
2-99"
OF S-QOT aS
69°2-H2°2S
0S°3-G0°2
S9° 2-1?
Th "Se" 2k°S
gl°2-€0°S
c
-~
~= 9
“TS°T
on
asuey ¥
am,
LN
co
ro
Qi
Oo
—
a
62° HT
" Jequny,
fq 4,
TO"
ge"
00° é
S9°2T
"3M
£q
u
88 °98Eh
OL°z
00° Heh
00° 00T
Ot 62
60"
One T
OTT
QS °2T
ge°€
6S"
O° LT
o9T2
OLS
~~ "SWS OOOT
6 "IM TeIOL *
Th
ole
6tOT
TOE
SUOTIOSTTOD Buta en
TL STq8L
HE = go
Ty go
Tee Fo
OTT go
yk «gO
iL go
c pie
L 0
9T go
f gO
T gC
o€ go
g6 go
09 fo
atdueg
‘dog
Say
“BAW
Bay
"Say
"SAY
‘Say
“BAY
° BAW
BAY
"SAY
"SAY
°SAY
“BAY
“BAY
seyust jung
STIETNUUB STXOMOg
SeptowTes snseqdozorn
snqyeqjound snainpeqoyt
STIRATTO SNQoOTpOTT”d
STTeLBU snantouy
sdosfizyo aucloW
suetuunis snqyoutpotdy
unjsadguod emo .soxoNW
snesso snes sostdetT
sn~Teqng sngotqoT
otdazeo snutadég
otdzeo sepatdsze9
unuetpsdss emasoicg
setosdg
--- Page 6 ---
L Eo @) ty
Le di O 6
7 O iL 8)
6 uf c 6)
tE 19 9T Q2
g OT § S
el €T ore S
©) ro SZ 6)
Te i OTT ToT
Ms O 6) O
8 ET 9 at
GZ 0 0 6)
g 0 0 @)
0 eal 0 e)
LTT OFT 0 TTT
OST rAd TZ HT
aa a Sane: “
UsoLEg TBI", eune ei _ ‘dy “teW "420
oa
cl
qT
TT
qe
ol
gt
elt
z
“4das
i) 0 0
9) t 0
O 9) O
) Z ©)
9 TI Tz
4 8 8
4 Té qT
g 9 9
0 T2T Oot
O 0 0
fe) g Th
@) @) ©)
fo) 0 9)
OT fo) TE
TeT OT +9
Th LE TOT
2 eg @
“38ny Aqnp aume
yquoW ey i Aq satnsey Surutes
TIT ST48h
STTtuny stmodetT
sngeqound stwodart
Ssn4tine stmcdaT
snydoTozotm stwodet
snatyoo1oew stuodsT
StyoTesem stmodat
suTTeueks stmodsy]
stiep~nuues stxomog
manueptpedes emosozcg
otdaeo sapotdszeo
seprowTes snizay.dorotw
XBTTSTA setTeydeutg
seoneTosézo snuoktwse10N
snqsnusa stdoz o0N
Stsuezyn~t stdoz0N
STUTGIe ersnaqmey
setoads
SUOTLOSTTON “ON
UUOW
--- Page 7 ---
Checklist of Fish
June 22, ]
Common Name
Longnose gar
Gizzard shad
Smallmouth buffalo
River carpsucker
Gray redhorse sucker
Golden shiner
Blacktail shiner
Red shiner
Parrot minnow
Southern channel catfish
Yellow bullhead
Flathead catfish
Common mosquitofish
White bass
Largemouth biack bass
Warmouth bass
Green sunfish.
Redear sunfish
spotted sunfish
Bliuegill
Orangespotted sunfish
Yeliowbelly sunfish
Western longear sunfish
Freshwater drum
San Angelo Reservoir
22
» 1954
Scientific Name
Lepisosteus osseus
Dorosoma cepedianum
Ietiobus bubalus
Carpiocdes carpio
Moxostoma congestum
Cyprinus carpio
Notemigonus crysoleucas
Notropis ventstus
Notropis lutrensis
Pimephales vigilax
Ictalurus punctatus
Ameiurus natalis
Pilodictus olivaris
Gambusia affinis
orone chrysops
Micropterus salmoides
Chaenobryttus coronarius
Lepomis cyanellus
Lepomis microlophus
Lepomis punctatus
Lepomis macrochirus
Lepomis humilis
Lepomis auritus
Lepomis megalotis
Aplodinotus grunniens
--- Page 8 ---
ON
Fifty-four gill net collections and nineteen seining cdlections were made.
y g
Water analysis was taken each month. Climatic conditions recorded and all
fishes captured were identified
For population studies, a sample number of each species were weighed, mea~
sured and other pertinent data recorded, Food, growth and age studies
were begun for the more important species.
A special study of largemouth black bass was started. 2,237 individuals
were tagged.
In abundance and distribution work, 1,741 individuals of fifteen species
were taken by gill nets and 2,547 individuals of 16 species were taken by
seining.
Because of inconsistencies in data taken thus far, and because the lake is
below the elevation designated as its conservation level, further work is
required before the inventory can be completed.
--- Page 9 ---
San AnGeto Reservoir
NORT + Coney o
a