TPWD 1955 F-2-R-2 #156: Inventory of Species Present and their Distribution in the Lampasas and Little Rivers, Region 6&8, Texas
Open PDFExtracted Text
STATE Texas
PROJECT F-2—R-2, Job 3-9
PERIOD June 1, 1955 through Novem-
ber 30, 1955
Job Completion Report
by
Billy D. COOper
TITLE
Inventory of species present and their distribution in those portions
of the Lampasas and Little Rivers within Region 6&8, which were not covered in
Job 3—6, Project F—2—R~l. '
OBJECTIVES
To continue and complete the study of these riv ers begun under Job
3—6, Project F—2-R—1.
METHODS
Seine, gill net and rotenone collections were made in the following
waters of Lampasas, Burnet and Milam Counties, Texas: The Lampasas River in Lam-
pasas County, 5 collections; Sulphur Creek, a tributary of the Lampasas River in
Lampasas County, 3 collections; the lampasas River in Burnet County, 1 collect—
ion; Rocky Creek, a tributary of the Lampasas River in Burnet County, 3 collec-
tions and the Little River in Milam County, 9 collections. The locations of the
stations at which collections were made are shown on the attached map, and in
Table 1.
All seine collections were made with 6‘ x h' and 10' x h‘ common sense
seines and/or with a 26' x 6’ bag seine with a %“ mesh. Rotenone and gill net
collections were made at Station Nos. 5 and 6 on the Little River in Milsm Coun-
ty. The nets used were 125 feet in length with square mesh sizes ranging from
one to three inches in 25 foot sections. Seined and rotenoned specimens were
preserved with ten percent formalin and taken to the laboratory for identifica—
tion and counting.. Larger specimens taken from gill nets and in rotenone
collections were identified in the field.
Thermal, chemical and ecological conditions were recorded in conjuncw
tion with Job A-3, Project F—2—R-2.
RESULTS
A total of 35 fish species were found to occur in the waters under
study. Of these, 21 species were found in the Lampasas River and its tributaries,
in Lampasas and Burnet Counties, 29 species were found in the Little River, in
Milam County, and 15 species were found to be common to both rivers. The relative
abundance and distribution of these species are shown in Table II.
The Lampasas River (Lampasas and Burnet Counties): — Since the Lampasas
River was not flowing at the time of the collections, except in a few scattered
localities, where a slight flow from pool to pool was discovered, most of the fish
2.
in this river were restricted to small pools, the larger pools being few and far
between. Therefore, several species which are known to occur in this portion of
the Lampasas River were not collected, and of the species collected, other than
a statement to the effect that they were taken in pools, liflie can be said as to
their habitat preferences. This is essentially true of those species which are
normally known to inhabit the riffles under normal conditions. Low water con;
ditions also tend to reduce the relative abundance of the predator and rough
species. The species which are known to occur here but which were not collected
are the yellow or flathead catfish, the shortnose gar and the blue catfish. The
blue catfish has been stocked in the river, according to the reports from local
-fishermen.
The species collected in the Lampasas River and its tributaries, in
Lampasas and Burnet Counties, are divided into five categories on the basis of
their frequency in the total number of collections. Those species which were
most frequently collected and therefore most widely distributed, are the black»
tail shiner, the red Shiner, the parrot minnow, the stoneroller, the common
mosquitofish, the largemouth bass, the green sunfish, the bluegill and the long-
ear sunfish, They were taken in 50 or more percent of the collections. Of this
group, the largemouth bass has been stocked in many of the more permanent pools
and is present in relatively large numbers.
The group of species collected next more frequently, in 33 to 50 per»
cent of the collections, includes the warmouth and the orangespotted sunfish.
The Rio Grande tetra, along with the river carpsucker, the grey red-
horse, the blackstripe topminnow, the spotted black bass and the logperch were
collected in from 7 to 17 percent of the collections. The Rio Grande tetra is
not native to this area and the specimens collected probably represent escaped
or introduced "bait minnows.
Since all of the pools encountered on trips to the Lampasas River were
easily collected with seines, none were treated with rotenone and no_gill nets
were set.
The Little River (Milam County): m Two of the nine collections made on
the Little River in Milam County wererotenone collections and of the other seven,
two were made with gill nets and five with seines.
In the basic survey of the Little River, in Milam County, Job AmB,
Project F~2wR-2, it was stated that the Little River flows through two ecologm
ical regions, the Blackland Prairie and the Post Oak Belt. No such division
was apparent in the collection data for the fish taken in these portions of the
river,
It was found that certain species, including: the shortnose gar, the
gizzard shed, the smallmouth buffalo, the blue sucker, the river carpsucker, the
European carp, the channel catfish, the flathead catfish, the largemouth bass
and the parrot minnow were frequently collected from medium to large pools with
bottoms of gravel and silt and limited cover in the form of aquatic vegetation
along the edges of the pools.
Sunfish were also taken in the pools, with smallerzmdividuals being more
abundant in the shallower pools and on the riffles.
The tadpole madtom was in all cases collected in association with sub-
merged aquatic vegetation in both the pools and on the riffles, whereas most of
the cyprinid species collected were taken from the riffle area where there as at
least some current and the common mosquitofish or Gambusia was almost always
3§
found along the edges of the pools or the edges of the riffles.
The 29 species of fish taken from the Little River have also been dim
vided, on the basis of their frequency in the collections, into five groups.
The most frequentiy collected species were the gizzard shed, the river carpsucker,
the blacktail shiner, the red shiner, the parrot minnow, the channel catfish, the
common mosquitofish and the longear sunfish. They were taken in 50 or more per-
cent of the coflections.
Next most frequently collected, in from 33 to 50percent of the colleen
tions, were the shortness gar, the blue sucker, the stoneroller,ihe flathead
catfish, the tadpole madtom, the largemouth bass and the bluegill.
In the third most frequently collected group of species, present in
from 18 to 32 percent of the collections, were the spotted black bass,the warmouth,
the green sunfish, the dusky darter and the freshwater drum.
The smallmouth buffalo, European carp, speckled dace, ghost shiner,
broadhead shiner, mimic shiner, yellow bullhead, spotted sunfish and orangethroat
darter were present in from T to 17 percent of the collections.
In the collections made at Station No. 5, on the Little River in Milam
County, 12 species were collected when using a seine and later, when checking with
rotenone, 17 species were proved to be present. Similarly, Station No. 6 producw
ed nine species when seined and 10 species when treated with rotenone. The seine
collection at Station No. 5 was made slightly above the area treated with rotennne
while the seine collection for Station No. 6 was made in and below the treated area.
A primary Objection to the use of rotenone as a collection tool in
streams is the danger of killing fish over a long distance downstream from the area
to be collected. This was successfully avoided in both of the rotenone collections
made as a part of this study by the following method;
1. An area was selected where there was a small pool with a riffle
below and a larger pool just below the riffle.
2. Rotenone, calculated to be half enough for a complete kill in a
standing body of water of the same size as the upper pool, was
applied to the upper pool.
3. A bag seine was then placed below the second pool to collect the
fish washed down by the current.
4. All surfacing fish were then collected and 30 to #5 minutes were
allowed to pass before the second application of rotenone of the
same strength.
5. As before, all fish were collected and 30 to #5 minutes allowed
to pass before a final application of rotenone, again of the same
strength.
It is noteworthy to mention that fish continued to surface with the
second and third applications of rotenone and that the larger catfish did not
surface until after the third application. Furthermore, the rotenone was suffic»
iently diluted by the water in the larger, lower pool so that the.only fish of
consequence to be killed outside of the test area were gizzard shed and a few
carpsuckers.
SUMMARY
1. The field work done for this jOb was done in conjunction with Job
Am?) and is the completion of the work begun under Job 3-.6, Project F~2-R-l.
2. In all a total of 11 collectbns were made on the Lampasas River
and its tributaries in Lampasas and Burnet Counties and nine collections were made
on the Little River in Milam County.
3. A total of El species was collected in the Lampasas and its tribu~
taries and 29 species were collected from the Little River.
h. Rotenone was used as a collection method after a technique was
developed for its use where the chemicai was applied in such a manner that very
few fish outside of the test area were killed.
5. Since the fishes of the Lacpasas were restricted to the pools,
because of drouth, no habitat preferences could be discovered.
6. Ecologically the fishes collected in the Little River were divided
into groups:
a. Those species most frequently found in medium to deep pools.
b. Those species most frequently found in shallow pools and on
the riffles.
c. Those species most frequently found on the riffles.
d. Those species most frequently found in association with sub-
merged vegetation. '
e. Those found almost always along the edges of the pools on
riffles.
Stream Survey Stations
Lampasas River (Lempasas and Burnet Counties)
Station No. Location
Lampasas River, 11 mi. N Adamsville
Lampasas River, 6 mi. NLAdamsville
Lampasas River, 1 mi. S. Adamsvflle
Lampasas River, 7 mi. S. E. Adamsville
Lampasas River, Rumely crossing
Donaldson Creek, 5 mi. W. lampasas,
on Farm Road 580
Donaldson Creek, 5 mi. N. Lampasas on
Farm Road 1h9h
Burleson Creek, 1 mi. N. W. Lampasas
Sulphur Creek, 3 blocks W. Lampasas
Golf Course
\ocr sq cnxntroinasJ
10. Sulphur Creek, 2 mi. E. lampasas in
City Municipal Park
11. Lampasas River, at mouth of Sulphur Creek
12. . Lampasas River, l mi. N. Oakalla
13. Rocky Creek, 1 mi. N. Watson on Farm Road 7%
1h. Rocky Creek, 2 mi. S. Natson
15. Rocky Creek, 3 mi. N. E. Watson
Little River (Milan County)
Little River, h mi. N. Buckholts
Little River, 6 mi. W. Cameron
Little River, 6 mi. S. W. Cameron
Little River, lt-mi. E. Cameron
Little River, A% mi. N. E. of Station a
Little River, 3 mi. N. W. Gauss
O
G\\J‘!-F’LAJI\31~'
a
Table 1. Locations of survey stations used during study period for
Job B-9, Project F-2—R-2, Boeic Survey of the Remaining
Portion of the Leon, Lampasas and Little Rivers Within
Region 6—B, which Werefnot covered in Job Bm6, Project
F-2wR-l.
Name of Species
Scientific
Lepisosteus platostomus
Dorosoma cepedianum
Ictiobus bubalus
Astyanax fasciatus
Cycleptus elongatus
Carpiodes carpio
Moxostoma congestum
Cyprinus carpio
Hybopsis aestivalus
Notropis potteri
Notropis venustus
Notropis lutrensis
Notropis volucellus
Notropis buchanani
Pimephales vigilax
Pimephales promelas
Campostoma anomalum
Ictalurus‘punctatus
Pilodictus olivaiis'
Schilbeodes gyrinus
Ameiurus natalis
Fundulus notatus
Gambusia affinis
Micropterus punctulatus
Micropterus salmoides
Chaenobryttus coronarius
'Lepomis cyanellus
Lepomis macrochirus
Lepomis punctatus
Lepomis humilis
Lepomis megalotis
Hadropterus scierus
Porcine caprodes
Etheostoma spectabile
Aplodinotus grunniens
Table 11.
Common
shortnose gar
gizzard shad
Lempasas River
Lampasas and
Burnet Coo
(12 collections)
smallmouth buffalo
Rio Grande tetra
blue sucker
river carpsucker
gray redhorse
EurOpean carp
speckled dace
broadhead Shiner
blacktail Shiner
red Shiner
mimic Shiner
ghost Shiner
parrot minnow
fathead minnow
stoneroller
scuthern channel
flathead catfish
tadpole madtom
yellow bullhead
catfish
blackstripe topminnow
common mosquitofish
spotted black bass
largemouth black bass
warmouth
green sunfish
bluegill sunfish
spotted sunfish
orangespotted sunfish
longear sunfish
dusky darter
logperch
orangethroat darter
freshwater drum
Distribution Checklist
I'IJ'T-jl'fll
Little River
Milam Co.
(9 collections)
A
VA
VA
Distribution of species collected in the Lampasas and Little
Rivers.
collections made as follows:
(7 — 17%), R - rare (6% or less).
The distribution figure is based on the number of
times each species was found in relation to the number of
VA — very abundant (over 50%),
Aw abundant (33 — 50%), c .- common (18 — 32%), F - frequent
Hemamam summonm «hum one min upon new “asoooo oomEmeHHHE on once Moos sob
aumsmam ocemoam “him one and none can nmoosoo Haom on once Moos nom “coca
rl
OHam ooh sum mom Aasonoo Seawzv Macao honsnm
oasm new eta ooh fiascooo EonEv nooflm Hoflnomw com
ofllm new jug new Ahpcooo Pocoomv soeflm Hoflaomw new apnea
mam non... To one Eocene sneaav note 33.5
wsm new msd pow Annapoooo poooom mom mmmeEva oopwm mommmamg
mowoomm we mofloooooscw whoeanm oflmmm oo>fim
mum ooamcm
mU¢ZH¢mm mm>Hm MABBHQ
0 one Q I wanna
a a noowpmpm coesooamoo
cow horonm
E .. meson.“ poem Ransom
“nutmeg