TPWD 1958 F-7-R-6 #377: Segment Completion Report: Experimental Control of Undesirable Fish Species in Lake Diversion, Project F-7-R-6, Job E-2
Open PDFExtracted Text
--- Page 1 ---
Segment Completion Report
State of TEXAS
Project No. F-7-R-6 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys
of the Waters of Region 1-B.
Job No. E-2 Title: Experimental Control of Undesirable
Fish Species in Lake Diversion.
Period Covered: June 1, 1958 - May 31, 1959
Abstract:
An estimated minimum of 185 tons of fish, mostly shad and drum, was removed from
Lake Diversion by an experimental selective-kill treatment in March 1957. Inventory
was made by nets and seines from ten months before to 26 months after the treatment in
order to compile comparative data which may indicate possible effects of the treatment.
A total of 4,385 fishes have been collected by gill nets from which data concerning
food habits, sexual development, spawning success, coefficient of condition, and patho-
logical conditions were recorded, and as far as possible, reduced to tabular form. A
total of 1,381 of the 4,385 fishes taken for study has been collected during the period
covered by this report.
The most significant changes in the fish population immediately following the treat-
ment were: (1) increase in "K" factors for all species; (2) reduction of the shad popu-
lation; (3) increase in the relative abundance of carpsucker and buffalo, and (4)
increase in average weight of all species except shortnose gar and carp.
Two years after treatment, condition factors of rough fish species either increased
or remained the same as they were during the preceding year; whereas game fish species
and shad showed a decrease in "K". Although some species have a lower condition factor
during the segment, as compared to the previous segment, all species are equal to or
higher than during the period preceding the selective-kill treatment.
Although having been reduced from 36.6 percent to 6.8 percent by the treatment, shad
have replenished themselves to 22.5 percent of the fish population within two years. Game
fish species increased from 14.9 percent during the 1956-1957 segment to 20.2 percent
during the 1957-1958 segment, but dropped to 19.6 percent during the period covered by
this report. White bass, black bass and channel catfish have made substantial gains, but
crappie decreased.
Apparently, the rotenone treatment killed the mayfly nymphs in March 1957, removing
them from the diet of fishes during 1957-1958. They began to re-appear in stomachs of
game fishes, as well as the buffalo fishes, in August 1958.
This work will continue until sufficient data is obtained to determine overall
effects of the reduction of shad and drum, selectively, with rotenone.
--- Page 2 ---
Objectives:
To determine the practical application and effectiveness of methods developed under
Job E-1 (Experimental Control of Undesirable Fish Species). Specifically, objectives of
the work covered by this report were to determine effects of the selective-kill treat-
ment during March 1957.
Techniques:
Field work on this job began in June 1957. Collections have been spaced one month
apart since that time so that data collected during each segment would be comparable
to that of the previous segment. Approximately 1,200 feet of gill net, ranging in size
from one inch to three inches square mesh, were set on each visit. Each fish taken in
these nets was measured, weighed, and the stage of gonadal development recorded. Filled
stomachs of predacious species were saved in formalin, along with ripe ovaries and path-
ological tissues. Samples of forage fishes were obtained with small-mesh minnow seines
and preserved in formalin. Game fish which were taken while seining were identified,
counted, and then released. Formalin-preserved materials were identified and counted
in the laboratory and the data recorded.
Physical data, including air temperature, water-surface temperature and turbidity
were recorded at the lake. .
Background Information:
An estimated minimum of 185 tons of fish, mostly gizzard shad and drum, was removed
from Lake Diversion by an experimental selective-kill treatment in March 1957. Inventory
had been taken by gill nets and seines for ten months prior to the treatment, in order
to compile data which would be comparative to that compiled following treatment. Details
of the treatment and work done during that period are discussed in the report F-7-R-4,
Job E-1. Collection of data continued during the following 12 month period (June 1, 1957
through May 31, 1958) and is presented in the report F-7-R-5, Job E-2. This report pre-
sents data collected during 12 consecutive months from June 1, 1958, through May 31, 1959,
which is the second 12 month period after the selective-kill treatment. The primary
purpose of this work is to compile information which may indicate resulting effects of
reducing shad and drum populations by killing selectively with rotenone.
Findings:
z
Fish Collections
A total of 2,663 fishes was collected from Lake Diversion for study during the
segment covered by this report. Gill nets collected 1,381 specimens, and the remaining
1,282 were taken in seine samples.
Comparison of the number and percentage of fish taken in gill nets during the 1956-
1957, 1957-1958, and 1958-1959 segments is given in Table 1. A total of 271, or 19.6
percent, of the fish collected by gill nets during the present segment, was game fish.
This is 0.57 percent less than in the previous segment, at which time game fish constitut
20.2 percent of the total. Prior to the treatment, game fish comprised 14.9 percent of
the total. Shad, smallmouth buffalo and carpsucker made up almost 70 percent of the gill
net collection during the segment covered by this report. The carpsucker was the most
abundant species present, comprising 25.8 percent of the total. Percentage composition,
sex ratios, and average weights by sex of fishes collected by gill nets during the 1956-
--- Page 3 ---
1957 segment as compared to the 1957-1958 and 1958-1959 segments is given in Tables 2,
3 and 4 respectively.
The total weight of all species collected by gill nets during the present segment
is 2,533.5 pounds. Percentage composition by weight and mean weights of fishes collected
by gill nets during the 1956-1957 segment as compared to the 1957-1958 and 1958-1959
segments is given in Tables 5, 6 and 7 respectively.
A total of 1,282 forage fishes was collected with small mesh minnow seines. The
major forage fishes continue to be Notropis lutrensis, Pimephales vigilax and Dorosoma
cepedianum. This information, with a break-down of species, is given in Table 8. The
total number of fishes taken by both gill nets and seines is given in Table 9. Table 10
presents monthly totals of species collected by gill nets during the segment covered by
this report.
Food Habits
Approximately 20 percent of all game fish collected contained food in their stomachs.
Food remains were found in stomachs of 59 specimens; 31 white bass, 13 channel catfish,
8 crappie, 4 black bass and 3 flathead catfish. Tables 1] through 15 present results of
analyses made on food remains found in stomachs of all predacious species that contained
food.
White bass fed largely upon sunfish, shad, mayfly nymphs and minnows. During the
month of March 1959, every white bass that contained food had eaten large numbers of
mayfly nymphs. Contents of one white bass taken in February included 17 small bluegills,
2 small orange spotted sunfish and 1 shad.
Cotton rats, insects, algae and other plant materials made up the bulk of food items
contained in channel catfish stomachs. During July, August and September 1958, cotton
rats (Sigmodon hispidus) became very numerous in the Wichita Valley, and especially so
in the area surrounding Lake Diversion. Whether this animal is semi-aquatic in habit or
was searching for food or new habitat is not known; however, many were observed swimming
aimlessly in the middle of the lake, floating with the current of the headwater river,
and dead along the shoreline. At any rate, they were proven to be a very popular food
item of channel catfish. It was interesting to note that, apparently, only live cotton
rats were utilized for food. Rats that were trapped alive and placed on trotlines were
not taken by catfish.
Crappie fed mostly on mayfly nymphs, shad and sunfish.
The four black bass examined contained only fish and fish remains. One cannibal
contained a black bass 73 mm in length.
Sunfish, other unidentifiable fish remains, and mayfly nymphs were found in the
stomachs of flathead catfish.
Sexual Development and Spawning Success
The gonads of all fishes captured in gill nets were examined, and the sex and stage
of gonadal development were recorded. If the gonads were large and well-developed, ob-
viously approaching spawning condition, they were recorded as "ripe". Fish taken shortly
--- Page 4 ---
after spawning were recorded as "spent". All others were recorded as "immature". As
spawning activities progressed, seining effort was increased in order to determine
spawning success of the various species. Immature individuals of the larger fishes taken
in seine drags were measured and counted. In addition, notes were made of schools of
fry seen, young fishes found in the stomachs of predacious fishes, etc.
Females of only two flathead catfish, one channel catfish, and one carpsucker were
found to be spent in April. In the early part of May, females of one channel catfish,
one smallmouth buffalo, one carpsucker and two longnose gar were spent. Apparently,
the major spawning period was in progress when the lake was checked on June 6, 1959.
Almost all shad of spawning size were spent. Fifteen percent of the carp were spent.
Twenty-nine percent of all carpsuckers taken were spent. Twenty-two percent of the small-
mouth buffalo were spent, and sixty percent of the longnose gar were spent. All other
spawning-size individuals of the above mentioned species were ripe and ready.
Also in June, large numbers of shad fry were seined, mostly from shallow mud-bottomed
areas in the upper end of the lake. Fry of carp, carpsucker and buffalo were found only
in shallow areas along the shore where water temperatures were in excess of 90 degrees.
Black bass fry were found at almost every seining location, indicating a very successful
spawning season for this species. Except in the river above Lake Diversion, white bass
fry, although plentiful, were not as numerous as black bass fry.
Unfortunately, the present segment termination date for this work occurs during the
major spawning period and causes confusion in compilation of data and report writing.
Therefore, for this and other reasons, the termination date for this work is being change
to December 31 of each year.
Coefficient of Condition
"K" factors were worked out for all of the larger fishes collected in gill nets as
they were during previous segments. Comparison of "K" factors of all species collected
in gill nets for the three consecutive years is given in Table 16. Distribution of "K"
factors for the 1958-1959 segment is shown in Table 17.
With the exception of smallmouth buffalo, carpsucker, carp and drum, average "K"
factors were about the same or lower as compared to the previous segment. Male carp
increased from 2.6 to 2.8, and females increased from 2.7 to 2.8. Female carpsucker
increased from 2.7 to 2.8, whereas the males remained at 2.7. Smallmouth buffalo of both
sexes remained at 3.2. Female drum increased from 2.9 to 3.0 and males from 2.8 to 2.9.
Longnose gar remained at .4. All other species displayed a decrease in "K".
In general, the "K" factors of rough fish species either increased or remained the
same as they were during the preceding segment; whereas game fish species and shad show-
ed a decrease in "K". Although some species show a lower "K" factor reading during this
segment as compared to the previous segment, they are still equal to or higher than during
the segment preceding the selective-kill treatment. Information contained in Table 16,
correlated with relative abundance data, indicates that decreasing the numbers of shad
and drum improves condition of all game fish species (as well as the remaining rough fish
species), and as the numbers of shad (and other rough fish species) increase during the
second year following the kill, the condition of game fish species decreases.
Physical Characteristics
The highest recorded temperature at one foot under the surface of open water was
--- Page 5 ---
80 degrees F. on September 12, 1958. During December and January, ice formed in protected
shallows and in the river thick enough to impede boat traffic and prevented net setting.
Turbidity readings were not taken, but the water was generally clear, as usual. Water
and air temperatures are given in Table 18.
Discussion:
The primary purpose of this work is to accumulate comparative data and record perti-
nent observations over a period of years from which possible effects of shad and drum
reduction with rotenone can be determined. Although certain facts appear to be significant
from the data that has been collected, no attempt will be made at this time to make any
definite conclusions concerning the overall effects of the selective-kill treatment. All
data will be grouped and carefully perused after sufficient data has been collected in an
effort to conclude as many facts as possible.
Noteworthy are changes in the relative abundance of shad. According to gill netting
results, shad were decreased from 36.6 percent before the treatment to 6.8 percent during
the segment following the treatment. During the second year after treatment, they in-
creased to 22.5 percent of the fish population, proving their reputed reproductive capabil-
ities. The average weight of shad increased from .7 pound to 1.43 pounds after the treatment,
but dropped to .97 during the period covered by this report. Increase in average weight
is possibly due to the great reduction of smaller shad, which are more susceptible to the
effects of rotenone, and the decrease in average weight may be due to the additional capture
of progeny of the surviving larger shad two years after treatment.
The gill net method of sampling fish populations failed again to show significant
changes in the drum population, although they were greatly reduced by the treatment. The
use of rotenone will probably be required to determine the status of drum.
Game fish increased from 14.9 percent during the 1956-1957 segment to 20.2 percent
during the 1957-1958 segment, but dropped to 19.6 percent during the period covered by
this report. White bass, black bass and channel catfish have made substantial gains,
but crappie decreased from 5.3 percent to 4 percent. Condition of all game fishes except
female black bass, as determined by "K" factors, has decreased since the 1957-1958 period,
but they are still in better condition than before the treatment.
Mayfly (Hexagenia) and mayfly nymphs have been proven to be very important food items
of game fishes in Lake Diversion. They were represented in stomachs of most predacious
type fishes before the treatment, but were practically absent during the segment follow-
ing the treatment.
Mayflys began to reoccur in the latter part of 1958 being found in the stomach of a
flathead catfish in August 1958, and were found to be an important food item again,
especially of white bass and crappie, by March 1959. It appears that rotenone killed
the mayfly nymphs in March 1957, removing them from the diet of fishes during 1957-1958.
They were probably restocked into Lake Diversion from irrigation canals, Lake Kemp and
other nearby waters and were again present in abundance after the summer of 1958.
More than two years have passed since the selective-kill treatment at Lake Diversion.
Progeny of surviving individuals of all species are now over two years old and will be
represented in gill net samples in increasing numbers during the remainder of this study.
--- Page 6 ---
Collections will continue until sufficient data is obtained to determine overall effects
of the reduction of shad and drum, selectively, with rotenone.
Prepared by Leo D. Lewis Approved by Doren L100
Project Leader Director Inland Fisheries Division
Date July 17, 1959
Table 1. Comparison of the Number and Percent of Total Fish Taken in Gill Nets in
Lake Diversion During the 1956-1957, 1957-1958 and 1958-1959 Segments.
Number Taken of Total
Species 1956-1957 1957-1958 1958-1959 1956-1957 1957-1958 1958-1959
Lepisosteus osseus 37 113 68 2.9 6.6 4.92
Lepisosteus platostomus h 6 1 0.3 0.3 0.80
Dorosoma cepedianum 472 116 311 36.6 6.8 22.52
Ictiobus cyprinellus 0) O 2 0.0 0.0 0.15
Ictiobus bubalus 175 456 291 13.6 26.6 21.07
Carpiodes carpio 369 620 356 26.6 36.1 25.78
Cyprinus carpio 31 hh 64 2.4 2.6 4.63
Ictalurus punctatus 38 95 Ti. 3.0 5.5 5.14
Ictalurus melas 0 3 (6) 0.0 0.2 0.0
Pylodictus olivaris 2 3 7 0.2 0.2 0.51
Roccus chrysops 76 121 121 5.9 7.1 8.76
Micropterus salmoides 7 18 Le 0.5 dO 1.23
Pomoxis annularis 68 110 55 5.3 6.4 3.99
Aplodinotus 9 11 7 OT 0.6 0.50
Total 1,288 1,716 1,381 100.00 100.00 100.00
--- Page 7 ---
Table 2. Percentage Composition, Sex Ratios and Average Weights by Sex of Fishes
Collected by Gill Nets from Lake Diversion, 1956 - 1957.
Number % of % Avg. Male % Avg. Female
Species Taken Total Males Weight Females Weight
Lepisosteus osseus 37 2.9 54.0 2.9 46.0 6.4
Lepisosteus platostomus 4 23 25.0 2.8 75.0 307
Lepisosteus productus 0 -00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dorosoma cepedianum 472 36.6 42.6 5 57.4 <T3
Ictiobus bubalus 175 13.6 64.0 8.22 36.0 3.54
Carpiodes carpio 369 28.6 54.2 L.27 45.8 133
Cyprinus carpio 31 2.40 48.4 3.82 51.6 LUT
Ictalurus punctatus 38 3.0 55.3 1.58 Wh. 7 1.68
Roceus chrysops 76 5.90 474 72 52.6 72
Micropterus salmoides 4 a) 28.6 74 71.4 1.80
Pomoxis annularis 68 5.3 47.0 34 53.0 53
Aplodinotus grunniens 9 -7 55..5 .80 Wy 5 .92
Pylodictus olivaris 2 .2 0.0 100.0 1.40
Total 1,288 100.0
--- Page 8 ---
Table 3. Percentage Composition, Sex Ratios, and Average Weights of Sex of Fishes
Collected by Gill Nets from Lake Diversion, 1957 - 1958.
Number % of % Avg. Male % Avg. Female
Species Taken Total Males Weight Female Weight
Lepisosteus osseus 133 6.6 51.4 4.19 48.6 7.97
Lepisosteus platostomus 6 0.3 0.0 - 100.0 1.54
Dorosoma cepedianum 116 6.8 40.0 1.16 60.0 1.63
Ictiobus bubalus 456 26.6 54.8 2.08 45.2 3.38
Carpiodes carpio 620 36.1 45.3 Le 35 54.7 1.39
Cyprinus carpio hy 2.6 43.9 3.12 56.1 4,30
Ictalurus punctatus 95 5.5 26.3 1.86 73.7 2.11
Ictalurus melas 3 0.2 0.0 100.0 1.19
Roccus chrysops 121 Tel 34.7 1.07 65.3 de 36
Micropterus salmoides 18 1.0 33.3 1.88 66.7 2.29
Pomoxis annularis 110 6.4 43.6 0.56 56.4 0.73
Aplodinotus grunniens ll 0.6 63.6 0.74 36.4 1.35
Pylodictus olivaris 3 0.2 0.0 - 100.0 4.10
Total 1,716 100.0
--- Page 9 ---
Table 4. Percentage Composition, Sex Ratios, and Average Weights by Sex of Fishes Collected
by Gill Nets from Lake Diversion, 1958 - 1959.
Species
Lepisosteus osseus
Lepisosteus platostomus
Dorosoma cepedianum
Ictiobus cyprinellus
Ictiobus bubalus
Carpiodes carpio
Cyprinus carpio
Ictalurus punctatus
ictalurus melas
Pylodictus olivaris
Roecus chrys ops
Micropterus salmoides
Pomoxis annularis
Aplodinotus grunniens
Total
No.
Taken
68
11
311
291
356
64,
71
Le1
17
a2
1,381
% of
Total
4.92
0.80
22.52
0.15
21.07
25.78
4.63
5.14
0.00
0.51
8.76
1.23
3.99
0.50
100.00
Males
Total Ave.
No. % Wt. Wt.
3652.94 82.66 2.30
5 45.45 3.42.68
92 29.58 54.80 60
1 50.00 3.18 3.18
173 59.45 529.80 3.06
182 51.12 242.63 1.33
32 50.00 54.83 1.71
27 ~=—- 38.03 57.87 2.14
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
fe) 0.00. 0.00 0.00
41 33.88 22.57 255
5 29.41 6.82 1.36
V4 25.45 12.10 86
ho 57.14 Wo45 1.11
612 1,075.13
Females
Total Ave.
No. % Wt. Wt.
32 = 447.06 233.59 7.30
6 54.55 1-37 421.23
219 70.42 248.05 1.13
1 50.00 1.50 1.50
118 =40.55 361.20 3.06
174 48.88 244.78 = 1.41
32 50.00 THT 2.33
hh 61.97 123.31 2.80
Oo 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 100.00 34.74 4.96
80 66.12 76.77 96
12 70.59 26.03 2.17
Kl 74.55 22.43 59
3 42.86 4.15 1.38
769 1,458. 39
--- Page 10 ---
10%
Table 5. Percentage Composition by Weight and Mean Weights of Fishes
Collected by Gill Nets from Lake Diversion, 1956 - 1957
Species Weight (lbs) 4% of Total Weight Mean Weight
Lepisosteus osseus 166.1 9.4 45
Lepisosteus platostomus 13.8 Jo 3.45
Lepisosteus productus 0 fe) )
Dorosoma cepedianum 335.4 . 19.0 fl
Ictiobus bubalus 472.0 26.8 2.7
Carpiodes carpio 479.5 27.2 1.3
Cyprinus carpio 128.7 7.3 4.15
Ictalurus punctatus 61.7 3.5 1.6
Roccus chrysops 54.5 3.1 -72
Micropterus salmoides 10.5 .6 1.50
Pomoxis annularis 30.0 ee 4 ty
Aplodinotus grunniens : 7.7 4 .85
Pylodictus olivaris 2.8 22 1.4
Total 1,763.2 100.0 -
--- Page 11 ---
Table 6. Percentage Composition by Weight and Mean Weights of Fishes
Collected by Gill Nets from Lake Diversion, 1957 - 1958
Species
Lepisosteus osseus
Lepisosteus platostomus
Dorosoma cepedianum
Ictiobus bubalus
Carpiodes carpio
Cyprinus carpio
Ictalurus punctatus
ictalurus melas
Roccus chrysops
Micropterus salmoides
Pomoxis annularis
Aplodinotus grunniens
Pylodictus olivaris
Totals
645.
7
149.
1,406.
728.
159.
19h.
3.
152.
38.
72.
10.
12.
3,580.
ll.
Weight (lbs)
y
7
8
FP oH
oO NWN
ON - ie) be
% of Total Weight
18.0
C2
4.2
3933
20.3
4.5
5.4
O.1
999
Weight
.03
54
43
Pace
37
.80
-O4
.19
26
.16
66
96
. LO
--- Page 12 ---
12.
Table 7. Percentage Composition by Weight and Mean Weights of Fishes
Collected by Gill Nets from Lake Diversion, 1958 - 1959
Species Weight (lbs.) % of Total Weight Mean Weight
Lepisosteus osseus 316.25 12.48 4.65
Lepisosteus platostomus 10.79 42 .98
Dorosoma cepedianum 302.85 11.96 97
Ictiobus cyprinellus 4.68 .19 2.34
Ictiobus bubalus 891.00 35.17 3.06
Carpiodes carpio 487.421 19.23 1.37
Cyprinus carpio 129.30 5.11 2.02
Ictalurus punctatus 181.18 7.15 2.55
Ictalurus melas 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pylodictus olivaris 34.74 1.37 4.96
Roccus chrysops 99.34 3.92 .82
Micropterus salmoides 32.85 1.30 1.93
Pomoxis annularis 34.53 1.36 .63
Aplodinotus grunniens 8.60 34 225
Total 2,533.52 100.00
--- Page 13 ---
Total
13.
Table 8. Total Numbers of Forage Fish Taken From Lake Diversion
1958 - 1959
Species No. % of Total
Dorosoma cepedianum 88 6.86
'Phenacobius mirabilis 35 2.73
Notropis percobromus 34 2.65
Notropis oxyrhynchus 16 1.25
Notropis girardi 105 8.19
Notropis lutrensis hag 33.46
Notropis deliciosus 10 78
Hybognathus placita 3 24
Pimephales vigilax 4202 32.91
Gambusia affinis 21 1.64
Micropterus salmoides 43 3.36
Lepomis microlophus 7 254
Lepomis macrochirus 4O 3.12
Lepomis humilis 20 1.56
Percina caprodes 8 -63
Aplodinotus grunniens 1 .08
1,282 100.00
--- Page 14 ---
14.
Table 9. Total Number of Fishes Taken From Lake Diversion, 1958-1959.
Species (Scientific Name)
Lepisosteus platostomus
Lepisosteus osseus
Dorosoma cepedianum
Ictiobus cyprinellus
Ictiobus bubalus
Carpiodes carpio
Cyprinus carpio
Phenacobius mirabilis
Notropis percobromus
Notropis oxyrhynchus
Notropis girardi
Notropis lutrensis
Notropis deliciosus (N. stramineus - new name)
Hybognathus placita
Pimephales vigilax
Ictalurus punctatus
Ictalurus melas
Pylodictus olivaris
Gambusia affinis
Roccus chrysops
Micropterus salmoides
Lepomis microlophus
Lepomis macrochirus
Lepomis humilis
Pomoxis annularis
Percina caprodes
Aplodinotus grunniens
Total
Common Name
shortnose gar
longnose gar
gizzard shad
bigmouth buffalo
smallmouth buffalo
carpsucker
carp
suckermouth minnow
plains shiner
sharpnose shiner
Arkansas River shiner
redhorse shiner
sand shiner
plains minnow
parrot minnow
channel catfish
black bullhead
flathead catfish
mosquiotfish
white bass
black bass
redear sunfish
bluegill
orangespotted sunfish
white crappie
logperch
freshwater drum
Number Taken
11
68
399
2
291
356
64
35
34
16
105
hag
10
3
hoe
71
0)
7
21
121
60
‘i
4O
20
2D
8
8
2,663
--- Page 15 ---
OO"OOT SOT OO°O0OT e2T O0°OOT 9ST CO*OOT get O'OOT 16 OO'00T SL O0'OOT QHT STB4O],
96° T zg" T 00°0 = OO 00°0 =i 00°0 = si«O 00°0 0 o0°7o Oo oTesgng yynoustg
Cleo E®) 49O°T Z ole OEE®) 00'0 )=—s«On Lot OT 00°O Oo 99° T ystgzeo peayyeTa
00°00 — («OO 00°0 =< 69° T zt a 00°O0 =i 00°O 0 oco'Oo Oo umig
2g°h 8 ge*h 6 Ont d, ago S Go" t q Ce°T T 00°O fe) atddero aqtyM
O6°T 2 49°T Z 62°T 2 T9° T 00°0 =O 00°0 0 0o0o7Oo Oo sseq yoeTg
€y°TtT at 4°S L 26°T € 92°h 6 2c’02 = 6T 19°9 S SO0°g oT sseq 94TUM
00°0 =i 00°0 = «On 00°0 = «OO 00°0 ~=—s«O 00°0 ~=—s«O 00°0 0 ooo O peeyT—ing yoetg
26°6 = OT one OE €T°S = gg 92° = TT TS°8 ce°€T OT geL 2 389 Touuey)
T6°T zZ 19°T zg TH'9 OT CoH 4 uae L 19°41 Tt TL°9 6 diego
cE°Ee = GE 1g°le HE €q°e2 GE 49°62 LE O6*HT = AT CE°€T OT Qy°Te 2 dTayonsdied Jaaty
OL°he 8692 96°TE 6€ HEEE =a qL°lt €2 L2°T2 02 CE°€T OT LT°9% 2S oTeszgnq YQNomTTeug
29°, g qO°QT = ad o€'1t 3 =6L2 9T°0g §= Se TL°TT = ET 19°92 og LL*HT O€ peys piezzty
00°O0 = «<0 00°0 =O "9" T feet Goth 00°0 o 8 L9° Z eB esouysoys
G6" T Tg" T TH'9 OT ohn ae) geo ak 19°0OT Q 60°HT 8g 123 esousu0T
% "ON % "ON % “ON % “ON of, “ON % ‘on 9 “ON sapoadg
Taqusoaq JaQMaeAON 1390190 Jaqueydag qsnsny Aqne eune
yooyg ATUQUOW UOTSIeATG ByeT
"6G6T - QS6T ‘UOTSIaATG Sye]T WoTg SZeN TTTD Aq pexoeT{TOD setoadg jo stTeqoy, ATUAUCM “OT eTaBL
“GT
--- Page 16 ---
00° O0OT
GT‘O
TS°0
0S°0
66°€
€2°t
9L°8
00°0
HT°S
£9 tt
gL’ Sz
Lo*Tz
2S°2e
0g°0
26° t
T8404,
JO %
TQE fT
LT
Tel
Th
49
9SE
T62
TTE
TT
89
Zaquny
TeI0L
00°00
00°0
00°0
OT’2
0S°€
On'T
On°T
00°0
On°T
61°6
LE*62
QgS°6T
L2*L2
00°0
6T*t
T €nT
aT
on
92
6€
key
0O0°O0OT SgT
00°0)—s(«éO
€9°T €
4S" T
on°S = =—OT
ooo)
G6°S Tt
00°0 = «On
zg°T €
) |
G6°SZ gt
€y°et | €S
Go'He £9
00°O0 )=—s«O
LZ°OT 6T
6 ON
Trady
00°O
00°0
00°0
00°0
ge" h
Loh
48°9
00°0
at €
00°0
98
€T°S
GL°9
00°0
Sg"
%
Oot LIT
oO @® uN
oO +
€ St
& tf
“ON
Yor
00°OOT 98
00°O )
00°O fe)
00°O 6)
HTT E
La°? ro)
69°0€ = Le
00°O @)
Q9e°TT OT
00°O fe)
6S°TZ 6T
q9°ET = aT
TE°6T =—oLT
00°O )
00°0 )
% ‘ON
Azenigag
yooug ATUAUCW UOTSZeATG ayeT
(peanut 70D)
“6S66T - QG6T ‘UOTSAeATG SYST WOlg SJeN TITD Aq payoaeT{ToD saetoedg jo sTeqoy, ATYQUOW
‘OT
00°00T LT
00°O fe)
00°O fe)
00°O fe)
00°O (6)
68°S T
62°SE 9
00°O fe)
00°0 O
00°O ce)
Ty°62 SG
00°O )
€o°co
00°0O 8)
gg°S T
% ‘ON
Arenuepe
STB{07,
oTesgnqg yQnoustTg
ystgzeo peo zely
mnig
aftddez aqtym
sseq 4oeTg
sseq a yTuM
pBsuliTng Hoe
4eo Toeuueyg
dire
dayonsdies Jaaty
oTeyynq YNoNTT es
peus plezzty
ae8 asouysoys
ies asousuocy
setoads
“OT STaBL
--- Page 17 ---
17.
Table ll. Stomach Analysis of White Bass Taken From Lake Diversion,
1958 - 1959
Frequency of Total Number
Food Item Occurrence Identified
Mayfly nymphs 9 292 7
Sunfish (Lepomis) 9 39
Shad (Dorosoma) 10 16
Black bass (Micropterus) 1 1
Fish remains (unidentifiable) 6 8
Minnows (unidentifiable) 4 4
Freshwater shrimp 1 1
Grasshopper (shorthorned ) 1 1
eK
Table 12. Stomach Analysis of Channel Cat Taken From Lake Diversion,
1958 - 1959
Frequency of Total Number
Food Item Occurrence Identified
Cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) 9 10
Hair (probably rat) 2 -
Filamentous algae 3 -
Leaf hopper a 1
Wasp 1 a
Grass seeds J. 20 #
Amphipods 1 65
Chironemid larvae 2 6
Water beetle (Haliplidae) 2. 1
Fish vertebra L 1
Plant fiber 1 -
--- Page 18 ---
18.
Table 13. Stomach Analysis of White Crappie Taken From Lake Diversion,
1958 - 1959.
Frequency of Total Number
Food Item Occurrence Identified
Mayfly nymphs y 70 #
Sunfish (Lepomis) 1 1
Fish remains 2 3
Shad (Dorosoma) iS 5
x ee *
Table 14. Stomach Analysis of Black Bass Taken From Lake Diversion,
1958 - 1959.
Frequency of Total Number
Food Item Occurrence Identified
Sunfish (Lepomis) 1 1
Fish remains 2 3
Black bass (Micropterus) 1 1
ee He %
Table 15. Stomach Analysis of Flathead Catfish Taken From Lake Diversion,
1958 - 1959.
Frequency of Total Number
Food Item Occurrence Identified
Mayfly nymphs 1
Sunfish (Lepomis) 2 6
Fish remains 1 1
--- Page 19 ---
19.
Table 16. Comparison of Average "K" Factors of Fish Taken From Lake
Diversion, 1958 - 1959.
Longnose gar
Male
Female
Shortnose gar
Male
Female
Gizzard shad
Male
Female
Bigmouth buffalo
Male
Female
Smallmouth buffalo
Male
Female
Carpsucker
Male
Female
Carp
Male
Female
Channel cat
Male
Female
Flathead cat
Male
Female
White bass
Male
Female
Black bass
Male
Female
Crappie
Male
Female
Drum
Male
Female
1956 to 1957
ones)
He
Nome)
ho ~ WW
e e ° °
1 OV a
Mh fo
Owl
ine)
Ww
1957 to 1958
hr
W
WW
NM Po
rh 19 hm 10
ron <)
He
oo Co
WW
oO
1958 to 1959
ee
Ww
Mm Pw
[NO
Uo WW
rw
WW
hw Pr
hM fo
on
MO
loom)
Pe
AA
Mw fp
—~1 @
ft fo
“wn
fm
leekXe)
Wh
oO
--- Page 20 ---
Factor
Males
Females
Factor
Males
Females
Factor
Males
Females
Factor
Males
Females
Factor
Males
Females
=— a wea
0.
Table 17. Distribution of "K" Factors for Fish Taken From Lake Diversion, 1958
Lepisosteus osseus
Average
3 ot 5 6 "EK
3 26 7 4
7 21 4 4
Lepisosteus platostomus
Average
3 nS 5 a Ff aR
1 3 1 a)
1 3 2 5
Dorosoma cepedianum
1.3 dh 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 24 2.5 2.6 2.
1 8 19 17 18 15 6 5 1 1
3 15 19 26 30 ho 30 21 12 14
Ictiobus cyprinellus
Average
3.3 3.4 3.5 "KN
1 3.5
1 3.4
Ictiobus bubalus
2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7. 3.
2 ) 6) 1 8 14 21 21 33 19 25 14 5 3
1 3 7 9 14 el 25 13 9 4 4 )
- 1959.
FON@
Average
nye
2.1
1 2.2
209
HH Oo
Average
5.0 mu
a 348
a: 342
--- Page 21 ---
L°T T - “ Fe T Zz T
wn T'S O'S 6°T Q°T L°T Q°T S'T
ese1eay
STIBATTO SnQoT potha
LA°t = T T T T 4 T t T S 4 OT & T
A’t oo { + rs - zZ T T @ Fe S 1 Z T
wns L°2 9°% GS HS E'S |e T's O'S BT QT L°T Q9°T GT HT
aBeraay
snjejound SnNINTeBYZOT
Ge - - T € 9 S L € + Z T - - -
g'2 Tt 7 T Z € z di ds t € - - - T
wn HE €°E Se TE OTE G62 Qa L*e 9° Gt? HS E'2 Se TZ
asBIaaAy
OTdaeo snutadhy
g'a T TT 62 S S et dt LE € je ET QI 2 0 0 Fe @) @)
L°e T T Fe t Fd Gt ec €S Eh SE €T +t € T T 0 T
utn 6°€ LE QE GE Hee ETE S|SeE TE O'€ G62 Qre Lee 9°S GS HS EC°2 Se! Ts O'2 G'T
aseraay
OTdieo Sapotdiey
( penut4uo))
6S6T - QS6T ‘UOTSTeATG Oye] WOTg usye], YSTY Joy saoqgoeq ,y,, JO uoTynqTazqstq “LT eTgqey
“Td
eT
0°d
ert
soTeueg
SoTeW
IoO7VOBT
soTeuag
SsoTew
Ioyoeg
so Teme
so Tey
roqoeg
gsoTeueg
SOTeW
Jo oR
--- Page 22 ---
ore T T T = - - soTeneg
6°2 = - =. 2 - - < soTey
ols ff TS OTF G62 gta Le 9°2 107,08 g
esezoay
suatuundid snjoutTpoLdy
g’'a 6 = ro - - 2 + ra - € 9 G 9 t - € rf seTeueg
6°2 = - * a ~ T - T T € S - - 2 T - - soT ew
uta =O" ~ ge G°E WE €°€ SE TE OTF 62% Qe Le 92 Ge He (C2 se Toq,oe8g
aBe1saAy
stze—nuue stTxouog
Le @ Fs - rf £ T - T T - seT ewe g
Go - - T T T - - - 2 - saT ey
wlu Of 6°2 Qe L'e 9g°2 Gre nee €°2 22 Te? 10708 g
aseIoaAy
soptomces Ssnie ydolotw
Ae OT Z z Fe A € TT OT OT TT 9 € Z = - SoT e987
g°2 T G T 8 S S 8 g + € T - - T saTey
oln °F EE Se TE ov€ 69% ge Le 92 Se Hse ECS S23 Ts oO toz,oeg
aseIaay
sdoskayo snoooy
(penutyuop)
"6S6T - QG6T ‘UOTSteATG eyeT WOIg Uy], YSTY TOF ssoqoe_ ,y,, JO uoTyngTaqstq "LT eTaeL
“oo
--- Page 23 ---
23.
Table 18. Temperatures of Air and Water at Lake Diversion
on Collection Dates.
Date Air Water
6/12/58 82 a
7/3/58 82 -
8/12/58 82 -
9/12/58 97 80
10/8/58 72 -
11/13/58 69 59
12/3/58 59 51
1/7/59 hg 37
2/10/59 hg 4h
3/4/59 65 51
4/8/59 53 63
5/8/59 Th 71