TPWD 1955 F-2-R-2 #173: Inventory of the species present and their distribution in those portions of the San Gabriel River and Brushy Creek within Region 6-E
Open PDFExtracted Text
STATE _ Texas _
PROJECT F~2uRm2, Job Bmlo
PERIOD gone 1, 1955 to Nov.
30. 1955
Job Completion Report -w fl n,i§
by
Billy D. Cooper
TITLE
Inventory of the species present and their distribution in those portions of
the San_Gabriel River and Brushy Creek within Region 6~E, which were not covered in
JOb B37, Project Fm2mle.
OBJECTIVES
To continue andcmmpbte the study of the rivers begun under Job BwT, Project
Fmele.
METHODS
Seine and rotenone collections were made in the following waters of Burnet
and Milam Counties; the North San Gabriel River in Burnet County, six collections;
The San Gabriel River in Milan County, four collections; Brushy Creek in Milan Counm
ty, two collections. (See Table l and the appended map for location of stations.)
All seine collections were made with 6‘ x h? and 10' x h“ common sense seines
and/or with a 26? X 6’ bag seine with %“ mesh. '
Seining collections were made at stations one, three, four, five, six and .
seven on the North San Gabriel River in Burnet County and at stationaeight and elevw
"en on the San Gabriel in Milan County.
Rotenone collections were made at stations eight and eleven on the San Gabe
riel River and thirteen and fourteen on Brushy Creek.in Milam County.
Seine and rotenone specimens were taken to the laboratory for identification
and counting after preservation with ten percent formalin. Large rotenone'specimens
were identified and counted in the field.
Thermal, chemical and ecological data were recorded for each station in conm
junction with Job Ash, Project Fm2-R~2.
FINDINGS
The coMbined streams yielded a total of 33 species representing nine famiu
lies. A total of 12 species were taken in the North San Gabriel River in Burnet
county, 32 species were taken in the San Gabriel River_in Milan County, and 18 spec~
ies were collected in the Brushy Creek in Milan County. Table II shows a breakdown
by species of the specimens collected by seining. Table :11 gives the percentages
and numbers of each species taken in two rotenone collectbns from each stream.
A list showing the distribution of the species collected during the study
has not been included since the study area is small and the work done is merely a
continuation of the work began under Job Bm7, Project F-EuRul.
:"\
" c: .
Seining collections in the North San Gabriel River, in Burnet County, prom
duced 12 species of fishes. The fishes most abundant and most widely distributed
were the red shiner, blacktail shiner and the longear sunfish. The green sunfish,
largemouth black bass, spotted bass and the stoneroller were taken in onemhalf or
more of the collections but were limited in number. The bluegill sunfish, orangew
throat darter, mosquitofish, parrot minnow and mimic shiner were fishes taken in
only one collection.
Scarcity of water in the Sanéhbriel River in Milan County limited collecm
tions to two locations. These areas were first seined and later treated with
rotenone. A total of 10 species were taken by seining in the first collection
while 28 species were later collected with rotenone. The most abundant species were
the: longear sunfish, tadpole madtom, blach'bullhead, ghost shiner and the red
Shiner. Those fish next in order of abundance were the: blacktail shiner, parrot
minnow, channel catfish and the river carpsucker.
Collection stations on Brushy Creek were dry or had very little water
when first visited and could not be collected. After a rain the stations were
again visited and two of them were treated with rotenone. The creek was not rune
ning buttmierwaspmesent in the larger pools. A total of 18 species were collects
ed from two stations using the rotenone. The presence of channel catfish in the
collections might indicate that a repopulation of the stream section occured from
downstream since no catfish were taken from upstream collections. (Job BmT, Projm
ect Fm2me1.) This occurrence could be explained in that the catfish were more
resistant to turbid conditions following a rain and could move into an area that
other fishes could not tolerate. The remainder of the fish population might ease
ily have'existed in the very shallow pools along the stream before the rain.
No ecological preference of the fishes could be noted since all fish were
restricted to shallow or medium depth pools at all collection stations.
'SUMMARY
1. The field work of this job was done in conjunction with Job Amt and
is a continuation of Job BmT, Project F~2mel.
2. A total of two collections were made on Brushy Creek, Milam County,
six collections on the North San Gabriel River in Burnet County and four collections
on the San Sabriel River in Milam County.
3. The distribution.breakdown is as follows:
Brushy Creek, 18 species, 7 families
North San Gabriel, 12 species, h families
San Gabriel, 32 species, 9 families'
A. No ecological distribution of the fishes found in the streams could be
:noted since all fish were restricted to shallow or medium depth pools.
Table 1
North San Gabriel River (Burnet County)
' "“ ”“ “ T“' “”'
Station No. Location
1. Russell Fork North San Gabriel, 6 mi. NE
Bertram
2. Russell Fork North san Gabriel, 5 mi. N
Burnet on Farm Road 963.
3. North San Gabriel River, 5 mi. SE Lake Victor
A. North San Gabriel River 3 mi. NNW Tamega
5 North San Gabriel River, crossing at Joppa
6 Russell Fork North San Gabriel, 2 mi. 8 Joppa
7 North San Gabriel River, A mi. SW Mahomet
on Farm Road 2H3
San Gabriel River (Milam County) ,
.
Station No. Location
8. %~mi. S town San Gabriel on Farm Road #86
9. 6 mi. SE town San Gabriel on county road'
10. 7 mi. NW Rockdale on county road
11. 6 mi. N Rockdale on Farm Road #87
Brushy Creek (Milan County)
Station No. Location
12. 1 mi. E Thorndale on Texas Highway 79
13. 6 mi. E Thorndale on county road
1h. 5 mi. NW Rockdale on county road
Locations of survey stations used during study period under
Job B-lO, Project_Fm2~R-2, Basic Survey of the Remaining
Portions of the San Gabriel River and Brushy Creek within
Region 6-B, Which Were Not COvered in Job B—7, Project Fm2gfim.
L.
E;
F: kn ya no PU F3
Et“
“3
Species
Eroductus
venustus
. lutrensis
. volucellus
. Vigilax
. anomalum
. notatus
. affinis
. punctulatus
. salmoides
. megalotis
. cyanellus
. spectabile
. macrochirus
. scierus
. Eromelas
Total
1
9
Stations
1 3 h 5 6 7
9 57 21 12
37 l” 3
8
3h
2 l
6 13 13 2h 52
l 3
A
Table ll.
2 7
6
Table 11.
.To- 't of
tal Total
' 99 26 259
63 16.710
8 2.122
3h 9 018
16 4.2uu
2 0.530
10 2.652
12 3.183
11h 30.238
13 3.uus
2. 0.530
t 1.061
377 99-995
Station
8 11
62 1
22 l
176 3
'To-
tal
23
35
179
Seining Collections North San Gabriel River,
Burnet County and San Gabriel River, Milan
County.
JOb B-lO Project F~2nR-2, June
Through November 1959.
0.558
35.195
12.889
0.558
21.229
3.910
l9~553
3.910
1.675
0.558
11___l______11_l__l__1________l__________________1___________________1_____________.
18 30 67 1&0 99 23
..mmfl_l.______l_l_______l____ll______l___l_n_._____l____.___oom_____.fl______uw__..
99°995
5.
Table 111
San Gabriel River Brushy Creek“
Name of Species Number Percent Number Percent
Lepisosteus platostomus 7 0.686 -- —~
Dorosoma cepedianum 5 0.h90 2h 1.758
Carpiodes carpio 37 3.627 6 0.839
beosto a congestum '2 0.196 -- --
Cyprinus carpio 1 0.098 2 0.1t6
Notropis venustus ha h.313 -~ -~
Notropis lutrensis 127 12.h50 186 10.695
Notropis volucellus h 0.392 —— «m
Notropis buchanani 9% 9.215 -- _-
Hybognathus nuchalis -w -- 1 0.073 '
Pimephales vigilax 70 6.682 56 u.102
Campostoma anomalum 30 2.981 -e -_
Ictalurus punctatus 53 5.196 5 0.366
Ameiurus melas 133 13.039 219 16.0h3
Ameiurus natalis 20 1.960 113 8.278
Pilodictus olivaris 5' 0.h9o 2 0.1u6
Schilbeodes gyrinus 92 9.019 22 1.611
Gambusia affinis 11 1.078 508 37.216
Micropterus punctulatus 9 0.882 ~~ _-
.Micropterus salmoides 9 0.392 -- c-
Chaenobryttus coronarius 18 1.768 10 0.732
Lepomis cyanellus 18, 1.769 92 6.739
Lepomis macrochirus 1h 1.372 8 0.293
Lepomis humilis_ 7 0.686 37 2.710
Lepomis megalotis 186 18.235 117 8.571
Hadropterus scierus 5 0.890 -m w-
Eercina caprodes 10 0.980 -— mm
EtheOstoma chlorosomum 1 0.098 1 0.073
Etheostoma spectabile. 9 0.882 m— we
Aplodinotus grunniens h ..0.392 -~ mm
1:920 99-989 1:355 99-991
Table 111. Results of Rotenone Collections, San Gabriel
River, Milam Countg'and Brushy Creek, Milan
County. Job B—lO, Project F—2—R-2, June
Through November 1958.
Hamnmam soomoom asum one mid snow com .hssooo oOmEmesz me 0866 Moo? Mom
Humamah poomoam .Oum one Had mfiofi eon «homooo Haom ofi omen Mao? ooh ”swam
Qaam new and ooh “hpoooo anfizv Mooao hflmoam
Qasm gob 33¢ new Amooooo Emawzv scram Hofloomw new
main 6mm 3-6 66 Asocsoe omeasmv sesam Haatnee new 60662
mam flow mad flow Amumooo EnHMEV noowm mappwg
mam flow mud new Amoflpoooo pooasm woo womemsoqv ooaam momomsmg
nowoomm %o eoflnowooocH whooasm owmmm soowm
mgw ooflmom
MU¢ZH¢MQ mmme MHBBHH
0 one Q n mosey
a : nooflwopm nowooofifloo
wow aoapom
: woowpmpm ho>oom
mH
unnamed