TPWD 1965 F-6-R-12 #957: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region 5-B: Basic Survey and Inventory of Fish Species Present in the Lower Nueces River

. JOB COMPLETION REPORT As required by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT TEXAS Federal Aid Project No. Fné—R-IZ FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS OF THE WATERS OF REGION 5-B Job No. B—23 Basic Survey and Inventory of Fish Species Present . in the Lower Nueces River- Project Leader: Charles T. Menn J. Weldon Watson Executive Director Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Marion.Toole Eugene A. Walker D—J Coordinator Assistant Director for Wildlife . January 21 , 1965 ABSTRACT The basic survey of the Lower Nueces River from Wesley Seale Dam to Nueces Bay revealed that channel and blue catfish, largemouth bass and white and black crappie are the principal game fish species. Rough fish species including alligator, spotted and longnose gars, gizzard shad, smallmouth buffalo, striped mullet, bluegill, freshwater drum, Rio Grande perch and lined sole dominated the netting collections both in numbers and in weight with 88.43 Per cent of the total number and 97.04 per cent of the weight. No developmental or management work is presently proposed or recommended. JOB COMPLETION REPORT State of Texas Project No. F-6—R-12 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region S-B Job No. B—23 Title: Basic Survey and Inventory of Fish Present in the Lower Nueces River Period Covered: January 1, 1964 through December 31, 1964 Objectives: To determine the physical, chemical and ecological conditions and the relative numbers of fish species present in the lower portions of the Nueces River lying within San Patricio, Jim Wells and Nueces Counties. Procedures: Field trips were made during the months of February, May, August and November. On each trip, nine netting collections and 10 seining collections were made. Standard, 125-foot long, gill nets were set overnight at established netting stations. Each fish was weighed in grams and measured in millimeters. Internal examinations were made to determine sex, stage of sexual development and incidence of parasitism. Specimens taken in seining collections were preserved in 10 per cent formaldehyde in the field and taken to the Mathis field office for identifi- cation and tabulation. Water analyses were made on each field trip. Notes were made on pollution, aquatic vegetation and topographical data. Maps prepared by the Texas Highway Department were used to pinpoint netting, seining and water analyses stations. A list of the fish species taken in nets and seines is included in Table l. The scientific and common names used in this table were taken from Hubbsl A Checklist 2f Texas Fresh-Water_Fishes, Texas Game and Fish Commission, IF Series No. 3, June, 1961, and from Special Publication No. 2, 1960, American _- —-a—:—:—. m ——-——m — II—II—l—II—I—l—I—II—II- m —-——n. — WWW—hm— Table 1. A list of fish species recorded from Lower Nueces River _ . Scientific Name . _ _ Alligator gar Lepisosteus spatula Lacépede Spotted gar L. oculatus (Winchell) Longnose gar L. osseus (Linnaeus) Ladyfish Elops saurus Linnaeus Finescale menhaden Brevoortia gunteri Hildebrand Gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum (LeSueur) Striped anchovy Anchoa hepsetus (Linnaeus) Mexican tetra Astyanax mexicanus (Filippi) Smallmouth buffalo Ictiobus bubalus (Rafinesque) Pugnose minnow ' Opsopoeodus emiliae Hay Red Shiner Notropis lutrensis (Baird and Girard) Bullhead minnow Pimephales vigilax (Baird and Girard) Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque) Blue catfish I. furcatus (LeSueur) Tadpole madtom Satan gyrinus (Mitchill) Gulf killifish Fundulus grandis Baird and Girard Sheepshead minnow Cyprinodon variegatus Lacepede Mosquitofish Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard) Sailfin molly Mollienesia latipinna LeSueur Amazon molly .M. formosa (Girard) Striped mullet Mugil cephalus Linnaeus Tidewater silverside Menidia beryllina (Cope) White bass Roccus chrysops (Rafinesque) Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides (Lacépede) Warmouth Chaenobryttus gulosus (Cuvier) Bluegill Lep_mis machrochirus Rafinesque White crappie Pomoxis annularis Rafinesque Black crappie.nigromacu1atus (LeSueur) Fountain darter Etheost.oma fonticola (Jordan and Gilbert) Leatherjacket Oligoplites saurus (Bloch and Schneider) Freshwater drum Aplodinot us grunniens Rafinesque Pinfish Lagodon rhomboides (Linnaeus) Rio Grande perch Cichlasoma c ano uttatum (Baird and Girard) Naked goby Gobiosoma bosci Lacepede Lined sole Achirus lineatus (Linnaeus) I!“ Findings: Physical Description That portion of the Nueces River from Wesley Seale Dam, at Lake Corpus Christi, to Nueces Bay on the Texas coast was intensively surveyed during this segment (see map). This section of the river, which is approximately 38 miles in length, flows in a southeasterly direction to Nueces Bay. The average depth varies from approximately 4 to 10 feet, while the average width ranges from about 40 feet below the dam to about 200 feet in the lower reaches of the river. The river banks are sharply cut, indicating flooding in the past. Willows, ash, hackberry, live oak, mesquite, retama, and huisache trees are numerous along the river. Netting Collections Nine netting stations were set up during this survey. They represented the different types of habitat present. An overnight set was made at each station during February, May, August and November. The nets were run the following morning, and data for each fish were recorded. A total of 511 fish of 17 species weighing 963 pounds was taken in the netting collections. Game fish species included channel and blue catfish, white bass, largemouth bass, white and black crappie. Collectively, the game fish comprised 11.57 per cent of the netted specimens and 2.96 per cent of their weight. Tables 2 and 3 show the results of netting by station. A single specimen of white bass was taken below the dam. It apparently came from the lake where they are found in limited numbers. White and black Rough fish species including alligator, spotted and longnose gars, gizzard shad, smallmouth buffalo, striped mullet, bluegill, freshwater drum, Rio Grande perch and lined sole dominated the netting collections both in numbers and in weights with 88.43 per cent of the total number and 97.04 per cent of the total weight. Gars of one species or another were taken at all stations and were evenly distributed in the river. Collectively, the three species of gets made up 36.79 per cent of the netting collections by number. Upon examination of their stomachs, shad, silversides, unidentifiable fish remains, grasshoppers, crayfish, and unidentifiable insect remains were found. Visceral round worms were found in several gars. Though gizzard shad were taken at each station, they were more numerous at the lower stations. In the case of smallmouth buffalo, the reverse was true. collections. The ”K” factors of all fish were considered normal for fish of this area. Lmflm mfimw meumofion e m¢.mw Swab Lwoom memo Hem mm.HH fimflm mamo ammo Mom as am No um eaom nomad Lumen encwnw OHM anew neum3£mmnm emflmmmno xomam soflmmmno muHSB Hanwmaam emmMQ spoofiownmg amuse ouflfia uoHHDE womwsum esmflmumo seam .eamaeueo fineness oammmnn LunoEHHmEm page mummuflw asseseau new omonwnoq new vmuuomm new noumwflaa¢ r—i LflI—Iz—Iu—h—I @3832 HmuOH mo “new mom mdoflumum doma .zoenom oflmmm no>flm mmoeoz HmBoA .msowueum he .ooxmu Lmfim mo Hmmfisz .N eaamw 4—”. “WM— newnoomn unmEonzmmmE usteB on mmumonGH we swam mfimw mmumowwnH c 1W! ¢O.N0 swam swnom nnoo Hem 00.N swam ofimw usou Hem 00.00H 0.00HH m.N0 m.0w No.0 N.0 oHOm waned m0.0 0.0 sound ewomuw OHM 00.H 0.NH anew Houmzzmmnm 0N.0 0.m ¢.H eoflmmmno womam 05.0 m.w m.0 eoflmmmno mufifig m0.0 0.0 H.0 Haflwmoam eq.0 N.m m.0 emmmfi Lusoaowueg m0.0 0.0 wmwma ouflLB H0.m H.N¢ w.0 umHHDE womfluum Hm.o o.oH H.© enmnmnmo seam em.0 0.0 ¢.H esmflmumo Handmzo mm.om m.mom m.oH oHsmmun nonosHHmEm m0.m N.Nw 0.n¢ mem wnmNNHU m0.0 d.0 ¢.0 Lmflmmwmg N0.mm 0.0 0.m¢ new mmoswsod 0w.m m.m. q.m new wmunomm w¢.0H m.H new noumwflaaw usufloz HeuOH . we memo mom. . . . _ . _. . _ meHDMmm doma .%o>wom oammm nmeflm mmoonz HmBOA .mQOHumum %@ .smxwu fimflm mo mwnoom .m mHLmH seem waned meow wexmz gonna mmsmnw cam .amaeeam umxoemnosueeg nephew casunoom Haammsam fiusofinmz mmmn Lunofimwnmq mwflmnm>afiw noumBewflH umHHoE wemflnum %HHOE noumfim asses eneaamm Lmflmouflovmoz BOGGHE weeSmmmosm Lmawflfifiwx Mano Soumma oHomUmH Bosnfle emosaaom Menage wmm BOGGHE mmocwnm snoop neoflxoz m>ososm nmmflnum muse meNNHw Cowmasofi manommsflm amneaemu new wouuomm nonasz HmDOH mo Homo mom mGOHumum domfi .kmDnSm onmm Hmbflm mmomnz woBOA .muanmmn wcficflom .m oHQmH were found, but they are not a problem at this time. Since there is sufficient flow in the river, aquatic vegetation is not considered a problem and is not likely to become one. Good soil conservation practices have been used in this area, but more are needed to prevent soil pollution. Many landowners have planted coastal bermuda along the river. This practice has been very successful in stabilizing soil. No nutria were seen along the river nor was there any indication of their presence. Discussion: At the present time there is a limited population of largemouth bass and white and black crappie. Many anglers limit their fishing to catfish, however. No flatheads were found, but there is a good channel and blue catfish population. No actual count of fishermen was made, but nearly all of them observed were at one of three places; the Highway 359 crossing, Bazemore Park or the Highway 9 crossing. Presently, there are no commercial fishing camps located along the river, but there are a number of bait stands nearby. Recommendations: A commercial netter is recommended to harvest unlimited numbers of gars and smallmouth buffalo from this portion of the river. Any catfish taken in their nets, however, should be returned to the water immediately. The area game warden has reported that he has taken a number of fish traps out of the river. This work should be continued. For the purpose of keeping a check on the populations, a limited survey and creel census should be made in the future for making management proposals. No developmental or management work is presently proposed or recommended. //-j .. .- x / -~“3/.{/’ Prepared by Charles T. Menn Approved by ,frfiiofluflmMVix'sx/aflw7 e" Project Leader ' Coordinator Date January 212 1965 Kenneth C. Jurgens Regional Supervisor F>SNJ 00mm“ m In; a ‘35:; semema . . @ mmwfim 0E 00rrm0HHoz mH>HH02m F mmMDHDm . OHHH nmfinwom I «$.an mbmwwmwm plhllllLlILIIL 0~wa flwpmm FO<<mfi ZCmOmm D. <mm