Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

TPWD 1963 F-2-R-10 #870: Job Completion Report: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region II-B, Job No. E-6: Inks Lake Fish Population Control Experiment, Project No. F-2-R-

Open PDF
tpwd_1963_f-2-r-10_870_inks_lake_fish_.pdf 12 pages completed 40 entities

Extracted Text

--- Page 1 --- JOB COMPLETION REPORT As required by FEDERAL ATD IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT TEXAS Federal Aid Project No. F-2-R-10 FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS OF THE WATERS OF REGION II-B Job No. E-6: Inks Lake Fish Population Control Experiment Asst. Project Leader; Richard L. White J. Weldon Watson Executive Director Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Marion Toole Eugene A. Walker D-J Coordinator Director, Program Planning August 30, 1963 --- Page 2 --- ABSTRACT An attempt was made to remove rough fish from Inks Lake using various size gill nets, hoop nets, fyke nets and chemical fish toxicants. After two years of work the job was dropped because the amount of time spent could not be justi- fied with the limited harvest of undesirable fish. During this period 118,200 feet of gill nets and selected fyke and hoop nets removed a total of 9,485.69 pounds of rough fish from the lake. Chemical eradication removed large numbers of gizzard shad and fresh water drum but no close estimates of numbers of weight were possible. No renewal of this job is anticipated. --- Page 3 --- JOB COMPLETION REPORT State of Texas Project No. F-2-R-10 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region II-B. Job No. E-6 Title: Inks Lake Fish Population Control Experiment. Period Covered: February 1, 1962 - January 31, 1963 Objectives: To intensively remove rough fish species from Inks Lake as an experiment to determine the effect of such removal upon the specific composition of the total fish population and angling success. Techniques used: A total of 118,200 feet of gill net was set during the two years of this job to intensively remove smallmouth buffalo, Ictiobus bubalus, river carpsucker, Carpiodes carpio, and longnose gar, Lepisosteus osseus, from the lake. Of this total, 90,950 feet consisted of 2-inch square mesh; 1,500 feet of 2%-inch square mesh; 23,900 feet of 3-inch square mesh, and 1,850 feet of 4-inch square mesh. Cottonseed cake and sour corn were used occasionally in an attempt to con- centrate bottom feeders in a netting sector. Baited and unbaited fyke nets were used in specific areas of the lake to determine if they would prove more efficient in harvesting rough fish. One slough of the lake, Devil's Waterhole, was treated with rotenone on December 12, 1961, at a concentration of 0.12 ppm to selectively remove gizzard shad. Plans called for treating various sloughs with concentrations of liquid rote- none approaching 0.21 ppm to selectively remove gizzard shad. However, treatment of the entire lake for this purpose was accomplished in early March of 1962, under Job 16a35, Project F-14-D-6. In order that adequate evaluation of this job could be made, slough treatments were suspended. Approximately eight experimental gill nets were set each month under Job B-24 (Resurvey). These collections were made at designated stations in an attempt to obtain data which could be compared with previously collected information. From this, an attempt was made to determine any population changes resulting from rough fish removal efforts. A limited creel census was conducted during June, July, and August of 1962 and 1963, with creel checks undertaken on one weekday and one weekend day of each week during this period. Data collected were used to determine any changes in fishing success. --- Page 4 --- -2- A checklist of species mentioned in this report is given in Table 1. Findings: Inks Lake was treated on March 1, 1962, with liquid rotenone at 0.14 ppm for a selective shad kill under Project F-14-D-5, Job 16a36. From all visual evidence, the selective treatment was successful. Shad comprised 48.88 per cent by numbers and 10.57 per cent by weight of the fish collected during the 1961 resurvey as op- posed to 11.11 per cent by weight and 2.34 per cent by number of the fish collected through extensive netting immediately after the selective treatment. Figures from the 1962 survey show shad comprising 32.85 per cent by number and 17.11 per cent by weight. There was an extensive kill of fresh water drum resulting from the selec- tive treatment, although this species was rarely collected by netting. In 13 months of netting, from 1961 to 1963, 9,485.69 pounds of rough fish were harvested. As shown in Table 2, the majority of this total consisted of smallmouth buffalo, river carpsucker, and carp. Only 11.57 pounds of fish per surface acre, or 8.02 pounds of fish per 100 feet of net, were collected on Inks Lake from 1961 to 1962. The netting was carried out for only 13 of a possible 24 months, but if the figures. were expanded for a 24-month period, the end result would still not be ex- tensive enough to warrant the man-days spent on the project. Baiting netted areas with cottonseed cake did not increase the rough fish harvest. Fyke nets were set in areas where smallmouth buffalo and carpsucker were ob- served to be schooling, but use of this type of net resulted in a collection of turtles and small channel catfish exclusively. Employment of hoop nets also met with negligible results. Limited creel censuses, which were conducted during June, July, and August of 1961 and 1962, revealed the success of anglers on Inks Lake during these periods. Tables 2 and 3 show the number, size of fish, and other data collected during the creel censuses of 1961 and 1962 respectively. In 1961, the total fish per-man-hour for Inks Lake was 0.92. This figure seems to represent fair success for the fisher- man, but it should be pointed out that 37 per cent of the total catch was white bass, Roccus chrysops, which are caught seasonly. Also, 39 per cent of the total fish per- man-hour consisted of sunfish, Lepomis sps.. In 1962, sunfish made up 72 per cent of the total fish per-man-hour on Inks Lake. The total fish per-men-hour was 0.81. From the data collected on the creel censuses, it is evident that the fishing on Inks Lake has not improved during the two years that this job was carried on. The table below illustrates the per cent of rough fish by weight and number as determined by experimental gill netting over the past eight years. The decided edge held by rough fish in previous years has been decreased during the 1962 pro- ject period. This seventeen per cent drop of rough fish in number was probably caused by the selective treatment of the lake for gizzard shad, rather than the harvesting of rough fish by netting. --- Page 5 --- =3- LAKE INKS ROUGH FISH RATIO,. 1955 - 1962 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 Per cent rough fish (Number) 63 78 63 71 65 70 73 56 Per cent rough fish (Weight) 74 74 78 71 74 79 79 80 After two years of operation of the project, the methods of harvesting rough fish have been somewhat exhausted and still there has been no discernible reduction of rough fish in Inks Lake. Because the lack of success of the job does not war- rant the man power spent on it, it is recommended that the project be dropped. Another approach to improve fishing on Inks Lake will be undertaken in the immediate future. f fo Prepared by _ Richard L. White Approved by Dleweon. Cnote Asst. Project Leader Coordinator Date; August 30, 1963 Regional Supervisor --- Page 6 --- Des TABLE 1 A CHECKLIST OF SPECIES MENTIONED IN REPORT SCIENTIFIC NAME Lepisosteus osseus Dorosoma cepedianum Ictiobus bubalus Carpiodes carpio Cyprinus carpio Ictalurus punctatus Pylodictis olivaris Roccus chrysops Micropterus salmoides Chaenobryttus gulosus Lepomis cyanellus Lepomis microlophus Lepomis macrochirus Lepomis megalotis Pomoxis annularis Aplodinotus grunniens COMMON NAME longnose gar gizzard shad smallmouth buffalo river carpsucker carp channel catfish flathead catfish white bass largemouth bass warmouth green sunfish redear sunfish bluegill longear sunfish white crappie freshwater drum --- Page 7 --- “1961 ‘tequeaoy 10 Ysn8ny ‘kaenuep Jo syjuow Sutanp aye] SYUT UO oepeu suoTJoOeTTOO Sutqqoeu ON 2990N 79°O96L O80¢ €6° T9L BLT L£e°LES COL cS ° 269 ELT STPIOL CT°8S QE 46° LE°T suetTuunais snjouTpoTdy 9L°67I1 1S°69 LT 66° SS otdies snutidag 6S °Z707 OZ * 122 06°6ET ZS °68 oTdies sepotdieo| os°96zgE | LEQ we nee L1°08S LIL | ZL°6€€ snjTeqnq snqotzoy TE°HT te eee le eee 9G°T unuUeTpedss ePWOSO10G 7E*67YT 86°694 £6 90°ST Snesso §nd4sos Tde7q| tequnn “sq'T “ON “ON “sq “ON SHI OddS TPO] GI-G itequeseg LI-OT 2990399 | ZZ-yT atequejdeg QT°8cyT L8E} TL°9SZT BSE |60°6ZET HE |OT°SZET IE oS °9CS 68 95°66 7) sTe OL cT’s 69° TT OO°T 2 | sueTUUNaS snjOUTpo [dy 00°S8ZE 94° 8YT ET°7Sc 16 otdzes snutadk9 ZS ° LEZ S8°70% SS°ELZ 96 OL°E9T otdies sepotdie9 TE*SLL 09°9LY GL°864% SOT snzTeqng snqotioy €8°T LS*T SZ*0 WMUeTpSdss BUOSoIOG HS "EZ 10°Z0E 64 SndSSO SHSISOSTUST “sqT “ON “sq “ON “sqT °ON “sq't “ON “ON “sq “ON SaL0adSs T@-1T Atmr | LZ-o% eunr |61-1T1 Aew loz-€1 tTtady TE-8z yore y0-7¢ Aaeniqeg ¥1961 “YHAWHOMA - AUVANVE ‘SLINSHY ONILIG! I0YINOD HSTa HONOW SINI QAVI IT WIaVvL --- Page 8 --- ‘yore, pue Areniqeg uT Butzjeu oN yx G6°77S ST TIVLOL “es*o | @ JOS" ZB | - wnmnws od -- snityooroeu stuodey a: at fy (6/3 cy A re -- | ----- -- 18°Z Z | suetuunazd snjoutpoTdy Ov °€EZ BL°STL O£ | OZ°OE 8 ET°s z oTdzes snutiddg GO°LEE SE°96 «8% | O%°LY €l Lo°set 09 otdies sepotdie9 €9°1L8 ZETISE OL] 9H°SE 8 S9°9L QT snyeqng snqoTjoT iT ot en ooo ee ~~ | .--++- -- oz°L 6 unueTpedes eulosoi0q 9L°9% IT’e€? S oS * ZT @ | cae -- snesso sne }sostday “sqT - °I4M zequny |*sqy ‘ON “sqT “ON] “Sq'T ON *sqT *ON TeqOL TeqO] g-¢ eunr T1-g8 Sew OZ-L1 Ttady 61-6 Azenuer ¥C961T ANNE OL AUWANVE SL'INSTY ONILLAN ‘IOWINOD HSTA HONOW SANT DVI (°p3u0D) IT Widvi --- Page 9 --- SZEi 1 I t z yO € 7 7 f 6 8 L 7% ET Z1€ OTT 96 ES ST Ly LOZ O8T 16 STPIOL i a a a i a a i Te LI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T Sg ¢ 9 To- TT To- = etddezs 937 TYyM 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = = OL 4% OF OT Ystzuns zve8uc7y EEE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = € G@ LET S6 EL T1t3entg ystyuns l “ _ - - - - “ “ 7 = - 2 - - - - - - = - - 7 - pejjodsefuei9 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TT Tt 4T 8 2 ystTyuns ivapey “6S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = = 8 Te 6% Ss ystjuns usei9 784 - = - ~ - - - ~ - = T T = Zl 8 4 6@% 89) 79 4S Gl sseq 93 TUM € - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ee Ae | yInowreM rt - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - € 9 € 9 To- = = = = sseq peqjodg Tot - - - I - - T - z t 7 I S A, a) a se re sseq yJnowesze7] I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i PeSYTING MOTT OK € I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a YsTJIe. MOTTAR STI ? = = s T - € T z 1 4 = ¢ ¢ 8l OF IT €1T 8 4% = - = = ysty3eo Touueyy € - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = = = F tT - JeuTys [TeqyJodg I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i ysty pto9 0% - I T = i v7) : z - t z z I z € - T ee dae9 eo a AS A A A | SS hf 7 oA | seyouy UT Yyqdue7 LHSNVD Sal odds Sayouy ut ysuey -——_-__— eee Soyouy ut yqsue7y 1961 “LSNONV - ANN’ ‘SHLONTI AG IHONVO HSI JO YTEWIN ‘SNSNHD THHYO FAV SYNI IIT Tavi --- Page 10 --- wT 6T x4 £9 88 TeIOL (a3 Ge 0% £? 9 tT 9 4 TT tT € G OL ET LE LET O€ OT ZI EL a - 1 SE a Os 4 Zo- - ee EG = 1 - - - To- = = = tT 2 § TW 8 % 8% OF 4 T TI - - tT 1 ep tT 9 € FT = = - = = ee - + - eg ee ol tT § - - ¢ 1 a - € O% wz te oc ot et 2t Ol St it et cet it cl 6 8 Z Z96T ‘LSMONV - ANNE ‘SHLONAT AG IHONVO HSIA AO YANN ‘“SNSNAO (*pqucg) TIT Wav THUD DIVT SANI LET ESE 16 LIT €O€ 78 0% VE €Z Sc SE STVLOL T1F8enTg¢ atddeis 94TYM sseq 93 TUM ystguns useir9 ysty}eo preyuqetg ysty}eo Teuueyy yqnowze, dieg sseq yNowsds1er] ystjzuns ireesu07 ystjuns 12eepey THSNVD SAIOadS --- Page 11 --- 88S°0 O9€°0 OVE ° T 98°0 €00°0 OvE°O 900°0 08°O 6£0°O 080°0 zc81°O 61°O LOT°O Z10°0 92S°O €0°0 700°O0 <¢T0°O O10°O €0°0 €Z0°O O040°0 670°0 L£1°O c96T «= TOST «= ss 77/T )=—i(sCT9'/T. Inoy-uey reg ueuzeysty reg q4y8ne9 °oN qysne) *oN T8°O c6°O L18°T 02°? ZOTST SZE*T 87 *T Ty *T 68S ZO9 z796T = T96T (setoeds [][e) Yystyuns 1y3 Teo sseq 33 Tym qy8ne. YSTJ}eo TouuPYyo qysnes otdderzs 34tym requny Iequny szequny iequny qusnes sseq peqjods sexey qysneo sseq YyNowessze,T szequny AInoy-uew-zed yysneo usty jo uosied sad yy8neo ystyz Fo 3yu8ne. YysTFZ Fo peusty sinoy-uew jo SutTysty etTdoed jo Z961 - 1961 BIBG SNsuey T2xeI5 OYeT SsyUT (3:U09) TIT WIavL setoedg owey Tedtoutszg requny Zequny zequiny requny iequny

Detected Entities

location (4)

Austin 0.900 p.1 Austin, Texas
Devil's Waterhole 0.900 p.3 One slough of the lake, Devil's Waterhole
Inks Lake 0.900 p.2 Inks Lake using various size gill nets
Texas 0.900 p.1 TEXAS Federal Aid Project No. F-2-R-10

organization (2)

Federal Aid in Fisheries Restoration Act 0.900 p.1 FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT
Parks and Wildlife Department 0.900 p.1 Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas

person (4)

Eugene A. Walker 0.900 p.1 Eugene A. Walker Director, Program Planning
J. Weldon Watson 0.900 p.1 J. Weldon Watson Executive Director
Marion Toole 0.900 p.1 Marion Toole D-J Coordinator
Richard L. White 0.900 p.1 Asst. Project Leader; Richard L. White
Aplodinotus grunniens 0.900 p.6 freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens
Carpiodes carpio 0.900 p.3 river carpsucker, Carpiodes carpio
Chaenobryttus gulosus 0.900 p.6 warmouth Chaenobryttus gulosus
Cyprinus carpio 0.900 p.6 carp Cyprinus carpio
Dorosoma cepedianum 0.900 p.6 gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum
Ictalurus punctatus 0.900 p.6 channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus
Ictiobus bubalus 0.900 p.3 smallmouth buffalo, Ictiobus bubalus
Lepisosteus osseus 0.900 p.3 longnose gar, Lepisosteus osseus
Lepomis cyanellus 0.900 p.6 green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus
Lepomis macrochirus 0.900 p.6 bluegill Lepomis macrochirus
Lepomis megalotis 0.900 p.6 longear sunfish Lepomis megalotis
Lepomis microlophus 0.900 p.6 redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus
Micropterus salmoides 0.900 p.6 largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides
Pomoxis annularis 0.900 p.6 white crappie Pomoxis annularis
Pylodictis olivaris 0.900 p.6 flathead catfish Pylodictis olivaris
Roccus chrysops 0.900 p.4 white bass, Roccus chrysops
Channel Catfish 0.850 p.4 ...s type of net resulted in a collection of turtles and small channel catfish exclusively. Employment of hoop nets als…
Flathead Catfish 0.850 p.6 ...d smallmouth buffalo river carpsucker carp channel catfish flathead catfish white bass largemouth bass warmouth gree…
Freshwater Drum 0.850 p.6 ...ish redear sunfish bluegill longear sunfish white crappie freshwater drum
Gizzard Shad 0.850 p.2 ...rom the lake. Chemical eradication removed large numbers of gizzard shad and fresh water drum but no close estimates…
Green Sunfish 0.850 p.6 ...tfish flathead catfish white bass largemouth bass warmouth green sunfish redear sunfish bluegill longear sunfish whi…
Largemouth Bass 0.850 p.6 ...arpsucker carp channel catfish flathead catfish white bass largemouth bass warmouth green sunfish redear sunfish blu…
Longear Sunfish 0.850 p.6 ...mouth bass warmouth green sunfish redear sunfish bluegill longear sunfish white crappie freshwater drum
Longnose Gar 0.850 p.3 ..., Ictiobus bubalus, river carpsucker, Carpiodes carpio, and longnose gar, Lepisosteus osseus, from the lake. Of this…
Redear Sunfish 0.850 p.6 ...catfish white bass largemouth bass warmouth green sunfish redear sunfish bluegill longear sunfish white crappie fres…
River Carpsucker 0.850 p.3 ...to intensively remove smallmouth buffalo, Ictiobus bubalus, river carpsucker, Carpiodes carpio, and longnose gar, Le…
Smallmouth Buffalo 0.850 p.3 ...set during the two years of this job to intensively remove smallmouth buffalo, Ictiobus bubalus, river carpsucker, C…
White Bass 0.850 p.4 ...ould be pointed out that 37 per cent of the total catch was white bass, Roccus chrysops, which are caught seasonly. …
White Crappie 0.850 p.6 ...uth green sunfish redear sunfish bluegill longear sunfish white crappie freshwater drum
Cyprinidae 0.800 p.6 not present, but family name Cyprinidae is mentioned as Cyprinus carpio