TPWD 1963 F-7-R-11 #852: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region I-A: Job No. D-1 Fisheries Problems Determination
Open PDFExtracted Text
--- Page 1 ---
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
As requested by
FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT
TEXAS
Federal Aid Project No. F-7-R-11
FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS OF THE WATERS OF REGION I-A
Job No. D-l Fisheries Problems Determination
Project Leader: Lonnie Peters
J. Weldon Watson
Executive Director
Parks and Wildlife Department
Austin, Texas
Marion Toole Eugene A. Walker
D-J Coordinator Assistant Director, Wildlife
May 28, 1964
--- Page 2 ---
ABSTRACT
Most fisheries problems in the major public waters of Region I-A are
associated with either overabundance of rough fish species or with ecological
problems of poor water quality and food production.
Fishing opportunities are limited by the scarcity of public waters in the
area, but new lakes recently completed or near completion will add considerably
to the total area of public fishing waters.
Chemical control of rough fish will be a valuable management tool in certain
lakes where costs and lasting effects are favorable but is not practical in
certain waters. Justification of chemical control and evaluating results on an
economic or monetary basis are dependent upon lake usage and fisherman harvest
records. The latter are not available for the waters of this region owing to the
fact that creel census have been omitted.
Specific fishery problems and recommended management practices for the
lakes of this region include renovations, fertilization and habitat improvements
Further studies regarding fish populations and ecology are needed on some
waters.
--- Page 3 ---
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
State of Texas
Project No. F-7-R-11 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the
Waters of Region I-A ee
Job No. D-1 Title: Fisheries Problems Determination
Period Covered January 1, 1963 - December 31, 1963 __
Objectives:
Analysis of data to determine specific fisheries problems on the concerned
waters.
Procedures;
Pield collected data were perused, fish population changes and specific
problems were noted. Emphasis in preparation of this report was given to the
amount of available public waters and degree of usage by fishermen,
Findings:
Fisheries problems of specific nature in the waters of Region I-A were found
to be mostly related to fish pvpulation composition. Undesirable species are
greatly dominant in most major waters and thus are detrimental to the sport
fishery, This problem, which tas always existed in the reservoirs of this area
which exceed a few years in age, has been discussed in detail in past job
completion reports.
The Rough Fish Problem
Table 1 lists the major public waters of the region and gives the degree
to which rough fish are considered detrimental to the sport fishery, Note that
only four of the lakes listed are considered as not having a rough fish problem.
One of these four is a new lake while the other is a newly renovated lake,
Childress Lake is shown as not having a rough fish problem because recent survey
data indicate a favorable percentage of game species, and the only undesirable
species present is the black bullhead. Lake Marvin does not have a serious
rough fish problem, but limited numbers of bullhead catfish and carp do exist
in the lake. Lake Marvin does, however, have a sunfish problem due to extreme
clarity of water and abundant submerged vegetation,
Lakes listed as having moderate rough fish problems are Lake Baylor
(excessive bullheads and a potential carp problem), Buffalo Springs Lake
(extreme overabundance of bullheads, - but also ecological problems including
water quality and limited littoral zone), and Lake Rita Blanca (dominant bull-
head population and potential goldfish problem).
Lakes having major rough fish problems include Buffalo Lake (carp, hybrid
carp, goldfish, and bullheads), Lake Fryer, (carp and bullheads), Lake McClellan
--- Page 4 ---
Table 1 Summary of Fisheries Problems in Eleven Major Public Lakes in Region I-A
Degree of Rough Fish Problem Ecological ‘ Sunfish or
Not Mod. Major Problems White Crappie
Lake Problem Problem Problem Water-Other Problem
Baylor X X X(SF)
Buffalo X
Buffalo Springs Xx X
Childress Xx X
Fryer Xx Xx X(W.Cr. )
Marvin Xx xX X(SF)
McClellan X X X(W.Cr.)
Rita Blanca X X
Stamford xX
Pauline xX
W. R. Reservoir xX
i
(2SF)
Totals 4 3 4 7 4 (2W.Cr.)
(carp, bullheads and river carpsucker) and Lake Stamford (river carpsucker,
carp, smallmouth buffalo and gizzard shad). At Lakes Fryer and McClellan,
ecological problems of flooding and high populations of stunted white crappie
add to the problem of rough fish,
At present the only effective solution to rough fish problems in certain
lakes is to eradicate the existing population and to restock with desirable game
and forage species. Such work has been proven valuable in temporary rehabilitation
of some lakes, but in certain other waters, costs, public opinion, or impossibility
of preventing rapid reintroduction of rough species preclude such work.
Evaluating Rough Fish Control Work
One problem of immediate concern to the continuance of our chemical control
of rough fish program is that of establishing the economics of such work, With
the present restriction on the use of toxaphene, lake renovations will cost about
one dollar per acre foot of water treated. Justification of such and expenditure
will be somewhat difficult, especially on larger impoundments where costs would
be high.
Creel censuses have been neglected in this area in the past due to the
time consuming nature of such work. Gill netting and seining surveys have been
relied upon to provide the data on which management recommendations have been
made. Such surveys conducted periodically on each of our waters are essential
to proper management because they provide the biologist with a history of the
fish population changes that occur. Admittedly, however, survey data alone do
not show the important features of fishing pressure and fisherman harvest, the
importance of which to the overall management program might be illustrated in
the following manner. If we consider that two lakes within an area are both in
--- Page 5 ---
need of a renovation because of excessive abundance of rough fish, but for
budgetary or some other reasons only one lake could be renovated, the problem
of deciding which lake would receive the renovation would most easily be resolved
on the basis of which lake, if renovated, would provide better fishing for the
most fishermen. In such a case, the value of having harvest and fishing pressure
records is obvious. If one lake had relatively low fisherman usage whereas the
other had relatively high usage, the first would probably be more adequately
meeting the fishing demands than the latter. The criteria then in deciding for
a treatment of the lake with higher usage would be based on fisherman usage
records and degree of fisherman success based on creel census. Gill netting
and seining will not provide this information.
Since gill netting and seining surveys have been the source of data showing
the fish population in the waters of this area, the evaluation of previous lake
renovations has been based on such data, Survey data of this type is relative,
and actual populations are never known, fisherman harvest records would be a
valuable supplement to the ordinary survey data.
If we consider a newly renovated lake, and find by netting that the fish
population has been changed from 10 per cent game fish to 90 per cent game fish,
it follows that a great improvement has been made. The poor fishing that pre-
ceded. the renovation would attest to the fact that a low game fish population
was present, and the good fishing that followed the renovation would similarly
attest to the fact that the fishery was improved. But, the critical fact insofar
as evaluating the economics of the renovation is concerned, is how much did the
fishing improve, and how long did the good fishing last.
If we are to be expected to evaluate the economics of chemical renovations
on a monetary basis, for future justification of such work, we must establish
before - and - after harvest of game fish and amount of fisherman usage, define
a unit of fishing recreation, assess a dollar value to the unit of fishing
recreation defined and then make a comparison. If the value of increased fishing
recreation following the renovation approximates the cost of the renovation, then
justification can be realized.
The Demand for More and Better Fishing
In Region I-A, public fishing waters are relatively widespread and limited
in size and numbers. Under such conditions, one might think that fishing interest
would be low. But such is not the case, and per capita fishing license sales in
this area approximate that of any other area in the state. Outdoor recreation
in the Panhandle is centered around the water-oriented sports of fishing, boating
and skiing. People are water-conscious; probably because of the arid nature of
the area. The statewide rate of fishing license sales based on 1963 sales data
and 1960 census figures was 9.1 per cent while Region I-A was 7.3 per cent. If
influence of coastal fishing on license sales was omitted, then Region I-A would
probably be above average.
The significance of this in relation to fisheries management is that since
the waters are heavily fished and that the demand for more fishing will probably
increase, fisheries management must be designed towards maximum game fish
production in all of the waters in the area.
--- Page 6 ---
In Region I-A, the population centers are located around Lubbock (population
156,271) and Amarillo (population 149,493). Buffalo Lake, 1800 acres, is located
about 25 miles from Amarillo, and Buffalo Springs Lake, 220 acres, is located
about 6 miles from downtown Lubbock.
Except for Buffalo Lake which cannot supply all the fishing demands of
the Amarillo area fishermen, the next nearest bodies of water are Lake McClellan
(150 acres and 57 miles distance), Rita Blanca Lake ( 285 acres and 78 miles
distance), Lakes Childress and Baylor (575 acres combined and 110 miles distance),
Lake Fryer (100 acres and 115 miles distance), Lake Marvin (60 acres and 111 miles
distance) and Lake Pauline (600 acres and 148 miles distance).
Except for Buffalo Springs Lake which cannot supply the fishing demands
of the Lubbock area fishermen, the next nearest lakes are Lake J. B. Thomas
(8000 acres and 115 miles distance), Lake Fort Phantom Hill (3950 acres and 170
miles distance) and Lake Stamford (6000 acres and 161 miles distance).
A few small public impoundments not mentioned exist in the region but are
of little importance except to local fishermen, and few people from the population
centers mentioned visit these lakes.
The total number of people living in Region I-A is about 802 thousand,
based on the 1960 population census. Major public fishing waters in the region
total about 22 thousand surface acres at present, Fishing license sales in the
1962-1963 season totaled 58,707 and persons fishing without a license (permitted
in home county unless a winding device is used - and persons under 17 or over
65 years of age) totaled an estimated 28,000. On the basis of these figures,
there are at least four fishermen living within Region I-A for every acre. of
public water that exists.
Fishermen usage figures for five lakes in Region I-A are given in Table 2.
In this table, annual fishing visits for the years 1961-62-63, average annual
visits, and approximate number of visits per surface acre of water are given.
Buffalo Springs Lake at Lubbock had an average of 130,259 fishing visits
for the 3-year period. Since the lake only covers about 300 surface acres,
fishing visits amounted to an astounding 434 per acre of water. This is far
above the average for any other lake in this region and is a reflection of the
scarcity of public fishing waters in close proximity to the Lubbock area.
Buffalo Lake averaged 101,408 fishing visits during 1961-63 which amounted
to an average of 60 visits per acre of water.
Rita Blanca Lake has shown a sharp decline in fishing pressure since 1961,
but averaged 23,322 visits for the 3-year period and 83 visits per acre of water.
For Lakes Marvin and McClellan, the figures given are for only the actual
number of fishing permits sold, and no attempt was made to estimate the number of
additional fishing visits made by children and people over 65 nor for the extra
number of visits accruing from annual fishing permits. Sixty-acre Lake Marvin
averaged 2,828 fishing visits annually and 47 per acre while Lake McClellan averaged
9,222 visits annually and 61 visits per acre.
--- Page 7 ---
Table 2 Summary of Recent Lake Usage based on Available Data
Ave. No. Approximate
Yearly Ave. Annual
Lake 1963 1962 1961 Visits Visits/Acre
Baylor and
Childress - = = = 7
(combined
Buffalo Springs 155,859 1/ 130,195 1) 104,784 1/ 130,259 434
Buffalo 180,000 2/ 85,000 2/ 39,225 2/ 101,408 60
Fryer = = - _ =
Marvin 2,274 2,691 3,520 2,828 47
McClellan 8,265 9,338 10,062 9,222 61
Rita Blanca 16,575 3/ 20,918 3/ S2 472 37 235322 83
Pauline - = = = =
1/ Supplied by Buffalo Springs Lake Office
(Based on revenue from fishing of $42,059, $29,267, $19,784 for years
1963-62-61 respectively).
2/ Based on Road Counter Figures (Per Cent of Total number visits = fishing
visits as follows: 1963-45%, 1962-25%, 1961-13%).
3/ Based on fishing permit sales. Twenty five per cent of the number of daily
fishing permits sold was added to include the fishing by persons under 17
and over 65; also an annual pass was considered as equivilant to 25 fishing
visits.
It is apparent from the figures given that fishing on these five lakes is
generally very heavy; excessively so at Buffalo Springs Lake.
Figure 1 shows county populations and county fishing license sales according
to groups.
Six population groups are listed and nine license sales groups are listed.
The relation of population groupsto license sales groups gives an index to fishing
interest in each county, and can be correlated with proximity to public fishing
waters and population density. Where the difference between population group
number and license sales group number is 3 or more a significant amount of fishing
interest is indicated. Eighteen of the 54 counties in Region I-A show a significant
difference between these group figures, and in 1l of the 18, close proximity to a
major public lake is the obvious cause. In two counties (Hutchinson and Dawson)
population density is a factor in high proportionate license sales. Two counties,
(Wheeler and Donley) register high license sales because of fishing in local small
lakes and streams, while 3 counties (Cottle, Dickens, and Garza) show proportionately
high sales because the local interest in fishing is high, but most fishing is done
at public lakes a considerable distance away.
It is interesting to note that Dallam County, less than 5,000 population -
group 1, was in group 7 (2,000 - 4,000) in license sales and was the county
having the greatest difference between population and license sales groups.
Fishing at Rita Blanca Lake, which is the only major public lake in Texas within
100 miles, influenced this.
--- Page 8 ---
Population:
DALLAM CO. L. Fryer
LIPSCOMB CO
. =)
: , 4.6 i, @
Amarillo
1, <- 5
a 5-410
3. {6-20 «
4 QO- 40 «
5. 40-]00 «
6. > ~/00 «
Fishing liscense:
@. <- 50
Q@. 50-~- 00
@. fo0- Aoo
@. 4oo- +00
6. too- (000
@. /000— 2000
@. 2000- 4%oo00
4o00- 8000
@ >? ~ 8000
LubbocK
@ Bu ffalo
B
Spr,
nines
Jones CO.
Ft. Phantom
Hil Le
--- Page 9 ---
Construction of New Public Lakes
The construction of three new lakes in Region I-A will greatly help to
relieve the shortage of public fishing areas, The newly completed White River
Reservoir (1200 acres ~ probable average pool) is located 19 miles South of
Crosbyton and 58 miles East of Lubbock, This lake will supply much needed fishing
for the Lubbock area and will help to relieve the heavy fishing pressure on
Buffalo Springs Lake. A second new lake, Meredith Lake (115,000 acres ~
probable average pool) located on the Canadian River about 30 miles North of
Amarillo is presently under construction and when completed will be the largest
lake in the area of Northwest Texas. A third lake, the Greenbelt Lake (2,000
acres - probable average pool) located on the Salt Fork of the Red River about
10 miles northeast of Clarendon is presently in the planning stage but con-
struction will probably begin during 1964. Probable opening dates for fishing
on the White River, Meredith, and Greenbelt lakes are 1965, 1966, and 1967
respectively. The combined surface acreage of the three lakes will increase
the present acreage of public waters by almost 100 per cent.
Specific Fisheries Problems and Proposed Management
New Lakes
Prior to a pre~impoundment rough fish eradication on the White River watershed,
carp and black bullhead catfish existed in great numbers. The rotenone treatment
of the lake basin, about 20 miles of stream area and about 30 private ranch ponds
was carried out in an effort to reduce the initial stock of rough fish in the new
lake. The lake basin has been heavily stocked with game species and after spring
rains fill the lake, good growth is expected,
No pre-impoundment work on the Meredith Lake is anticipated. The vastness
of the watershed which extends into eastern New Mexico precludes any rough fish
control work. Rough species known to exist in the Canadian River presently
include carp, shad and black bullhead catfish.
At the Greenbelt Lake, pre-impoundment work should probably include the
strategic location of brush piles in the basin before the lake fills. The need
for watershed rough fish control work has not been investigated, but will
probably not be needed,
Lake McClellan
The fishery of Lake McClellan is in poor condition, Recent surveys show
a rough fish population consisting of nearly 90 per cent rough species. The
problematical species, listed in decreasing order of abundance (by weight) are
carp, bullheads, and river carpsucker. In addition to fish population problems,
the lake is characterized by having heavy spring flooding, rapid siltation,
rapidly falling water level during summer months (the top five feet of water is
being released to provide flood storage), limited fertility and a stunted white
crappie population. Through a cooperative effort with the U. S. Forest Service,
a complete lake management plan has been prepared, and if approved, will be
carried out in 1964 during the period when construction on a new spillway is
underway. The management plan calls for a total kill treatment with rotenone,
--- Page 10 ---
increasing natural cover by adding brush piles, planting the lake bed with a
grain crop, relocating catfish spawning devices, restocking with forage species
and game species. The habitat improvement work will be facilitated by the fact
that the lake will be lowered at least 10 feet during construction and much of
the lake bed will be exposed during this time. After the new spillway is complete
the lake will not be lowered five-feet as has previously been done to provide
flood control storage. This will increase the average size of the lake considerably.
Lake Marvin
Fishery problems at Lake Marvin are largely related to the extreme clarity
of the water. Heavy growths of submerged plants persist throughout most of the
year, and sunfish are problematical due to stunting and overabundance. Immediate
management plans call for fertilization with 16-20-0 fertilizer applied in three
applications of 150 1b. per acre in early April, 75 1b. per acre in late May and
an additional 75 1b. per acre in early July. This work will also be carried out as
a cooperative effort with the Forest Service. Success of the fertilization in
controlling submerged vegetation, increasing basic productivity, and alleviating
the sunfish problem will be evaluated, and if successful will probably be con-
tinued in later years. If fertilization is unsuccessful, chemical control of
vegetation and possibly a rotenone renovation will be considered. Fish eradication
work would have to include treatment of a lake of similar size and nature located
immediately upstream from Lake Marvin. This lake which also has a sunfish problem
is owned by the Boy Scouts of America, and because water from this lake is released
into Marvin, it would serve as a source of sunfish for rapid reinfestation of
Marvin should it not also be treated.
Lake Fryer
Lake Fryer is located in, and operated by, Ochiltree County. The lake is
smaller than Lake McClellan but is otherwise very similar, Spring flooding,
rapid siltation, carp, bullhead, and stunted crappie characterize the lakes
fishery problems. A lake renovation has been proposed but will not be carried
out because private interests prohibit treatment of the watershed stream areas
which would be essential in order to prevent rapid reinfestation of the lake.
Presently, management plans for the lake call for continued study of the ecology
of the lake with a view to possible habitat improvement, a study of lake usage
and game fish harvest, a check into the possibility of constructing upstream
flood control dams and supplemental stocking of game fish to increase predation
on undesirable species.
Buffalo Springs Lake
Production of game species at Buffalo Springs Lake has been inadequate.
The present fish population consists of a high percentage of black bullheads,
but serious problems associated with water quality and a very limited littoral
zone exist. A special study to determine game fish production and the relation
of water quality to the existing ecology has been initiated.
Rita Blanca Lake
The fish population in Rita Blanca Lake has shown some improvement within the
last two years, but bullhead catfish remain a serious problem. Ecological problems
--- Page 11 ---
associated with a shortage of water exist, but little could be done to relieve
these problems, with the possible exception of a copper sulfate treatment to control
a bloom of noxious algae that has persisted for the past three years. The fishery
of this lake is discussed in detail in job completion report F-7-R-11, Job E-3.
Lake Stamford
The fishery of Lake Stamford is unbalanced in favor of rough species, but
the sport fishing has not yet declined to an unacceptable level, The great size
of the lake when full (6,000 surface acres) would preclude a chemical renovation
at present. During the coming few years, the trend in the Lake Stamford fishery
will probably be towards a rapidly declining sport fishery, and eventually some
measures will have to be taken to reduce the number of rough species. Perhaps
this can be accomplished at some future date when the lake level is sufficiently
low to permit chemical treatment at a reasonable cost. There would be a limited
amount of watershed treatment, and the creek feeding the lake flows only following
rains.
The lake has a gently sloping spillway which is not effective in keeping rough
fish from entering the lake from downstream areas during periods of overflow and
some modification in the spillway, or else installation of an electrical screen to
block upstream migration should be considered before any renovation work is
attempted.
Lakes Baylor and Childress
Fish populations at the two adjacent lakes near Childress are fairly well
balanced at present. The older and smaller Lake Childress has only the black
bullhead as a problematical species, while Baylor Lake contains a considerable
number of carp as well as abundant bullheads. Both lakes are characterized by
very clear water, low fertility, and low basic food production. Baylor Lake has
a limited littoral zone around most of the lake and a major problem exists in
the lack of medium-size forage. Ample abundance of minnow species is lacking
because of insufficient marginal shallow water cover and heavy predation from
sunfish. Reproduction by largemouth bass in both lakes has been successful in
recent years, but survival of the young bass is critically low. Competition
with sunfishes for food, and predation from larger fishes has resulted in very
poor survival of bass to the yearling stage.
A lake renovation would not be advisable at present since a fair balance
exists, but habitat improvement work is needed. Fertilization would be the
management practice most likely to improve the fishery. The increase in production
of small foods that would accompany fertilization should greatly aid in increasing
the available forage needed to obtain survival of young game species. Increased
turbidity from the algae bloom produced would tend to reduce submerged vegetation
which now is serving to harbor and protect an overabundant sunfish population.
At present, however, the city of Childress uses water from the lakes for municipal
purposes and due to the limited capacity of filtering equipment, the production
of plankton that would accompany fertilization is not desirable. After com-
pletion of the Greenbelt Lake, the city of Childress will obtain municipal water
from this source and use of the local supply will cease. At this time fertilization
and other management can be carried out without concern for the present restrictions.
--- Page 12 ---
-10-
Lake Pauline
No further management for this lake is anticipated in the near future,
The lake was renovated in May 1963 and restocked with game species. Recent
checks show a rapidly developing bass population, but the status of channel
catfish stocked as fingerlings in September 1963 is presently unknown. Bass
fry, stocked in mid-May following the rotenone renovation, had by October attained
sizes up to about nine inches in standard length and averaged about one-fourth
pound in weight. It is possible that these bass preyed upon the smaller channel
catfish, but owing to the presence of abundant other forage, depredation of
channel catfish fingerlings should not have been excessive. Further surveys in
early 1964 will reveal whether added channel catfish are needed.
Recommendations:
Continuance of Job D-1l should be a part of the future work on this project.
Attention should be given to the problems above discussed, and where practical,
the activities on other jobs of this project should be directed towards resolving
the various problems of both specific and general nature. fo
gota
Prepared by __Lonnie Peters Approved by Ap ton’ ~-7
Project Leader ( Coordinator
Date May 28, 1964 Leo D.Lewis
Regional Supervisor