TPWD 1965 F-6-R-12 #967: Job Completion Report: Experimental Stocking of Largemouth Bass and Threadfin Shad in Ponds in South Texas, Project F-6-R-12
Open PDFExtracted Text
--- Page 1 ---
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
As required by
FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT
Federal Aid Project No. F-6-R-12
FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS OF THE WATERS OF REGION 5-B
Job No. E-6 Experimental Stocking of Largemouth Bass
and Threadfin Shad in Ponds in South Texas
Project Leader: Charles T. Menn
J. Weldon Watson
Executive Director
Parks and Wildlife Department
Austin, Texas
Marion Toole Eugene A. Walker
eo D-J Coordinator Assistant Director for Wildlife
March 11, 1965
--- Page 2 ---
ABSTRACT
Monthly sampling of largemouth bass in the five ponds being used in the
study was continued during 1964. An effort was made to take a minimum of 10
bass from each of the ponds on each trip. This was done by using a combination
of seining and rod and reel sampling.
At this time the best or steadiest growth rate in the study ponds con-
tinues to be in Pond No. 2. This pond was originally stocked with largemouth
bass at the rate of 100 per acre.
Most of the fishing was done at Ponds No. 1, 2, and 5. However, fishing
seems to be best in Pond No. 1, which was stocked with 50 bass per acre. In
Pond No. 1, it took an average of less than 20 minutes to catch a bass, whereas
in Pond No. 3, it took an average of 30 minutes to catch a bass.
No evidence was found to indicate the presence of threadfin shad in Ponds
No. 3, 4, and 5, but they are still present and apparently reproducing in
Ponds No. 1 and 2. Green sunfish, bluegills and crayfish are providing the
principal forage for the bass in Ponds No. 3 and 4, and not threadfin shad.
Dragonfly larvae and unidentified insect remains provide the main forage for
the bass tn Pond No.5. Im addition.to the shad in Pods No.1 and 2, blue-
gills, Rio Grande perch, crayfish and grass shrimp supplement the diet of
bass.
An effort will be made to find additional ponds so that this work can be
continued for another two years.
--- Page 3 ---
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
State of Texas
Project No. _F-6-R-12 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Sur-
veys of the Waters of Region 5-B
Job No. E-6 Title: Experimental Stocking of Large-
mouth Bass and Threadfin Shad in
Ponds in South Texas
Period Covered: January 1, 1964 through December 31, 1964
Objectives:
To determine growth rates and fishing success for largemouth bass stocked
with threadfin shad as forage.
Techniques Used:
Monthly sampling of largemouth bass in the five ponds being used in the
study was continued during 1964. An effort was made to take a minimum of 10
bass from each of the ponds on each trip. This was accomplished in most cases
by using a combination of seining and rod and reel sampling.
A physical description of each pond along with its location was given in
the completion report for Job E-6, D-J Project F-6-R-11.
In addition to bass sampling, data regarding temperature and water quality
were recorded on a monthly basis for each of the ponds.
After the first seven months of this segment, fishermen were allowed to
fish in the ponds and to keep whatever bass they were able to catch. Data on
their catch were recorded on creel census cards provided for them by project
personnel. The ponds were opened to fishing in August 1964.
Results and Discussion:
A comparison of temperature and water quality conditions in the five ponds
being used in the study is given in Table 1. Though some changes in water
quality occurred, they were minor in nature and they compared favorably with
the results of the previous year.
Note that the ponds, although approximately comparable in size, fall into
two distinct groups on the basis of water quality. Ponds 1, 2, and 5 are very
--- Page 4 ---
a0819-0'°0
30813-0'0
UAaWNN GNOd
“peys UTjJpeery, pue sseq YyJNowses1eT
Yam peyo0 3s spuod ut #96] BuUTANp suoTITpuoD Azeem Jo uosTAeduoo VW
“T 2TdPL
asuez eoeyans
"dy °dway,
asuei wo jj0g
esuei soeyans
Hd
asuez woq}0gG
asuezl soeyans
(udd) -4%Iv uq-ud
esuer woj7}0gG
eSuezi ooeyans
(udd) AQ TUTIOTYD
asuei wo j 0g
eSuezl soeyans
(udd) eptxotp uoqize9
esuei wo 0g
esuezl ooezans
(udd) uaeshxo
aBeIDAV
asuey
(seyout) ISTp TYyDIIeg
--- Page 5 ---
similar in water quality and turbidity, whereas Ponds 3 and 4 are considerably
more turbid and alkaline. Turbidity was the limiting factor in taking bass
samples from Ponds 3 and 4.
The growth rates of the largemouth bass are compared in Figures 1 through
5. In most cases it was possible to collect the sample of 10 bass from Ponds 1,
2, and 5, but poor sampling results were obtained in Ponds 3 and 4; thus, there
are significant gaps in the data for these two ponds.
On the basis of the data included in these tables, the best or steadiest
growth rate in the study ponds continues to be in Pond No. 2. This pond was
originally stocked with largemouth bass at the rate of 100 per acre. These
fish increased from a mean of 108- to 178-mm in 1963 and from 181- to 291-mm
in 1964.
Fishing Success - Most of the fishing was done at Ponds No. 1, 2, and 5.
Due to the turbidity, little fishing was done at Ponds No. 3 and 4. Presently,
fishing seems to be best in Pond No. 1, which was stocked with 50 bass per
acre. During 1964, it took an average of 19.6 minutes to catch a bass in
Pond No. 1, whereas in Pond No. 3, it took an average of 30 minutes to catch
a bass. The average time for taking a bass in the other three ponds is as
follows: Pond No. 2, one bass per 22.8 minutes; Pond No. 4, one bass per
28.7 minutes; and Pond No. 5, one bass per 23.4 minutes.
Project personnel and fishing guests of the pond owners used spinning
rigs and rods and reels with artificial lures. No live bait was used.
No evidence was found to indicate the presence of threadfin shad in Ponds
No. 3, 4, and 5; however, they are still present and apparently reproducing
in Ponds No. 1 and 2. Therefore, it must be pointed out that green sunfish,
bluegills and crayfish are providing the principal forage for the bass in
Ponds No. 3 and 4 instead of threadfin shad. Also, dragonfly larvae and un-
identified insect remains provide the main forage for the bass in Pond No. 5,
not shad. In addition to the threadfin shad in Ponds No. 1 and 2, evidence
was found to indicate that bluegills, Rio Grande perch, crayfish and grass
shrimp supplement the bass' diet.
Due to the high turbidity in Ponds No. 3 and 4, little information on the
fish population has been obtained up to this time. However, when the ponds
are treated with rotenone in 1965, more data will be available.
Recommendations:
This job should be continued to learn as much as possible about the five
stocking ratios here in South Texas. Additional ponds should be found to con-
tinue this work for at least two more years.
af g fo
oa TV made Oh x
Prepared by Charles T. Menn Approved by Je ttre we seh
Project Leader “ Coordinator
Date March 11, 1965 Kenneth C. Jurgens
Regional Supervisor
--- Page 6 ---
wd
Figure 1. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 1, 1964
(Stocking rate: 50 bass/acre)
360
340
320
300
280
260
240
220
200 | |
|
ee
180
160
T
wo |
120
100
Number of fish caught per month
10 10 10 10 10 10 — 29 37 ll 19 12 18
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
--- Page 7 ---
Figure 2. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 2, 1964
(Stocking rate: 100 bass/acre)
220
200
166
160
140
120
100 Number of fish caught per month
10 10 10. «10 10 610 23 10 3 18 4 2
eee ees eee eee Dees ee a
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
--- Page 8 ---
=h~
Figure 3. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 3, 1964
(Stocking rate: 150 bass/acre)
360
340
320
300
280
260
—_
240
220
200
180
+
a
Number of fish caught per month
4 1 1 0 0 0 860 4 0 60 0 0
160
140
120
100
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
--- Page 9 ---
Figure 4. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 4, 1964
(Stocking rate: 200 bass/acre)
360
340
320
300
280
F
220
t-» ——_1
t—}»—
al ce.
200
— <——_4
180
160
bdy
140
ty —
K-47 —
i
120
100
Number of fish caught per month
10 10 #5 0 60 3 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
--- Page 10 ---
Figure 5. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 5, 1964
(Stocking rate: 250 bass/acre)
360
340
320
300
280
260
240
220 [
200 T |
180 | J
160
140
120
100
Number of fish caught per month
11 10 10 10 #10 10 £68 «#19 «5 0 16 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec