Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

TPWD 1965 F-6-R-12 #967: Job Completion Report: Experimental Stocking of Largemouth Bass and Threadfin Shad in Ponds in South Texas, Project F-6-R-12

Open PDF
tpwd_1965_f-6-r-12_967_experimental_st.pdf 10 pages completed 23 entities

Extracted Text

--- Page 1 --- JOB COMPLETION REPORT As required by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT Federal Aid Project No. F-6-R-12 FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS OF THE WATERS OF REGION 5-B Job No. E-6 Experimental Stocking of Largemouth Bass and Threadfin Shad in Ponds in South Texas Project Leader: Charles T. Menn J. Weldon Watson Executive Director Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Marion Toole Eugene A. Walker eo D-J Coordinator Assistant Director for Wildlife March 11, 1965 --- Page 2 --- ABSTRACT Monthly sampling of largemouth bass in the five ponds being used in the study was continued during 1964. An effort was made to take a minimum of 10 bass from each of the ponds on each trip. This was done by using a combination of seining and rod and reel sampling. At this time the best or steadiest growth rate in the study ponds con- tinues to be in Pond No. 2. This pond was originally stocked with largemouth bass at the rate of 100 per acre. Most of the fishing was done at Ponds No. 1, 2, and 5. However, fishing seems to be best in Pond No. 1, which was stocked with 50 bass per acre. In Pond No. 1, it took an average of less than 20 minutes to catch a bass, whereas in Pond No. 3, it took an average of 30 minutes to catch a bass. No evidence was found to indicate the presence of threadfin shad in Ponds No. 3, 4, and 5, but they are still present and apparently reproducing in Ponds No. 1 and 2. Green sunfish, bluegills and crayfish are providing the principal forage for the bass in Ponds No. 3 and 4, and not threadfin shad. Dragonfly larvae and unidentified insect remains provide the main forage for the bass tn Pond No.5. Im addition.to the shad in Pods No.1 and 2, blue- gills, Rio Grande perch, crayfish and grass shrimp supplement the diet of bass. An effort will be made to find additional ponds so that this work can be continued for another two years. --- Page 3 --- JOB COMPLETION REPORT State of Texas Project No. _F-6-R-12 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Sur- veys of the Waters of Region 5-B Job No. E-6 Title: Experimental Stocking of Large- mouth Bass and Threadfin Shad in Ponds in South Texas Period Covered: January 1, 1964 through December 31, 1964 Objectives: To determine growth rates and fishing success for largemouth bass stocked with threadfin shad as forage. Techniques Used: Monthly sampling of largemouth bass in the five ponds being used in the study was continued during 1964. An effort was made to take a minimum of 10 bass from each of the ponds on each trip. This was accomplished in most cases by using a combination of seining and rod and reel sampling. A physical description of each pond along with its location was given in the completion report for Job E-6, D-J Project F-6-R-11. In addition to bass sampling, data regarding temperature and water quality were recorded on a monthly basis for each of the ponds. After the first seven months of this segment, fishermen were allowed to fish in the ponds and to keep whatever bass they were able to catch. Data on their catch were recorded on creel census cards provided for them by project personnel. The ponds were opened to fishing in August 1964. Results and Discussion: A comparison of temperature and water quality conditions in the five ponds being used in the study is given in Table 1. Though some changes in water quality occurred, they were minor in nature and they compared favorably with the results of the previous year. Note that the ponds, although approximately comparable in size, fall into two distinct groups on the basis of water quality. Ponds 1, 2, and 5 are very --- Page 4 --- a0819-0'°0 30813-0'0 UAaWNN GNOd “peys UTjJpeery, pue sseq YyJNowses1eT Yam peyo0 3s spuod ut #96] BuUTANp suoTITpuoD Azeem Jo uosTAeduoo VW “T 2TdPL asuez eoeyans "dy °dway, asuei wo jj0g esuei soeyans Hd asuez woq}0gG asuezl soeyans (udd) -4%Iv uq-ud esuer woj7}0gG eSuezi ooeyans (udd) AQ TUTIOTYD asuei wo j 0g eSuezl soeyans (udd) eptxotp uoqize9 esuei wo 0g esuezl ooezans (udd) uaeshxo aBeIDAV asuey (seyout) ISTp TYyDIIeg --- Page 5 --- similar in water quality and turbidity, whereas Ponds 3 and 4 are considerably more turbid and alkaline. Turbidity was the limiting factor in taking bass samples from Ponds 3 and 4. The growth rates of the largemouth bass are compared in Figures 1 through 5. In most cases it was possible to collect the sample of 10 bass from Ponds 1, 2, and 5, but poor sampling results were obtained in Ponds 3 and 4; thus, there are significant gaps in the data for these two ponds. On the basis of the data included in these tables, the best or steadiest growth rate in the study ponds continues to be in Pond No. 2. This pond was originally stocked with largemouth bass at the rate of 100 per acre. These fish increased from a mean of 108- to 178-mm in 1963 and from 181- to 291-mm in 1964. Fishing Success - Most of the fishing was done at Ponds No. 1, 2, and 5. Due to the turbidity, little fishing was done at Ponds No. 3 and 4. Presently, fishing seems to be best in Pond No. 1, which was stocked with 50 bass per acre. During 1964, it took an average of 19.6 minutes to catch a bass in Pond No. 1, whereas in Pond No. 3, it took an average of 30 minutes to catch a bass. The average time for taking a bass in the other three ponds is as follows: Pond No. 2, one bass per 22.8 minutes; Pond No. 4, one bass per 28.7 minutes; and Pond No. 5, one bass per 23.4 minutes. Project personnel and fishing guests of the pond owners used spinning rigs and rods and reels with artificial lures. No live bait was used. No evidence was found to indicate the presence of threadfin shad in Ponds No. 3, 4, and 5; however, they are still present and apparently reproducing in Ponds No. 1 and 2. Therefore, it must be pointed out that green sunfish, bluegills and crayfish are providing the principal forage for the bass in Ponds No. 3 and 4 instead of threadfin shad. Also, dragonfly larvae and un- identified insect remains provide the main forage for the bass in Pond No. 5, not shad. In addition to the threadfin shad in Ponds No. 1 and 2, evidence was found to indicate that bluegills, Rio Grande perch, crayfish and grass shrimp supplement the bass' diet. Due to the high turbidity in Ponds No. 3 and 4, little information on the fish population has been obtained up to this time. However, when the ponds are treated with rotenone in 1965, more data will be available. Recommendations: This job should be continued to learn as much as possible about the five stocking ratios here in South Texas. Additional ponds should be found to con- tinue this work for at least two more years. af g fo oa TV made Oh x Prepared by Charles T. Menn Approved by Je ttre we seh Project Leader “ Coordinator Date March 11, 1965 Kenneth C. Jurgens Regional Supervisor --- Page 6 --- wd Figure 1. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 1, 1964 (Stocking rate: 50 bass/acre) 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200 | | | ee 180 160 T wo | 120 100 Number of fish caught per month 10 10 10 10 10 10 — 29 37 ll 19 12 18 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec --- Page 7 --- Figure 2. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 2, 1964 (Stocking rate: 100 bass/acre) 220 200 166 160 140 120 100 Number of fish caught per month 10 10 10. «10 10 610 23 10 3 18 4 2 eee ees eee eee Dees ee a Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec --- Page 8 --- =h~ Figure 3. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 3, 1964 (Stocking rate: 150 bass/acre) 360 340 320 300 280 260 —_ 240 220 200 180 + a Number of fish caught per month 4 1 1 0 0 0 860 4 0 60 0 0 160 140 120 100 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec --- Page 9 --- Figure 4. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 4, 1964 (Stocking rate: 200 bass/acre) 360 340 320 300 280 F 220 t-» ——_1 t—}»— al ce. 200 — <——_4 180 160 bdy 140 ty — K-47 — i 120 100 Number of fish caught per month 10 10 #5 0 60 3 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec --- Page 10 --- Figure 5. Growth rate of largemouth bass in Experimental Pond No. 5, 1964 (Stocking rate: 250 bass/acre) 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 [ 200 T | 180 | J 160 140 120 100 Number of fish caught per month 11 10 10 10 #10 10 £68 «#19 «5 0 16 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

Detected Entities

location (9)

Texas 0.900 p.1 Austin, Texas
Rio Grande 0.850 p.2 ...5. Im addition.to the shad in Pods No.1 and 2, blue- gills, Rio Grande perch, crayfish and grass shrimp supplement t…
Pond No. 1 0.800 p.2 Pond No. 1, which was stocked with 50 bass per acre
Pond No. 2 0.800 p.2 Pond No. 2, which was originally stocked with largemouth bass
Pond No. 3 0.800 p.2 Pond No. 3, it took an average of 30 minutes to catch a bass
Pond No. 4 0.800 p.2 Pond No. 3, 4, and 5, but they are still present in Ponds No. 1 and 2
Pond No. 5 0.800 p.2 Pond No. 5, dragonfly larvae and unidentified insect remains provide the main forage
Region 5-B 0.800 p.3 Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region 5-B
South Texas 0.800 p.1 Ponds in South Texas

organization (1)

Parks and Wildlife Department 0.900 p.1 Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas

person (5)

Charles T. Menn 0.900 p.1 Project Leader: Charles T. Menn
Eugene A. Walker 0.900 p.1 Eugene A. Walker Assistant Director for Wildlife
J. Weldon Watson 0.900 p.1 J. Weldon Watson Executive Director
Kenneth C. Jurgens 0.900 p.5 Approved by Kenneth C. Jurgens Regional Supervisor
Marion Toole 0.900 p.1 Marion Toole eo D-J Coordinator

species (8)

Largemouth Bass 0.900 p.1 Job No. E-6 Experimental Stocking of Largemouth Bass
Threadfin Shad 0.900 p.1 Job No. E-6 Experimental Stocking of Largemouth Bass and Threadfin Shad
Bluegills 0.800 p.2 Green sunfish, bluegills and crayfish are providing the principal forage
Crayfish 0.800 p.2 Green sunfish, bluegills and crayfish are providing the principal forage
Dragonfly larvae 0.800 p.2 Dragonfly larvae and unidentified insect remains provide the main forage
Grass shrimp 0.800 p.2 Rio Grande perch, crayfish and grass shrimp supplement the bass' diet
Green sunfish 0.800 p.2 Green sunfish, bluegills and crayfish are providing the principal forage
Rio Grande perch 0.800 p.2 Rio Grande perch, crayfish and grass shrimp supplement the bass' diet