Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

TPWD 1969 F-6-R-16 #1301: Fisheries Investigations - Region 5-B: Trotline Study, Job Progress Report, Federal Aid Project No. F-6-R-16

Open PDF
tpwd_1969_f-6-r-16_1301_trotline_study.pdf 8 pages completed 41 entities

Extracted Text

--- Page 1 --- JOB PROGRESS REPORT As required by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT TEXAS Federal Aid Project No. F-6-R-16 FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS - REGION 5-B Job No. B-28 Trotline Study Project Leader: Roger L. McCabe J. R. Singleton Executive Director Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Marion Toole Eugene A. Walker D-J Coordinator : Director, Wildlife Service October 15, 1969 --- Page 2 --- SUMMARY Trotline fishing has been neglected in the research and study of fishery scientists, so information to improve the fisherman's catch or upon which to base regulations is not available. The present survey has concentrated on interviews with trotline fishermen and on experimental bait trapping in an effort to supply such information. Much was gained in testing the interview forms and developing interviewing skills, but actual data obtained this segment was not of sufficient quantity to present conclusive statements as to gear and techniques preferred or catch obtained. The short-term bait trapping study in Lake Corpus Christi provided a combined catch of all traps which showed a tendency to capture the desired species and rough fishes instead of game fishes. The results at Lake Llano Grande showed conclusively that the traps were effective in taking Rio Grande perch. --- Page 3 --- JOB PROGRESS REPORT State Texas Project No.: F-6-R-16 Project Title: Fisheries Investi- gations - Region 5-B Job No. ; B-28 Job Title: Trotline Study mber 31, 1968 _ Period Covered: January 1, 1968 to Dece Background: - Trotlining, a major form of sport and commercial fishing, has had very little attention from fishery scientists. While some scientific works per- taining to the related long-line fishing in deep marine waters have been published, research to determine the status of trotlining in freshwater lakes has been neglected. A literature search has not revealed planned, long- term scientific studies undertaken to provide the lake trotline fisherman with the knowledge of techniques and materials necessary to influence his catch per unit effort and catch per unit expense. Currently, there are no limits on the numbers of trotlines and hooks or lengths of lines which can be used in Lake Corpus Christi. Very little data exists on which to base any limits if and when they are needed. The information that is available has been obtained from general creel censuses and from non-scientific books, pamphlets or magazine articles written by and for the fishermen. The most pertinent and directly related data which are currently on hand were obtained during a 10-month (September 1953 through June 1954) creel census on Lake Corpus Christi, Trotline fishermen comprised 61 per cent of the fishermen contacted in this census. These trotline fisher- men expended 79 per cent of the total man-hours, were 77 per cent successful, caught 68 per cent of the fish recorded, generally caught the larger fish (mostly catfish), expended 6.5 man-hours per fish caught and used mainly cut fish, shrimp, white naptha laundry soap and sunfish for bait. Objective: To conduct a survey of the trotline fishery of Lake Corpus Christi. ca Procedures: This job (B-28) is a four-year study of trotline fishing on Lake Corpus Christi and has been underway for one year. During this first segment, interviews with trotline fishermen were conducted in an attempt to provide --- Page 4 --- basic data as well as information for executing two future phases of the study: a creel census and an experimental trotlining program to test the effective- ness of various techniques and equipment. Twenty-six fishermen were inter- viewed to provide preliminary data related to techniques, equipment, seasons, baits, and catch. These interviews were conducted at fishing camps or personal lake cottages on all days of the week except Sunday. The short-term experimental bait trapping phase of the study was carried out in July and August with %-inch square mesh, hardware cloth traps (Figure 1), designed to selectively trap the deep-bodied, laterally compressed Rio Grande perch (Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum) and sunfishes (Lepomis spp.). These traps were set in Lake Corpus Christi in 30 separate locations, encompassing as much variation in habitat as possible and left for varying periods of time from one to 24 hours. Cottonseed cake, range cubes (cattle feed), oats, and maize (grain) were used as baits in various combinations. Further tests were carried out on Lake Llano Grande in the lower Rio Grande Valley. This lake had an overabundance of Rio Grande perch so it was used to compare and contrast trapping results obtained in Lake Corpus Christi, where there was a more balanced fish population. Progress: Twenty-six interviews with fishermen were conducted during the first seg- ment of the job. The unexpected difficulty in locating trotline fishermen and the time involved in searching or waiting for these fishermen contributed to the relatively small number of interviews. The data obtained were not of sufficient quantity to form conclusions so it is presented in the form of broad ranges of low and high extremes. It is expected that the extensive interviewing in following segments will establish more limited ranges and provide grounds for more conclusive information. The trotline fishermen contacted had from one to 14 lines in the water per party. Main (horizontal) lines were constructed of No. 36 to No. 96 nylon and ranged from 20 to 300 feet in length. The "staging" (drop or hook) lines were from 10 inches to 24 inches in length and there were six to 100 of them per main line. Hook sizes varied from 3/0 to 9/0. All lines were initially set out during the daylight hours. The time interval between successive "runnings" varied from three hours to six days. Trotlines were left in the water various lengths of time from two days to three years or in some cases indefinitely. Preferred seasons, wind, and water conditions were similar to those considered optimum by rod-and-reel fishermen seeking other types of sport fishes. The 26 fishermen interviewed listed a total of 18 types of bait they used in trotline fishing. For flathead catfish (Pylodictus olivaris), Rio Grande perch was the preferred bait; while cubes of white naptha soap were used by many for both channel catfish (lctalurus punctatus) and blue catfish (I. furcatus). --- Page 5 --- 23- Figure 1 Bait Traps Used Cloverleaf Type - Isometric Sketch V-Mouth Type - Isometric Sketch Cloverleaf Type - Top View Diagram - - V-Mouth Type - Top View Diagram --- Page 6 --- Table 1 Catch of Traps Set in Lake Corpus Christi | Common Name. _. Scientific Name Trotline Bait Fishes Rio Grande perch Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus Longear sunfish Lepomis megalotis Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus Green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus Warmouth Chaenobryttus gulosus Game Fishes Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus White crappie Pomoxis annularis Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides Rough Fishes Carp Cyprinus carpio 8 330 --- Page 7 --- Table 2 Catch of Traps Set in Lake Llano Grande | Common Name __ Scientific Name Trotline Bait Fishes Rio Grande perch Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum Game Fishes None Rough Fishes Carp Cyprinus carpio Threadfin shad Dorosoma petenense --- Page 8 --- Fe a There was no evident "ideal" depth of water for a trotlining location. Water depth at trotlining locations ranged from two feet to 30 feet. The depths at which hooks were set varied from six inches to 30 feet. No particular preference was indicated between mid-lake (open water) and near- shore locations. Of the catches reported in this survey there were 79 channel catfish (3/4 lb. to 3% 1lb.), 49 blue catfish (4% lb. to 12 lbs.), and 19 flathead catfish (2 lbs. to 27 lbs.). O£ those fishermen reporting catches at the "run" previous to interview time, a catch of 0.54 fish/man-hour was calcu- lated. This is misleading, however, since those not reporting catches did not show the number of hours fished either and could not be included in the calculations. Corrections in the interview form should remedy this error in the following segments. All persons interviewed were males from 37 to 74 years of age. Their occupations were quite varied, including: farming, oil refinery labor, insurance, law, sales, engineering, and others. The catfish tagging phase was not begun this segment but will be carried out in conjunction with the experimental trotlining phase in the following segments. The short-term bait trapping study was undertaken as preliminary testing to determine if Rio Grande perch and sunfishes could be selectively trapped for use as live bait by trotline fishermen. Although no conclusive data is available, certain trends were noticed and will be pursued in the next segment. All of the baits used in the traps proved to be effective in attracting species used as trotline bait. A total of 330 fishes were taken in 30 samples from Lake Corpus Christi. The catches of all traps combined showed a tendency to catch bait fishes over all others by a large ratio (Table 1). Collections made on Llano Grande Lake, near Weslaco in the Rio Grande Valley, provided data to test the effectiveness of the traps in taking Rio Grande perch from a lake known to have an extremely large population of this species. A total of 268 fish was taken, most of which were Rio Grande perch (Table 2). The remainder were rough fish and none were game fish even though game fish were known to be present in the lake. Prepared by Gordon P. Garwood Approved by WOE nse ou Cote Assistant Project Leader Coordinator Date October 15, 1969 Elgin M. C. Dietz Inland Supervisor

Detected Entities

location (9)

Austin 0.950 p.1 Austin, Texas
Lake Corpus Christi 0.950 p.2 The short-term bait trapping study in Lake Corpus Christi
Lake Llano Grande 0.950 p.2 The results at Lake Llano Grande showed conclusively
Texas 0.950 p.1 TEXAS Federal Aid Project No. F-6-R-16
Llano Grande Lake 0.900 p.8 Collections made on Llano Grande Lake
Rio Grande Valley 0.900 p.8 near Weslaco in the Rio Grande Valley
Weslaco 0.900 p.8 near Weslaco in the Rio Grande Valley
Rio Grande 0.850 p.2 ...showed conclusively that the traps were effective in taking Rio Grande perch.
Llano County 0.800 p.2 ...nd rough fishes instead of game fishes. The results at Lake Llano Grande showed conclusively that the traps were eff…

organization (2)

Parks and Wildlife Department 0.950 p.1 Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas
Federal Aid in Fisheries Restoration Act 0.900 p.1 FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT

person (6)

Eugene A. Walker 0.950 p.1 Eugene A. Walker Director, Wildlife Service
Gordon P. Garwood 0.950 p.8 Prepared by Gordon P. Garwood
J. R. Singleton 0.950 p.1 J. R. Singleton Executive Director
Marion Toole 0.950 p.1 Marion Toole D-J Coordinator
Roger L. McCabe 0.950 p.1 Project Leader: Roger L. McCabe
Elgin M. C. Dietz 0.900 p.8 Date October 15, 1969 Elgin M. C. Dietz
Rio Grande perch 0.950 p.2 effective in taking Rio Grande perch
Chaenobryttus gulosus 0.900 p.6 Warmouth Chaenobryttus gulosus
Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum 0.900 p.4 deep-bodied, laterally compressed Rio Grande perch (Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum)
Cyprinus carpio 0.900 p.6 Carp Cyprinus carpio
Dorosoma petenense 0.900 p.7 Threadfin shad Dorosoma petenense
Ictalurus punctatus 0.900 p.4 channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus)
Lepomis cyanellus 0.900 p.6 Green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus
Lepomis macrochirus 0.900 p.6 Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus
Lepomis megalotis 0.900 p.6 Longear sunfish Lepomis megalotis
Lepomis microlophus 0.900 p.6 Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus
Lepomis spp. 0.900 p.4 and sunfishes (Lepomis spp.)
Micropterus salmoides 0.900 p.6 Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides
Pomoxis annularis 0.900 p.6 White crappie Pomoxis annularis
Pylodictus olivaris 0.900 p.4 For flathead catfish (Pylodictus olivaris), Rio Grande perch was the preferred bait
Blue Catfish 0.850 p.4 ...by many for both channel catfish (lctalurus punctatus) and blue catfish (I. furcatus).
Channel Catfish 0.850 p.4 ...while cubes of white naptha soap were used by many for both channel catfish (lctalurus punctatus) and blue catfish (…
Flathead Catfish 0.850 p.4 ...otal of 18 types of bait they used in trotline fishing. For flathead catfish (Pylodictus olivaris), Rio Grande perch…
Green Sunfish 0.850 p.6 ...nfish Lepomis megalotis Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus Green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus Warmouth Chaenobryttus gu…
Ictalurus furcatus 0.850 p.4 blue catfish (I. furcatus)
Largemouth Bass 0.850 p.6 ...atfish Ictalurus punctatus White crappie Pomoxis annularis Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides Rough Fishes Carp C…
Longear Sunfish 0.850 p.6 ...perch Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus Longear sunfish Lepomis megalotis Redear sunfish Lepomis…
Redear Sunfish 0.850 p.6 ...gill Lepomis macrochirus Longear sunfish Lepomis megalotis Redear sunfish Lepomis microlophus Green sunfish Lepomis …
Threadfin Shad 0.850 p.7 ...atum Game Fishes None Rough Fishes Carp Cyprinus carpio Threadfin shad Dorosoma petenense
White Crappie 0.850 p.6 ...s gulosus Game Fishes Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus White crappie Pomoxis annularis Largemouth bass Micropteru…