Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

TPWD 1971 F-6-R-18 #1427: Fisheries Investigations - Region 5-B: Trotline Study, Federal Aid Project No. F-6-R-18

Open PDF
tpwd_1971_f-6-r-18_1427_trotline_study.pdf 12 pages completed 49 entities

Extracted Text

--- Page 1 --- 17.0 (fo? 4a. Marion Toole D-J Coordinator ite. FINAL REPORT As required by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT TEXAS Federal Aid Project No. F-6-R-18 FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS - REGION 5-B Job No. III Trotline Study Project Leader: Roger L. McCabe James U. Cross Executive Director Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas J. M. Beall Director, Current Operations June 8, 1971 --- Page 2 --- SUMMARY Project personnel researched the literature, interviewed, trotline fisher- men, and conducted actual experimental trotlining and bait trapping on Lake Corpus Christi to procure information on trotlining. A literature search revealed that trotlining was the least effective fishing method in terms of average catch per man-hour. According to two creel census, trotline fishermen averaged .15 and .17 fish per man-hour, respectively. Fishermen interviews provided data on the individuals doing trotline fishing, their methods, and their equipment. The fishermen were male resi- dents of the state. Their lines averaged 189 feet in length and contained a mean number of 40 hooks each. Experimental trotlining by project personnel yielded 118 fish in 54,590 hook-bait-hours for an average catch of .00216 fish per hook-bait-hour. All trap types and baits were selective for trotline bait species. The catch consisted of 95.97 per cent trotline bait species, 2.7/7 per cent rough fish, and 1.26 per cent game fish. --- Page 3 --- FINAL REPORT State Texas Project No. F-6-R-18 Project Title: Fisheries Investigations - Region 5-B Job No. III Job Title: Trotline Study Period Covered: January 1, 1970 to December 31, 1970 Background: Trotlining is a widespread fishing technique employed by both sport and commercial fishermen. Lake Corpus Christi is a popular trotline fishing lake in South Texas which provides a suitable area for studying the sport. Cur- rently, a hook interval regulation, limiting the distance between hooks to no less than three feet, is the only law governing trotline fishing on this lake. Unfortunately, there is little available scientific data upon which to base management regulations. More information regarding the effects of this form of fish harvesting is essential. During the course of this study (January 1, 1968 through December 31, 1970), project personnel have researched the literature, interviewed trot- line fishermen and conducted experimental trotlining and bait trapping. Literature pertaining to trotlining is scarce, consisting mainly of nonsci- entific articles in outdoor magazines and saltwater oriented research publi- cations. Fishermen interviews furnished information about the individuals involved in trotline fishing, their methods, and their equipment. Experimental trotlining and bait trapping by project personnel furnished data on materials, methods, and yields. Bait trapping exhibited a high degree of selectivity toward trotline bait species. Objectives: To study the trotline fishery of Lake Corpus Christi. 1, To conduct a literature search for publications pertaining to trot- lining. 2. To gather trotline fishing information through the use of fishermen interviews at Lake Corpus Christi. 3. To obtain data on actual trotline yields from Lake Corpus Christi. 4. To determine the feasibility of trapping live bait (Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum (Filippi), Lepomis spp. (Rafinesque)) for use on trotlines. --- Page 4 --- Procedures: Project personnel examined bibliographies and a list of unpublished Federal Aid Reports furnished by the Denver Public Library and utilized departmental facilities to procure information regarding trotlining. Fisher- men interviews were conducted using a form designed specifically to obtain data concerning trotline fishing and fishermen, their methods and equipment, their preferred locations, as well as baits and catches. Experimental trotlining on Lake Corpus Christi was initiated on May 29, 1969, and continued through July 29, 1970. Trotlines of various construction were fished at different locations in a variety of habitat types. Seven 105-foot trotlines were used, each containing a different hook size ranging from 2/0 to 8/0. Eagle Claw, Kirby, O'Shaughnessey, and Limerick hooks were arranged in sequence with each line centaining 20 hooks. Staging (drop or hook) lines were from 12 to 26 inches in length. Hook interval length (distance between hooks) was either 3, 4, or 4% feet. Fourteen bait types were fished in various combinations with hook sizes. Trotline clips and/or swivels were used to attach staging lines to main lines. Trotlines were set by tying one end of the main line to an object at or above the water surface and sinking the other end, thus enabling baits to be fished at a variety of depths. Experimental bait trapping was conducted in conjunction with experimental trotlining, using traps constructed of one-half of an inch square mesh hard- ware cloth (see Job Progress Report F-6-R-16), designed specifically to trap deep-bodied, laterally compressed, Rio Grande perch and sunfish. Traps were baited with milo, cob corn, range cubes, cottonseed cubes, or cottonseed cake in various combinations and set in different locations on the lake in suitable habitat. , Findings: Literature pertaining to the subject of trotlining is scarce and consists mainly of non-scientific articles in outdoor magazines ‘and technical publi- cations concerning saltwater research. According to a 10-month creel census by Alvin Flury (September 1953 through June 1954) on Lake Corpus Christi, trotline fishermen comprised 61 per cent of the fishermen contacted. They expended 79 per cent of the man-hours (man-hours calculated by multiplying the number of men fishing, times the number of hours the line was set), were 77 per cent successful and caught 68 per cent of the fish recorded. Fisher- men contacted in this census caught one fish every 6.53 man-hours for an average of .15 fish per man-hour and used mainly cut fish, white naptha laundry soap, and sunfish for bait. A creel census of eight Texas lakes by William H. Brown, published in the March 1957 issue of the Texas Game and Fish magazine, states that trotlines caught .17 fish per man-hour. On the basis of the data presented in this article, trotlining was the least ef- fective method of sport fishing in terms of average catch per man-hour. --- Page 5 --- Findings: (Con.) A total of 71 trotline fishermen was interviewed by project personnel. These fishermen were male residents of the state between the ages of 14 and 74. Trotline parties on Lake Corpus Christi contained an average of 4 per- sons fishing 3.4 trotlines. Trotlines usually were constructed of nylon from 20 to 750 feet in length. Mean length per trotline was 189 feet. Hook size preference varied from 1/0 to 9/0 with some trotliners using several hook sizes. Each trotline contained an average of 40 hooks. The length of staging lines varied from 8 to 26 inches. Fishermen checked their lines every 10.94 hours and rebaited 46 per cent of their hooks on each run. Trotlines were left in water for lengths of time ranging from one day to an indefinite period, Fishermen indicated no partic- ular preference between mid-lake (open water) and near-shore fishing locations. Preferred seasons, weather and water conditions were similar to those con- sidered optimum by rod-and-reel fishermen. Mean depth of the water fished was 16.8 feet while actual depths fished varied from 3 to 40 feet. Hooks were set at an average depth of 11 feet, with individual sets ranging from surface to 40 feet. Fishermen interviewed specified 22 preferred bait types (Table 1). Rio Grande perch was the most popular bait for flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris (Rafinesque) ) (Table 1). Cut bait, bar soap, and shrimp were the preferred baits for channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque) ), while bar soap, cut bait, Rio Grande perch, and sunfish were their favorite baits for blue catfish (1. furcatus (LeSueur) ) (Table 1). Experimental trotlining by project personnel yielded 118 fish (Table 2) in 54,590 hook-bait-hours (hook-bait-hours are calculated by multiplying the number of baited hooks times the number of hours fished) for an average catch of .00216 fish per hook-bait-hour (Table 3). Results are expressed in hook- bait-hours instead of man-hours because man-hours fail to take into con- sideration the number of hooks fished. The most efficient bait was beef kidney which caught .00618 fish per hook-bait-hour followed by shrimp, blood bait, sunfish, and fisherman's bait soap (Table 3). Several baits (cheese bait, heart, Rio Grande perch and Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus (Filippi) ) failed to catch any fish. Obviously, some of the baits are more productive than the results indicate; otherwise, they could not maintain their popularity among the fishermen interviewed (Table 1). Hook size 2/0 accounted for the most fish while size 6/0 caught the most by weight (Table 4). Fish were caught at an average depth of 4.7 feet, while the mean depth of the water where fish were caught was 13.7 feet. There was no substantial difference in the hooking abilities of the different hook makes tested. Swivels were more effective than trotline clips as a means of attaching staging lines to main lines. Trotline clips were more susceptible to rust than brass swivels and occasionally broke as a result. In addition, trotline clips frequently become entangled with the main line. --- Page 6 --- wll Table 1 Fishermen Interview Bait Preference ——= Flathead Largemouth Catfish | _. Bass Blood bait Crayfish Cut bait Dough bait Dry gar Frogs Goldfish Grasshopper Heart Kidney Liver Minnows Mussels Pork skin Rio Grande perch Salamander Shrimp Soap Spleen Sunfish Tripe Worms ee e 1) 5 5 8 1 1 2 7 1 if 1 5 6 2 i de 1 7 0 1 9 1 Some fishermen interviewed cited numerous bait preferences accounting for the large number of responses. --- Page 7 --- Table 2 Experimental Trotlining Catch _Number Caught _ _j Per Cent of Total Game Fish Channel catfish Blue catfish Flathead catfish Largemouth bass Rough Fish Yellow bullhead Freshwater drum Spotted gar --- Page 8 --- Table 3 Number of Fish Caught per Hook-Bait-Hour by Bait Type Blood bait Cheese bait Cut bait Dried liver Fel's soap Fisherman's bait soap | Fresh liver Heart Kidney Live shad Rio Grande perch Shrimp | sunfish | Mexican tetra --- Page 9 --- soouno) | “(seouno) | 3ysneg ysTq | ezTS YooH 2u8neD USTA 13g °IH-ITeg-yooy 3y8ne) “ON Jo °aM 7u8neD) °ON Jag Wysne) 1USTOM a3eIDAV 2UZTOM ezts yooH Aq yo eO BUTUTTIOAL [eIUeWTAedxy y eTqeL --- Page 10 --- Trotline Bait Fish Bluegill Redear sunfish Longear sunfish Warmouth Golden shiner Rio Grande perch Green sunfish Redbreast sunfish Game Fish Channel catfish White bass Largemouth bass White crappie Rough Fish Carp Gizzard shad Table 5 Catch of Traps in Lake Corpus Christi Lepomis macrochirus (Rafinesque) Lepomis microlophus (Gunther) Lepomis megalotis (Rafinesque) Lepomis gulosus (Cuvier) Notemigonus crysoleucas (Mitchil1l) Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum (Baird & Girard) Lepomis cyanellus (Rafinesque) Lepomis auritus (Linnaeus) Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque) Morone chrysops (Rafinesque) Micropterus salmoides (Lacepede) Pomoxis annularis (Rafinesque) Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus) Dorosoma cepedianum (LeSueur) --- Page 11 --- Findings: (Con.) All trap types and baits were selective toward the capture of the desired trotline bait species (Table 5). Of the 795 fishes trapped, 95.97 per cent were trotline bait fish, 2.77 per cent rough fishes and 1.26 per cent game fishes (Table 5). Recommendations: The Experimental Trotline Study was reevaluated by Federal Aid and project personnel, during the third year of a proposed four-year study. It was evident that many variables were present. As a result, some of the findings were inconclusive and the continued involvement of project personnel and funds could no longer be justified. It was decided to terminate this study upon completion of the third job segment. ’ c , Prepared by Ben S. Watson Approved by y / itp Hee Capote Asst. Project Leader Coordinator Elgin M. C, Dietz _ Inland ‘Supervisor Date June 8, 1971 LITERATURE CITED Brown, William H. 1957. Creel census of Texas lakes. Texas Game and Fish Commission. 5:No. 3, p. 8. Flury, Alvin. 1954. Creel census and check of commercial catch of rough fish from Lake Corpus Christi. Job Completion Report, Project No. F-6-R-1, Job B-6 (Unpublished) .

Detected Entities

location (3)

Lake Corpus Christi 0.900 p.2 experimental trotlining and bait trapping on Lake Corpus Christi
Texas 0.900 p.2 male residents of the state
Rio Grande 0.850 p.4 ...ned specifically to trap deep-bodied, laterally compressed, Rio Grande perch and sunfish. Traps were baited with mil…

organization (3)

Denver Public Library 0.900 p.4 Denver Public Library and utilized departmental facilities
Federal Aid in Fisheries Restoration Act 0.900 p.1 As required by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT
Parks and Wildlife Department 0.900 p.1 Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas

person (8)

Alvin Flury 0.900 p.4 Alvin Flury (September 1953 through June 1954)
Ben S. Watson 0.900 p.11 Prepared by Ben S. Watson
Elgin M. C. Dietz 0.900 p.11 Elgin M. C. Dietz Inland Supervisor
J. M. Beall 0.900 p.1 J. M. Beall Director, Current Operations
James U. Cross 0.900 p.1 James U. Cross Executive Director
Marion Toole 0.900 p.1 Marion Toole D-J Coordinator
Roger L. McCabe 0.900 p.1 Project Leader: Roger L. McCabe
William H. Brown 0.900 p.4 William H. Brown, published in the March 1957 issue
Rio Grande perch 0.900 p.5 Rio Grande perch was the most popular bait
Blue Catfish 0.850 p.5 ...Rio Grande perch, and sunfish were their favorite baits for blue catfish (1. furcatus (LeSueur) ) (Table 1). Experim…
Channel Catfish 0.850 p.5 ...Cut bait, bar soap, and shrimp were the preferred baits for channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque) ), whi…
Flathead Catfish 0.850 p.5 ...s (Table 1). Rio Grande perch was the most popular bait for flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris (Rafinesque) ) (Ta…
Freshwater Drum 0.850 p.7 ...thead catfish Largemouth bass Rough Fish Yellow bullhead Freshwater drum Spotted gar
Gizzard Shad 0.850 p.10 ...White bass Largemouth bass White crappie Rough Fish Carp Gizzard shad Table 5 Catch of Traps in Lake Corpus Christi …
Golden Shiner 0.850 p.10 ...it Fish Bluegill Redear sunfish Longear sunfish Warmouth Golden shiner Rio Grande perch Green sunfish Redbreast sunf…
Green Sunfish 0.850 p.10 ...sh Longear sunfish Warmouth Golden shiner Rio Grande perch Green sunfish Redbreast sunfish Game Fish Channel catfish…
Largemouth Bass 0.850 p.7 ...al Game Fish Channel catfish Blue catfish Flathead catfish Largemouth bass Rough Fish Yellow bullhead Freshwater dru…
Longear Sunfish 0.850 p.10 Trotline Bait Fish Bluegill Redear sunfish Longear sunfish Warmouth Golden shiner Rio Grande perch Green sunfish Redb...
Mexican Tetra 0.850 p.5 ...3). Several baits (cheese bait, heart, Rio Grande perch and Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus (Filippi) ) failed to …
Redbreast Sunfish 0.850 p.10 ...fish Warmouth Golden shiner Rio Grande perch Green sunfish Redbreast sunfish Game Fish Channel catfish White bass La…
Redear Sunfish 0.850 p.10 Trotline Bait Fish Bluegill Redear sunfish Longear sunfish Warmouth Golden shiner Rio Grande perch Gr...
Spotted Gar 0.850 p.7 ...rgemouth bass Rough Fish Yellow bullhead Freshwater drum Spotted gar
White Bass 0.850 p.10 ...Green sunfish Redbreast sunfish Game Fish Channel catfish White bass Largemouth bass White crappie Rough Fish Carp G…
White Crappie 0.850 p.10 ...nfish Game Fish Channel catfish White bass Largemouth bass White crappie Rough Fish Carp Gizzard shad Table 5 Catch …
Yellow Bullhead 0.850 p.7 ...Blue catfish Flathead catfish Largemouth bass Rough Fish Yellow bullhead Freshwater drum Spotted gar
Astyanax mexicanus 0.800 p.5 Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus (Filippi))
Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum 0.800 p.4 trapping live bait (Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum (Filippi))
Cyprinus carpio 0.800 p.10 Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus)
Dorosoma cepedianum 0.800 p.10 Dorosoma cepedianum (LeSueur)
Ictalurus furcatus 0.800 p.5 blue catfish (I. furcatus (LeSueur))
Ictalurus punctatus 0.800 p.5 channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque))
Lepomis auritus 0.800 p.10 Lepomis auritus (Linnaeus)
Lepomis cyanellus 0.800 p.10 Lepomis cyanellus (Rafinesque)
Lepomis gulosus 0.800 p.10 Lepomis gulosus (Cuvier)
Lepomis macrochirus 0.800 p.10 Lepomis macrochirus (Rafinesque)
Lepomis megalotis 0.800 p.10 Lepomis megalotis (Rafinesque)
Lepomis microlophus 0.800 p.10 Lepomis microlophus (Gunther)
Lepomis spp. 0.800 p.4 trapping live bait (Lepomis spp. (Rafinesque))
Micropterus salmoides 0.800 p.10 Micropterus salmoides (Lacepede)
Morone chrysops 0.800 p.10 Morone chrysops (Rafinesque)
Notemigonus crysoleucas 0.800 p.10 Notemigonus crysoleucas (Mitchill)
Pomoxis annularis 0.800 p.10 Pomoxis annularis (Rafinesque)
Pylodictis olivaris 0.800 p.5 flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris (Rafinesque))