Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

TPWD 1974 F-5-R-21 #1581: Region I-B Fisheries Studies: Ecological Evaluation of Striped Bass in Lake E. V. Spence, Federal Aid Project No. F-5-R-21

Open PDF
tpwd_1974_f-5-r-21_1581_ecological_eval.pdf 14 pages completed 41 entities

Extracted Text

--- Page 1 --- PERFORMANCE REPORT As Required By FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT TEXAS Federal Aid Project No. F-5-R-21 REGION I-B FISHERIES STUDIES Objective XV: Ecological Evaluation of Striped Bass in Lake E. V. Spence Project Leader: Billy J. Follis Assistant Project Leader: David J. Morris Clayton T. Garrison Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Lonnie J. Peters Robert J. Kemp, Director Chief, Inland Fisheries Fish and Wildlife Division March 15, 1974 --- Page 2 --- Abstract This report represents one part of a study undertaken to measure the ecological factors that may influence and be influenced by the success of striped bass introductions in Lake E. V. Spence. Three enclosures (2.33 acres) in Lake E. V. Spence were treated with rotenone to obtain a total fish kill. Of 363 marked fish introduced into the enclosures 204 (56.20 per cent) were recovered. There were 5,595 unmarked fish weighing 292.13 pounds recovered. A total standing crop of 4,272.76 fish per acre weighing 223.13 pounds per acre was estimated. This standing crop exceeded that of 1972 probably because of the rapid lake expansion in 1971. Essentially, a new lake had been created and carrying capacity had not been reached by the time of the 1972 rotenone sampling. ? Monthly physicochemical profiles obtained near the dam and elsewhere indicated stratification from May through August. Striped bass, which prefer cooler water, may have concentrated in a narrow zone above the thermocline in late summer because of the low oxygen levels below 30 feet. 4A significant fresh- water influx in March affected chemical readings in March, April and May. --- Page 3 --- State: PERFORMANCE REPORT Texas Project Number; F-5-R-21 Project Title: Region I-B Fisheries Studies Study Title; Ecological Evaluation of Striped Bass in Lake E. V. Spence Contract Period: From March 1, 1973 To February 28, 1974 Program Narrative Objective Number: XV Objective: To measure the ecological factors that may influence and be IL. influenced by the success of striped bass introductions in Lake E. V. Spence. Segment Objectives: 1. To determine, by rotenone sampling, species composition and estimated standing crop of fish in Lake E. V. Spence. 2. To collect and analyze basic limnological data. 3. To tabulate data for comparison with the results of other studies of striped bass introductions in Texas and other states, Summary of Progress: In August, 1973 a 0.50-acre cove, a 0.92-acre straight shoreline area, and a 0.92-acre shallow open-water area in Lake E. V. Spence were blocked off with 3/4-inch mesh netting. Test fishes, each marked with a hole punched in its caudal fin, were introduced into each enclosure. Rotenone (5% powder) was applied at the rate of 4 pounds per acre-foot. Fish were collected from each enclosure for 48 hours following treatment, sorted and counted by species and inch-groups (total length). Test fishes were counted separately to estimate overall recovery percentages. Ten or more unmarked fish of each species inch- group were weighed to estimate the total weight of fishes in each cove. Between the 10th and 20th days of each month from March, 1973 through February, 1974, water samples were collected and hydrologic measurements made at one or two stations in Lake Spence. The temperature profile was determined with an electronic probe in the deepest water near the dam. A water sampler was used to collect samples from the surface and the bottom. Part of each sample was preserved for analysis by the regional chemist and the remainder analyzed on the spot for dissolved oxygen content. If the temperature profile revealed evidence of stratification, additional samples were obtained from the top and bottom of each distinct stratum. Also additional measure- ments were taken at a sampling station midway up the lake. --- Page 4 --- <3 A summary of the actual recovery of unmarked fish by species is shown in Table 1. The total treated area from which these fish were recovered was 2.33 acres. A summary of marked fish releases and recoveries by species and length classes is shown in Table 2. Of 363 marked fishes released in all 3 enclosures, 204 (56.20%) were recovered. Table 3 is an estimate of the total standing crop per acre by species. This figure was derived from total number and weight of fish recovered on 2.33 acres adjusted by the percentage of marked fish recovery (56.20%). Although the treatment sites were selected to be as representative as possible of the different lake environments, several species of fish known to be present in the lake were missing from the sample: white bass, blue catfish, black bullhead, flathead catfish, and golden shiner. Small fishes such as silversides and minnows were underrepresented because of the difficulty of recovering them with dip nets, predation of dying fishes by larger fishes during the treatment, and the tendency of small fishes to appear briefly on the surface and, then, sink and decompose rapidly on the bottom. Comparison of 1973 (Table 3) with 1972 (Table 4) rotenone sampling results indicates a larger standing crop in 1973. A graph of lake level fluctuation (Figure 1) shows that Lake Spence expanded greatly in 1971 (from 1808.1' MSL on May 26 to 1855.1" on September 29). This rise increased the total lake surface 1,000% and its volume more than 5,000%, Essentially, a new lake was created and carrying capacity of fishes had not been reached at the time of the 1972 rotenone samples. @ The lake was at or near carrying capacity by the time of the 1973 samples. Table 5 summarizes Lake Spence temperature profiles near the dam from March, 1973 through February, 1974. A strong temperature gradient was evident from 45 to 50 feet below the surface in May and a distinct thermocline was detected at the 35-40 foot level in June, July and August. The stratification had dissipated by September 14, probably due mostly to high winds and rain in early September (remnants of Hurricane Delia). Table 6 shows dissolved oxygen concentrations at various depths during the year. In August, lake water with oxygen concentrations higher than 1.2 ppm was. at temperatures from 78° to 85°F. Striped bass, which prefer cooler water, were probably concentrated in narrow, cooler lake zones and were relatively inactive at this time. This may explain why only two were collected in the August rotenone sampling. Selected chemical parameters, from analyses made by the regional chemist on Lake Spence water samples, are shown in Table 7. The samples were collected concurrently with the dissolved oxygen and temperature measurements shown in Tables 5 and 6. Lake chemistry appeared generally stable. Lower values for total hardness, chlorine, total dissolved solids, and conductivity in March, April and May probably resulted from a substantial influx of fresh water in early --- Page 5 --- -3- Table 1 LAKE E. V. SPENCE AUGUST 1973 ROTENONE SAMPLE RECOVERY OF SPECIES BY NUMBER AND WEIGHT Total area treated: 2.33 acres Species Number Weight (lbs. Threadfin shad 863 9.88 Gizzard shad 2,538 140 .63 River carpsucker 31 17.89 Carp 30 28.15 Red shiner 24 0.08 Blacktail shiner 10 0.04 Bullhead minnow 91 0.18 Channel catfish 67 27.29 Mosquitofish 2 0.01- Tidewater silverside 109 0.18 Striped bass 2 0.10 Largemouth bass 98 15.35 Warmouth 17 0.56 Green sunfish 195 4.46 Redear sunfish 19 0 23 Bluegill 1,363 43 .39 Orangespotted sunfish 26 0.37 Longear sunfish 98 1.84 White crappie 3 0.31 Freshwater drum 9 1.20 TOTAL RECOVERED 5,595 292.13 --- Page 6 --- aA BERAAAA240RE wos ttt yaar ot cae sieo OY - 000 . 090s «1% se |% omnis | 66th 7% 00°97 a Hig |% INDNAd SWIOL £7 ZZ IZ 0% a Ql A Hel Zi noé@L9Gh & “Sovstay ow 2 x A 9 ASSYTO HON! AYSAOISAY HSIS GSANYVW CG4ANIGWOD WLOL E/6\ ISNONY “AIdWYS SNONFLOY JON3dS A DY & =r SIVLOL addos> apUumM inSenig YStyUNns svapey| USIFUNS UB2AC) ssvg yynowebs oF s50q @HUM preying 1g ysiyyo ang USI FED |PUOYD sauIYs Uepjocy dao) 42H? nsdaod APAlyl GAlD3dS --- Page 7 --- -5- Table 3 ESTIMATED STANDING CROP OF FISHES IN LAKE E. V. SPENCE Based on rotenone sampling with 56.20% marked fish return Species Threadfin shad Gizzard shad River carpsucker Carp Red shiner Blacktail shiner Bullhead minnow Channel catfish Mosquitofish Tidewater silverside Striped bass Largemouth bass Warmouth Green sunfish Redear sunfish Bluegill Orangespotted sunfish Longear sunfish White crappie Freshwater drum TOTALS Total area treated: 2.33 acres August 1973 No./Acre 659.05 1,938.20 23.67 22.91 18.33 7.64 69.49 51.17 1.53 83 .24 1.53 74.84 12.98 148.92 14.51 1,040.89 19.86 74.84 2.29 6.87 4,272.76 Wt.(1bs)/Acre 7.55 107 .40 13.66 21.50 0.06 0.03 0.14 20 .84 Trace 0.14 0.08 11.72 0.43 0.18 33.14 0.28 1.41 223.13 --- Page 8 --- -G- Table 4 ESTIMATED STANDING CROP OF FISHES IN LAKE E. V. SPENCE Based on rotenone sampling with 45.45% marked fish return Total area treated: 3 acres August 1972 Species No./acre Wt.(1bs)/acre Threadfin shad 147.3 0.93 Gizzard shad 1,567.7 60.48 River carpsucker 9.7 5.97 Goldfish 0.3 0.14 Carp 137 .3 81.02 Golden shiner 9.0 0.35 Red shiner 0.7 Trace Channel catfish 20.3 8.84 Blue catfish 1.0 0.15 Black bullhead 1.0 0.09 Flathead catfish 0.3 0.01 Silverside 0.3 Trace White bass 0.3 0.32 Striped bass 3.7 0.13 Largemouth bass 18.0 8.58 Warmouth 23.3 0.24 Green sunfish 130.3 2.40 Redear sunfish 3.3 0.08 Bluegill 1,232 +7 20.70 --- Page 9 --- aT Table 4 ESTIMATED STANDING CROP OF FISHES IN LAKE E. V. SPENCE (Continued) Species No./acre Wt.(1bs)/acre Orangespotted sunfish 3263 0.31 Longear sunfish 47.7 1.01 White crappie 12.0 2.64 Freshwater drum 3.0 0.37 TOTALS 3,401.5 194.76 --- Page 10 --- foe) 826'T é S6L'O! ovel €E€L‘el STQI 69 ‘8 oEel 73Aa7 v3s ae 90158 S€3l NVAW -JUYov Baoay 1334 e901 One 664 ‘49 Sha 192 ‘se€ —— 098! O€L'691 Soe ANN TOA €l6| cL6\ \Z6| NOJLVWAS 14 av SAWNI0A GNV SNOLIWAS13 SIVIENS SNAdS AA AV] | 241.014 --- Page 11 --- Ll BL 6°L o°8 7°8 c°8 9°8 L°8 8°83 6°8 0°6 T°6 c°6 qed €1 CL5)9S 8°S 8° 8° 6°S 6°S 6°S 6°S 0°9 0°9 T°9 €°9 7°9 uel yy (,29)0°21(479)8° 61 O° ZT O° TT O° TI O° LT O° TT O'TT O° LT O° TT T Tt O° LT Tit (ama! (amas e Tt O° LT y° TL 0° LT 9° TT O° LT 2200 QL AON QT 6° 1? a4 c° CC C° oC CG’ CS C° CC o° CS °C? °C? C° GC CCS €°C? 6° CC 390 GT 7°77 (,€5)9°0Z 1° €Z% 6° 0z 7° €Z 0°2%z L°€@ 8° €Z% 8° EZ EGZ 8° €Z 6°97 6° €% 1° LZ 0°72 €° LZ 0°72 8° LZ 1° 7Z 6° LZ 1° 7% 1°82 €° 77 2° 62 des 71 3nvy 0z 0°61 (17S) 6° LT 1° 0z 6°81 0° 1z 8°61 6°12 8°07 6° €Z 7° 2 L°9% 0° €Z 7° SZ 9° €Z% 8°SZ 8° €Z 1°92 6° €Z% €°9Z 6° €Z €°97 0°47 €°97 0°72 mr €l unr eT wed Teen peinseey (9. ) VL6L Atenaged - €161 YoseW SHTIHOdd AUNLVEddNaL SONHdS “A °H MAVI G BL ISI (,€9)0° €1(,7S) T° €T G°91 a" 61 6° LT L°€l G8 L°€l T° €1 9°81 8° SI 6° €1 6°81 7° €1 0°61 0°71 7° €1 9°61 9° €1 €°1Z 0°71 9° €1 7 Te aval 9° €1 8°12 1°71 S* YT Kew gt adv /1 Jen 0z 199 109 iGG 10S iS? 107 iGt i0€ iSC 102 iGl i0T iG aoezans qideq --- Page 12 --- -10- i877 108 icy ucy 109 u8S 178 - u9E WA] ucs use AQTptqan3 soeyans (97 09 69 04 (,29)0°6 (179) at 109 (,29) 0°11 9 | - - 0°01 - - aT x70 9°0 iSS ¥(,€S)0°0 (,7S)7°0 (,€5)8 (.2%6)6 - - - - - - - - - - - 0S - - - - - - - - 9°2 6 - - St - - - - - - - xe - . 10% - - - - -- - ram - L 8 - - iS - - - - - - - Qre - - - - 10€ - - - - - - arg - - - - - SZ - - - - - - - - - 8 - - 0% - - - - - - - - - - - - iT - - w = . - = - - - - 01 - - _ - . = s - - - - - ‘iS ZIl | O'tt oor ste 86% a et a: a6 01 O1 O1 aoeyang - oO qed €1 uel FT sod 81 «CON OT «C00 GLC TOCSY Of «CTP et )6C nr eT) Xe BT dV ZT) FPN 07 qaded Tyo0es ,, wed 1eeN poanseey ut AATptqiny soeyans pejou azopo s¢H x bl6, Atenaged - €L61 Yyoren wdd ut *o’p ALIGIGUNL GNV NHDAXO GHATOSSIC AONAdS “A “a AVI 9 e19eL --- Page 13 --- -li- izow | eo00% WO.LLOG ALIALLINGNOD sonwd €LOT 000% Qorz Oh6l HELI bbe rr A Isel BtTl SHT | ova! || advauns EO! 481! 980] || WOiLod 266 Sal0$ daA10S -SId TWALOL 897! 2001 Shit | Wad SIO] 4 lev IS GLE an aovsuns ss¢ LHe | WosLod OLS “ANIYO THD ht | Eh Of + OSE |Wdd ThE | ADvAUNS 61+ SS OO OOF olen y: OSE OO S6E Lip| SSh| 00h Le\ Sel WO1LLOD A.LINIWOHY “WLOL STI +e) 3ovsUNs 29) SBL|(,L8) 62 2 lfasl © ‘ 3 ' 1 S6L 62 G44 €1] NVC HI WOLLOG SSANGUYVH TWLOL ShE |Wdd Ose || 3dvauns od WoLLog AON 91 190 GI yd : : , BIwsyNs IdaS +) | 9NV OZ | MINF EL] SNAP EL| AWW Sl | YdV AL | YWO WVC WSN GaL0aTIOD SatdWVS UsaLwM £6] haenaqey - CLE| Y°?*OW SLINSTY SISXTYNY YSLVYM GSa1DaTSS JDNadS A'S DVT Z£ Pree --- Page 14 --- TLL. IV. =]9« March (Figure 1). Values of pH in these months and June was higher than in later measurements. Total alkalinity appears to have peaked in August or September. The greatest measured ranges of pH, total alkalinity, chlorine, and conductivity corresponded with the maximum thermal stratification in July and August. Significant Deviation: Segment objectives (1) and (2) were accomplished on schedule with no significant problems. One of the enclosures treated in the August rotenone sampling was only 0.50 acre in area because the 1l-acre cutoff point in the cove selected was too deep for the barrier. However, it is felt this did not significantly affect the results. In the hydrologic measurements, a third sampling station in the upper end of the lake was not used because (1) excessive time would be required to travel to the station, (2) the upper end of the lake is mostly within the river channel, does not contribute much to the total volume of the lake, and is never stratified, and (3) the volume, temperature, and turbidity of inflowing water vary widely and rapidly and are not useful in determining longer-term lake fluctuations. In other words, this station is not representative of lake conditions. The third segment objective, tabulation and analysis of the data for comparison with other lakes, has been deleted from the coming project segment and will be rescheduled for the 1975-1976 segment. This was done to allow final tabulation, correlation, and statistical analysis by electronic computer when data collection is complete. Preliminary tabulations and analyses were, however, presented in this report. Conclusions, Evaluations and Recommendations; The study is progressing according to design. It appears meaningful evaluations of striped bass introductions into Lake E. V. Spence can be made when data collection and analyses have been completed. Prepared by: David J. Morris Assistant Project Leader Date: March 15, 1974 Leo Lewis Regional Director, Inland Fisheries Region I Approved by: Dingell-Johnson Coordinator

Detected Entities

location (3)

Austin 0.900 p.1 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas
Lake E. V. Spence 0.900 p.2 striped bass introductions in Lake E. V. Spence. Three enclosures (2.33 acres) in Lake E. V. Spence were treated
Texas 0.900 p.1 Federal Aid in Fisheries Restoration Act Texas Federal Aid Project No. F-5-R-21

organization (2)

Federal Aid in Fisheries Restoration Act 0.900 p.1 As Required By Federal Aid in Fisheries Restoration Act Texas
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 0.900 p.1 Clayton T. Garrison Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

person (7)

Billy J. Follis 0.900 p.1 Project Leader: Billy J. Follis Assistant Project Leader: David J. Morris
Clayton T. Garrison 0.900 p.1 Clayton T. Garrison Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
David J. Morris 0.900 p.1 Assistant Project Leader: David J. Morris Clayton T. Garrison
Leo Lewis 0.900 p.14 Date: March 15, 1974 Leo Lewis Regional Director, Inland Fisheries Region I
Lonnie J. Peters 0.900 p.1 Lonnie J. Peters Robert J. Kemp, Director Chief, Inland Fisheries Fish and Wildlife Division
Morris, David J. 0.900 p.14 Prepared by: David J. Morris Assistant Project Leader Date: March 15, 1974
Robert J. Kemp 0.900 p.1 Robert J. Kemp, Director Fish and Wildlife Division
Black bullhead 0.900 p.8 Blue catfish 1.0 0.15 Black bullhead 1.0 0.09 Flathead catfish 0.3 0.01
Blacktail shiner 0.900 p.5 Red shiner 24 0.08 Blacktail shiner 10 0.04 Bullhead minnow 91 0.18
Blue catfish 0.900 p.8 Channel catfish 20.3 8.84 Blue catfish 1.0 0.15 Black bullhead 1.0 0.09
Bluegill 0.900 p.5 Redear sunfish 19 0 23 Bluegill 1,363 43 .39 Orangespotted sunfish 26 0.37
Bullhead minnow 0.900 p.5 Blacktail shiner 10 0.04 Bullhead minnow 91 0.18 Channel catfish 67 27.29
Carp 0.900 p.5 River carpsucker 31 17.89 Carp 30 28.15 Red shiner 24 0.08
Channel catfish 0.900 p.5 Bullhead minnow 91 0.18 Channel catfish 67 27.29 Mosquitofish 2 0.01-
Flathead catfish 0.900 p.8 Black bullhead 1.0 0.09 Flathead catfish 0.3 0.01 Silverside 0.3 Trace
Freshwater drum 0.900 p.5 White crappie 3 0.31 Freshwater drum 9 1.20 TOTAL RECOVERED 5,595 292.13
Gizzard shad 0.900 p.5 Threadfin shad 863 9.88 Gizzard shad 2,538 140 .63 River carpsucker 31 17.89
Golden shiner 0.900 p.8 Carp 137 .3 81.02 Golden shiner 9.0 0.35 Red shiner 0.7 Trace
Goldfish 0.900 p.8 Goldfish 0.3 0.14 Carp 137 .3 81.02 Golden shiner 9.0 0.35
Green sunfish 0.900 p.5 Warmouth 17 0.56 Green sunfish 195 4.46 Redear sunfish 19 0 23
Largemouth bass 0.900 p.5 Striped bass 2 0.10 Largemouth bass 98 15.35 Warmouth 17 0.56
Longear sunfish 0.900 p.5 Orangespotted sunfish 26 0.37 Longear sunfish 98 1.84 White crappie 3 0.31
Mosquitofish 0.900 p.5 Channel catfish 67 27.29 Mosquitofish 2 0.01- Tidewater silverside 109 0.18
Orangespotted sunfish 0.900 p.5 Bluegill 1,363 43 .39 Orangespotted sunfish 26 0.37 Longear sunfish 98 1.84
Red shiner 0.900 p.5 Carp 30 28.15 Red shiner 24 0.08 Blacktail shiner 10 0.04
Redear sunfish 0.900 p.5 Green sunfish 195 4.46 Redear sunfish 19 0 23 Bluegill 1,363 43 .39
River carpsucker 0.900 p.5 Gizzard shad 2,538 140 .63 River carpsucker 31 17.89 Carp 30 28.15
Silverside 0.900 p.8 Flathead catfish 0.3 0.01 Silverside 0.3 Trace White bass 0.3 0.32
Striped Bass 0.900 p.2 factors that may influence and be influenced by the success of striped bass introductions in Lake E. V. Spence.
Threadfin shad 0.900 p.5 Threadfin shad 863 9.88 Gizzard shad 2,538 140 .63 River carpsucker 31 17.89
Tidewater silverside 0.900 p.5 Mosquitofish 2 0.01- Tidewater silverside 109 0.18 Striped bass 2 0.10
Warmouth 0.900 p.5 Largemouth bass 98 15.35 Warmouth 17 0.56 Green sunfish 195 4.46
White bass 0.900 p.8 Blue catfish 1.0 0.15 Black bullhead 1.0 0.09 Flathead catfish 0.3 0.01
White crappie 0.900 p.5 Longear sunfish 98 1.84 White crappie 3 0.31 Freshwater drum 9 1.20
Cyprinidae 0.800 p.4 Small fishes such as silversides and minnows were underrepresented because of the difficulty
Blenniidae 0.700 p.2 not actually present but Blenniidae was mentioned