CAS_16094
Not suspect, not examinedPhotos
No photos available.
Map
No location data available.
Taxonomy
FamilyPercidae
GenusEtheostoma
Specimen
Num Specimens1
TypePhysicalObject
PreparationsAlcohol
Basis Of RecordPRESERVED_SPECIMEN
Identification
Identified ByCross, Frank
Date Identified1950-01-01T01:00Z
Collection Event
CollectorLindzey, J. B.
Collected Date1947.8.20
Field NumberOAM 20-VIII-47
Event RemarksPresented by Frank Cross, Oklahoma A & M. Some specimens coll. F. Cross
Geography
CountryUS
StateOklahoma
CountyMcCurtain
Higher GeographyNorth America; United States; Oklahoma; McCurtain
Water BodyMountain Fork River
Localitymouth & Mountain Fork River.
Record
Occurrence Idurn:catalog:CAS:SU (ICH):16094
IssueTAXON_MATCH_HIGHERRANK;IDENTIFIED_DATE_UNLIKELY
Rights & Source
Identifierurn:catalog:CAS:SU (ICH):16094
LicenseCC0_1_0
Record Source
Source
California Academy of Sciences
(type: specimens)
Institution
California Academy of Sciences
(type: museum)
Record URL
https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/607766949
Curator
Luiz Rocha
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
May 16, 2022
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
5/2017 to 11/2017
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
1
Current Determination
Determiner
Unknown
Determination Date
Unknown
Determination Type
Unspecified
Identification Comments
None
Identification Confidence
Unknown
Collecting Event
Collected
Aug. 20, 1947
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
275329
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Higher Geography
North America; United States; Oklahoma; McCurtain
Jurisdiction
Unknown
Name
mouth & Mountain Fork River.
Hydrography
Not available
Water Body
Mountain Fork River
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC
—
Georeferencing Remarks
—
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On CAS_16094