Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

CAS_566

Not suspect, not examined
Suckermouth Minnow Phenacobius mirabilis
SGCN NS G5 NS S4

Photos

No photos available.

Map

No location data available.

Taxonomy

FamilyCyprinidae
SpeciesPhenacobius mirabilis
GenusPhenacobius

Specimen

Num Specimens1
TypePhysicalObject
PreparationsAlcohol
Basis Of RecordPRESERVED_SPECIMEN

Collection Event

CollectorJordan, David S.; Gilbert, Charles H.
Collected Datenone
Field NumberZ100566

Geography

CountryUS
StateArkansas
Higher GeographyNorth America; United States; Arkansas
Water BodyPoteau river

Record

Occurrence Idurn:catalog:CAS:SU (ICH):566

Rights & Source

Identifierurn:catalog:CAS:SU (ICH):566
LicenseCC0_1_0

Record Source

Curator Luiz Rocha
Record Added June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified May 16, 2022
Data Processing Track Track 3
From Data Set Received 5/2017 to 11/2017

Identification

Suspect Notes None
Count 1

Current Determination

Actinopterygii Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Phenacobius Phenacobius mirabilis
Determiner Unknown
Determination Date Unknown
Determination Type Unspecified
Identification Comments None
Identification Confidence Unknown

Collecting Event

Collected Jan. 1, 1716 – Dec. 31, 2017
Collecting Event ID 434183
Collecting Event Notes Assigned full date range of database since no date given. Date can likely be refined based on data provided.
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.

Locality

Higher Geography North America; United States; Texas; TRAVIS
Jurisdiction Unknown
Name Rio Colorado at Austin and springs & creeks flowinginto it
Hydrography Not available
Water Body Drainage: RIO COLORADO
Captive no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
Ecoregion Unknown
HUC
Georeferencing Remarks
Georeferencing Annotation
Has not been Georeferenced because This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.

Comments On CAS_566

No comments have been posted yet.