CAS_589
Not suspect, not examinedPhotos
No photos available.
Map
No location data available.
Taxonomy
FamilyCyprinidae
GenusHybognathus
Specimen
Num Specimens1
TypePhysicalObject
PreparationsAlcohol
Basis Of RecordPRESERVED_SPECIMEN
Collection Event
CollectorJordan, David S.; Gilbert, Charles H.
Collected Datenone
Field NumberZ100589
Geography
CountryUS
StateArkansas
Higher GeographyNorth America; United States; Arkansas
Water BodyEureka springs
Record
Occurrence Idurn:catalog:CAS:SU (ICH):589
Occurrence Remarksdiscarded
IssueTAXON_MATCH_HIGHERRANK
Rights & Source
Identifierurn:catalog:CAS:SU (ICH):589
LicenseCC0_1_0
Record Source
Source
California Academy of Sciences
(type: specimens)
Institution
California Academy of Sciences
(type: museum)
Record URL
https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/607782949
Curator
Luiz Rocha
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
May 16, 2022
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
5/2017 to 11/2017
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
1
Current Determination
Determiner
Unknown
Determination Date
Unknown
Determination Type
Unspecified
Identification Comments
None
Identification Confidence
Unknown
Collecting Event
Collected
Jan. 1, 1716
– Dec. 31, 2017
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
434183
Collecting Event Notes Assigned full date range of database since no date given. Date can likely be refined based on data provided.
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Higher Geography
North America; United States; Texas; TRAVIS
Jurisdiction
Unknown
Name
Rio Colorado at Austin and springs & creeks flowinginto it
Hydrography
Not available
Water Body
Drainage: RIO COLORADO
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC
—
Georeferencing Remarks
—
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On CAS_589