OMNH_26111
Not suspect, not examined
Photos
No photos available.
Map
Location
35.43300° N, 99.22360° W
(± 100
m)
Taxonomy
FamilyCentrarchidae
SpeciesLepomis cyanellus
GenusLepomis
Specimen
Num Specimens2
Basis Of RecordPRESERVED_SPECIMEN
Collection Event
CollectorGordon Hall
Collected Date1948.7.1
Field NumberOLD 0755
Geography
CountryUS
StateOklahoma
CountyCuster
Latitude35.433
Longitude-99.2236
Water BodyClinton Lake
Record
Occurrence Idurn:catalog:OMNH:FISH:26111
IssueGEODETIC_DATUM_ASSUMED_WGS84
Rights & Source
Identifierurn:catalog:OMNH:FISH:26111
LicenseCC0_1_0
Rights HolderSam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History
Record Source
Source
Oklahoma Museum of Natural History
(type: specimens)
Institution
Oklahoma Museum of Natural History
(type: museum)
Record URL
https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/899103747
Curator
Edie Marsh-Matthews
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
June 22, 2022
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
5/2017 to 11/2017
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
2
Current Determination
Determiner
Unknown
Determination Date
Unknown
Determination Type
Unspecified
Identification Comments
None
Identification Confidence
Unknown
Collecting Event
Collected
July 1, 1948
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
275550
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Jurisdiction
Washita, Oklahoma
Name
Clinton Lake
Hydrography
Arkansas-White-Red Region
Red-Washita
Washita
Upper Washita
City of Clinton-Washita River
Turkey Creek
Water Body
Clinton Lake
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC 12
111303020202
Georeferencing Remarks
Georeference needs verification/refinement; coordinates provided by donor
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On OMNH_26111