TNHCi_47392
Not suspect, not examinedPhotos
No photos available.
Map
Location
30.64989° N, 99.25083° W
(± 45
m)
Taxonomy
FamilyCyprinidae
GenusCyprinella
Speciesvenusta
Specimen
Num Specimens20
PreparationFluid - 20
Identification
Identified ByMartin2, Floyd
Date Identified2011.8.5
Collection Event
CollectorCohen, Adam; Labay, Ben; Tomelleri, Joe
Collected Date2011.7.8
Field NumberAEC20110708-1
Event Remarksseine nets also used; habitat photos 24 and 25 on olympus
Geography
CountryUnited States
StateTexas
CountyMason
LocalityLlano River at SH 2389, near Mason
Latitude30.64989
Longitude-99.25083
DatumWGS84
Record Source
Source
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: specimens)
Institution
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: museum)
Curator
Dean Hendrickson
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
March 23, 2026
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
5/2017 to 11/2017
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
20
Current Determination
Determiner
Floyd Douglas Martin
Determination Date
Feb. 11, 2016
Determination Type
specimen examination
Identification Comments
Specimen examined and Id'ed for FoTX project.
Identification Confidence
High
Collecting Event
Collected
July 8, 2011
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
401814
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Jurisdiction
Mason, Texas
Name
Llano River at SH 2389, near Mason
Hydrography
Texas-Gulf Region
Lower Colorado-San Bernard Coastal
Middle Colorado-Llano
Llano
Comanche Creek-Llano River
Schep Creek-Llano Creek
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC 12
120902040501
Georeferencing Remarks
Georeference needs verification/refinement; coordinates provided by donor
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On TNHCi_47392