TNHCi_47557
Not suspect, not examinedPhotos
No photos available.
Map
Location
30.42529° N, 99.35160° W
(± 45
m)
Taxonomy
FamilyCentrarchidae
GenusLepomis
Speciescyanellus
Specimen
Num Specimens1
PreparationFluid - 1; Tissue - 1
Identification
Identification Remarksverified by F.D. Martin 02-05-2011
Identified ByBugh, Valerie
Date Identified2011.4.5
Collection Event
CollectorHendrickson, Dean; Cohen, Adam; Labay, Ben; Harrison, Jeremy
Collected Date2011.2.22
Field NumberAEC20110222-3
Event Remarkshabitat photos 4100 - 4108 (Dean's camera); field notes available
Geography
CountryUnited States
StateTexas
CountyKimble
LocalityFalls Prong at SH 385
Latitude30.42529
Longitude-99.3516
DatumWGS84
Record Source
Source
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: specimens)
Institution
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: museum)
Curator
Dean Hendrickson
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
March 23, 2026
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
5/2017 to 11/2017
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
1
Current Determination
Determiner
Unknown
Determination Date
Unknown
Determination Type
Unspecified
Identification Comments
None
Identification Confidence
Unknown
Collecting Event
Collected
Feb. 22, 2011
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
400912
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Jurisdiction
Kimble, Texas
Name
Falls Prong at SH 385
Hydrography
Texas-Gulf Region
Lower Colorado-San Bernard Coastal
Middle Colorado-Llano
Llano
Little Devils River-James River
Falls Prong
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC 12
120902040403
Georeferencing Remarks
Georeference needs verification/refinement; coordinates provided by donor
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On TNHCi_47557