TNHCi_56345
Not suspect, not examined
Photos
Map
Location
30.53764° N, 95.63457° W
(± 11646.9
m)
Taxonomy
FamilyFundulidae
GenusFundulus
Speciesnotatus
Specimen
Num Specimens17
PreparationFluid - 17
Identification
Identification RemarksThe ID for this lot was not verified before it was cataloged.
Date Identified..
Collection Event
CollectorBonham, K.
Collected Date1939.10.31
Field Numberz56345
Geography
CountryUnited States
StateTexas
CountyMontgomery
LocalityNew Waverly, 9 mi E
Latitude30.537637
Longitude-95.6345729
DatumWGS84
Error11646.944
Georeferencing
Georeference RemarksTreated as measure by air.
Record
Occurrence RemarksPrevious A&M catalog number: W-2-a-68. Information taken only from original jar labels.
Record Source
Source
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: specimens)
Institution
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: museum)
Curator
Dean Hendrickson
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
March 23, 2026
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
5/2017 to 11/2017
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
17
Current Determination
Determiner
Unknown
Determination Date
Unknown
Determination Type
Unspecified
Identification Comments
None
Identification Confidence
Unknown
Collecting Event
Collected
Oct. 31, 1939
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
274156
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Jurisdiction
Walker, Texas
Name
New Waverly, 9 mi E
Hydrography
Texas-Gulf Region
Galveston Bay-San Jacinto
San Jacinto
West Fork San Jacinto
West Fork San Jacinto River-Conroe Lake
McDonald Creek-West Fork San Jacinto River
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC 12
120401010202
Georeferencing Remarks
Georeference needs verification/refinement; coordinates provided by donor
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On TNHCi_56345