TNHCi_56372
Not suspect, not examinedPhotos
No photos available.
Map
Location
30.23927° N, 95.17025° W
(± 13401.5
m)
Taxonomy
FamilyCyprinidae
GenusCyprinella
Speciesvenusta
Specimen
Num Specimens79
PreparationFluid - 79
Identification
Identification RemarksThe ID for this lot was not verified before it was cataloged.
Date Identified..
Collection Event
CollectorLamb, L.; Buckley, F.
Collected Date1940.9.20
Field Numberz56372
Geography
CountryUnited States
StateTexas
CountyMontgomery
LocalityPeach Creek between Cleveland and New Caney
Latitude30.239271
Longitude-95.170248
DatumWGS84
Error13401.468
Georeferencing
Georeference RemarksTreated as named place - stream. Measured from confluence onto Caney Creek, to a point directly west from Cleveland.
Record
Occurrence RemarksPrevious A&M catalog numbers: 444 and M-3-d-207. Information was taken only from the original jar labels.
Record Source
Source
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: specimens)
Institution
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: museum)
Curator
Dean Hendrickson
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
March 23, 2026
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
5/2017 to 11/2017
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
79
Current Determination
Determiner
Unknown
Determination Date
Unknown
Determination Type
Unspecified
Identification Comments
None
Identification Confidence
Unknown
Collecting Event
Collected
Sept. 20, 1940
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
274542
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Jurisdiction
Montgomery, Texas
Name
Peach Creek between Cleveland and New Caney
Hydrography
Texas-Gulf Region
Galveston Bay-San Jacinto
San Jacinto
East Fork San Jacinto
Peach Creek-Caney Creek
Gully Branch-Peach Creek
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC 12
120401030109
Georeferencing Remarks
Georeference needs verification/refinement; coordinates provided by donor
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On TNHCi_56372