TNHCi_59378
Not suspect, not examined
Photos
No photos available.
Map
Location
35.91266° N, 100.31872° W
(± 120
m)
Taxonomy
FamilyCentrarchidae
GenusLepomis
Speciesgulosus
Specimen
Num Specimens10
PreparationFluid - 10
Identification
Identified ByMartin, F.
Date Identified2015.11.12
Collection Event
CollectorCohen, A.; Casarez, Melissa; Mayes, Kevin; Robertson, Sarah; Robertson, Clint; Aziz, Karim; Urbanczyk, Aaron
Collected Date2015.10.5
Field NumberMJC20151005-2
Event Remarkstrammel net and seine used too; coordinates taken from field camera
Geography
CountryUnited States
StateTexas
CountyHemphill
LocalityOxbow #2 at Gene Howe Wildlife Management Area
Latitude35.912655
Longitude-100.318723
DatumWGS84
Error120.0
Record Source
Source
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: specimens)
Institution
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: museum)
Curator
Dean Hendrickson
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
March 23, 2026
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
5/2017 to 11/2017
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
10
Current Determination
Determiner
Unknown
Determination Date
Unknown
Determination Type
Unspecified
Identification Comments
None
Identification Confidence
Unknown
Collecting Event
Collected
Oct. 5, 2015
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
425988
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Jurisdiction
Hemphill, Texas
Name
Oxbow #2 at Gene Howe Wildlife Management Area
Hydrography
Arkansas-White-Red Region
Lower Canadian
Middle Canadian
Middle Canadian-Spring
Oasis Creek-Canadian River
Clear Creek-Canadian River
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC 12
110901060801
Georeferencing Remarks
Georeference needs verification/refinement; coordinates provided by donor
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On TNHCi_59378