TNHCi_70222
Not suspect, not examinedPhotos
No photos available.
Map
Location
30.58888° N, 99.59823° W
(± 1500
m)
Taxonomy
FamilyCyprinidae
GenusCyprinella
Speciesvenusta
Specimen
Num Specimens198
PreparationFluid - 198
Collection Event
CollectorMiller, Brenda
Collected Date11-6-1972 to 11-6-1972
Field Numberz70222
Geography
CountryUnited States
StateTexas
CountyKimble
LocalityLlano River south of London; Kimble, Texas, United States; 30.5888800000, -99.5982300000
Latitude30.5888800000
Longitude-99.5982300000
DatumWGS84
Error1500.0000000000
Record Source
Source
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: specimens)
Institution
Texas Natural History Collections
(type: museum)
Curator
Dean Hendrickson
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
March 23, 2026
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
June 6, 2020
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
198
Current Determination
Determiner
Unknown
Determination Date
Unknown
Determination Type
Unspecified
Identification Comments
None
Identification Confidence
Unknown
Collecting Event
Collected
June 11, 1972
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
296245
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Jurisdiction
Kimble, Texas
Name
Llano River south of London; Kimble, Texas, United States; 30.5888800000, -99.5982300000
Hydrography
Texas-Gulf Region
Lower Colorado-San Bernard Coastal
Middle Colorado-Llano
Llano
Big Saline Creek-Llano River
Red Creek-Llano River
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC 12
120902040204
Georeferencing Remarks
Georeferencing details copied from donor into FoTX fields | Georef remarks: Coordinates placed in Llano River at its intersection with RM385 which is the most likely collection site and it is around 5 miles south of London, uncertainty is large because of the vague locality. Should be Llano not Llona.
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On TNHCi_70222