UMMZ_210658
Not suspect, not examined
Photos
No photos available.
Map
Location
36.64466° N, 96.71391° W
(± 45
m)
Taxonomy
GenusPercina
Speciescaprodes
Specimen
Num SpecimensEtOH - 2
PreparationEtOH - 2
Identification
DeterminerCS Anderson, 1982
Collection Event
CollectorBaumgartner & Moore
Collected Date1940.4.14
Field NumberWL40-3
Geography
CountryUSA
StateOklahoma
CountyOsage
LocalitySalt Creek, 6 mi (10 km) N and 1 mi (1.6 km) E of Shidler (Schidler); Arkansas River dr
Latitude36.644662
Longitude-96.713913
Other
Specimen NotesField notes in acc. env. | 39 mm SL | 1130-1400 |
Event Remarksc.s. seine
Record Source
Source
University of Michigan
(type: specimens)
Institution
University of Michigan
(type: university)
Curator
William L. Fink
Record Added
June 24, 2020
Record Last Modified
June 22, 2022
Data Processing Track
Track 3
From Data Set Received
5/2017 to 11/2017
Identification
Suspect Notes
None
Count
No data
Current Determination
Determiner
Unknown
Determination Date
Unknown
Determination Type
Unspecified
Identification Comments
None
Identification Confidence
Unknown
Collecting Event
Collected
April 14, 1940
Collector(s)
Collecting Event ID
274321
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.
Locality
Jurisdiction
Osage, Oklahoma
Name
Salt Creek, 6 mi (10 km) N and 1 mi (1.6 km) E of Shidler (Schidler); Arkansas River dr
Hydrography
USGS HUC
Arkansas-White-Red Region
Arkansas-Keystone
Arkansas-Keystone
Black Bear-Red Rock
Lower Red Rock Creek
Stewart Creek-Salt Creek
HydroBASINS
7424
742491
74249106
7424910602
742491060200
Captive
no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
HUC 12
110600060306
Georeferencing Remarks
Georeference needs verification/refinement; coordinates provided by donor
Georeferencing Annotation
—
Has not been Georeferenced because
This record, being part of the track 3 import, is not formally georeferenced by FoTX staff at this time. However, to allow mapping and visualization of this record, locality information has been provisionally accepted if provided by the donor or if location text could be matched to previously georeferenced records by FoTX team or donor data. For many records spatial error is either accepted from the donor (when provided) or derived based on coordinate precision.
Comments On UMMZ_210658