Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

USNM_615

Not suspect, not examined
Spotted Seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus
NS G5 NS S4

Photos

No photos available.

Map

Location 28.51943° N, 96.49404° W (± 2105.0 m)

Taxonomy

GenusCynoscion
Speciesnebulosus

Specimen

Num Specimens1

Collection Event

CollectorEmory, Maj.
Collected Datenone

Geography

CountryUnited States
StateTexas
CountyUnknown
LocalityINDIANOLA

Record Source

Source National Museum of Natural History (type: specimens)
Institution National Museum of Natural History (type: museum)
Curator Lynne Parenti
Record Added May 13, 2010
Record Last Modified June 22, 2022
Data Processing Track Track 2
From Data Set Received 04/2009 to 10/2010

Identification

Suspect Notes None
Count 1

Current Determination

Actinopterygii Perciformes Sciaenidae Cynoscion Cynoscion nebulosus
Determiner Fishes of Texas staff
Determination Date Unknown
Determination Type Unspecified
Identification Comments None
Identification Confidence Unknown

Collecting Event

Collected Jan. 1, 1853 – Dec. 31, 1853
Collecting Event ID 74
Collecting Event Notes For collection details see: Girard 1859 Ichthyology of the Boundary. U.S. and Mexican Boundary Survey Rep. 2:1-85. Evermann & Kendall 1894 The fishes of Texas and the Rio Grande… US Government Printing Office
Field Notes
There are no field notes available.

Locality

Region Gulf Coast Prairies & Marshes
Jurisdiction Calhoun, Texas
Name Indianola, bay-side coast
Hydrography Texas-Gulf Region Central Texas Coastal Central Texas Coastal West Matagorda Bay Powderhorn Lake-Matagorda Bay Powderhorn Lake-Matagorda Bay
Captive no
Locality Photos
No locality photos available.
Ecoregion Gulf Coast Prairies & Marshes
HUC 12 121004020500
Georeferencing Remarks Original georeference point was moved from city center to coast. Species data reflects presence of obligate marine species, therefore, chances of specimens being collected in water are far greater than being collected inland.
Georeferencing Annotation
Has not been Georeferenced because
flag (suspect/examine) June 30, 2021
suspect: noexamination: no
collectors June 30, 2021
note: Collection details found here: Girard 1859 Ichthyology of the Boundary. U.S. and Mexican Boundary Survey Rep. 2:1-85. Evermann & Kendall 1894 The fishes of Texas and the Rio Grande… US Government Printing Office.
collectors: Clark John H.
date June 30, 2021
note: For collection details see: Girard 1859 Ichthyology of the Boundary. U.S. and Mexican Boundary Survey Rep. 2:1-85. Evermann & Kendall 1894 The fishes of Texas and the Rio Grande… US Government Printing Office.
date_range: 1/1/1853-12/31/1853
date June 27, 2012
date_range: 1/1/1851-12/31/1861
collectors May 23, 2012
collectors: Emory, William Hemsley MajorKennerly, C.B. Dr.
staff comment November 5, 2011
ID Status: Not flagged for specimen examination. By default we accept donor specimen determinations (after synonymization to our taxonomy). If georeferenced to TX this record has been considered in spatial context with other occurences of this species and accepted as correct.
ID Comments: NA
Georef Remark: Original georeference point was moved from city center to coast. Species data reflects presence of obligate marine species, therefore, chances of specimens being collected in water are far greater than being collected inland.
Georef Annotation: Not in Brewster County but in Calhoun County
collectors November 5, 2011
collectors: W.H. Emory, C.B. Kennerly
date November 5, 2011
date_range: 1/1/1851-12/31/1861
georeference October 27, 2010
Error: 2105.02195199097
Remarks: Original georeference point was moved from city center to coast. Species data reflects presence of obligate marine species, therefore, chances of specimens being collected in water are far greater than being collected inland. Not in Brewster County but in Calhoun County
Locality: Indianola, bay-side coastCoordinates: 28.51943336;-96.494044517Georeferencer: MJCGeographic note: Inland USA Texas
Original georeference point was moved from city center to coast. Species data reflects presence of obligate marine species, therefore, chances of specimens being collected in water are far greater than being collected inland. Not in Brewster County but in Calhoun County

Comments On USNM_615

No comments have been posted yet.