(1960–1961) Fisheries Reconnaissance: Angelina, Attoyac, and Neches Rivers, Texas, 1960-1961
Open PDFExtracted Text
--- Page 1 ---
Report of Fisheries Investigations
Fisheries Reconnaissance
by
John N. Dorchester
Assistant Project Leader
Dingell-Johnson Project F-3-R-8, Job B-18
June 1, 1960 - January 31, 1961
H. D. Dodgen - Executive Secretary
Texas Game and Fish Commission
Austin, Texas
Marion Toole Kenneth C. Jurgens and William H. Brown
Coordinator Assistant Coordinators
--- Page 2 ---
ABSTRACT
A reconnaissance survey was conducted on the Angelina, Attoyac
and Neches Rivers in eastern Texas. Data included seining and netting
collections as well as ecological data including water analysis. While
no major overall changes were noted that could not be attributed to
methods or procedure, there were several fish species collected which
had not been previously collected from these waters. Conversely, there
were many species collected before that were not collected during this
survey. Water quality was generally good though there was one area of
pollution in evidence. Lack of good public access is the major problem
on these waters. Some aquatic vegetation was present in certain areas
but generally presents no problems.
--- Page 3 ---
Ana tiner
Job Completion Report
State of TEXAS
Project No. F-3-R-8 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys
of the Waters of Region 5-B.
Job No. B-18 | Title: Fisheries Reconnaissance
Period covered: June i, 1960 = January 31, 1961.
OBJECTIVES
To conduct limited investigations to obtain current information concerning gross
changes in fishing conditions and factors influencing fish populations.
INTRODUCTION
This report covers the reconnaissance work conducted on two major river systems
in the eastern part of Texas. The rivers are the Angelina system including the
Attoyac Bayou and the Neches River. The original basic survey conducted on the
Angelina system was from March 1, 1956 through February 28, 1957. ‘The Neches River
survey was conducted from June 1, 1956 through November 30, 1957.
The procedures are basically the same for both systems, however, the findings
for each river are kept separate in this report.
PROCEDURES
Location of Work and Methods
Collection sites were established during the original basic surveys. A total of
lll of these sites were revisited during this period. All previously established
stations were not visited due to various reasons. Broken down by individual streams
and methods there were 56 sites visited on the Angelim River excluding the Attoyac
Bayou. These stations were seined with either a 26- by 6-foot bag seine with a qeinch
mesh, or a 15- by 4-foot straight seine with a 1/8-inch woven mesh.
Three sites which were previously designated as pollution stations were also re-
visited on the Angelina drainage.
There were 21 sites visited on the Attoyac Bayou drainage using the same seines
as mentioned above. .
On the Neches River there were 24 sites visited which were seined with the above
equipment plus a 15- by 4foot bag seine with a 1/8-inch woven mesh which was received
near the end of the job. This type of seine appears to be very good for these types
--- Page 4 ---
Ss
of waters. In addition, there were seven sites revisited which were netted with
experimental type gill nets. The dimensions of these nets were 125 feet long, eight
feet deep with mesh sizes of l-, 14-, 2-, ei-, and 3-inches changing every 25 feet.
All fish collected by seining were brought back to the laboratory for identifi-
cation.
Limnological Data
Limnological conditions noted were turbidity (Secchi disk), air and surface
water temperatures and aquatic vegetation present. In addition, water samples were
taken and analyzed in the laboratory for pH, methyl orange alkalinity and chlorides.
FINDINGS
Angelina River
Table 1 lists each species of fish collected from the Angelina River including
the original survey and the reconnaissance survey. This table gives the common
names, scientific names, the number of specimens collected on each survey and the
number of times each species was collected. While there are no major basic changes
in fish populations there were several species which appear to be more common in the
river than before. Species such as Gambusia affinis increased in numbers from 257 to
731. Ina survey of this type these figures are not significant but act only as an
indicator as to which species of fish are present and only approximately how abundant.
It is interesting to note that there were eight species of fish not previously
collected from the Angelina River which were taken during this time. On the other
hand there were 20 species collected previously which were not taken during the re-
connaissance survey.
There was a total of 59 species of fish collected during the basic survey and 45
species collected during the reconnaissance survey. Combining the species from the
first survey and the new species from the second survey there has been a total of 67
species of fish collected from the Angelina River excluding the Attoyac Drainage.
».. gives the locations of the collection stations revisited and Table 3 shows
the ecological data as a matter of record. A few of these stations had changed in
character due mostly to new bridge construction or lake construction. The chemical
and physical property of the water was generally about the same as before.
Public Use. During the visits made to the collection sites on this reconnaissance
survey there were no fishermen, either sports or commercial, observed.
There are two commercial camps located on the river and one of them appeared to be
abandoned at the time. Facilities such as boat launching ramps would be a great
asset as it is all but impossible to put a boat in at most of the roads erossing the
lower section of the river.
Pollution. There are two areas of either active or potential pollution on the
Angelina River. The active pollution is the effluent of the Southland
Paper Mill, near Lufkin. The temperature of this black water taken several miles
from the plant outlet is 95 degrees F. compared to 73 degrees F. of a nearby parallel
--- Page 5 ---
n3<
stream. With the coming of MeGee Bend Dam and Reservoir on the Angelina River below
the outfall, more pressure should be put on the paper mill to improve the quality of
their effluent before it enters the river.
The potential pollution is in the Striker Creek area where the chloride content
of the water is much higher than other waters from the Angelina System. This is from
the East Texas oil fields.
Vegetation. There were only eight collections sites visited that had aquatic vege-
tation other than black willow, Salix nigra, which is fairly common.
Sagittaria sp. was found on five occasions, sawgrass, Zizaniopsis miliacea, was found
three times, parrot feather, Myriophyllum sp., twice, yellow water lily, Nuphar sp.,
white water lily, Nymphaea sp., and broad leaf pondweed, Potamogeton sp., once each.
Attoyac Drainage
This is spoken of as the Attoyac Drainage because most of the collection stations
were located on the tributary streams.
Table 4 lists the species of fish collected from the Attoyac Drainage in a similar
manner as Table 1. During the reconnaissance survey there were five species collected
which were not previously taken bringing the total numbers of species collected from
this drainage up to 66. However, 36 of these species were not captured during this
survey making a total of only 30 species taken. This can be attributed to the fact
that the original basic survey was much more intensive than the reconnaissance survey.
The major changes noted were the failure to catch any black bullhead catfish,
Ictalurus melas, during the second survey. Also, black and white crappie, Pomoxis
nigromaculatus and P. annularis, which were common the first time were not found at
this time. Other species were generally in about the same numbers or relative abun~
dance as before.
Table 5 gives the geographical locations and Table 6 gives the ecological data
of the collection stations. The chemical properties of the water were surprisingly
similar to the qualities determined during the first survey.
Public Use. This stream is seldom used by fishermen and then they are usually colored
people who fish with cane poles and worms or crawfish. Attoyac Bayou
itself would possibly provide good fishing if it were easier to get to from public
highways.
Pollution. There was no indication of any pollution on this stream.
Vegetation. Aquatic vegetation was found at three collection sites. The following
vegetation was observed in a borrow ditch at one location: lizzard's tail,
Saururus cernuus, sawgrass, Zizaniopsis miliacea, white water lily, Nymphaea sp., and
musk grass, Chara sp. At another location the following were found: cattails, Typha
latifolia, and coontail, Ceratophyllum demersum. At a third site yellow water lily,
Nuphar sp., was observed. At several locations black willow, Salix nigra, was found.
Vegetation presents no problem on this drainage.
--- Page 6 ---
-h-
Neches River
Table 7 lists each species of fish collected from the Neches River during both
surveys. There were six species collected which were not collected previously bring~
ing the total species collected from the Neches River up to 72. There were only 42
species collected during the reconnaissance survey. However, during the reconnais-
sance survey the river level was up considerably above the level during the original
basic survey. Also, previously there were collections made in the salt water section
of the river which were not made during this time. In addition, the original survey
was made during the summer months while the reconnaissance survey was made during
the fall. This latter factor influenced the failure to catch many species which were
quite abundant before. There were several private lakes included in the basic survey
which were not included at this time.
Table 8 gives the geographical location of the sites revisited and Table 9 the
ecological data. The chemical properties of the water were more "normal" for East
Texas than before. The pH, alkalinity, and chlorides were lower and more uniform
during this time.
Public Use. The Neches River is more widely used by the fishing public than the
Angelina and Attoyac. There are several commercial camps located at
the major highway crossings as well as private camps situated along the river. However,
during the time of reconnaissance survey, which was late fall, there was no fishing
activity observed.
Pollution. There was no active pollution observed at this time. However, the areas
of pollution noted on the basic survey were not visited during the re-
connaissance survey.
Vegetation. There was no aquatic vegetation observed other than black willow, Salix
nigra, along the Neches River at this time. The water had backed up
onto non-aquatic grasses and weeds which was not a normal situation.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
While a survey of this type probably does not indicate a true status of a fish
population, especially in streams, it has provided a means of adding additional fish
species to the previously compiled checklist. Also it provides an up-to-date indica-
tor of the water quality over a comparatively short period of time.
No recommendations are made for fish management other than to provide better
access in the form of permanent boat launching facilities at the major highway crossings.
This could possibly be a function of the State Highway Department using fees collected
from boat registration.
Prepared by John N. Dorchester Approved by. WZ Aaspeves S pple
Assistant Project Leader Director Inland Fisheries Division
Date April 18, 1961
--- Page 7 ---
Table 1.
Common: name
Spotted gar
Longnose gar
Threadfin shad
Gizzard shad
Grass pickerel
Smallmouth buffalo
River carpsucker
Gray redhorse
Blacktail redhorse
Spotted sucker
Lake chubsucker
Creek chubsucker
Golden shiner
Creek chub
Pugnose minnow
Speckled chub
Suckermouth minnow
Emerald shiner
Texas shiner
Ribbon shiner
Brazos River shiner
Weed shiner
Chub shiner
Longnose shiner
Pallid shiner
Spottail shiner
Redhorse shiner
Sand shiner
Blackspot shiner
Mimic shiner
Silvery minnow
Parrot minnow
Channel catfish
Black bullhead
Yellow bullhead
Flathead catfish
Tadpole madtom
Freckled madtom
Redspot topminnow
Blackstripe topminnow
Blackspot topminnow
Common mosquitofish
Pirate pereh
Brook silversides
Spotted bass
-5-
scientific name
Lepisosteus productus
L. osseus
Dorosoma petenense
D. cepedianum
Esox americanus
Ietiobus bubalus
Carpiodes carpio
Moxostoma congestum
M. poecilurum
Minytrema melanops
Erimyzon sucetta
E. oblongus
Notemigonus crysoleucas
Semotilus atromaculatus
Opsopoeodus emiliae
Hybopsis aestivalis
Phenocobius mirabilis
Notropis atherinoides
N. amabilis
N. fumeus
[2
a
a
iti)
i)
oO
mm
i)
=)
i
bh
mn
texanus
potteri
sabinae
amnis
venustus
lutrensis
stramineus
atrocaudalis
N. volucellous
Hybognathus nu nuchalis
Pimephales vigilax
o
i
ictalurus punctatus
i. melas
7. natalis
Pylodictus olivaris
Schilbeodes gyrinus gyrinus
&. nocturnus
Fundulus chrysotus
F. notatus
EF. olivaceus
Gambusia affinis
Aphredoderus sayanus
Labidesthes sicculus
Micropterus punctulatus
A checklist of Angelina River fish species.
Basic Survey Reconnaissance
(1956-57) 1960
Numbers Times Numbers Times
2 2 i. i
14 2 0
0 1 i
260 15 155 8
12 10 rf 3
13 i. )
0 a zi
25 6 \ 2
5 5 0
2 1 T 6
6 2 2 a
1 i 3 3
7 13 123 13
1 1 fe)
30 iH 9)
38 3 10 6
0 6 3
55 g 5 3
* 1 0
629 30 104 11
13 2 0
af 5 360 8
62 5 ho 5
6 1 0
193 10 0
265 27 488 30
2. 5 3 2
2ho 2h 155 16
379 13 0
2h3 19 154 21
17 2 0
150 23 420 28
10 6 32 5
re) 2 2
2 1 2 2
1 1 f)
af i 0
3 2 e)
189 2 yh \
) 168 26
hog ks 3 1
257 33 731 4 §
1 1, ue nf
i) 15 18 3
90 31 31 13
--- Page 8 ---
Table 1. (continued)
Largemouth bass
Warmnouth
Green sunfish
Spotted sunfish
Redear sunfish
Bluegill sunfish
Orangespotted sunfish
Yellowbelly sunfish
Longear sunfish
White crappie
Black crappie
Banded pigmy sunfish
Blackside darter
Dusky darter
River darter
Logperch
Arkansas sand darter
Western sand darter
Bluntnose darter
Slough darter
Redspot darter
Freshwater drum
Total species
wEu
M. salmoides
—
Chaenobryttus guicsus
Lepomis cyanellus
L. punctatus
microlophus
macrochirus
humilis
auritus
L. megalotis
Pomoxis annularis
P. nigromaculatus
Elassoma zonatus
Hadropterus maculatus
H. scierus
H. shumardi
Percina caprodes
Aumocrypta vivax
A. clara
.
PIP Ie
Etheostoma chlorosomum
E. gracilie
E. grahami
Aplodinotus grunniens
im
o
AOPANDOrWSO
Pow ON FP OW WH WW
WRrOUWMP NH &
ine)
IM fo
AOWOWOOW MOWNOPUNEHO
--- Page 9 ---
Table 2
Station
number
- Lecation of collection stations on the Angelina River.
County Name of water
Location
1 Rusk Brumley Creek 3 mi SW Henderson on US 79
2 Rusk Scoober Creek 7 mi SW Henderson on US 79
3 Rusk Johnson Creek 10 mi SW Henderson on US 79
4 Cherokee Mud Creek 3 mi SW Troup on FM 347
5 Cherokee Caney Creek 3 mi S Troup on SH 110
6 Cherokee Twin Creek 25 mi N New Summerfield on SH 110
10 Nacogdoches Angelina River 9 mi E Alto on SH 21
11 Angelina Angelina River 9 mi N Lufkin on US 59
12 Angelina Angelina River 14 mi E Lufkin, + mi downstream trom SH 103
13 Angelina Angelina River 1h mi E Lufkin, 7 mi downstream from SH 103
1) Nacogdoches Angelina River 1h mi E Lufkin, 3 mi downstream from SH 10
a5 Angelina Angelina River 14 mi E Lufkin, 4 mi downstream from SH 103
16 Angelina Angelina River 14 mi E Lufkin, 5 mi dowmstream from SH 103
L? Angelina Angelina River 14 mi E Lufkin, 6 mi downstream from SH 103
18 Angelina Angelina River 14 mi E Lufkin, 8 mi downstream from SH 103
19 Rusk Jarrell Creek 8 mi SE Henderson on SH 26
20 Rusk Ham Creek 34 mi NE Mt. Enterprise on SH 26
21 Rusk Trib. E Fork Ang. R. 4 mi SW Mt. Enterprise on County Road
22 Rusk E. Fork Angelina R. 3 mi N Cushing on FM 225
23 Rusk E. Fork Angelina R. 6 mi NW Cushing on County Road
ah Rusk Trib. to Angelina R. | 34 mi E Reklaw on US 84
25 Rusk Angelina River 3 mi E Reklaw on US 84
26 Cherokee Mud Creek 1 mi SW Reklaw on US 8h
27 Cherokee Angelina River 12 mi E Rusk on FM 343
28 Cherokee. Angelina River 74 mi NE Wells on County Road
29 Angelina Angelina River 16 mi N Lufkin on SH 7
30 San Augustine] Ayish Bayou 4 mi N San Augustine on County Road
31 San Augustine] Ayish Bayou 13 mi N San Augustine on County Road
33 San Augustine] Ayish Bayou 10. mi SSW San Augustine on SH 103
35 Sabine Bear Creek 3, mi WNW Pineland on County Road
36 Sabine Bear Creek 3 mi WSW Brookland on County Road
37 San Augustine| Ayish Bayou 5 mi WSW Brookland on County Road
38 San Augustine} Angelina River 8 mi WSW Brookland on County Road
LO Angelina Rocky Creek 6 mi NE Zavalla on County Road
hi Jasper Angelina River 10 mi W Jasper, 1 mi downstream from SH 63
he Jasper Indian Creek 4 mi W Jasper on SH 63
43 Jasper Angelina River 9 mi W Jasper on FM 1745
hy Jasper Angelina River 12 mi, NW Jasper, 1 mi upstream from Ayish B
45 Jasper Angelina River ll mi NW Jasper, mouth Ayish Bayou
46 Jasper Angelina River 9 mi NW Jasper, 2 mi downstream from AyishB
47 Jasper Angelina River ll mi NW Jasper, 2 mi ENE Ebernezer Road
48 Jasper Angelina River 10 mi NW Jasper, 14 mi S Ebernezer Road
Like} Jasper Angelina River Le mi WNW Jasper, 4 mi upstream from SH 63
51 Jasper Angelina River 9 mi W Jasper, 2 mi upstream from FM 1745
52 Jasper Angelina River 1l mi W Jasper, half way between FM 1745
and SH 63
--- Page 10 ---
Table 2. (continued)
53 Rusk Shawnee Creek
5h Rusk Barnhardt Creek
55 Rusk Barnhardt Creek
56 Rusk Shawnee Creek
57 Rusk Angelina River
58 Rusk Striker Creek
60 Rusk Beaver Run
61 Smith Gilley Creek
62 Smith Mud Creek
63 Smith West Mud Creek
64 Smith Shakleford Creek
P-2 Angelina Trib. to Willis Creek
P=-3 Angelina Willis Creek
P=) Angelina Angelina River
P - pollution stations
6 mi S Henderson, off of FM 225
7 mi S Henderson on FM 225
3 mi NW Laneville on County Road
34 mi NE Laneville on County Road
5 mi SW Laneville on FM 1662
1 mi SW New Salem on FM 839
2 3/4 mi SW Carlisle on FM 13
9 mi W Troup on FM 848
3 aw. W Troup on SH 110
32 at NE Bullard on FM 344
3 / mi NNE Bullard on FM 346
1 mi W Moffett on FM 842
1 mi W Moffett on FM 8ho
24 mi NNE Moffett below Mill Creek
--- Page 11 ---
Table 3. Ecological and chemical data on the Angelina drainage.
Temperature Turbidity
Station] Name of Water Date F.°) Secchi disk Color of M.O. Alkalinity Chlorides
number |Air |Surface| (inches water (p.p.m.)
3. Brumley Creek 8/17/60 | 90 8h. 12 brown 6.4 28 21.28
2 Scoober Creek 8/17/60 | 89 82 clear rusty 6.0 15 14,18
3 Johnson Creek 8/17/60 | 88 8h. clear none 6.6 23 226.94
\ Mud Creek 8/17/60 | 88 80 12 black-brown [6.8 37 28.37
5 Caney Creek 8/17/60 | 88 85 rid black-brown |7.2 235 85.10
6 Twin Creek 8/17/60 | 87 85 clear green 6.2 3h 28.37
10 Angelina River 10/ 4/60 |] 84 Th 18 greenish-tan | 6.4 17 106.38
it Angelina River 10/11/60 | 82 79 18 brown 6.4 26 99.29
12 Angelina River 10/12/60 }| 62 72 10 brown 6.6 22 127.66
13 Angelina River 11/ 2/60 | 70 61 8 milky black |6.7 23 56.74
14. Angelina River 11/ 2/60 | 68 61. 8 milky black [6.7 32 70.92
15 Angelina River 11/ 2/60 | 68 61 8 milky black |6.7 32 70.92
16 Angelina River 11/ 2/60 | 68 61 8 milky black |6.7 32 70.92
17 Angelina River 11/ 2/60 | 68 61 8 milky bleck |6.7 35 92.20
18 Angelina River ~ 11/ 2/60 | 65 61 8 milky black |6.7 35 92.20
19 Jarrell Creek 9/13/60 | 75 65 clear tan 6.6 15 21.28
20 Ham Creek 9/13/60 | 76 69 clear none 6.6 28 21.28
2. Trib. E Fork Ang. R. 9/13/60 | 89 70 25 brown 6.6 18 35.46
22 E Fork Angelina River | 9/13/60 | 90 7h clear none 6.8 20 14.18
23 E Fork Angelina River | 9/13/60 | 90 van clear none 6.8 20 14.18
2h. Trib to Angelina River} 9/13/60} 92 76 h tan 7.0 35 35.46
25 Angelina River 9/13/60} 91 76 12 tan 7.0 39 78.01
26 Mud Creek 9/13/60} 91 73 12 tannish-brown] 7.0 35 49.64
27 Angelina River 10/11/60 | 82 73 12 tannish-green| 6.6 26 78.01
28 Angelina River 10/ 4/60 | 85 76 12 tannish-brown] 6.4 13 85.10
29 Angelina River 10/11/60 | 82 78 2h. brown 6.2 18 156.02
30 Ayish Bayou 10/ 3/60] 82 69 clear none 6.0 20 28.37
31 Ayish Bayou 10/ 3/60} 82 71 12 green-brown | 6.2 ho 28.37
33 Ayish Bayou 10/ 3/60 | 82 71 18 tan 7.2 55 28.37
35 Bear Creek 10/ 4/60 | 76 73 h tan 6.6 20 35.46
36 Bear Creek 10/ 4/60 | 75 69 clear none 6.4 19 28.37
37 Ayish Bayou 10/ 3/60 | 78 77 8 tan 6.8 36 28.37
38 Angelina River 10/ 3/60 | 75 7 6 brown 6.8 33 63.83
ho Rocky Creek 10/12/60 | 90 68 12 brown 6.6 M5 70.92
--- Page 12 ---
~10-
Table 3. (continued)
41 Angelina River 10/25/60 brown 7.0 92.20
ho Indian Creek 10/12/60 none 6.6 35.46
43 Angelina River 10/12/60 12 brown 6.6 99.29
Yd Angelina River. 10/25/60 9 brown-black | 7.2 70.92
45 Angelina River 10/25/60 9 brown=black | 7.2 70.92
46 Angelina River 10/25/60 8 brown 7.2 56.74
47 Angelina River 10/25/60 8 brown 7.2 70.92
48 Angelina River 10/25/60 8 brown 7.2 70.92
49 Angelina River 10/25/60 8 brown 7.2 70.92
51 Angelina River 10/25/60 8 brown 7.0 85.10
52 Angelina River 10/25/60 8 brown 7.0 85.10
53 Shawnee Creek 8/17/60 5 green-brown | 7.0 21.28
5h Barnhardt Creek 8/17/60 green 6.6 21.28
55 Barnhardt Creek 8/17/60 green-brown | 6.8 7.09
56 Shawhee Creek 8/17/60 green-brown | 7.2 7.09
57 Angelina River 8/17/60 tan 7.0 35.46
58 Striker Creek 8/17/60 none 7.6 226.94
60 Striker Creek 8/17/60 rusty 6.2 680.83
61 Gilley Creek 10/11/60 tan 6.6 35.46
62 Mud Creek 10/11/60 black-brown | 6.8 35.46
63 West Mud Creek 10/11/60 tan 6.0 35 46
64 Shakleford Creek 10/11/60 tan-brown 6.6 35.46
P-2 Trib. Willis Creek 10/11/60 black-gray | 7.0 ?
P=3 Willia Creek 10/11/60 tan 6.8 35.46
P-)y Angelina River 10/11/60 black-brown | 6.4 70.92
*Turbidity caused by pipeline construction upstream.
--- Page 13 ---
ole
Table 4. A checklist of Attoyac Drainage fish species
Basic Survey Reconnaissance
Common name Scientific name (1956-57) (1960)
Yombers imes Numbers| ‘Times
eer [cottectea| -- |eoizected
Spotted gar Lepisosteus productus e 2 .¢)
Longnose gar L. osseus 2 1 8)
Gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum 158 k 0
Grass pickerel Esox americanus 25 LO 3 3
Smallmouth buffalo Ictiobus bubalus 14. 2 fe)
River carpsucker Carpiodes carpio 8 1 )
Gray redhorse Moxostoma_ congestum h h 0
Blacktail redhorse M. poecilurum L 1 6)
Spotted sucker Minytrema_ melanops 1 a 0
Lake chubsucker Erimyzon sucetta Ty 3 3 3
Creek chubsucker E. oblongus hg 5 fe)
Golden shiner Notemigonus crysoleucas| 498 8 167 9
Creek chub Semotilus atromaculatus ni 1 1 1
Pugnose minnow Opsopeodus emiliae 122 6 )
Silver chub Hybopsis storeriana 2 1 0
Emerald shiner Notropis atherinoides 9 3 (@]
Texas shiner N. amabilis 14 2 2)
Ribbon shiner N. fumeus 228 11 53 5
Redfin shiner N. umbratilis 38 5 @
Weed shiner N. texanus 11 h 218 6
Chub shiner N. potteri 8) 1 L
Pallid shiner N. amnis 3 de 0
Spottail shiner N. venustus 186 5 90 9
Redhorse shiner N. lutrensis 5 3 2 1
Sand shiner N. stramineus 81 8 10 1
Blackspot shiner | MN. atrocaudalis 170 12 0
Mimic shiner ' | N. volucellus Th 8 81 11
Silvery minnow Hybognathus nuchalis 50 5 1 1
Plains minnow H. placita 38 6 0
Parrot minnow Pimephales vigilax ek 5 36 7
Fathead minnow P. promelas 2 2 0
Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus 2 2 8)
Blue catfish I. furcatus 1 L 0
Black bullhead I. melas 1,546 3 0
Yellow bullhead i. natalis 8) 1 1
Flathead catfish Pylodictus olivaris 1 1 8)
Tadpole madtom Schilbeodes gyrinus 1 Is 8)
Redspot topminnow Fundulus chrysotus 9 1 0
Blackstripe topminnow | F. notatus @) 140 12
Blackspot topminnow F. olivaceus 179 LT 0
Common mosquitofish Gambusia affinis 180 13 215 T
Pirate perch Aphredoderus. sayanus 16 5 1 1
Brook silverside Labidesthes sicculus 36 3 0
Spotted bass Micropterus: punctulatus 33 9 5 3
2 2 2
Largemouth bass M. salmoides | 2
F ag
--- Page 14 ---
=12-
Table 4. (continued)
Warnouth Chaenob tus gulosus 5 11 1
Green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus T 3 1
Spotted sunfish L. punctatus 2 29 8
Redear sunfish L. microlophus 3 0
Bluegill sunfish L. macroc Ss 2 61 6
Orangespotted sunfish | L. humilis 2 10)
Yellowbelly sunfish L. 1 0
Longear sunfish L 8 fe)
White crappie i 1 5 ¢)
Black crappie P. nigromaculatus 5 6)
Flier Centrarchus macropterus 1 af 1
Banded pigmy sunfish Blassoma zonatum 2 )
Blackside darter Hadropterus maculatus 1 0
Dusky darter H. scierus 4 2
River darter H. shumardi 3 0
Arkansas sand darter Awmocrypta vivax 3 3 1
Bluntnose darter Etheostoma chlorosomum 9 55 8
Snubnose darter E. histrio a Ef ae
Slough darter E. gracilie e) 7 y
Cypress darter E. proeliare L 0
Freshwater drum plodinotus grunniens az 0
Total species
--- Page 15 ---
Table 5.
Station
number
At-Sh-1
At-Sh-2
At-Sh-3
At-R-1
At-R-2
At-R-3
At-R=
At-N-1
At-N-2
At-N-4
At-N-5
At-N-6
At-N-7
At-N-8
At-N-9
At-N-10
At-N-11
At-SA-1
At-SA-3
At-SA-6 -
At-SA-7
~13-
Location of collection stations on the Attoyac Drainage.
Rusk
Rusk
Nacogdoches
Nacogdoches
Nacogdoches
Nacogdoches
Nacogdoches
Nacogdoches
Nacogdoches
Nacogdoches
Nacogdoches
Nacogdoches
San Augustine
San Augustine
San Augustine
San Augustine
cout | me ot water
Attoyac Bayou
Sandy Creek
Borrow ditch
Attoyac Bayou
Golondrino Creek
Golondrino Creek
Attoyac Bayou
No-named creek
Neconiche Creek
Neconiche Creek
Un-named Creek
Turkey Creek
Attoyac Bayou
Polly Creek
Tandakee’ Creek
Alamodares Creek
Attoyac Bayou
Tributary Creek
Prairie Creek
Spear Creek
Arenose Creek
Location
6 3/4 mi. W Timpson on US 84
42 mi. NE Martinsville on County Road
2i mi. NE of Garrison on US 59
14 mi. N Caledonia on County Road
24 mi. SSE Concord onCounty Road off
FM 127)
3 mi. NNW Garrison on FM 95
2 mi. NE Garrison on US 59
13 mi. NE Garrison on US 59
53 mi. S Garrison on County Road W
of FM 1274
8 mi. SSE Garrison on FM 1274
5 mi. S Garrison on FM 1274
10 mi. SSE Garrison on FM 1274
1 mi. E Martinsville on SH 7
24 wi. SE Martinsville on FM 1274
h2 mi. SE Martinsville on FM 1274
fle
2 mi. N Chireno on FM 1274
7 mi. SSE Chireno, 2 mi N SH 103 crossing
3 mi. E Chireno, 5 mi. S SH 21 on FM 1196
2 mi. NE Broaddus on County Road
34 mi. S Denning on County Road
3 mi. SSW Camp Worth on County Road
--- Page 16 ---
-1)-
Table 6. Ecological and chemical data on the Attoyac Drainage.
Temperature Turbidity
Secchi disk
Chlorides
(p.p.m. i
Station
number
Name of Water Date Color of pH
water
At-R-1 | Attoyac Bayou 9/13/60 tan 6.8 21,28
At-R-2 | Golondrino Creek 9/13/60 none 6.8 21.28
At-R-3 | Golondrino Creek 9/13/60 tan 6.8 35.46
At-R- | Attoyac Bayou 9/13/60 none 7.0 21.28
At-SH-1] Attoyac Bayou 9/13/60 tan 6.8 21.28
At-Sh-2| Sandy Creek 9/16/60 green 6.2 14.18
At-Sh-3] Borrow Ditch 9/13/60 tan TO 35 46
At-N-1 | No-Named Creek 9/16/60 green 6.6 92.20
At-N-2 | Neconiche Creek 9/16/60 green-brown | 6.6 14.18
At-N- | Neconiche Creek 9/16/60 none 6.6 14.18
At-N-5 | Un-named Creek 9/16/60 tan 7.0 28.37
At-N-6 | Turkey Creek 9/16/60 green 6.7 14.18
At-N-7 | Attoyac Bayou 9/16/60 tan 7.2 35.46
At-N-8 | Polly Creek 9/16/60 none 6.0 14.18
At-N-9 | Tandakee Creek 9/16/60 green 6.4 21.28
At-N-10 | Alamodares Creek 10/ 4/60 none 6.8 28.37
At-N-11 | Attoyac Bayou 10/ 4/60 green=-brown | 6.4 35.46
At-SA-1] Tributary Creek 10/ 4/60 light brown | 6.6 14.18
At-SA-3 | Prairie Creek 10/ 4/60 brown 6.8 45.55
At-SA-6 | Spear Creek 10/ 4/60 brown 6.0 28.37
At-SA-7 | Arenosa Creek 9/16/60 green 6.7 14.18
--- Page 17 ---
=15«
A checklist of Neches River fish species.
1956- 1960
Table 7.
Scientific name
Common name
Numbers | Times |Numbers| Times
collected collected
Chestnut lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus 4 1 0
Alligator gar Lepisosteus spatula 13 4 @)
Shortnose gar L. platostomus a 2 O-
Spotted gar L. productus L6 15 2 2
Longnose gar L. osseus Xe) 12 )
Bowfin Amia calva 309 5 1 1
Threadfin shad Dorosoma petenense 0) 8 2
Gizzard shad . cepedianum 331 16 vas 6
Grass pickerel Boos americanus 19 9 1 1
Bigmouth buffalo ictiobus cyprinellus 2 2 @)
Smallmouth buffalo I. bubalus 80 22 18 6
River carpsucker Carpiodes carpio 16 T 3 3
Blacktail redhorse Moxostoma’ poecilurum 3 2 )
Spotted sucker Minytrema melanops 34 8 32 8
Lake chubsucker Erimyzon sucetta 83 2 0
Carp Cyprinus carpio 8 iF @)
Golden shiner Notemigonus crysoleucas 8h 7 6 2
Pugnose minnow Opsopoeodus emiliae 9 h 58 9
Speckled chub Hybopsis aestivalis ke 2 9)
Emerald shiner — atherinoides 0 2 2
Ribbon shiner N. fumeus 26 10 4 3
Brazos River shiner N. brazosensis 62 1 .@)
River shiner N. blennius il 2 Q
Chub shiner N. potteri 272 10 3 1
Longnose shiner N. sabinae ky 4 ©)
Pallid shiner N. amnis 198 3 )
Spottail, shiner N. venustus 51 21 173 17
Redhorse shiner N. lutrensis 368 12 162 8
Sand shiner N. stramineus 193 15 61 10
Blackspot shiner N. atrocaudalis 8h 6 0
Mimic shiner N. volucellus 27 ) 27
Taillight shiner N. maculatus 17 iF )
Silvery minnow Hybognathus “nuchalis (6) 1 j 1
Plains minnow H. placita 7 2 0 |
Parrot minnow Pimephales vigilax 313 14 207 14
Channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus 28 12 12 5
Blue catfish i. furcatus 7 1 10 4
Black bullhead ai- melas 121 3 0
Yellow bullhead I- natalis oT y 0
Flathead catfish Pylodictus olivaris e 2 “1. ‘a
Bayou killifish Fundyius pulvereus 1 1 0
Redspot topminnow FE. chrysotus 17 5 0
Starhead topminnow F. notti @) - ti 1
Blackstripe topminnow | F. notatus 303 25 61 13
Variegated cyprinodon | Cyprinodon variegatus 36 5 )
--- Page 18 ---
Table 7. (continued)
Common mosquitofish
Pirate perch
Striped mullet
Tidewater silverside
Brook silverside
Spotted bass
Largemouth bass
Warmouth
Green sunfish
Spotted sunfish
Redear sunfish
Bluegill sunfish
Yellowbelly sunfish
Longear sunfish
White crappie
Black crappie
Flier
Blackside darter
Dusky darter
River darter
Logperch
Arkansas sand darter
Bluntnose darter
Slough darter
Greenthroat darter
Freshwater drum
Clown goby
Total species
Gambusia affinis
Aphredoderus sayanus
Mugil cephalus
Menidia beryllina
Labidesthes sicculus
Micropterus punctulat
M.salmoides
Chaenob tus gulosus
Lepomis cyanelius
L. punctatus
LL. microlophus
L. macrochirus
guritus
iL. megalotis
Pomoxis annularis
P. nigromaculatus
its
Centrarchus macropterus
Hadropterus maculatus
H. scierus
H. shumardi
Percina caprodes
Ammocrypta vivax
Etheostoma chlorosomum
E. gracilie
E. lepidum
Aplodinotus grunniens
Microgobius gulosus
~
lo
FE
8
2
2
4
8
1
0
1
2
2
Ww
TFCOOFWHNONDOUWEO
a)
-
14
“Oe OW —] WI Wo Go Oo
La) Whee fo
--- Page 19 ---
-17-
Table 8. Location of collection stations on the Neches River.
number
N-1 Van Zandt-Smith Neches River 8 mi W Tyler on SH 64
N-2 Van Zandt-Smith Neches River 2 mi E Chandler on SH 31
N-3 Henderson Kickapoo Creek 2 mi W Chandler on SH 31
N-4 Henderson Neches River 4 mi SW Chandler on County Road
N-=5 smith Neches River 12 mi SW Tyler on SH 155
N-6 Cherokee Neches River h mi E Frankston on US 175
N-7 Cherokee Neches River ll mi SW Jacksonville on US 79
n-8 Cherokee Neches River 15 mi W Rusk on US 84
N-9 Cherokee Weches River 12 mi W Alto on SH 294
N-10 Cherokee Neches River 8 mi SW Alto on SH 21
Nell Cherokee Neches River 8 mi ENE Ratcliff on National
Forest Hwy 11
N-12 Trinity Neches River 9 mi WSW Lufkin on SH 94
N-13 Angelina Neches River 9 mi N Corrigan on US 59
N-14 Jasper Neches River 18 mi N Woodville on US 69
N-15 Tyler Dam "B" Reservoir 12 mi W Jasper on US 190
N-16 Tyler Weches River 5 mi E Spurger on County Road
N-17 Jasper Neches River 6 mi E Silsby on US 96
N-18 Jasper Neches River 6 mi below US 96 on County Road
N-19 Hardin Neches River 9 mi 5S Evadale on County Road off
FM 1131
N-30 Angelina Neches River 153 mi WNW Lufkin on SH 103
N-31 Jasper Dam "B" Reservoir l2 mi W Jasper above US 190
N-32 Jasper Dam "B" Reservoir 12 mi W Jasper above US 190
N-33 Jasper Dam "B" Reservoir 12 mi W Jasper below US 190
N-34 Jasper Dam "B" Reservoir 12 mi W Jasper below US 190
N+G-1 Smith-Henderson Neches River 12 mi SW Tyler on County Road off
SH'155
N-G-11 Jasper Dam "B" Reservoir l2 mi W Jasper above US 190
N=-G-12 Jasper Dam "B" Reservoir 12 mi W Jasper above US 190
N+-G-13 Jasper Dam "B" Reservoirs 12 mi W Jasper above US 190°
N-G-17 Jasper Dam "B" Reservoir 12 mi W Jasper below US 190
N-G-18 Jasper Dam “"B" Reservoir 12 mi W Jasper below US 190
N-G=19 Jasper Dam "B" Reservoir 12 mi W Jasper below US 190
--- Page 20 ---
-18-
Table 9. Ecological and chemical data on the Neches River.
“Temperature | Turbidity | | MO.
Station! Name of water Secchi disk
number p.p.m.
N-1 Neches River 11/22/60 brown 6.2 56.74
N-2 Neches River 11/22/60 brown 6.4 63.83
N~3 Kickapoo Creek 11/22/60 brown 6.4 35.46
N-4 Neches River 11/22/60 brown 6.4 35.46
Ne5 Neches River 11/22/60 none 6.2 OQ. 64
N-6 Neches River 11/22/60 tan-brown 6.4 56.74
N-7 Neches River 11/22/60 dark tan 6.4 85.10
N-8 Neches River 11/22/60 tan 6.4 70.92
N-9 Neches River 11/22/60 tan 6.4 56.74
N-10 Neches River 11/23/60 tan 6.4 35.46
N-11 Neches River 11/23/60 tan 6.4 35.46
N-12 | Neches River 11/23/60 tan 6.4 35.46
N-13 Neches River 11/23/60 tan 6.2 35.46
N-1), Neches River 11/23/60 tan 6.4 35.46
N-15 Dan "B" Reservoir | 11/23/60 tan 6.4 35.46
N-16 Neches River 11/23/60 tan 6.6 35.46
N-17 Neches River 12/ 6/60 tan 6.2 56. 74
N-18 Neches River 12/ 6/60 tan-brown 6.4 56.74
N-19 Neches River 12/ 6/60 tan 6.4 70.92
N-30 Neches River 11/23/60 tan 6.2 35.46
N-=31 Dam "B" Reservoir }|12/ 7/60 tan 6.6 35.46
N-32 Dam "B" Reservoir |12/ 7/60 tan 6.4 28.37
N-33 Dam "B" Reservoir }|12/ 7/60 tan 6.6 28.37
N-34 Dam "B" Reservoir |12/ 7/60 brown 6.6 28.37
N-G-1 | Neches River 12/15/60 tan 7.2 70.92
N-G-11] Dam "B" Reservoir {12/ 7/60 tan 6.4 28.37
N-G-12 | Dam "B" Reservoir |12/ 7/60 tan 6.4 28.37
N-G-13 | Dam "B" Reservoir [|12/ 7/60 tan 6.4 28.37
N-G-17 | Dam "B" Reservoir [|12/ 7/60 tan 6.4 28.37
N-G-18 | Dam "B" Reservoir |12/ 7/60 tan o- 33°30
N-G-19 | Dam "B" Reservoir |12/ 7/60 tan