(1958–1959) Basic Survey and Inventory of Species, as Well as Their Distribution in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in Region 3-B, Texas
Open PDFExtracted Text
--- Page 1 ---
Report of Fisheries Investigations
Basic Survey and Inventory of Species, as Well as Their Distribution
in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in Region 3-B, Texas
by
James F. Wilcox
Assistant Project Leader
Dingell-Johnson Project F-5-R-6, Job B-16
April 16, 1958 - April 15, 1959
H. D. Dodgen - Executive Secretary
Texas Game and Fish Commission
Austin, Texas
Marion Toole Kenneth C. Jurgens & William H. Brown
Coordinator Assistant Coordinators
--- Page 3 ---
Job Completion Report
State: of TEXAS
Project No. F-5-R-6 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys
of the Waters of Region 3-B.
Job lo. B-16 Title: Basic Survey and Inventory of Species,
as Well as Their Distribution in the
Clear Fork of the Brazos River in
Region 3-B, Texas.
Pericd Covered: April 16, 1958 - April 15, 1959
Abstract:
Altogether 28 seining stations and 15 netting stations were employed to collect
5,33$ specimens of fish life representing 10 families, 18 genera, and 29 species. Redhorse
shiners (Notropis lutrensis) dominated the seining sample while gizzard shad (Dorosoma
cepedianum) dominated the netting. Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) were found to
be tke most prevalent of the larger game species. It was concluded that the survey
should be extended for another year in an effort to obtain more complete fishery data
from the lower areas of the Brazos watershed and more information concerning pollution
and water quality.
Ob jectives:
fo gather fundamental data on the above waters in regard to their physical, chemical
and biological aspects and to determine the distribution of the species present, their
relative abundance and the ecological factors influencing their distribution.
Procedure:
4 total of 95 gill nets were set and 28 seine collections were made in an effort
to sample the fish population of the Clear Fork of the Brazos River and its watershed.
The use of netting as a sampling technique was limited in use in the river and impossible
in the river's tributaries due to the shallowness of the water in most places and the
narrowmess of the river and creek beds. For that reason only 10 netting collections were
made at five localities in the river. A total of 85 nets were set in 10 lakes on the
river's watershed. Some of the netting collections from lakes were obtained in conjunction
with other Dingell-Johnson Projects.
All nets employed were experimental type gill nets measuring 125 feet in length
by 8 feet in depth. All seines used were either 20 feet long by 6 feet deep common-
sense seines, or 30 feet long by 6 feet deep bag seines.
specimens collected by seining were taken to the laboratory for identification and
study. Samples of each species were preserved in a 10 percent formalin solution.
--- Page 4 ---
Since water quality records were available on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River
through the Texas Board of Water Engineers, and since time that could be devoted to this
job was at a premium, no special chemical analyses were made. Air and water temperatures,
pH and turbidity recordings, and physical and botanical observations were made at various
netting and seining localities during the course of the survey.
Findings:
Physical Characteristics
The Clear Fork of the Brazos River arises in the south-eastern part of Scurry ‘Sounty
from a series of small springs. As the stream progresses through Fisher and Jones “Zounties
a multitude of creeks are added to the watershed. Permian red soils prevail in this
area and much of the land is in cultivation. The river in this region usually flows only
in periods of heavy rain. For these reasons the water flowing in these areas usually
contains much red and brown collodal suspension. However, the water becomes clearer and
the stream becomes more deserving of its name as it continues further east. In times
of drouth much of the standing water of the upper watershed dries up completely. Tais
upper area is best characterized as a sporadic, intermittent stream (Figures 1 and 2).
On down the river, at the Nugent station, average annual runoff figures for a perioi of
30.6 years equaled 91,770 acre feet. The minimum flow recorded during this period was
7,830 acre feet and the maximum flow recorded was 518,000 acre feet. (Figures 3 and 4).
The eastern part of the Clear Fork Watershed is chiefly composed of Shackelfori,
Throckmorton and Stephens Counties. The undulating surface of the land in these coanties
is used principally for ranching. The vegetative cover on these black and grey soils
and the presence of several small ponds and lakes are probably the main reasons for the
less turbid waters in the lower Clear Fork Watershed, The stream bed in this area is
generally packed sand with limestone projections and the banks of the river are lin:d
with large trees. For the Fort Griffin station, in this lower area, the average anaual
runoff figures for a period of 30.8 years equaled 173,300 acre feet. The minimum flow
recorded during this period was 6,370 acre feet and the maximum flow recorded was 711,000
acre feet,
Aquatic Vegetation
Streambed vegetation varies from the headwaters to the lower reaches of the Cl:ar
Fork as the topography and water characteristics. Vegetation in the upper reaches of
the watershed is relatively scattered and is composed mainly of mesquite, button willows,
and a few hackberry trees with various weeds and grasses intermingled. Small patches
of bulrushes (Scirpus ) and various forms of algae were the only aquatics noted in tae
upper area. (Figure 5).
The lower drainage of the Clear Fork supports more profuse vegetation with larzer
mesquites, pecans, hackberries, post oaks, blackjack oaks, and willows being the principal
trees along the river banks. Various grasses, vines, and brambles are likewise abuadant.
The bulk of the aquatic vegetation appears to be muskgrass (Chara) and coontail
(Ceratophyllum).
Pollution
Small scattered patches of oil-well, salt-water, pollution seem to be common i:
several localities along the Clear Fork of the Brazos River. The areas of most heary
--- Page 5 ---
concentrations apparently lie on California Creek, in Jones County (see Table 53); on
the Clear Fork itself, in north-eastern Stephens County; and in the Old Hamlin City
Lake, Three nets set in the Old Hamlin City Lake produced no fish and seining yielded
only very salt tolerant species (see Tables 26 and 39). A small refinery at Lueders,
Texas, is emptying a by-product into the river. Detailed examinations and investigations
of these pollutions or possible pollutions has been impossible during the survey thus
far due to the lack of available time. It is hoped that more time may be expended on
this phase of the survey during the following segment.
Fish Populations
The results of the netting and seining collections can best be given in the follow-
ing annotated species list and the fishery charts included in this report. For a complete
summation of fishery results consult Tables 31 and 51. A total of 5,339 specimens of
29 species were collected. These 29 species represented 10 families and 18 genera.
Annotated Species List
Lepisosteidae (Gars)
Lepisosteus osseus (longnose gar). This species is probably the dominant one in
the lower part of the Clear Fork of the Brazos River. In the lower regions there are
some sections of stream that have apparently been stripped of practically all small fish
by this species. It was also observed that gar in those sections were rather poor and
on the average, weighed only one pound. It is possible that they were having a hard
time finding enough to eat. In one particular hole of water the gar were so active
and perhaps so ravenous that there were approximately 20 of them in the gill net before
the survey crew had it completely set out. There were no gar taken in the upper reaches
of the watershed. Thus, considering the whole river and all its tributaries, gar com-
poseé only 4.42% by number of the total fish netted.
Clupeidae (Herrings)
Dorosoma cepedianum (gizzard shad). This species was very prevalent in the netting
collections in some localities and equaled 24.9%of the total number of fish taken by
netting. This was the highest percentage, by number, of any species taken by netting.
However, it must be mentioned that some lakes and netting localities produced no shad
at all. The shad taken from the river were generally very large, 97 of them averaging
slightly over 10 ounces. Shad of this size are considered to be highly undesirable.
(See Table 47).
Catostomidae (Suckers and buffalofishes)
Ictiobus bubalus (smallmouth buffalo). Most netting stations in the river yielded
this species but none were taken from any of the lakes sampled even though they are
known. to exist in some of the lakes (i.e. Lake Fort Phantom Hill). No buffalo were
obtained in any of the seining collections. Although this species has a high commercial
value, the difficulty of access and netting in the holes in the river, where the majority
of this species exist, probably tends to make the commercial fishing for this fish
unprefitable.
--- Page 6 ---
Carpiodes carpio (river carpsucker). These fish were taken both by net and seine.
The presence of this species constitutes a serious fishery problem in some lakes on
the watershed, since no utilization of this species by either man or fish has been
observed.
Cyprinidae (Shiners and minnows)
Cyprinus carpio (carp). This species is sub-dominant to the river carpsucker but
does constitute a fishery problem in all lakes. Carp are becoming more and more fished
for in many West Texas lakes because of their tremendous strength and willingness to
fight when caught.
Notemigonus crysoleucas (golden shiner). Although this species was taken by net
and seine, it was taken only from lakes. This fish is not believed to be native in
the Clear Fork of the Brazos River, or its watershed, but is known to have been intro-
duced as a forage fish by the state fish hatcheries.
Notropis lutrensis (redhorse shiner). This is the dominant shiner in the Clear
Fork of the Brazos River. Practically all of the 1,468 individuals collected were taken
from the river and its tributaries. Even so they constituted over 33% of the fish taken
by seining for the whole watershed. These minnows thrive particularly in the sporadic,
intermittent streams of the upper part of the Clear Fork.
Notropis volucellus (mimic shiner). Only one individual of this species was col-
lected. It was taken from the upper part of the river. (See Table 12).
Notropis buchanani (ghost shiner). Only one specimen of this species was collected.
This fish was taken from a tributary of the Clear Fork during a muddy run off of rain
waters. (See Table 22).
Pimephales vigilax (parrot minnow). All of the small sample of this species were
obtained from the bigger waters of the middle and lower reaches of the river.
Pimephales promelas {fathead minnow). This species is fairly abundant but seems
to be more prevalent in the upper reaches of the river.
Ameiuridae (Freshwater catfishes)
ictalurus punctatus (channel catfish). Only occasional specimens of this fish
were obtained by seining and netting in the river and its tributaries. The species
was very abundant in netting collections taken from the lakes and composed over 21%
of the number and over 47% of the weight of the total netting sample. This is one of
the most sought after species by West Texas Anglers and is frequently stocked from the
state fish hatcheries.
Ictalurus melas (black bullhead). This species was taken by net and seine from
both the river and the lakes. It appears to be more abundant in some of the smaller
lakes, which apparently have no flathead catfish, than in any other waters.
Ictalurus natalis (yellow bullhead). This species was obtained only by seining.
It is fairly common in the river but was not collected from the lakes.
--- Page 7 ---
Pylodictus olivaris (flathead catfish). This very desirable food fish is much
sought after by anglers and apparently serves as an effective bullhead control in
lakes where it occurs. One specimen, taken from the river, was the only
individual of this species collected. The species is known, however, to be fairly
common in some of the lakes on the watershed. Possibly these fish lie on the bottom
in a lethargic state for long periods of time which might account for their scarcity
in netting collections.
Cyprinodontidae (Killifishes and topminnows)
Fundulus notatus (blackstripe topminnow). The only locality in which this top-
minnow was seined was a tributary of the lower part of the river (See Table 2h).
Fundulus kansae (plains killifish). This species was collected from a lake con-
taining large amounts of chlorides which are believed to be the results of nearby oil
wells. The killifish was not taken from any other locality. (See Table 26).
Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis (Red River pupfish). This species appears to be the
dominant fish in the lake mentioned above where the water is too salty for many other
species.
Poeciliidae (Mosquitofishes)
Gambusia affinis (mosquitofish). The mosquitofish is common in backwater sloughs
and quiet pools throughout the watershed. They were the second most common fish in
the seining collections, and are considered to be very desirable to man because of their
practice of eating mosquitos.
Serranidae (Basses)
Roccus chrysops (white bass) - This species is not indigenous to the Clear Fork
but has been introduced in some of the lakes on the watershed. Although not many of
these fish were collected, Fort Phantom Hill Lake is known to have a large population.
Centrarchidae (Black basses and sunfishes)
Micropterus salmoides (largemouth bass). The evasive nature of these fish makes
them difficult to capture in nets and seines. It is therefore difficult to arrive at
an accurate estimate of their occurence. The data collected would indicate, however,
that they are much more common in some of the lakes than they are in the river.
Lepomis cyanellus (green sunfish). This sunfish is common throughout the water-
shed and is a desirable species to the angler when it attains a reasonable size. However,
very few of these sunfish collected were large enough to be fished for and some indi-
viduals, only 2 inches long, were fully grown, sexually ripe, fish.
Lepomis microlophus (redear sunfish). This is one sunfish that generally attains
a desirable size in West Texas waters. Only a few individuals of this species were
collected. (See Tables 12 and 44), These were present probably because of hatchery
stocking and very likely are not native to the stream.
Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill). This species is very common in the lakes and the
river. None of these fish were of a desirable size due to overpopulation of this species.
Some individuals were sexually mature at a length of 2 inches.
--- Page 8 ---
Lepomis humilis (orangespotted sunfish). Under ideal conditions, these sunfish
do not attain a very desirable size. All of the individuals collected from the Clear
Fork were extremely small. This species is apparently sub-dominant to the other native
sunfish.
Lepomis megalotis (longear sunfish). These fish, along with bluegills, are the
dominant sunfish. They appear to prefer running stream areas but were very abundant
in the upper reaches of the river whether the water was running or was standing in
pools. These fish, like the other species of sunfish, were nearly all stunted.
Pomoxis annularis (white crappie). Practically all the bigger waters of the Clear
Fork and its watershed contained this species. They were particularly abundant in
the lakes. Not many were collected, however, that were a desirable size and many indi-
viduals were stunted.
Pomoxis nigromaculatus (black crappie). Two specimens of this species were taken
from Lake Sweetwater in a previous segment. (See Table 45). They were very large
crappie and in very good condition. It is nearly certain, however, that these fish
were stocked in that reservoir and are not indigenous to the watershed.
Percidae (Perches and darters)
Percina caprodes (logperch) - This apparently unimportant species was collected
from only one lake on the watershed. (See Table 28).
Conclusions 3
Because very limited fish sampling was performed on the lower reaches of the
river and since none of the sampling stations were worked but one time, it is concluded
that this survey should be continued for another year. There is also a vast amount
of investigation that needs to be conducted in regards to water quality and pollution.
As much time as can possibly be used for this facet of the project, in conjunction
with the pollutions investigations projects, needs to be used.
' ao
Prepared by James F. Wilcox Approved by FD ac teare A bal
Assistant Project Leader Director Inland Fisheries Division
Date September 24, 1959
--- Page 9 ---
Table l. Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Springs on A. R. Willingham Ranch in Southeast Scurry
County
Dates July 18, 1958
Weather: Hot
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 6 11.11
Fathead minnow 18 33.33
Green sunfish 20 37.04
Bluegills 10 18.52
Totals 54 100.00
Table 2. Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location; Clear Fork on Sterling Willingham Ranch in Southwest
Fisher County
Date: July 18, 1958
Weather: Hot
Percent
Species No. by No.
River carpsucker 4 «90
Redhorse shiner 400 90.50
Yellow bullheads 26 5.88
Green sunfish 10 2.26
Longear sunfish 2 46
Totals ko 100.00
--- Page 10 ---
Table 3. Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collections Seining
Location: Netlleton Ranch in Western Fisher County
Date: July 18, 1958
Weather: Hot
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 200 72.46
Fathead minnow 18 6.52
River carpsucker 15 5 Ak
Yellow bullhead 12 434
Green sunfish 20 7-25
Bluegill 3 1.09
Orangespotted sunfish 5 1.81
Longear sunfish 3 1.09
Totals 276 100.00
x * *
Table hk, ‘Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Noles Ranch in North West Fisher County
Date: July 19, 1958
Weathers: Hot
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 30 36.58
Fathead minnow FT@) 48.78
Black bullhead 2 2.44
Yellow bullhead 2 24k
Green sunfish 4 4.88
Bluegill h i 88
Totals 82 100.00
--- Page 11 ---
Table 5.
Type of Collection:
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Location: Dirt Road Crossing in North Central Fisher County
Date: July 19, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Fathead minnow
Green sunfish
Bluegill
Longear sunfish
Totals
Table 6.
Type of Collection:
No.
50
50
16
12h
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Percent
by No.
40.32
ho.32
12.90
3.23
3.23
100.00
Location: Highway 70 Crossing North of Roby in Fisher County
Date: July 19, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Mosquitofish
Green sunfish
Longear sunfish
Totals
No.
25
20
99
Percent
by No.
25.25
50.51
ok
20.20
100.00
--- Page 12 ---
Table 7.
Type of Collection:
10.
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Location: Roy Eaton's Ranch in North Eastern Fisher County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Gizzard shad
Redhorse shiner
Fathead minnow
Mosquitofish
Yellow bullhead
Green sunfish
Bluegill
Longear sunfish
Totals
Table 8.
Type of Collection:
No.
15
6
16
15
35
Lil
%* * *
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Percent
by No.
1.80
13.51
5.41
14.41
1.80
13.51
18.03
31.53
100.00
Location: J. R. Murff's Ranch in North Eastern Fisher County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Fathead minnow
Mosquitofish
Green sunfish
Bluegill
Longear sunfish
Totals
Percent
by No.
hO. 32
5.38
43,01
1.08
4,83
5.38
100,00
--- Page 13 ---
Table 9.
Type of Collection:
Location: Cecil Edward's Ranch in Eastern Fisher County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Fathead minnow
Mosquitofish
Channel catfish
Black bullheads
Green sunfish
Bluegills
Longear sunfish
Totals
Table 10.
Type of Collections
Location; Carriker's Ranch in Eastern Fisher County
Dates: July 2h, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Gizzard shad
Redhorse shiner
Mosquitofish
Channel catfish
Bluegills
Longear sunfish
Totals
ll.
Clear Fork of Brazos River
45
50
30
10
20
173
% & *
Clear Fork of Brazos River
No.
1
12
2h
L
20
3
61
Percent
by No.
26.01
28.90
17.34
2.89
5.78
-58
6.93
LST
100.00
Percent
by No.
1.63
19.68
39.34
1.64
32.79
4.92
100.00
--- Page 14 ---
Table 11.
Type of Collection:
12,
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Seining
Location: Highway 180 - Crossing East of Roby
Date: July 24, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Bluegilis
Longear sunfish
Totals
Table 12.
Type of Collection:
Location: Turner Ranch in Eastern Fisher County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Mimic shiner
Fathead minnow
Mosquitofish
Green sunfish
Redear sunfish
Bluegills
Longear sunfish
Totals
No.
HED
14
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Seining
pe
“4
=
nN
“AMWRrHOrFRrFO
105
Percent
by No.
85.72
7.14
7.14
100.00
Percent
by No.
66.66
96
96
19.03
-96
2.85
1.91
6.67
100.00
--- Page 15 ---
Table 13.
Type of Collection:
Location: Dirt Road in South Western Jones County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Fathead minnow
Mosquitofish
Channel catfish
Bluegills
Longear sunfish
Totals
Table 1h,
Type of Collection:
13.
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Seining
No.
100
4O
189
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Seining
Percent
by No.
52.91
23.80
21.17
1.06
253
053
100.00
Location: Dirt Road Crossing in South Western Jones County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Fathead minnow
Mosquitofish
Green sunfish
Bluegills
Longear sunfish
Totals
No.
ho
30
12
154
Percent
by No.
38.96
25.97
19.48
7-79
5.20
2.60
100.00
--- Page 16 ---
14,
Table 15. Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Farm Road Crossing in Southwestern Jones County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weathers: Hot
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 60 52.17
Fathead minnow 8 6.96
Mosquitofish LS 39.13
Channel catfish i -87
Longear sunfish 1 .87
Totals 115 100.00
Table 16. Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Farm Road 707 Crossing at Truby, Texas, in Jones County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weathers: Hot
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 50 64.10
Fathead minnow 5 6.41
Mosquitofish 20 25.64
Bluegilis 1 1.28
Longear sunfish 2 2s5T
Totals 78 100.00
--- Page 17 ---
Table 17.
Type of Collection:
15%
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Seining
Location: Highway 277, 83 Crossing Southeast of Anson in Jones
County
Date: July 23, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Mosquitofish
Longear sunfish
Totals
Table 18.
Type of Collection:
ee ¥
Clear Fork of Brazos River
Seining
Percent
by No.
84.90
1+99
7+55
100.00
Location: Williams' Ranch near Nugent, Texas, in Jones County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weather: Hot
Species
Redhorse shiner
Fathead minnow
Mosquitofish
Channel catfish
Green sunfish
Bluegills
Longear sunfish
Totals
No.
70
7)
2
a)
130
Percent
by No.
53.84
11.54
19.23
1.54
“TT
11.54
1.54
100.00
--- Page 18 ---
16.
Table 19. Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Mack Doty's Ranch near Nugent in Jones County
Date: January 15, 1959
Weather: Cold and Cloudy
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 30 90.90
Parrot minnow 2 6.06
Mosquitofish L 3.04
Totals 33 100.00
xe *
Table 20. Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location; Ed Davis Ranch near Leuders in Jones County
Date; March 10, 1959
Weather: Cool and Sunny
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 1 20.00
Parrot minnow h 80.00
Totals 5 100.00
--- Page 19 ---
LT.
Table 21. Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: J. C. Putnam Ranch in Southwest Throckmorton County
Dates March 11, 1959
Weather: Cool and Sunny
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 65 75.58
Parrot minnow 20 23.25
Fathead minnow 1 Lol]
Totals 86 100.00
Table 22,
Tributaries of the Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Highway 277, 83 Crossing on Mulberry Creek Southeast of
Anson in Jones County
Date: July 23, 1958
Weather: Hot
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 6 54.54
Ghost shiner 1 9.09
Mosquitofish iL 9.09
Black bullheads 1 9.09
Green sunfish 2 18.19
Totals 11 100.00
--- Page 20 ---
18.
Table 23.
Tributaries of the Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Farm Road Crossing of Elm Creek - South of Nugent in
Jones County
Date: July 24, 1958
Weather: Hot
Percent
Species No. by No.
Gizzard shad d. 452
Carp 4 6.05
Redhorse shiner 20 30.30
Mosquitofish 25 37.88
Channel catfish 1 1.52
Black bullheads 3 4.53
Largemouth bass 1 1.52
Green sunfish 1 1.52
Longear sunfish 10 15.16
Totals 66 100.00
x * X
Table 2h.
Tributaries of the Clear Fork of Brazos River
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Farm Road Crossing on Salt Prong of Hubbard Creek in
Shackelford County
Dates: October 29, 1958
Weather: Cool and Sunny
Percent
Species No. by No.
Blackstripe topminnow LS 37.50
Mosquitofish 12 30.00
Green sunfish 2 5.00
Bluegills il 27-50
Totals IT@) 100.00
--- Page 21 ---
Table 25.
19.
Lakes on the Clear Fork of Brazos River Watershed
Type of Collection; Seining
Location: New Hamlin Lake in Jones County
Date: October 17, 1958
Weathers: Cool and Sunny
Species
Golden shiner
Redhorse shiner
Mosquitofish
Black bullheads
Largemouth bass
Green sunfish
Bluegills
White crappie
Totals
Table 26.
No.
FPOOMNF O&O MV.
145
Percent
by No.
6.20
5.52
34.48
69
hh
6.90
41.38
-69
100.00
Lakes on the Clear Fork of Brazos River Watershed
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Old Hamlin Lake in Fisher County
Date: October 17, 1958
Weather: Cool and Sunny
Species
Red River pupfish
Plains killifish
Mosquitofish
Totals
No.
160
85
58
303
Percent
by No.
52.80
28.05
19.15
100.00
--- Page 22 ---
20.
Table 27.
Lakes on the Clear Fork of Brazos River Watershed
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Lake McCarthy near Albany in Shackelford County
Date: October 29, 1958
Weather: Cool and Sunny
Percent
Species No. by No.
Mosquitofish 5 9.80
Largemouth bass 5 9.80
Bluegills 30 58.83
Orangespotted sunfish 10 19.60
Longear sunfish L 1.97
Totals 51 100.00
Table 28.
Lakes on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River Watershed
Type of Collection: Seining
Location: Lake Trammell in Nolan County
Dates June and August
Weather: Hot
Percent
Species No. by No.
Redhorse shiner 3 2.54
Black bullhead 3 2.54
Mosquitofish 12 10.17
Largemouth bass 23 19.49
Bluegill 60 50.85
Green sunfish 8 6.78
Redear sunfish 3 2.54
Logperch 6 5.09
Totals 118 100.00
--- Page 23 ---
el.
Table 29. Chart Showing Results of all Seining Collections
Obtained from the Clear Fork of the Brazos River
and its Tributaries during the Period from April
16, 1958 to April 15, 1959.
Species
Gizzard shad
River carpsucker
Carp
Redhorse shiner
Mimic shiner
Ghost shiner
Parrot minnow
Fathead minnow
Channel catfish
Black bullhead
Yellow bullhead
Blackstriped topminnow
Mosquitofish
Largemouth bass
Green sunfish
Redear sunfish
Bluegill
Orangespotted sunfish
Longear sunfish
Totals
No.
19
1,457
26
297
12
16
ho
15
4.23
Tit
129
2,687
Percent
by No.
ol5
«(0
«15
54.22
1.56
56
15.74
413
ell
ke51
el6
481
100.00
--- Page 24 ---
22.
Table 30. Chart Showing Results of all Seining Collections
Obtained from Lakes on the Watershed of the Clear
Fork of the Brazos River during the Period from
April 16, 1958 to April 15, 1959. (New Hamlin
Lake, Lake McCarthy, Old Lake Hamlin, Lake Trammell. )
Percent
Species No. by No.
Golden shiner 9 1.45
Redhorse shiner 11 1.79
Black bullhead 4 » 64
Plains killifish 85 13.78
Red River pupfish 160 25.93
Mosquitofish 125 20.26
Largemouth bass 34 5.51
Green sunfish 18 2.92
Redear sunfish 3 49
Bluegill 150 24.31
Orangespotted sunfish 10 1.62
Longear sunfish 1 -16
White crappie 1 6
Logperch 6 98
Totals 617 100.00
--- Page 25 ---
23.
Table 31. Chart Showing Results of all Seining Collections
Obtained from the Clear Fork of the Brazos River
and its Tributaries and Lakes on its Watershed
during the Period from April 16, 1958 to April 15,
Species
Gizzard shad
River carpsucker
Carp
Golden shiner
Redhorse shiner
Mimic shiner
Ghost shiner
Parrot minnow
Fathead minnow
Channel catfish
Black bulilhead
Yellow bullhead
Blackstriped topminnow
Plains killifish
Red River pupfish
Mosquitofish
Largemouth bass
Green sunfish
Redear sunfish
Bluegill
Orangespotted sunfish
Longear sunfish
White crappie
Logperch
Totals
1959.
No.
19
26
297
20
ho
15
85
160
548
52
129
271
15
130
3,304
Percent
by No.
#12
DT
«12
oof
Kh yh
3-95
203
100.00
--- Page 26 ---
Table 32.
Type of Collcetion: Netting
Location:
Doty Ranch near Nugent, Texas
Number of Nets; 1
Weather:
Species
Smallmouth buffalo
Totals
Cold and Cloudy
No.
Table 33.
Type of Collection; Netting
Ed Davis Ranch near Lueders
Number of Nets: 3
Cold, Raining and Snowing
Location:
Weather:
Species
Gizzard shad
Smallmouth buffalo
River carpsucker
Channel catfish
Black bullheads
Largemouth bass
Green sunfish
Bluegills
White crappie
Totals
No.
R
=
PurPwWwoe
=
109
Percent
by No.
100.00
100.00
Percent
by No.
60.55
4.58
11.01
92
4.58
2.76
-92
4.58
10.10
100.00
2h.
Date:
Clear Fork of the Brazos River
January 15, 1959
125 x 8 x Exp.
Types of Nets:
Condition of Water:
Total Wt.
lbs. ozs.
12 13
12 13
x H %
Date:
Type of Netss
Condition of Water:
Total Wt.
lbs. ozs.
43004
9 3
11 5
4k = 13
3 8
6 2
5
13
1 lo
81 9
Avg. Wt.
lbs.
2
Clear Fork of the Brazos River
OZS.
9
Avg. Wt.
lbs.
OZS5 «
10.64
13.40
15.08
13.00
11.20
-66
5.00
2.60
2.36
Still and Slightly Turbid
Percent
by Wt.
LOO. 00
100.00
January 15, 1959
125 x 8 x Exp.
Slightly Flowing and Turbid
Percent
by Wt.
53-19
11.26
13.87
5.90
4.29
7-51
239
299
2.00
100.00
Avg.
K
3.32
Avg.
K
a o «o 2.
WOW AO
oS Qk ow Ly EMF
Wi
Ww ow fo Po fh Pw w
.
--- Page 27 ---
00°OOT
G9°2 Te°rT
gt’? €9°92
ge°T 89°9
02°2 42°eT
0S°2 €9°T
€G° TO°Th
xy "am Aq
“BAY quso1eg
TesTOQ pue Supmota ATIUSTIS
"dxdt X g X G2T
6S6T ‘eT yorey
00° OOT
62°2 98 °OT
TS*2 ge",
Qz°aZ 1°09
QS°2 60°T2
Dt “am £q
° BAY que. 1eg
teeTQ pue ButMoTg ATIUSTIS
0S°S
ee°h
00° +T
0S°2
00° TT
LL°t
*3ZO
Ine? AA
T
“SQT
"aM “SAY
&
9 6
L Fete
OT G
S OT
9 T
T GE
*sZzo0 "SqT
"4M TBQOI,
:i04eM JO uoTatpuog
ssqen fo adAy,
2078q
00°OOT Li
2S"
ST*6T
6£°9
Go°h
Go"h
qt LS
"on AQ
qusa 18g
eA Mm Ost
“ON
uung pue [oo
co *84e,f JO
Aueqry - yousey Zaqq,eqpey stazz0y
STB407,
sseq UQ.NoMEa.eT
YstspPeo Touuey)
Teyonsdieo Taaty
oTejjnqg YynomTTeug
peys paezzty
iIe2 ssousuoyT
setosdg
2:13. 2aM
“ON
2U0T9)800T
BUT999N <suoTZoeTTON Jo addy,
TaAATY SozBig ey. jo yAOW azABeaTo °*ce aTqeL
xe *
6 Lz 00°OOT Tl STBqoOL
€ € 60°6 T ystyzeo Teuueyp
Z 2 60°6 T reyonsdreo JaATy
00°¢ a Zt 9T LE°9E oTeyynq YQnouT Teg
09°2 T €T ¢ Gye Sh G peys paezzty
°SZO °SdT "sZOo °satT -on Aq “ON sotoadg
"3M ° SAY °9M TRQOL quedstag
322938mM JO uoT4yTpuog Auung pue Toop) 3.1aTy4BemM
*dxa XQ X G2T ssgeN Jo adAy, gf ‘¢sqenN fo °on
6S6T ‘ZT yore sage Aueqty Teeu youey meugng °9 °f suOTAZBD0T
IOATY sozeig oy4 jo yIog zBeTo
*GZ
BUT 999N
"He eTABL,
SUOT}OETTOD Jo adfy,
--- Page 28 ---
00° OOT 9 02 00° O0T G2 STBIOL
nO°E 66°E €9°T €T 00° Ze g etddezo e9TUM
Go°t 26° 00°€ € 00° t T STI Tent g
TS°2 €2°T 00° t t 00°9 ro SsisuTys uspTop
TL°2 26° 00°€ € 00° T speeyTTng yoeT_
LT°S gl’ TL L2°s T OT kT 00° th TT ystsyeo Teuuey)
L1g°? 9T° Te 0S°2 Z S 00°9 2 szeyonsdied JeATY
¥ -am £q °szO 0° SQT °szo 0° SQT eon &q °ON sotoedg
“BAY queoleg "aM °Say "4M TBI07, qusozag
PTOO pue ieeTD ‘saeqgemM fo uoTAZTpuog Surzaerg pue Aug saayy.eoy
‘dxg xX 9 X GZT <:sqenN go ody, € esqfoanN fo °o
QS6T ‘OT tequeaosq 2e9Kq SyeT uosuy PTO suoT.Boo'y
BUTLION suoTZOeTTOO Jo sedAy,
Ppeus13e1eM A®ATY sozeig 244 JO YAO T AVSTO ayy uo sayeyT "LE atTaqey
ee KH
00°OOT 69 00°OOT 96 sTeqoy,
62°€ 9S° 00°g g qO°T T etddezo aqtuM
Ho°€ gE°E 00°g T € 60°2 2 sseq YQnomes1ey
6° T TG°E 00°2 € 2] € HO°T T ystszeo peeyqeta
9e° 2 eT°T T T O° T T speeyTrTnq yoeT”
6L°T 26°H 00°€ rf 9 t 60°2 ro ystyyBo Teuueyo
QS°2 Ge°? t Ff 60°2 Z szayonsdzeo JeATYy
H6°T LO* et oto h Zt OT 00°S2 42 peys pilezzty
Or° 6T°eL TE° T 1 a) T9°S9 €9 eZ esousu0y
J eam Aq °Sszo °SqT °SZO —° SAT -on Aq °ON setoedg
° BAY .uadteg UM ° Bay °"oM TBeL0], ques Teg
IB8TO pues PTOD 2409eM Jo uoTYTpUOD PTOD ia2eu4e0y
°dxa ¥ Q X GET 2830N FO addy, a 3seN gO on
6S6T *9T Arenigag 2:9 9eq STTTASBTITY Teoau Youey soTIg °D) "N suoTZBo0T
Buty3eN suoTZoeTTOD Jo adéy,
TaATY sozerg ey} JO y4oq ABeTO "Of eTaQRy
"92
--- Page 29 ---
"BAY
peuTeyqg e1eK YSTT ON
eam Aq °szO 9° SQT °szZO *SQT ‘on £q "ON setoadg
queorag "9M “Say "1M TRIO7, yusoteg
IB@sTO pue TOON 3:4098M JO UOTATpUOD Auung pue Toop) 321ey7,e8ey
"dxq XQ xX GET 3sgeN fo edAéy, : € ¢sgonN fo °oN
QS6T ‘LT teqoz00 «6s aqeq eyeT UTTMeY pO suoTyeooT
BuT 72a suOTZ_OSTTODQ Jo ody,
peusiza7eM TeaATY sozerg oy JO yAIoy reeTOQ 9ug4 UO seyeT °6€ eTaeL
ee He %
00° 00T TT OOT 00°OOT HOT SsTeqo],
glen SH°T cl ok Ze°ae €S afddeto e4TuM
T° 00°ET €T T9° T ystjuns 1eesu0cT
GO’? 00°T rs T 2 T9° T sseq YyNomes.1eT
QT°T og°€ € T Go°e S speeyTing yoerg
L9°hL T3°ET € SL 64° SS T6 ystiqyeo Teuueyp
TS°9T one UT OT 9T 26°), €T Jeyonsdies eaty
eam £q °SZO "SQT °sZ0 °SQT "on Aq *ON setoedg
questeg "am ° Say "AM TeLOF qusoi1eg
PTOO pue eeTD %2:4938mM JO uoTayTpuo| Supzeeig pue Aaq szeyqvey
*dxy XQ X G2T %s}eN Jo sedsy, € ssgen fo "on
Q@S6T ‘6 Jaqmeseq sageq ayeT uosuy MANE 2uOTYBDOT
peys194BM TeATY sozerg ouy JO ysog azeeTD eA uO sayeT
BSUTTAEN wuOTZOSTTOQ Jo sdAjz,
°QE ETABTL
*le
--- Page 30 ---
00°O0T OT gf 00°OOT 9), STBqO],
One? G6°TT 61°T 9 H ZE°TS 6€ eTddez. a4TqM
LT°T tL*T 00°S OT €9°2 Fe STI Tent g
Ty’? 60° 00°g 8 T G6°E € speeuTing yoeTg
GO°2’ G9° lz 0S° 2 2 OT Q@S°9 S ystyyeo Teuuey)
69°2 EL°2 T a TE°T rE dazep
gg°2 S0°Sh OH°OT =«T g 9T OT°ET OT deyonsdieo Teaty
a1? T Z2Q°9 0S°2 8 Z So°T2 QI peys piezzTp
"y om £q °szZO °SQqT °gzZO 0° SGT "on £q °ON satoedg
* Bay quadtag UM ° say °OM TeqLO] queo1eg
ZB8TQ pue Toop 34984eM Jo uoTATpUOD fuung pue Too9 32ey7ReM
"dxq XQ X GET 3890N fo addy, 4 $sqeN Jo °on
QS6T fof Taqo1090 sage Aueqty zeeu Ay VIBAOW eyeyT suoOT}BDOT
BUTYZION suoT-oeTTON jo adAéy,
Ppeusitse eM TeATY sozerg ayy Jo yao7g TesTOD ayy uo sexyeyT “TH eTqgqey,
% xX *
00°OOT ro fe} 00°OOT Ly STBqOY,
GL°2 oL° Lz OS°T t é go°TS 42 eftddeto 39 7UM
Te°e 4S°TT 9€°T ST On’ EZ Aa . STtt8ent¢
OT’? 4Q°e OS°2 4 Goon 4 SieuTYys UspTOH
GS°2 HS°TH oO°TT T 9 € Ge°h rs sseq YQNoOMeS.1eT
19°T Zo°h 00°2 9 6£°9 € speeyuT—Tng yoeTg
On°T 9L°OT 0g°2 qT €9°OT S ystgszeo Teuueyp
¥ oom £q °$ZO "*SaQT °S$ZO °SqT on Aq "ON satoedg
° Bay qus0 18g "IM °aAy °oM TBO, queoteg
pTqiny, ATYYSTTS pus Toop %404eq Jo uoTATpUOD Auung pue TooQ ?2ey Vem
°dxg xX g X GeT 2s3eN Jo sodfy, € esqenN go °on
QS6T ‘LT teqoq00 «6s e48q oye] UTTMeR MeN uot ZBOOT
BUTZ9EN wUOT_ZDSETTOD Jo edz,
IOATY SOzeig ey} JO YAOq ABSTO O44 UO SeXST “Oh PTQBL
"92
--- Page 31 ---
00°O0T
GS°2 T9°S oj
age 60°9 €
S6°T Os° €
ene? SQ°OT €
99°T TL td, @ ro
6g°T qS°S €
xy "om £q °szO 0° SQT
° SAW qusoleg OM “BAY
peys1to.eM TeATY sozelg JO YIOg 1B9eTO oYy4 UO seyeT
00° O0T
G9°2 LE° SS 00°. {
66°T €9° td, 02°6 Z
pi “am £q "$20 *SQT
"BAY quad1ag "aM °Say
IBeTO pue PTOY
°dxg X Q X G2T
6S6T *6T Arenaqedg
peysiejeM JTeATY sozeig eyy jo yso¥4
qT = HET
OT
TT
02g
get
T Ff
"SZO °SQT
"9M TBQ0L
HAN dot tO
"dx X g X G2T
00*OOT
LZ* He
4S°LT
gs"
62° TE
TO°6T
TEL
son Aq
juso 18g
ssgon jo adAy,
LT <%89eN Jo *on
6S6T ‘ST Trady ysnoryy QG6T “OT Trady worzsy [Tomer], oye] Mors uSsye], suoTZoeTTON ButggeN JO syTnsey
¥e * %
tT LT 00° OOT
9 ui os° LE
qT ot 05°29
*"szo *SqT “on Aq
“9M TRIO, quested
s1a4emM jo uoptatpuog
esqen jo edz,
309eq
°62
Sutmoug pue Zutupey ‘pToo
s[Tetueg ay4eT
SuT 9 49N
IBETO 94} UO soXeyT
oye STBqOY,
£9 etddezo 3a9TuM
09 STTTSentTg
2 sseq YW .NoMes.zeT
LOT SpeeyTing yoelg
S9 ysTsyeo Teuueyp
vA SIeUTYysS uspToyH
“ON seToodg
"Eh TQS,
9 sTe qo],
€ Yystsyeo Teuueyo
G aayonsdzeo Teaty
°ON sotoada
3.10 7.BOM
Z sgenN fo °on
suoT 2 BD07T
suUOTZOETTON jo adAy,
“oh STIBL
--- Page 32 ---
QT°S
TO’
Li?€
Of ° +
qth)
76°T |
26°T
Liz
gn’?
Z9°T
° BAY
00° OOT
€9°0¢
90°
09°
6L°€
ce °S
69°99
10°
0S°
69°
Si’
“am £q
quso1eg
9 4&S
S G GTT
G G
€ 9 €
Ol 2 Tz
q S eT
qT #6 9 69£
€ 9
€l 2 €l 2
T 92
Z g 2
°szO 6° SaT *SZ0 °*SqT
"OM °SAy "9M TeQO1
00° OOT
GL°ge
6T°
one
TS°T
49° 6
qe" Le
gt°
6T°
T6"%
6L°€
°on Aq
qusotag
°dxy XQ X¥ GeT ssgeN Jo ody,
q2@ :899N JO
“N
62S sTeqoy
S02 etdderd 384TUM
tT ystjuns 1eepey
QT STTP9en Tg
9 sseq Uqnomes.rey
TS SpeeyTTng yoetg
LET ystygeo Teuueyo
z gzreuTys uapToy
T dre
92 deyonsdireo JoATYy
0g peys prezzty
°ON satoodg
6S6T “OT Trady yBnoryy Qcé6T ‘QT THady morzy oueTTqy eye] WoT uexey suOTZDeTTOD BuTy{eN JO sy Tnsey
poeysto,em JaaTyY sozeig ey4 JO YAO aeeT) syq Uo seyeT
"of
"th eTaBL
--- Page 33 ---
get
2°?
QT’?
00°?
9e°2
98°T
Bt
* Say
00° OOT
00°6
zo’"e
€T° HT
66°6
OT°0S
9S°ET
“om £q
queodeg
TT
6 qT
eT
9
eT
HT
ie)
Aneta
*SZO *SQT *szo
"9M ° SAY “om
°dxg x QQ x
9
LG6T ‘ST Tyady ysnory, 966T ‘OT Tttdy mors TITH
G6°2
TS°2?
Lg°t
26°?
oye?
€G°T
En°T
2o°a
oT°s
ql’ T
° BAY
00° OO0T
€h°
18°%
60°
Zl ° HT
60°9
on’ LZ
6i°
oL°9
66°QT
ZS°02
“am £q
quso1eg
peysie7eM Jeaaty sozearg oyy
G
et Q
L
¢ ¢
oT €
OT 9
ui T q
rf
T ZT
Q T
Z rf
* 820 *sqr * 320
"9M ° SAY "aM
°dxg X Q X GeT
:S4eN fo
0c
06
L
G
ol
8
eh
ST
"Sat
TeqOT
00° 0OT
OL* qT
OT'2
On°6
02°S
09°92
00° Ot
"on Aq
queo.eg
G2T 289eN jo sod,
ssgen jo
MmoZUuey YIOT SyeT Mor usyey,
jo y4Og TeeTO au UO sOReT
ee Ke X
Gog
T
OT
62
er
9S
7
€T
6€
oh
*sqT
TeqO],
00°OOT
ot’
gL
Te°
go" t
OT" t
GE°6
99°T
62°
TH’S
90°01
"on AG
queateg
¢sqzean go addy,
66
qT
lz
ge
“ON
STBLOF,
etdders eatum
sseq YQnomes1ey
sseq ey TUM
Ustspeo Teuusy)
szeyonsdze0 JaATY
pers parezzty
satoeda
SUOTLOATTON Sura7eN FO syTnsey
"OH OTARL
Teh
STBIO],
atdderzo yoetg
etddezo aqtuM
ystjguns [TTzentg_
sseq YQnomeszeT
SpesylTng MOTTEL
UST FPeo Teuueyp
iautys uapToy
dzeg
szeyonsdied JaaTy
peys prezzty
sepToedg
Q@S6T “ST Ttady ysnozyy LO6T ‘QT Trady wos ceqenqoeng eye] Worf usye], SUOTJOeTTOD ButyAeN JO syTnsey
peys1eq4eM TaATY sozerg Jo yIOT TeeTD ayy uO sayeT
“TE
"Gh «OT ORL
--- Page 34 ---
00° 0O0T
21,”
ge°
tt
g2°9
90°T
€S°T
€L° tt
60°L
z9°9T
46°02
49° Ee
“am &q
{ue l0feg
QS6T ‘QT Trady moray potaeg 949 Sutanp JeaTYy sozeig 244 Jo y4og IBOTO
ey} WOTS peutezqg suoT_ZDeTTOD BuTAqeN TTB Jo syrTnsey Butmoyg 41e4O
€g°2
09°2
00°S
00°T z
00°2 €
00°2T
TOOT 2
19°2 iE
90°T €
61° OT
S9°T ‘a
°SzO °SqT
“7M °SAy
€ G62
2 2
eT
4
6 gt
ro €
8 of
OT #€
St 02
T 64
€t 19
GC 666
°SzO *SQT
“9M TeI0L
Here
Sern
oL’9
L6°S
6T°9E
gS°Cce
eon Aq
queo1eg
"6G66T ‘ST Trady 09
"Ze
g9c
oT
ET
gt
gt
L6
06
“ON
sTeq07,
etddezo agtyumy
STI TZenTg
ystyuns user
sseq Yynoues.2e7
ysTs3eo peoyQela
SspesyTTng 4oeTd
ystsyeo Toeuueyy)
zeyonsdzeo TaATY
oTeyyng YAnouTTeug
peys plez2zty
ie8 asousuoT
setTosda
*)t STOUBL
--- Page 35 ---
cO*t
S9°%
TO*h
gg°e
€G°€
She?
Ge"?
L6°T
99°2
49°e
L9°t
“BAY
00° O0T
L6°4T
60°
£0°
gL°T
T6°2
T6°€
LH°99
T9°
Th°
92°83
45°
eam £q
quso.13g
‘ayBT uosuy PTO ‘ayeT A4TO UTTMe Man SoyeT AQTO UTTMe_ pTO ‘AuZTeQOH
"6S6T “ST TI4dy 09 gS6T ‘“9T Ttady morz
potieg ey4 SuTanp JeaTy sozerg ey4 Jo y1og 1eeT) ey. jo peyszeqgemM aqy
UO SeYST HOLY Peupegqg suocTyZooTTOD BuTAQeN TTB Jo sytnsey Bupmoyg yaeyp
‘sTetTueg ‘Troumery, ‘ouettay soyeT)
T9°T
00°€T
00°S
qe"?
00°T 4
6E°E
00°OT «iT
06°2
OS*4T =
09°S T
22S
°szO °SQT
“9M °Say
Zt 26
St LET
€T
G
9 9T
ET 92
tT 9€
Tt 29
oT Ss
€T €
S 9b
S
°SszO °SdqT
“9M T8907
(°eye8] UoSsuUy Malt
"Ee
00*O0T
09° HE
go*
g0°
SP Fa
60°T
ge° HT
GQ°Te
09°2
Li
OL°
Zo’€
"on Aq
qusltag
T6T‘T
oth
26
€T
OLT
LLE
TE
9S
9£
"ON
STe{O 7,
etddeio a4tuM
ysfjuns 1ee3u0T,T
ystjyuns reepey
ysTsuns [TT FsenTg_
sseq YU .nomes.1eT
SspeeyTing yoeTg
Yst seo Teuuey)
IauTys wepTor
daeg
aayonsdzeo TeaTy
peys prezzty
Setoedg
“Oy eTaBL
--- Page 36 ---
S6°2
6L°2
19°€
gLrz2
9T°2
rhe
LE’
C4°T
2S°2
Te°2
Te°T
° SAY
00° O0T
ZS°*
OT°9
Lo°
99° OT
61°
L2°n
03° 2z
HE°
OL t
TE ge
rh QT
"am Aq
quso1eg
00°2T
Sh°L
00°€
06°2 €
LL°S ‘
00° OT
oe*h =o
00°2
00°9,- iT
To°6 =i
Of °2
°$ZO °SQqT
"9M ° Say
“(TTTH moqueyg °44a pue teqBMgeeng seyxeT)
Zt e6e
g T
qT LT
€
€T TE
q = ST
8 at
69
T
et €T
qT eg
4S
°SZ0 *SqT
"4M T2907,
He
00° OO0T
GE°
Jt’9
LT°
qT
9S°T
gre
89°8
6£°T
T6°T
02°6
OT°S9
°on Aq
queotag
9Ls
LE
OT
OS
TT
£&
GLE
“ON
QS6T ‘9T Ttady 03 aoTag
JOATY SOZeIg oY} JO YIOg AVeTO sy Jo peysze7,eMm ayy UO sayeT
WOLF PSUTeZQO SUCTZOSTTOD BuTg9eN TTB FO sqTnsey BSupaoyg gazeyO
STR07
atddero yoeTg_
etddero aqgtumM
STTTZenT¢
sseq [Ynomes.1e7T
sseq eqTuM
SpBeeqTing 4oeld
ystyyeo Teuueyg
IauTys uepToy
dzreg
iayonsdzeo IaAty
peys prezzZty
geToedg
"64 2TABL
--- Page 37 ---
66°€
19°
O°
HL°€
6T°E
LT°E
64° T
ay’?
e°z
L6°T
89°2
69°2
6S°2
G9°2
eh?
° SAY
00° OOT
TS*TT
90°
€0°
THT
£0°
eL°e
92°
c€°€
0e°€S
2
TE”
co°h
66°)
6r°S
9T°8
-am Aq
qusoIeg
ge°s
00° ET
00°S
licens
00°S
00°T Z
00°2 €
Lg°€
SS°OT T
06°2
0S° qT
m er
90°T
zo°S) iT
€0°g
ct
69°T
°8ZO0 °SQT
°aM ° SAY
St 9Te*T
T OWT
€T
G
¢ LT
S
9 St
2 €
6 On
A)
OT S
eT €
r 6h
4 L6
eT 99
S$ 666
°SZO °SaT
"aM TBIOT,
00° OOT
90°62
L0°
10°
69°9
10°
TS°T
10°
90°2T
€L°9z
4
qT”
OT°T
L0°S
oL’6
9T°9
son £q
quso.lag
6St T
het
ei
ao
ght
06£
TE
gt
qd.
£ET
06
"ON
°6G6T “ST THady 09 gG6T ‘QT Ttady morzy potseg
ou} Buti poysieqzem S4y pue JoATY sozeag 944 JO HIOg BETO aud
WOTT PSUTBIQO SUCTZOSTTOD BuTAIEN TTB FO syTnsey BuTMoyg gae4D
sTeqQo7,
etddezo e4tuM
ystjyuns resS8uo0y
ystjuns iTeepey
STL FSen Tg
ystjuns usary
sseq YQnowmes1e7
Ystiqeo peey ela
SpesuTTng HoeTE_
ystyyeo [Teuusy)
JeUTYysS uspToy
die
oTeyma YAnouTTeug
aoeyonsdieo TeATy
peys pzezzty
e383 asousuo'T
setoedg
"0S eTqeBL
--- Page 38 ---
66°
6g°€
TO" t
To"
4L°€
6T°E€
Hor’
9T°2
64° T
eyes
Qt°s
GQ°T
HS?
6g°2
On°Z
gS°T
€t°
“BAY
00° OOT
OT’
Ly’ OT
GO°
Zo°
ST°T
zo"
TT’S
2Q°
0Z°
2°€
Qt’ Lt
rhe
QT°T
Ge"e
€6°TT
TOo°g
16°9
"am £q
quso.eg
00°2T
gt °S
00°ET
00°S
T9°2
00°S
65°9 3]
LL°S =
00°2 €
cert
06°6 zt
th*Z
T9°S c
90°T €
69°9 iT
og°€
69°9 «+t
°SZ0 °SqT
“4M °SAy
TT
St
ET
NN - mo UN Oo
J
OT
€T
°§ZO
60S‘T
LST
LT
LL
oL
€S
eth
LT
6x
OgT
OzT
66
“sqt
"9M TBQO],
* potsed
00°00T
OT’
99°22
S0°
GO°
Te*h
So°
LS*T
ah’
S0°
19°6
Z9°te
T6°T
49°
6L°
qe°9
96° te
anh
°on Aq
gusoteg
Sf0%%e
TOK
96
AS
96T
Ort
6£
€T
ot
L2T
gos
06
"ON
784} 04 AoTIg pues 6G6T “ST Ttady 09 9G6T ‘QT Ttady moray potaeg
ayy BuTang peysze em sqft pue JeaTy sozeig 049 jo yaog azeaTO eu4
WOT peutTezqO SUCTZOEeTTON BuTA,eN TT@e Jo sqtnsey ButMoyg yaeyH
“Of
sTBQO],
atddezo yoetd
atdderto aytum
ystjuns reeZu0'T,
Ystyuns 1eapay
STL T3enTg
ystjuns usec)
sseq y{Znomesz2eT
sseq 98 Tum
UST Fpeo peoy ela
speeyTTnq 4oeTa
ystyyeo Teuueyp)
Jaupys ueptoy
daeg
oTeggng YyNouyTTeug
aeyonsdzes JaAty
peys piezzty
1e8 esousuo'y
satoedg
"TS eTqQBL
--- Page 39 ---
o°e-S°L
Zena
q°grLel
1g-9°L
€°g-E°L
Ered
eBuey yd
9g
TEE
6TH
S69
o€9
The
0952
98 soum
~OLOTH
gt
HE
TE
6€
ae
9g
®N
p
92 €TT
QT ROT
On THT
oHT LLZ
got 902
6LT 062
a18 By
“UOgIg@D B89
-uoN
€oge9 -
sseupiey
T838mM JO piteog sexey, Jo Asaqanog stsfkTeuy) *9S6T fof requaqdsag
ysnorg, OS6T *T 189490990 WorZ ZOATY sozeag ey JO yIO4q BETO 344
uO SUOTZBIS Sno, tea 42 UueyHey, seTdmeg 19a4eM Jo stsflTeuy [Teotmeyy
oT
Z6T
092
Q&S
€6€
69S
mdd
SpTTOs
peatos
-STq
L°2
we
He
wn
ON
Qs TT
Th S°6
LE Bh
90T cot
L9 TOT
96 L6T
To ‘og
( °stecutsuq
“LE
90T
60T
qt
SOT
6TT
9ET
OOH
Ag
Ge
62
Tg
ah
OL
BN
a
Let
OT
Qc
ST
Hz
gt
LE
OH
9
QS
Ld
BD
9S-SS
TT 1°22 = 49EAD preqqny
GS=4S
TT “642 Yoeortg pareqqny
€G-2S
ST +°2T quan
aG-TS
ot 9°OT quadsny
TS~0S
9T 1°98 UFIITIN ° 4g
TS=0S
LT g°et quesn yy
Sorg seg
°2S eTqeyL
--- Page 40 ---
°Butads MoTeq peep arom
USTI TTems fmdB ¢-€ 428
peyeutyse MOTT *A,99 107VeM
fo eingeredme, fsetq
-qnq se2 Sutyy.tme ATTeBOT
-pezods Sutads Aq Tes
morf uayeg eTdmeg
“peqou asTT
oTyenbe Jo souaptas 4usTTS
fMOTI a4RNTZSa 074 eTqB
-un fdoep ,C-2 BurtBezoae
‘qutod sty 98 .,0¢ ATeqem
=Txoadde st uaptma fapts
ueeryZsuMop uo Tood
Su0T worry eTdues
*Tood sy.
UL Uses a7aKM UST ButAp
fud3 ¢e-o2 928 pegemtase
MOT] fmep yoor pTo mors
meerysuMOp [ood 4s1T J motTeq
uni 4yjJTaMs ‘MoT TBus
mory ueyey eTdmec .
syreusy eouBZonpu0g
OOT ‘tg
06'S
009 *9T
oT JToedg
OTS‘T
002
LTH
‘og
£8
ool
6S
€
OOH
0S9‘T
TIT
o9€
oT 069 ‘0g
LEg
- ¥/28N
L oto *€
Sotg ~—s« BN
*9aoqe
‘*— Wagt UT peqttosep mep pToO
SAOCgB saeTTM €°O f4S9M pue ysBe
Buptuunz eutt Agzedoud uosT.ze9
-uosTO UAT!
uoTZoes1e4UT *ysoaI9 BTUIOIT
qe Ayr19d01d “TBO jo yueg ut
009 ‘E uosTaeg uO Suptads ueptseqay °¢
‘et ABAUSTH 4QTA uot Zounl
gO 9sBo eTTm G *009 ABAYsTH
‘Ss °V ’d
ofg‘T uo e8ptiq $y 9yeedQ BTUOJTTeO °Z
*009 AemyStH “S “WV *a
mwory meerysdn settm J°o ATeVeWT
-xoidde ‘mep yoor yno-peysem pTo
moteq ‘f42ad0.1d
0969 Meysusyoy UQ Yaeetn STUAOITTeEO °T
a qutog jo qutog Buy tdueg
UOT }B907T
(°SteouTsuq 1043emM Jo paieog sexe], jo &s04.2n09) £quno0y seuor Jo spTety
TTO BOOAY S44 UL Yyoorg BTUATOJTTTeQ uo saetTdmeg 199emM Jo sesfkT Buy TeoTMsO “CG aTqey
°9€
--- Page 41 ---
39
Table 54. A Checklist of Fish Species Caught by Netting and
Seining from the Clear Fork of the Brazos River from
April 16, 1958 through April 15, 1959 and Prior to
that Period.
Scientific Name Common Name
Lepisosteidae (Gar)
Lepisosteus osseus longnose gar
Clupeidae (Herrings )
Dorosoma cepedianum gizzard shad
Catostomidae (Suckers and buffalofishes)
Ictiobus bubalus smallmouth buffalo
Carpiodes carpio river carpsucker
Cyprinidae (Shiners and minnows)
Cyprinus carpio carp
Notemigonus crysoleucas golden shiner
Notropis lutrensis redhorse shiner
Notropis volucellus mimic shiner
Notropis buchanani ghost shiner
Pimephales vigilax parrot minnow
Pimephales promelas fathead minnow
Ameiuridae (Freshwater catfishes)
Ictalurus punctatus channel catfish
Ictalurus melas black bullhead
Ictalurus natalis yellow bullhead
Pylodictus olivaris flathead catfish
Cyprinodontidae (Killifishes and topminnows)
Fundulus notatus blackstripe topminnow
Fundulus kansae plains killifish
Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis Red River pupfish
--- Page 42 ---
ho.
Table 54. (Continued) A Checklist of Fish Species Caught by Netting
and Seining from the Clear Fork of the Brazos River from
April 16, 1958 through April 15, 1959, and Prior to that Period.
Scientific Name Common Name
Poeciliidae (Mosquitofishes )
Gambusia affinis mosquitofish
Serranidae (Basses)
Rocecus chrysops white bass
Centrarchidae (Black basses and sunfishes)
Micropterus salmoides largemouth bass
Lepomis cyanellus green sunfish
Lepomis microlophus redear sunfish
Lepomis macrochirus bluegill
Lepomis humilis orangespotted sunfish
Lepomis megalotis longear sunfish
Pomoxis annularis white crappie
Pomoxis nigromaculatus black crappie
Percidae (Perches and darters)
Percina caprodes logperch
--- Page 43 ---
hi,
“J
> Pal ea
Figure l. Intermittent stream area of the Clear Fork
of the Brazos River in Western Fisher County.
Figure e. Pool on the Clear Fork of the Brazos
River in hastern Fisher County.
--- Page 44 ---
e eahs ; \ - apt x
y” 6, 49) a 37) @ go Pp \ 7 Se \
ee A(20 a * Xe : it 5
ea @ \ : 10) . i a \ ‘ ¥ 4
Je < \ ae A 16 ; bs Ia 4 Sa G >&
Poe as : x 14 ; / a sy \
“ <= 5 A FRI: | ; r a4 a »” Map Numbers
4 * 2 Zw ay * ‘. ®
\ % ee ve : oo Correspond With
é| Vv ned
he a : of \. Table Numbers
a ne \ wb wD
yi. Lt\« \J« 1,2,3 ete= SEINING
\¢ ; a ae =
Ps . . Xo uf = .
‘To ‘ye? Cr \ | = C. 8 9 M l | e Ss
‘ ¥
--- Page 45 ---
he.
Figure 3. Semi-permanent Water of the Clear Fork of the
Brazos River near Nugent, Texas, in Jones County.
Figure 4. Semi-permanent Water of the Clear Fork
of the Brazos River at Highway 180 Crossing in
Eastern Jones County.
--- Page 46 ---
Figure 5. Patches of Bulrushes Along the Banks
of the Brazos River above the Leuders Dam
in Eastern Jones County.
Figure 6, The Leuders Dam on the Clear Fork of the
Brazos River near Leuders, Texas,
in Eastern Jones County.