Skip to content
A Virtual Museum on the State's Fish Biodiversity

(1958–1959) Basic Survey and Inventory of Species, as Well as Their Distribution in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in Region 3-B, Texas

Open PDF
TXHD40.pdf 46 pages completed 92 entities

Extracted Text

--- Page 1 --- Report of Fisheries Investigations Basic Survey and Inventory of Species, as Well as Their Distribution in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in Region 3-B, Texas by James F. Wilcox Assistant Project Leader Dingell-Johnson Project F-5-R-6, Job B-16 April 16, 1958 - April 15, 1959 H. D. Dodgen - Executive Secretary Texas Game and Fish Commission Austin, Texas Marion Toole Kenneth C. Jurgens & William H. Brown Coordinator Assistant Coordinators --- Page 3 --- Job Completion Report State: of TEXAS Project No. F-5-R-6 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region 3-B. Job lo. B-16 Title: Basic Survey and Inventory of Species, as Well as Their Distribution in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in Region 3-B, Texas. Pericd Covered: April 16, 1958 - April 15, 1959 Abstract: Altogether 28 seining stations and 15 netting stations were employed to collect 5,33$ specimens of fish life representing 10 families, 18 genera, and 29 species. Redhorse shiners (Notropis lutrensis) dominated the seining sample while gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum) dominated the netting. Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) were found to be tke most prevalent of the larger game species. It was concluded that the survey should be extended for another year in an effort to obtain more complete fishery data from the lower areas of the Brazos watershed and more information concerning pollution and water quality. Ob jectives: fo gather fundamental data on the above waters in regard to their physical, chemical and biological aspects and to determine the distribution of the species present, their relative abundance and the ecological factors influencing their distribution. Procedure: 4 total of 95 gill nets were set and 28 seine collections were made in an effort to sample the fish population of the Clear Fork of the Brazos River and its watershed. The use of netting as a sampling technique was limited in use in the river and impossible in the river's tributaries due to the shallowness of the water in most places and the narrowmess of the river and creek beds. For that reason only 10 netting collections were made at five localities in the river. A total of 85 nets were set in 10 lakes on the river's watershed. Some of the netting collections from lakes were obtained in conjunction with other Dingell-Johnson Projects. All nets employed were experimental type gill nets measuring 125 feet in length by 8 feet in depth. All seines used were either 20 feet long by 6 feet deep common- sense seines, or 30 feet long by 6 feet deep bag seines. specimens collected by seining were taken to the laboratory for identification and study. Samples of each species were preserved in a 10 percent formalin solution. --- Page 4 --- Since water quality records were available on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River through the Texas Board of Water Engineers, and since time that could be devoted to this job was at a premium, no special chemical analyses were made. Air and water temperatures, pH and turbidity recordings, and physical and botanical observations were made at various netting and seining localities during the course of the survey. Findings: Physical Characteristics The Clear Fork of the Brazos River arises in the south-eastern part of Scurry ‘Sounty from a series of small springs. As the stream progresses through Fisher and Jones “Zounties a multitude of creeks are added to the watershed. Permian red soils prevail in this area and much of the land is in cultivation. The river in this region usually flows only in periods of heavy rain. For these reasons the water flowing in these areas usually contains much red and brown collodal suspension. However, the water becomes clearer and the stream becomes more deserving of its name as it continues further east. In times of drouth much of the standing water of the upper watershed dries up completely. Tais upper area is best characterized as a sporadic, intermittent stream (Figures 1 and 2). On down the river, at the Nugent station, average annual runoff figures for a perioi of 30.6 years equaled 91,770 acre feet. The minimum flow recorded during this period was 7,830 acre feet and the maximum flow recorded was 518,000 acre feet. (Figures 3 and 4). The eastern part of the Clear Fork Watershed is chiefly composed of Shackelfori, Throckmorton and Stephens Counties. The undulating surface of the land in these coanties is used principally for ranching. The vegetative cover on these black and grey soils and the presence of several small ponds and lakes are probably the main reasons for the less turbid waters in the lower Clear Fork Watershed, The stream bed in this area is generally packed sand with limestone projections and the banks of the river are lin:d with large trees. For the Fort Griffin station, in this lower area, the average anaual runoff figures for a period of 30.8 years equaled 173,300 acre feet. The minimum flow recorded during this period was 6,370 acre feet and the maximum flow recorded was 711,000 acre feet, Aquatic Vegetation Streambed vegetation varies from the headwaters to the lower reaches of the Cl:ar Fork as the topography and water characteristics. Vegetation in the upper reaches of the watershed is relatively scattered and is composed mainly of mesquite, button willows, and a few hackberry trees with various weeds and grasses intermingled. Small patches of bulrushes (Scirpus ) and various forms of algae were the only aquatics noted in tae upper area. (Figure 5). The lower drainage of the Clear Fork supports more profuse vegetation with larzer mesquites, pecans, hackberries, post oaks, blackjack oaks, and willows being the principal trees along the river banks. Various grasses, vines, and brambles are likewise abuadant. The bulk of the aquatic vegetation appears to be muskgrass (Chara) and coontail (Ceratophyllum). Pollution Small scattered patches of oil-well, salt-water, pollution seem to be common i: several localities along the Clear Fork of the Brazos River. The areas of most heary --- Page 5 --- concentrations apparently lie on California Creek, in Jones County (see Table 53); on the Clear Fork itself, in north-eastern Stephens County; and in the Old Hamlin City Lake, Three nets set in the Old Hamlin City Lake produced no fish and seining yielded only very salt tolerant species (see Tables 26 and 39). A small refinery at Lueders, Texas, is emptying a by-product into the river. Detailed examinations and investigations of these pollutions or possible pollutions has been impossible during the survey thus far due to the lack of available time. It is hoped that more time may be expended on this phase of the survey during the following segment. Fish Populations The results of the netting and seining collections can best be given in the follow- ing annotated species list and the fishery charts included in this report. For a complete summation of fishery results consult Tables 31 and 51. A total of 5,339 specimens of 29 species were collected. These 29 species represented 10 families and 18 genera. Annotated Species List Lepisosteidae (Gars) Lepisosteus osseus (longnose gar). This species is probably the dominant one in the lower part of the Clear Fork of the Brazos River. In the lower regions there are some sections of stream that have apparently been stripped of practically all small fish by this species. It was also observed that gar in those sections were rather poor and on the average, weighed only one pound. It is possible that they were having a hard time finding enough to eat. In one particular hole of water the gar were so active and perhaps so ravenous that there were approximately 20 of them in the gill net before the survey crew had it completely set out. There were no gar taken in the upper reaches of the watershed. Thus, considering the whole river and all its tributaries, gar com- poseé only 4.42% by number of the total fish netted. Clupeidae (Herrings) Dorosoma cepedianum (gizzard shad). This species was very prevalent in the netting collections in some localities and equaled 24.9%of the total number of fish taken by netting. This was the highest percentage, by number, of any species taken by netting. However, it must be mentioned that some lakes and netting localities produced no shad at all. The shad taken from the river were generally very large, 97 of them averaging slightly over 10 ounces. Shad of this size are considered to be highly undesirable. (See Table 47). Catostomidae (Suckers and buffalofishes) Ictiobus bubalus (smallmouth buffalo). Most netting stations in the river yielded this species but none were taken from any of the lakes sampled even though they are known. to exist in some of the lakes (i.e. Lake Fort Phantom Hill). No buffalo were obtained in any of the seining collections. Although this species has a high commercial value, the difficulty of access and netting in the holes in the river, where the majority of this species exist, probably tends to make the commercial fishing for this fish unprefitable. --- Page 6 --- Carpiodes carpio (river carpsucker). These fish were taken both by net and seine. The presence of this species constitutes a serious fishery problem in some lakes on the watershed, since no utilization of this species by either man or fish has been observed. Cyprinidae (Shiners and minnows) Cyprinus carpio (carp). This species is sub-dominant to the river carpsucker but does constitute a fishery problem in all lakes. Carp are becoming more and more fished for in many West Texas lakes because of their tremendous strength and willingness to fight when caught. Notemigonus crysoleucas (golden shiner). Although this species was taken by net and seine, it was taken only from lakes. This fish is not believed to be native in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River, or its watershed, but is known to have been intro- duced as a forage fish by the state fish hatcheries. Notropis lutrensis (redhorse shiner). This is the dominant shiner in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River. Practically all of the 1,468 individuals collected were taken from the river and its tributaries. Even so they constituted over 33% of the fish taken by seining for the whole watershed. These minnows thrive particularly in the sporadic, intermittent streams of the upper part of the Clear Fork. Notropis volucellus (mimic shiner). Only one individual of this species was col- lected. It was taken from the upper part of the river. (See Table 12). Notropis buchanani (ghost shiner). Only one specimen of this species was collected. This fish was taken from a tributary of the Clear Fork during a muddy run off of rain waters. (See Table 22). Pimephales vigilax (parrot minnow). All of the small sample of this species were obtained from the bigger waters of the middle and lower reaches of the river. Pimephales promelas {fathead minnow). This species is fairly abundant but seems to be more prevalent in the upper reaches of the river. Ameiuridae (Freshwater catfishes) ictalurus punctatus (channel catfish). Only occasional specimens of this fish were obtained by seining and netting in the river and its tributaries. The species was very abundant in netting collections taken from the lakes and composed over 21% of the number and over 47% of the weight of the total netting sample. This is one of the most sought after species by West Texas Anglers and is frequently stocked from the state fish hatcheries. Ictalurus melas (black bullhead). This species was taken by net and seine from both the river and the lakes. It appears to be more abundant in some of the smaller lakes, which apparently have no flathead catfish, than in any other waters. Ictalurus natalis (yellow bullhead). This species was obtained only by seining. It is fairly common in the river but was not collected from the lakes. --- Page 7 --- Pylodictus olivaris (flathead catfish). This very desirable food fish is much sought after by anglers and apparently serves as an effective bullhead control in lakes where it occurs. One specimen, taken from the river, was the only individual of this species collected. The species is known, however, to be fairly common in some of the lakes on the watershed. Possibly these fish lie on the bottom in a lethargic state for long periods of time which might account for their scarcity in netting collections. Cyprinodontidae (Killifishes and topminnows) Fundulus notatus (blackstripe topminnow). The only locality in which this top- minnow was seined was a tributary of the lower part of the river (See Table 2h). Fundulus kansae (plains killifish). This species was collected from a lake con- taining large amounts of chlorides which are believed to be the results of nearby oil wells. The killifish was not taken from any other locality. (See Table 26). Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis (Red River pupfish). This species appears to be the dominant fish in the lake mentioned above where the water is too salty for many other species. Poeciliidae (Mosquitofishes) Gambusia affinis (mosquitofish). The mosquitofish is common in backwater sloughs and quiet pools throughout the watershed. They were the second most common fish in the seining collections, and are considered to be very desirable to man because of their practice of eating mosquitos. Serranidae (Basses) Roccus chrysops (white bass) - This species is not indigenous to the Clear Fork but has been introduced in some of the lakes on the watershed. Although not many of these fish were collected, Fort Phantom Hill Lake is known to have a large population. Centrarchidae (Black basses and sunfishes) Micropterus salmoides (largemouth bass). The evasive nature of these fish makes them difficult to capture in nets and seines. It is therefore difficult to arrive at an accurate estimate of their occurence. The data collected would indicate, however, that they are much more common in some of the lakes than they are in the river. Lepomis cyanellus (green sunfish). This sunfish is common throughout the water- shed and is a desirable species to the angler when it attains a reasonable size. However, very few of these sunfish collected were large enough to be fished for and some indi- viduals, only 2 inches long, were fully grown, sexually ripe, fish. Lepomis microlophus (redear sunfish). This is one sunfish that generally attains a desirable size in West Texas waters. Only a few individuals of this species were collected. (See Tables 12 and 44), These were present probably because of hatchery stocking and very likely are not native to the stream. Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill). This species is very common in the lakes and the river. None of these fish were of a desirable size due to overpopulation of this species. Some individuals were sexually mature at a length of 2 inches. --- Page 8 --- Lepomis humilis (orangespotted sunfish). Under ideal conditions, these sunfish do not attain a very desirable size. All of the individuals collected from the Clear Fork were extremely small. This species is apparently sub-dominant to the other native sunfish. Lepomis megalotis (longear sunfish). These fish, along with bluegills, are the dominant sunfish. They appear to prefer running stream areas but were very abundant in the upper reaches of the river whether the water was running or was standing in pools. These fish, like the other species of sunfish, were nearly all stunted. Pomoxis annularis (white crappie). Practically all the bigger waters of the Clear Fork and its watershed contained this species. They were particularly abundant in the lakes. Not many were collected, however, that were a desirable size and many indi- viduals were stunted. Pomoxis nigromaculatus (black crappie). Two specimens of this species were taken from Lake Sweetwater in a previous segment. (See Table 45). They were very large crappie and in very good condition. It is nearly certain, however, that these fish were stocked in that reservoir and are not indigenous to the watershed. Percidae (Perches and darters) Percina caprodes (logperch) - This apparently unimportant species was collected from only one lake on the watershed. (See Table 28). Conclusions 3 Because very limited fish sampling was performed on the lower reaches of the river and since none of the sampling stations were worked but one time, it is concluded that this survey should be continued for another year. There is also a vast amount of investigation that needs to be conducted in regards to water quality and pollution. As much time as can possibly be used for this facet of the project, in conjunction with the pollutions investigations projects, needs to be used. ' ao Prepared by James F. Wilcox Approved by FD ac teare A bal Assistant Project Leader Director Inland Fisheries Division Date September 24, 1959 --- Page 9 --- Table l. Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: Springs on A. R. Willingham Ranch in Southeast Scurry County Dates July 18, 1958 Weather: Hot Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 6 11.11 Fathead minnow 18 33.33 Green sunfish 20 37.04 Bluegills 10 18.52 Totals 54 100.00 Table 2. Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location; Clear Fork on Sterling Willingham Ranch in Southwest Fisher County Date: July 18, 1958 Weather: Hot Percent Species No. by No. River carpsucker 4 «90 Redhorse shiner 400 90.50 Yellow bullheads 26 5.88 Green sunfish 10 2.26 Longear sunfish 2 46 Totals ko 100.00 --- Page 10 --- Table 3. Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collections Seining Location: Netlleton Ranch in Western Fisher County Date: July 18, 1958 Weather: Hot Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 200 72.46 Fathead minnow 18 6.52 River carpsucker 15 5 Ak Yellow bullhead 12 434 Green sunfish 20 7-25 Bluegill 3 1.09 Orangespotted sunfish 5 1.81 Longear sunfish 3 1.09 Totals 276 100.00 x * * Table hk, ‘Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: Noles Ranch in North West Fisher County Date: July 19, 1958 Weathers: Hot Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 30 36.58 Fathead minnow FT@) 48.78 Black bullhead 2 2.44 Yellow bullhead 2 24k Green sunfish 4 4.88 Bluegill h i 88 Totals 82 100.00 --- Page 11 --- Table 5. Type of Collection: Clear Fork of Brazos River Location: Dirt Road Crossing in North Central Fisher County Date: July 19, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Fathead minnow Green sunfish Bluegill Longear sunfish Totals Table 6. Type of Collection: No. 50 50 16 12h Clear Fork of Brazos River Percent by No. 40.32 ho.32 12.90 3.23 3.23 100.00 Location: Highway 70 Crossing North of Roby in Fisher County Date: July 19, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Mosquitofish Green sunfish Longear sunfish Totals No. 25 20 99 Percent by No. 25.25 50.51 ok 20.20 100.00 --- Page 12 --- Table 7. Type of Collection: 10. Clear Fork of Brazos River Location: Roy Eaton's Ranch in North Eastern Fisher County Date: July 24, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Gizzard shad Redhorse shiner Fathead minnow Mosquitofish Yellow bullhead Green sunfish Bluegill Longear sunfish Totals Table 8. Type of Collection: No. 15 6 16 15 35 Lil %* * * Clear Fork of Brazos River Percent by No. 1.80 13.51 5.41 14.41 1.80 13.51 18.03 31.53 100.00 Location: J. R. Murff's Ranch in North Eastern Fisher County Date: July 24, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Fathead minnow Mosquitofish Green sunfish Bluegill Longear sunfish Totals Percent by No. hO. 32 5.38 43,01 1.08 4,83 5.38 100,00 --- Page 13 --- Table 9. Type of Collection: Location: Cecil Edward's Ranch in Eastern Fisher County Date: July 24, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Fathead minnow Mosquitofish Channel catfish Black bullheads Green sunfish Bluegills Longear sunfish Totals Table 10. Type of Collections Location; Carriker's Ranch in Eastern Fisher County Dates: July 2h, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Gizzard shad Redhorse shiner Mosquitofish Channel catfish Bluegills Longear sunfish Totals ll. Clear Fork of Brazos River 45 50 30 10 20 173 % & * Clear Fork of Brazos River No. 1 12 2h L 20 3 61 Percent by No. 26.01 28.90 17.34 2.89 5.78 -58 6.93 LST 100.00 Percent by No. 1.63 19.68 39.34 1.64 32.79 4.92 100.00 --- Page 14 --- Table 11. Type of Collection: 12, Clear Fork of Brazos River Seining Location: Highway 180 - Crossing East of Roby Date: July 24, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Bluegilis Longear sunfish Totals Table 12. Type of Collection: Location: Turner Ranch in Eastern Fisher County Date: July 24, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Mimic shiner Fathead minnow Mosquitofish Green sunfish Redear sunfish Bluegills Longear sunfish Totals No. HED 14 Clear Fork of Brazos River Seining pe “4 = nN “AMWRrHOrFRrFO 105 Percent by No. 85.72 7.14 7.14 100.00 Percent by No. 66.66 96 96 19.03 -96 2.85 1.91 6.67 100.00 --- Page 15 --- Table 13. Type of Collection: Location: Dirt Road in South Western Jones County Date: July 24, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Fathead minnow Mosquitofish Channel catfish Bluegills Longear sunfish Totals Table 1h, Type of Collection: 13. Clear Fork of Brazos River Seining No. 100 4O 189 Clear Fork of Brazos River Seining Percent by No. 52.91 23.80 21.17 1.06 253 053 100.00 Location: Dirt Road Crossing in South Western Jones County Date: July 24, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Fathead minnow Mosquitofish Green sunfish Bluegills Longear sunfish Totals No. ho 30 12 154 Percent by No. 38.96 25.97 19.48 7-79 5.20 2.60 100.00 --- Page 16 --- 14, Table 15. Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: Farm Road Crossing in Southwestern Jones County Date: July 24, 1958 Weathers: Hot Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 60 52.17 Fathead minnow 8 6.96 Mosquitofish LS 39.13 Channel catfish i -87 Longear sunfish 1 .87 Totals 115 100.00 Table 16. Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: Farm Road 707 Crossing at Truby, Texas, in Jones County Date: July 24, 1958 Weathers: Hot Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 50 64.10 Fathead minnow 5 6.41 Mosquitofish 20 25.64 Bluegilis 1 1.28 Longear sunfish 2 2s5T Totals 78 100.00 --- Page 17 --- Table 17. Type of Collection: 15% Clear Fork of Brazos River Seining Location: Highway 277, 83 Crossing Southeast of Anson in Jones County Date: July 23, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Mosquitofish Longear sunfish Totals Table 18. Type of Collection: ee ¥ Clear Fork of Brazos River Seining Percent by No. 84.90 1+99 7+55 100.00 Location: Williams' Ranch near Nugent, Texas, in Jones County Date: July 24, 1958 Weather: Hot Species Redhorse shiner Fathead minnow Mosquitofish Channel catfish Green sunfish Bluegills Longear sunfish Totals No. 70 7) 2 a) 130 Percent by No. 53.84 11.54 19.23 1.54 “TT 11.54 1.54 100.00 --- Page 18 --- 16. Table 19. Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: Mack Doty's Ranch near Nugent in Jones County Date: January 15, 1959 Weather: Cold and Cloudy Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 30 90.90 Parrot minnow 2 6.06 Mosquitofish L 3.04 Totals 33 100.00 xe * Table 20. Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location; Ed Davis Ranch near Leuders in Jones County Date; March 10, 1959 Weather: Cool and Sunny Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 1 20.00 Parrot minnow h 80.00 Totals 5 100.00 --- Page 19 --- LT. Table 21. Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: J. C. Putnam Ranch in Southwest Throckmorton County Dates March 11, 1959 Weather: Cool and Sunny Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 65 75.58 Parrot minnow 20 23.25 Fathead minnow 1 Lol] Totals 86 100.00 Table 22, Tributaries of the Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: Highway 277, 83 Crossing on Mulberry Creek Southeast of Anson in Jones County Date: July 23, 1958 Weather: Hot Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 6 54.54 Ghost shiner 1 9.09 Mosquitofish iL 9.09 Black bullheads 1 9.09 Green sunfish 2 18.19 Totals 11 100.00 --- Page 20 --- 18. Table 23. Tributaries of the Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: Farm Road Crossing of Elm Creek - South of Nugent in Jones County Date: July 24, 1958 Weather: Hot Percent Species No. by No. Gizzard shad d. 452 Carp 4 6.05 Redhorse shiner 20 30.30 Mosquitofish 25 37.88 Channel catfish 1 1.52 Black bullheads 3 4.53 Largemouth bass 1 1.52 Green sunfish 1 1.52 Longear sunfish 10 15.16 Totals 66 100.00 x * X Table 2h. Tributaries of the Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: Farm Road Crossing on Salt Prong of Hubbard Creek in Shackelford County Dates: October 29, 1958 Weather: Cool and Sunny Percent Species No. by No. Blackstripe topminnow LS 37.50 Mosquitofish 12 30.00 Green sunfish 2 5.00 Bluegills il 27-50 Totals IT@) 100.00 --- Page 21 --- Table 25. 19. Lakes on the Clear Fork of Brazos River Watershed Type of Collection; Seining Location: New Hamlin Lake in Jones County Date: October 17, 1958 Weathers: Cool and Sunny Species Golden shiner Redhorse shiner Mosquitofish Black bullheads Largemouth bass Green sunfish Bluegills White crappie Totals Table 26. No. FPOOMNF O&O MV. 145 Percent by No. 6.20 5.52 34.48 69 hh 6.90 41.38 -69 100.00 Lakes on the Clear Fork of Brazos River Watershed Type of Collection: Seining Location: Old Hamlin Lake in Fisher County Date: October 17, 1958 Weather: Cool and Sunny Species Red River pupfish Plains killifish Mosquitofish Totals No. 160 85 58 303 Percent by No. 52.80 28.05 19.15 100.00 --- Page 22 --- 20. Table 27. Lakes on the Clear Fork of Brazos River Watershed Type of Collection: Seining Location: Lake McCarthy near Albany in Shackelford County Date: October 29, 1958 Weather: Cool and Sunny Percent Species No. by No. Mosquitofish 5 9.80 Largemouth bass 5 9.80 Bluegills 30 58.83 Orangespotted sunfish 10 19.60 Longear sunfish L 1.97 Totals 51 100.00 Table 28. Lakes on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River Watershed Type of Collection: Seining Location: Lake Trammell in Nolan County Dates June and August Weather: Hot Percent Species No. by No. Redhorse shiner 3 2.54 Black bullhead 3 2.54 Mosquitofish 12 10.17 Largemouth bass 23 19.49 Bluegill 60 50.85 Green sunfish 8 6.78 Redear sunfish 3 2.54 Logperch 6 5.09 Totals 118 100.00 --- Page 23 --- el. Table 29. Chart Showing Results of all Seining Collections Obtained from the Clear Fork of the Brazos River and its Tributaries during the Period from April 16, 1958 to April 15, 1959. Species Gizzard shad River carpsucker Carp Redhorse shiner Mimic shiner Ghost shiner Parrot minnow Fathead minnow Channel catfish Black bullhead Yellow bullhead Blackstriped topminnow Mosquitofish Largemouth bass Green sunfish Redear sunfish Bluegill Orangespotted sunfish Longear sunfish Totals No. 19 1,457 26 297 12 16 ho 15 4.23 Tit 129 2,687 Percent by No. ol5 «(0 «15 54.22 1.56 56 15.74 413 ell ke51 el6 481 100.00 --- Page 24 --- 22. Table 30. Chart Showing Results of all Seining Collections Obtained from Lakes on the Watershed of the Clear Fork of the Brazos River during the Period from April 16, 1958 to April 15, 1959. (New Hamlin Lake, Lake McCarthy, Old Lake Hamlin, Lake Trammell. ) Percent Species No. by No. Golden shiner 9 1.45 Redhorse shiner 11 1.79 Black bullhead 4 » 64 Plains killifish 85 13.78 Red River pupfish 160 25.93 Mosquitofish 125 20.26 Largemouth bass 34 5.51 Green sunfish 18 2.92 Redear sunfish 3 49 Bluegill 150 24.31 Orangespotted sunfish 10 1.62 Longear sunfish 1 -16 White crappie 1 6 Logperch 6 98 Totals 617 100.00 --- Page 25 --- 23. Table 31. Chart Showing Results of all Seining Collections Obtained from the Clear Fork of the Brazos River and its Tributaries and Lakes on its Watershed during the Period from April 16, 1958 to April 15, Species Gizzard shad River carpsucker Carp Golden shiner Redhorse shiner Mimic shiner Ghost shiner Parrot minnow Fathead minnow Channel catfish Black bulilhead Yellow bullhead Blackstriped topminnow Plains killifish Red River pupfish Mosquitofish Largemouth bass Green sunfish Redear sunfish Bluegill Orangespotted sunfish Longear sunfish White crappie Logperch Totals 1959. No. 19 26 297 20 ho 15 85 160 548 52 129 271 15 130 3,304 Percent by No. #12 DT «12 oof Kh yh 3-95 203 100.00 --- Page 26 --- Table 32. Type of Collcetion: Netting Location: Doty Ranch near Nugent, Texas Number of Nets; 1 Weather: Species Smallmouth buffalo Totals Cold and Cloudy No. Table 33. Type of Collection; Netting Ed Davis Ranch near Lueders Number of Nets: 3 Cold, Raining and Snowing Location: Weather: Species Gizzard shad Smallmouth buffalo River carpsucker Channel catfish Black bullheads Largemouth bass Green sunfish Bluegills White crappie Totals No. R = PurPwWwoe = 109 Percent by No. 100.00 100.00 Percent by No. 60.55 4.58 11.01 92 4.58 2.76 -92 4.58 10.10 100.00 2h. Date: Clear Fork of the Brazos River January 15, 1959 125 x 8 x Exp. Types of Nets: Condition of Water: Total Wt. lbs. ozs. 12 13 12 13 x H % Date: Type of Netss Condition of Water: Total Wt. lbs. ozs. 43004 9 3 11 5 4k = 13 3 8 6 2 5 13 1 lo 81 9 Avg. Wt. lbs. 2 Clear Fork of the Brazos River OZS. 9 Avg. Wt. lbs. OZS5 « 10.64 13.40 15.08 13.00 11.20 -66 5.00 2.60 2.36 Still and Slightly Turbid Percent by Wt. LOO. 00 100.00 January 15, 1959 125 x 8 x Exp. Slightly Flowing and Turbid Percent by Wt. 53-19 11.26 13.87 5.90 4.29 7-51 239 299 2.00 100.00 Avg. K 3.32 Avg. K a o «o 2. WOW AO oS Qk ow Ly EMF Wi Ww ow fo Po fh Pw w . --- Page 27 --- 00°OOT G9°2 Te°rT gt’? €9°92 ge°T 89°9 02°2 42°eT 0S°2 €9°T €G° TO°Th xy "am Aq “BAY quso1eg TesTOQ pue Supmota ATIUSTIS "dxdt X g X G2T 6S6T ‘eT yorey 00° OOT 62°2 98 °OT TS*2 ge", Qz°aZ 1°09 QS°2 60°T2 Dt “am £q ° BAY que. 1eg teeTQ pue ButMoTg ATIUSTIS 0S°S ee°h 00° +T 0S°2 00° TT LL°t *3ZO Ine? AA T “SQT "aM “SAY & 9 6 L Fete OT G S OT 9 T T GE *sZzo0 "SqT "4M TBQOI, :i04eM JO uoTatpuog ssqen fo adAy, 2078q 00°OOT Li 2S" ST*6T 6£°9 Go°h Go"h qt LS "on AQ qusa 18g eA Mm Ost “ON uung pue [oo co *84e,f JO Aueqry - yousey Zaqq,eqpey stazz0y STB407, sseq UQ.NoMEa.eT YstspPeo Touuey) Teyonsdieo Taaty oTejjnqg YynomTTeug peys paezzty iIe2 ssousuoyT setosdg 2:13. 2aM “ON 2U0T9)800T BUT999N <suoTZoeTTON Jo addy, TaAATY SozBig ey. jo yAOW azABeaTo °*ce aTqeL xe * 6 Lz 00°OOT Tl STBqoOL € € 60°6 T ystyzeo Teuueyp Z 2 60°6 T reyonsdreo JaATy 00°¢ a Zt 9T LE°9E oTeyynq YQnouT Teg 09°2 T €T ¢ Gye Sh G peys paezzty °SZO °SdT "sZOo °satT -on Aq “ON sotoadg "3M ° SAY °9M TRQOL quedstag 322938mM JO uoT4yTpuog Auung pue Toop) 3.1aTy4BemM *dxa XQ X G2T ssgeN Jo adAy, gf ‘¢sqenN fo °on 6S6T ‘ZT yore sage Aueqty Teeu youey meugng °9 °f suOTAZBD0T IOATY sozeig oy4 jo yIog zBeTo *GZ BUT 999N "He eTABL, SUOT}OETTOD Jo adfy, --- Page 28 --- 00° OOT 9 02 00° O0T G2 STBIOL nO°E 66°E €9°T €T 00° Ze g etddezo e9TUM Go°t 26° 00°€ € 00° t T STI Tent g TS°2 €2°T 00° t t 00°9 ro SsisuTys uspTop TL°2 26° 00°€ € 00° T speeyTTng yoeT_ LT°S gl’ TL L2°s T OT kT 00° th TT ystsyeo Teuuey) L1g°? 9T° Te 0S°2 Z S 00°9 2 szeyonsdied JeATY ¥ -am £q °szO 0° SQT °szo 0° SQT eon &q °ON sotoedg “BAY queoleg "aM °Say "4M TBI07, qusozag PTOO pue ieeTD ‘saeqgemM fo uoTAZTpuog Surzaerg pue Aug saayy.eoy ‘dxg xX 9 X GZT <:sqenN go ody, € esqfoanN fo °o QS6T ‘OT tequeaosq 2e9Kq SyeT uosuy PTO suoT.Boo'y BUTLION suoTZOeTTOO Jo sedAy, Ppeus13e1eM A®ATY sozeig 244 JO YAO T AVSTO ayy uo sayeyT "LE atTaqey ee KH 00°OOT 69 00°OOT 96 sTeqoy, 62°€ 9S° 00°g g qO°T T etddezo aqtuM Ho°€ gE°E 00°g T € 60°2 2 sseq YQnomes1ey 6° T TG°E 00°2 € 2] € HO°T T ystszeo peeyqeta 9e° 2 eT°T T T O° T T speeyTrTnq yoeT” 6L°T 26°H 00°€ rf 9 t 60°2 ro ystyyBo Teuueyo QS°2 Ge°? t Ff 60°2 Z szayonsdzeo JeATYy H6°T LO* et oto h Zt OT 00°S2 42 peys pilezzty Or° 6T°eL TE° T 1 a) T9°S9 €9 eZ esousu0y J eam Aq °Sszo °SqT °SZO —° SAT -on Aq °ON setoedg ° BAY .uadteg UM ° Bay °"oM TBeL0], ques Teg IB8TO pues PTOD 2409eM Jo uoTYTpUOD PTOD ia2eu4e0y °dxa ¥ Q X GET 2830N FO addy, a 3seN gO on 6S6T *9T Arenigag 2:9 9eq STTTASBTITY Teoau Youey soTIg °D) "N suoTZBo0T Buty3eN suoTZoeTTOD Jo adéy, TaATY sozerg ey} JO y4oq ABeTO "Of eTaQRy "92 --- Page 29 --- "BAY peuTeyqg e1eK YSTT ON eam Aq °szO 9° SQT °szZO *SQT ‘on £q "ON setoadg queorag "9M “Say "1M TRIO7, yusoteg IB@sTO pue TOON 3:4098M JO UOTATpUOD Auung pue Toop) 321ey7,e8ey "dxq XQ xX GET 3sgeN fo edAéy, : € ¢sgonN fo °oN QS6T ‘LT teqoz00 «6s aqeq eyeT UTTMeY pO suoTyeooT BuT 72a suOTZ_OSTTODQ Jo ody, peusiza7eM TeaATY sozerg oy JO yAIoy reeTOQ 9ug4 UO seyeT °6€ eTaeL ee He % 00° 00T TT OOT 00°OOT HOT SsTeqo], glen SH°T cl ok Ze°ae €S afddeto e4TuM T° 00°ET €T T9° T ystjuns 1eesu0cT GO’? 00°T rs T 2 T9° T sseq YyNomes.1eT QT°T og°€ € T Go°e S speeyTing yoerg L9°hL T3°ET € SL 64° SS T6 ystiqyeo Teuueyp TS°9T one UT OT 9T 26°), €T Jeyonsdies eaty eam £q °SZO "SQT °sZ0 °SQT "on Aq *ON setoedg questeg "am ° Say "AM TeLOF qusoi1eg PTOO pue eeTD %2:4938mM JO uoTayTpuo| Supzeeig pue Aaq szeyqvey *dxy XQ X G2T %s}eN Jo sedsy, € ssgen fo "on Q@S6T ‘6 Jaqmeseq sageq ayeT uosuy MANE 2uOTYBDOT peys194BM TeATY sozerg ouy JO ysog azeeTD eA uO sayeT BSUTTAEN wuOTZOSTTOQ Jo sdAjz, °QE ETABTL *le --- Page 30 --- 00°O0T OT gf 00°OOT 9), STBqO], One? G6°TT 61°T 9 H ZE°TS 6€ eTddez. a4TqM LT°T tL*T 00°S OT €9°2 Fe STI Tent g Ty’? 60° 00°g 8 T G6°E € speeuTing yoeTg GO°2’ G9° lz 0S° 2 2 OT Q@S°9 S ystyyeo Teuuey) 69°2 EL°2 T a TE°T rE dazep gg°2 S0°Sh OH°OT =«T g 9T OT°ET OT deyonsdieo Teaty a1? T Z2Q°9 0S°2 8 Z So°T2 QI peys piezzTp "y om £q °szZO °SQqT °gzZO 0° SGT "on £q °ON satoedg * Bay quadtag UM ° say °OM TeqLO] queo1eg ZB8TQ pue Toop 34984eM Jo uoTATpUOD fuung pue Too9 32ey7ReM "dxq XQ X GET 3890N fo addy, 4 $sqeN Jo °on QS6T fof Taqo1090 sage Aueqty zeeu Ay VIBAOW eyeyT suoOT}BDOT BUTYZION suoT-oeTTON jo adAéy, Ppeusitse eM TeATY sozerg ayy Jo yao7g TesTOD ayy uo sexyeyT “TH eTqgqey, % xX * 00°OOT ro fe} 00°OOT Ly STBqOY, GL°2 oL° Lz OS°T t é go°TS 42 eftddeto 39 7UM Te°e 4S°TT 9€°T ST On’ EZ Aa . STtt8ent¢ OT’? 4Q°e OS°2 4 Goon 4 SieuTYys UspTOH GS°2 HS°TH oO°TT T 9 € Ge°h rs sseq YQNoOMeS.1eT 19°T Zo°h 00°2 9 6£°9 € speeyuT—Tng yoeTg On°T 9L°OT 0g°2 qT €9°OT S ystgszeo Teuueyp ¥ oom £q °$ZO "*SaQT °S$ZO °SqT on Aq "ON satoedg ° Bay qus0 18g "IM °aAy °oM TBO, queoteg pTqiny, ATYYSTTS pus Toop %404eq Jo uoTATpUOD Auung pue TooQ ?2ey Vem °dxg xX g X GeT 2s3eN Jo sodfy, € esqenN go °on QS6T ‘LT teqoq00 «6s e48q oye] UTTMeR MeN uot ZBOOT BUTZ9EN wUOT_ZDSETTOD Jo edz, IOATY SOzeig ey} JO YAOq ABSTO O44 UO SeXST “Oh PTQBL "92 --- Page 31 --- 00°O0T GS°2 T9°S oj age 60°9 € S6°T Os° € ene? SQ°OT € 99°T TL td, @ ro 6g°T qS°S € xy "om £q °szO 0° SQT ° SAW qusoleg OM “BAY peys1to.eM TeATY sozelg JO YIOg 1B9eTO oYy4 UO seyeT 00° O0T G9°2 LE° SS 00°. { 66°T €9° td, 02°6 Z pi “am £q "$20 *SQT "BAY quad1ag "aM °Say IBeTO pue PTOY °dxg X Q X G2T 6S6T *6T Arenaqedg peysiejeM JTeATY sozeig eyy jo yso¥4 qT = HET OT TT 02g get T Ff "SZO °SQT "9M TBQ0L HAN dot tO "dx X g X G2T 00*OOT LZ* He 4S°LT gs" 62° TE TO°6T TEL son Aq juso 18g ssgon jo adAy, LT <%89eN Jo *on 6S6T ‘ST Trady ysnoryy QG6T “OT Trady worzsy [Tomer], oye] Mors uSsye], suoTZoeTTON ButggeN JO syTnsey ¥e * % tT LT 00° OOT 9 ui os° LE qT ot 05°29 *"szo *SqT “on Aq “9M TRIO, quested s1a4emM jo uoptatpuog esqen jo edz, 309eq °62 Sutmoug pue Zutupey ‘pToo s[Tetueg ay4eT SuT 9 49N IBETO 94} UO soXeyT oye STBqOY, £9 etddezo 3a9TuM 09 STTTSentTg 2 sseq YW .NoMes.zeT LOT SpeeyTing yoelg S9 ysTsyeo Teuueyp vA SIeUTYysS uspToyH “ON seToodg "Eh TQS, 9 sTe qo], € Yystsyeo Teuueyo G aayonsdzeo Teaty °ON sotoada 3.10 7.BOM Z sgenN fo °on suoT 2 BD07T suUOTZOETTON jo adAy, “oh STIBL --- Page 32 --- QT°S TO’ Li?€ Of ° + qth) 76°T | 26°T Liz gn’? Z9°T ° BAY 00° OOT €9°0¢ 90° 09° 6L°€ ce °S 69°99 10° 0S° 69° Si’ “am £q quso1eg 9 4&S S G GTT G G € 9 € Ol 2 Tz q S eT qT #6 9 69£ € 9 €l 2 €l 2 T 92 Z g 2 °szO 6° SaT *SZ0 °*SqT "OM °SAy "9M TeQO1 00° OOT GL°ge 6T° one TS°T 49° 6 qe" Le gt° 6T° T6"% 6L°€ °on Aq qusotag °dxy XQ X¥ GeT ssgeN Jo ody, q2@ :899N JO “N 62S sTeqoy S02 etdderd 384TUM tT ystjuns 1eepey QT STTP9en Tg 9 sseq Uqnomes.rey TS SpeeyTTng yoetg LET ystygeo Teuueyo z gzreuTys uapToy T dre 92 deyonsdireo JoATYy 0g peys prezzty °ON satoodg 6S6T “OT Trady yBnoryy Qcé6T ‘QT THady morzy oueTTqy eye] WoT uexey suOTZDeTTOD BuTy{eN JO sy Tnsey poeysto,em JaaTyY sozeig ey4 JO YAO aeeT) syq Uo seyeT "of "th eTaBL --- Page 33 --- get 2°? QT’? 00°? 9e°2 98°T Bt * Say 00° OOT 00°6 zo’"e €T° HT 66°6 OT°0S 9S°ET “om £q queodeg TT 6 qT eT 9 eT HT ie) Aneta *SZO *SQT *szo "9M ° SAY “om °dxg x QQ x 9 LG6T ‘ST Tyady ysnory, 966T ‘OT Tttdy mors TITH G6°2 TS°2? Lg°t 26°? oye? €G°T En°T 2o°a oT°s ql’ T ° BAY 00° OO0T €h° 18°% 60° Zl ° HT 60°9 on’ LZ 6i° oL°9 66°QT ZS°02 “am £q quso1eg peysie7eM Jeaaty sozearg oyy G et Q L ¢ ¢ oT € OT 9 ui T q rf T ZT Q T Z rf * 820 *sqr * 320 "9M ° SAY "aM °dxg X Q X GeT :S4eN fo 0c 06 L G ol 8 eh ST "Sat TeqOT 00° 0OT OL* qT OT'2 On°6 02°S 09°92 00° Ot "on Aq queo.eg G2T 289eN jo sod, ssgen jo MmoZUuey YIOT SyeT Mor usyey, jo y4Og TeeTO au UO sOReT ee Ke X Gog T OT 62 er 9S 7 €T 6€ oh *sqT TeqO], 00°OOT ot’ gL Te° go" t OT" t GE°6 99°T 62° TH’S 90°01 "on AG queateg ¢sqzean go addy, 66 qT lz ge “ON STBLOF, etdders eatum sseq YQnomes1ey sseq ey TUM Ustspeo Teuusy) szeyonsdze0 JaATY pers parezzty satoeda SUOTLOATTON Sura7eN FO syTnsey "OH OTARL Teh STBIO], atdderzo yoetg etddezo aqtuM ystjguns [TTzentg_ sseq YQnomeszeT SpesylTng MOTTEL UST FPeo Teuueyp iautys uapToy dzeg szeyonsdied JaaTy peys prezzty sepToedg Q@S6T “ST Ttady ysnozyy LO6T ‘QT Trady wos ceqenqoeng eye] Worf usye], SUOTJOeTTOD ButyAeN JO syTnsey peys1eq4eM TaATY sozerg Jo yIOT TeeTD ayy uO sayeT “TE "Gh «OT ORL --- Page 34 --- 00° 0O0T 21,” ge° tt g2°9 90°T €S°T €L° tt 60°L z9°9T 46°02 49° Ee “am &q {ue l0feg QS6T ‘QT Trady moray potaeg 949 Sutanp JeaTYy sozeig 244 Jo y4og IBOTO ey} WOTS peutezqg suoT_ZDeTTOD BuTAqeN TTB Jo syrTnsey Butmoyg 41e4O €g°2 09°2 00°S 00°T z 00°2 € 00°2T TOOT 2 19°2 iE 90°T € 61° OT S9°T ‘a °SzO °SqT “7M °SAy € G62 2 2 eT 4 6 gt ro € 8 of OT #€ St 02 T 64 €t 19 GC 666 °SzO *SQT “9M TeI0L Here Sern oL’9 L6°S 6T°9E gS°Cce eon Aq queo1eg "6G66T ‘ST Trady 09 "Ze g9c oT ET gt gt L6 06 “ON sTeq07, etddezo agtyumy STI TZenTg ystyuns user sseq Yynoues.2e7 ysTs3eo peoyQela SspesyTTng 4oeTd ystsyeo Toeuueyy) zeyonsdzeo TaATY oTeyyng YAnouTTeug peys plez2zty ie8 asousuoT setTosda *)t STOUBL --- Page 35 --- cO*t S9°% TO*h gg°e €G°€ She? Ge"? L6°T 99°2 49°e L9°t “BAY 00° O0T L6°4T 60° £0° gL°T T6°2 T6°€ LH°99 T9° Th° 92°83 45° eam £q quso.13g ‘ayBT uosuy PTO ‘ayeT A4TO UTTMe Man SoyeT AQTO UTTMe_ pTO ‘AuZTeQOH "6S6T “ST TI4dy 09 gS6T ‘“9T Ttady morz potieg ey4 SuTanp JeaTy sozerg ey4 Jo y1og 1eeT) ey. jo peyszeqgemM aqy UO SeYST HOLY Peupegqg suocTyZooTTOD BuTAQeN TTB Jo sytnsey Bupmoyg yaeyp ‘sTetTueg ‘Troumery, ‘ouettay soyeT) T9°T 00°€T 00°S qe"? 00°T 4 6E°E 00°OT «iT 06°2 OS*4T = 09°S T 22S °szO °SQT “9M °Say Zt 26 St LET €T G 9 9T ET 92 tT 9€ Tt 29 oT Ss €T € S 9b S °SszO °SdqT “9M T8907 (°eye8] UoSsuUy Malt "Ee 00*O0T 09° HE go* g0° SP Fa 60°T ge° HT GQ°Te 09°2 Li OL° Zo’€ "on Aq qusltag T6T‘T oth 26 €T OLT LLE TE 9S 9£ "ON STe{O 7, etddeio a4tuM ysfjuns 1ee3u0T,T ystjyuns reepey ysTsuns [TT FsenTg_ sseq YU .nomes.1eT SspeeyTing yoeTg Yst seo Teuuey) IauTys wepTor daeg aayonsdzeo TeaTy peys prezzty Setoedg “Oy eTaBL --- Page 36 --- S6°2 6L°2 19°€ gLrz2 9T°2 rhe LE’ C4°T 2S°2 Te°2 Te°T ° SAY 00° O0T ZS°* OT°9 Lo° 99° OT 61° L2°n 03° 2z HE° OL t TE ge rh QT "am Aq quso1eg 00°2T Sh°L 00°€ 06°2 € LL°S ‘ 00° OT oe*h =o 00°2 00°9,- iT To°6 =i Of °2 °$ZO °SQqT "9M ° Say “(TTTH moqueyg °44a pue teqBMgeeng seyxeT) Zt e6e g T qT LT € €T TE q = ST 8 at 69 T et €T qT eg 4S °SZ0 *SqT "4M T2907, He 00° OO0T GE° Jt’9 LT° qT 9S°T gre 89°8 6£°T T6°T 02°6 OT°S9 °on Aq queotag 9Ls LE OT OS TT £& GLE “ON QS6T ‘9T Ttady 03 aoTag JOATY SOZeIg oY} JO YIOg AVeTO sy Jo peysze7,eMm ayy UO sayeT WOLF PSUTeZQO SUCTZOSTTOD BuTg9eN TTB FO sqTnsey BSupaoyg gazeyO STR07 atddero yoeTg_ etddero aqgtumM STTTZenT¢ sseq [Ynomes.1e7T sseq eqTuM SpBeeqTing 4oeld ystyyeo Teuueyg IauTys uepToy dzreg iayonsdzeo IaAty peys prezzZty geToedg "64 2TABL --- Page 37 --- 66°€ 19° O° HL°€ 6T°E LT°E 64° T ay’? e°z L6°T 89°2 69°2 6S°2 G9°2 eh? ° SAY 00° OOT TS*TT 90° €0° THT £0° eL°e 92° c€°€ 0e°€S 2 TE” co°h 66°) 6r°S 9T°8 -am Aq qusoIeg ge°s 00° ET 00°S licens 00°S 00°T Z 00°2 € Lg°€ SS°OT T 06°2 0S° qT m er 90°T zo°S) iT €0°g ct 69°T °8ZO0 °SQT °aM ° SAY St 9Te*T T OWT €T G ¢ LT S 9 St 2 € 6 On A) OT S eT € r 6h 4 L6 eT 99 S$ 666 °SZO °SaT "aM TBIOT, 00° OOT 90°62 L0° 10° 69°9 10° TS°T 10° 90°2T €L°9z 4 qT” OT°T L0°S oL’6 9T°9 son £q quso.lag 6St T het ei ao ght 06£ TE gt qd. £ET 06 "ON °6G6T “ST THady 09 gG6T ‘QT Ttady morzy potseg ou} Buti poysieqzem S4y pue JoATY sozeag 944 JO HIOg BETO aud WOTT PSUTBIQO SUCTZOSTTOD BuTAIEN TTB FO syTnsey BuTMoyg gae4D sTeqQo7, etddezo e4tuM ystjyuns resS8uo0y ystjuns iTeepey STL FSen Tg ystjuns usary sseq YQnowmes1e7 Ystiqeo peey ela SpesuTTng HoeTE_ ystyyeo [Teuusy) JeUTYysS uspToy die oTeyma YAnouTTeug aoeyonsdieo TeATy peys pzezzty e383 asousuo'T setoedg "0S eTqeBL --- Page 38 --- 66° 6g°€ TO" t To" 4L°€ 6T°E€ Hor’ 9T°2 64° T eyes Qt°s GQ°T HS? 6g°2 On°Z gS°T €t° “BAY 00° OOT OT’ Ly’ OT GO° Zo° ST°T zo" TT’S 2Q° 0Z° 2°€ Qt’ Lt rhe QT°T Ge"e €6°TT TOo°g 16°9 "am £q quso.eg 00°2T gt °S 00°ET 00°S T9°2 00°S 65°9 3] LL°S = 00°2 € cert 06°6 zt th*Z T9°S c 90°T € 69°9 iT og°€ 69°9 «+t °SZ0 °SqT “4M °SAy TT St ET NN - mo UN Oo J OT €T °§ZO 60S‘T LST LT LL oL €S eth LT 6x OgT OzT 66 “sqt "9M TBQO], * potsed 00°00T OT’ 99°22 S0° GO° Te*h So° LS*T ah’ S0° 19°6 Z9°te T6°T 49° 6L° qe°9 96° te anh °on Aq gusoteg Sf0%%e TOK 96 AS 96T Ort 6£ €T ot L2T gos 06 "ON 784} 04 AoTIg pues 6G6T “ST Ttady 09 9G6T ‘QT Ttady moray potaeg ayy BuTang peysze em sqft pue JeaTy sozeig 049 jo yaog azeaTO eu4 WOT peutTezqO SUCTZOEeTTON BuTA,eN TT@e Jo sqtnsey ButMoyg yaeyH “Of sTBQO], atddezo yoetd atdderto aytum ystjuns reeZu0'T, Ystyuns 1eapay STL T3enTg ystjuns usec) sseq y{Znomesz2eT sseq 98 Tum UST Fpeo peoy ela speeyTTnq 4oeTa ystyyeo Teuueyp) Jaupys ueptoy daeg oTeggng YyNouyTTeug aeyonsdzes JaAty peys piezzty 1e8 esousuo'y satoedg "TS eTqQBL --- Page 39 --- o°e-S°L Zena q°grLel 1g-9°L €°g-E°L Ered eBuey yd 9g TEE 6TH S69 o€9 The 0952 98 soum ~OLOTH gt HE TE 6€ ae 9g ®N p 92 €TT QT ROT On THT oHT LLZ got 902 6LT 062 a18 By “UOgIg@D B89 -uoN €oge9 - sseupiey T838mM JO piteog sexey, Jo Asaqanog stsfkTeuy) *9S6T fof requaqdsag ysnorg, OS6T *T 189490990 WorZ ZOATY sozeag ey JO yIO4q BETO 344 uO SUOTZBIS Sno, tea 42 UueyHey, seTdmeg 19a4eM Jo stsflTeuy [Teotmeyy oT Z6T 092 Q&S €6€ 69S mdd SpTTOs peatos -STq L°2 we He wn ON Qs TT Th S°6 LE Bh 90T cot L9 TOT 96 L6T To ‘og ( °stecutsuq “LE 90T 60T qt SOT 6TT 9ET OOH Ag Ge 62 Tg ah OL BN a Let OT Qc ST Hz gt LE OH 9 QS Ld BD 9S-SS TT 1°22 = 49EAD preqqny GS=4S TT “642 Yoeortg pareqqny €G-2S ST +°2T quan aG-TS ot 9°OT quadsny TS~0S 9T 1°98 UFIITIN ° 4g TS=0S LT g°et quesn yy Sorg seg °2S eTqeyL --- Page 40 --- °Butads MoTeq peep arom USTI TTems fmdB ¢-€ 428 peyeutyse MOTT *A,99 107VeM fo eingeredme, fsetq -qnq se2 Sutyy.tme ATTeBOT -pezods Sutads Aq Tes morf uayeg eTdmeg “peqou asTT oTyenbe Jo souaptas 4usTTS fMOTI a4RNTZSa 074 eTqB -un fdoep ,C-2 BurtBezoae ‘qutod sty 98 .,0¢ ATeqem =Txoadde st uaptma fapts ueeryZsuMop uo Tood Su0T worry eTdues *Tood sy. UL Uses a7aKM UST ButAp fud3 ¢e-o2 928 pegemtase MOT] fmep yoor pTo mors meerysuMOp [ood 4s1T J motTeq uni 4yjJTaMs ‘MoT TBus mory ueyey eTdmec . syreusy eouBZonpu0g OOT ‘tg 06'S 009 *9T oT JToedg OTS‘T 002 LTH ‘og £8 ool 6S € OOH 0S9‘T TIT o9€ oT 069 ‘0g LEg - ¥/28N L oto *€ Sotg ~—s« BN *9aoqe ‘*— Wagt UT peqttosep mep pToO SAOCgB saeTTM €°O f4S9M pue ysBe Buptuunz eutt Agzedoud uosT.ze9 -uosTO UAT! uoTZoes1e4UT *ysoaI9 BTUIOIT qe Ayr19d01d “TBO jo yueg ut 009 ‘E uosTaeg uO Suptads ueptseqay °¢ ‘et ABAUSTH 4QTA uot Zounl gO 9sBo eTTm G *009 ABAYsTH ‘Ss °V ’d ofg‘T uo e8ptiq $y 9yeedQ BTUOJTTeO °Z *009 AemyStH “S “WV *a mwory meerysdn settm J°o ATeVeWT -xoidde ‘mep yoor yno-peysem pTo moteq ‘f42ad0.1d 0969 Meysusyoy UQ Yaeetn STUAOITTeEO °T a qutog jo qutog Buy tdueg UOT }B907T (°SteouTsuq 1043emM Jo paieog sexe], jo &s04.2n09) £quno0y seuor Jo spTety TTO BOOAY S44 UL Yyoorg BTUATOJTTTeQ uo saetTdmeg 199emM Jo sesfkT Buy TeoTMsO “CG aTqey °9€ --- Page 41 --- 39 Table 54. A Checklist of Fish Species Caught by Netting and Seining from the Clear Fork of the Brazos River from April 16, 1958 through April 15, 1959 and Prior to that Period. Scientific Name Common Name Lepisosteidae (Gar) Lepisosteus osseus longnose gar Clupeidae (Herrings ) Dorosoma cepedianum gizzard shad Catostomidae (Suckers and buffalofishes) Ictiobus bubalus smallmouth buffalo Carpiodes carpio river carpsucker Cyprinidae (Shiners and minnows) Cyprinus carpio carp Notemigonus crysoleucas golden shiner Notropis lutrensis redhorse shiner Notropis volucellus mimic shiner Notropis buchanani ghost shiner Pimephales vigilax parrot minnow Pimephales promelas fathead minnow Ameiuridae (Freshwater catfishes) Ictalurus punctatus channel catfish Ictalurus melas black bullhead Ictalurus natalis yellow bullhead Pylodictus olivaris flathead catfish Cyprinodontidae (Killifishes and topminnows) Fundulus notatus blackstripe topminnow Fundulus kansae plains killifish Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis Red River pupfish --- Page 42 --- ho. Table 54. (Continued) A Checklist of Fish Species Caught by Netting and Seining from the Clear Fork of the Brazos River from April 16, 1958 through April 15, 1959, and Prior to that Period. Scientific Name Common Name Poeciliidae (Mosquitofishes ) Gambusia affinis mosquitofish Serranidae (Basses) Rocecus chrysops white bass Centrarchidae (Black basses and sunfishes) Micropterus salmoides largemouth bass Lepomis cyanellus green sunfish Lepomis microlophus redear sunfish Lepomis macrochirus bluegill Lepomis humilis orangespotted sunfish Lepomis megalotis longear sunfish Pomoxis annularis white crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus black crappie Percidae (Perches and darters) Percina caprodes logperch --- Page 43 --- hi, “J > Pal ea Figure l. Intermittent stream area of the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in Western Fisher County. Figure e. Pool on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in hastern Fisher County. --- Page 44 --- e eahs ; \ - apt x y” 6, 49) a 37) @ go Pp \ 7 Se \ ee A(20 a * Xe : it 5 ea @ \ : 10) . i a \ ‘ ¥ 4 Je < \ ae A 16 ; bs Ia 4 Sa G >& Poe as : x 14 ; / a sy \ “ <= 5 A FRI: | ; r a4 a »” Map Numbers 4 * 2 Zw ay * ‘. ® \ % ee ve : oo Correspond With é| Vv ned he a : of \. Table Numbers a ne \ wb wD yi. Lt\« \J« 1,2,3 ete= SEINING \¢ ; a ae = Ps . . Xo uf = . ‘To ‘ye? Cr \ | = C. 8 9 M l | e Ss ‘ ¥ --- Page 45 --- he. Figure 3. Semi-permanent Water of the Clear Fork of the Brazos River near Nugent, Texas, in Jones County. Figure 4. Semi-permanent Water of the Clear Fork of the Brazos River at Highway 180 Crossing in Eastern Jones County. --- Page 46 --- Figure 5. Patches of Bulrushes Along the Banks of the Brazos River above the Leuders Dam in Eastern Jones County. Figure 6, The Leuders Dam on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River near Leuders, Texas, in Eastern Jones County.

Detected Entities

Nolan County 0.950 p.22 ...ed Type of Collection: Seining Location: Lake Trammell in Nolan County Dates June and August Weather: Hot Percent Sp…
Shackelford County 0.950 p.20 ...ation: Farm Road Crossing on Salt Prong of Hubbard Creek in Shackelford County Dates: October 29, 1958 Weather: Cool…
Stephens County 0.950 p.5 ...(see Table 53); on the Clear Fork itself, in north-eastern Stephens County; and in the Old Hamlin City Lake, Three n…
Clear Fork of the Brazos River 0.900 p.1 Basic Survey and Inventory of Species, as Well as Their Distribution in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River
Fisher County 0.900 p.4 As the stream progresses through Fisher and Jones Counties
Jones County 0.900 p.4 As the stream progresses through Fisher and Jones Counties
Region 3-B 0.900 p.3 Project No. F-5-R-6 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region 3-B
Scurvy County 0.900 p.4 The Clear Fork of the Brazos River arises in the south-eastern part of Scurry County
Brazos River 0.850 p.1 ...ies, as Well as Their Distribution in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in Region 3-B, Texas by James F. Wilcox Ass…
California Creek 0.850 p.5 concentrations apparently lie on California Creek, in Jones County (see Table 53); on the Clear Fork itself,...
Clear Fork 0.850 p.1 ...Inventory of Species, as Well as Their Distribution in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in Region 3-B, Texas by Ja…
Clear Fork of Brazos River 0.850 p.9 Table l. Clear Fork of Brazos River Type of Collection: Seining Location: Springs on A. R. Wi...
Elm Creek 0.850 p.20 ...ype of Collection: Seining Location: Farm Road Crossing of Elm Creek - South of Nugent in Jones County Date: July 24…
Mulberry Creek 0.850 p.19 ...Collection: Seining Location: Highway 277, 83 Crossing on Mulberry Creek Southeast of Anson in Jones County Date: Ju…
Red River 0.850 p.7 ...her locality. (See Table 26). Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis (Red River pupfish). This species appears to be the domina…
Salt Prong of Hubbard Creek 0.850 p.20 ...ype of Collection: Seining Location: Farm Road Crossing on Salt Prong of Hubbard Creek in Shackelford County Dates: …
Tributary 0.850 p.6 ...n of this species was collected. This fish was taken from a tributary of the Clear Fork during a muddy run off of ra…
Brazos County 0.800 p.1 ...ies, as Well as Their Distribution in the Clear Fork of the Brazos River in Region 3-B, Texas by James F. Wilcox Ass…
Limestone County 0.800 p.4 ..., The stream bed in this area is generally packed sand with limestone projections and the banks of the river are lin…
Scurry County 0.800 p.4 ...ork of the Brazos River arises in the south-eastern part of Scurry ‘Sounty from a series of small springs. As the st…
Throckmorton County 0.800 p.4 ...he Clear Fork Watershed is chiefly composed of Shackelfori, Throckmorton and Stephens Counties. The undulating surfa…

organization (3)

Dingell-Johnson Project F-5-R-6 0.900 p.1 Dingell-Johnson Project F-5-R-6, Job B-16
Texas Board of Water Engineers 0.900 p.4 water quality records were available on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River through the Texas Board of Water Engineers
Texas Game and Fish Commission 0.900 p.1 Texas Game and Fish Commission Austin, Texas

person (5)

H. D. Dodgen 0.900 p.1 H. D. Dodgen - Executive Secretary
James F. Wilcox 0.900 p.1 by James F. Wilcox Assistant Project Leader
Kenneth C. Jurgens 0.900 p.1 Kenneth C. Jurgens & William H. Brown Assistant Coordinators
Marion Toole 0.900 p.1 Marion Toole Coordinator
William H. Brown 0.900 p.1 Kenneth C. Jurgens & William H. Brown Assistant Coordinators
Carpiodes carpio 0.950 p.6 Carpiodes carpio (river carpsucker). These fish were taken both by net and s...
Notropis buchanani 0.950 p.6 ...as taken from the upper part of the river. (See Table 12). Notropis buchanani (ghost shiner). Only one specimen of t…
Notropis volucellus 0.950 p.6 ...intermittent streams of the upper part of the Clear Fork. Notropis volucellus (mimic shiner). Only one individual of…
Pimephales promelas 0.950 p.6 ...igger waters of the middle and lower reaches of the river. Pimephales promelas {fathead minnow). This species is fai…
Pimephales vigilax 0.950 p.6 ...ork during a muddy run off of rain waters. (See Table 22). Pimephales vigilax (parrot minnow). All of the small samp…
Ameiuridae 0.900 p.6 Ameiuridae (Freshwater catfishes)
Catostomidae 0.900 p.5 Catostomidae (Suckers and buffalofishes)
Centrarchidae 0.900 p.7 Centrarchidae (Black basses and sunfishes)
Ceratophyllum 0.900 p.4 and coontail (Ceratophyllum)
Chara 0.900 p.4 The bulk of the aquatic vegetation appears to be muskgrass (Chara)
Clupeidae 0.900 p.5 Clupeidae (Herrings)
Cyprinidae 0.900 p.6 Cyprinidae (Shiners and minnows)
Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis 0.900 p.7 Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis (Red River pupfish)
Cyprinodontidae 0.900 p.7 Cyprinodontidae (Killifishes and topminnows)
Cyprinus carpio 0.900 p.6 Cyprinus carpio (carp)
Dorosoma cepedianum 0.900 p.3 gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum) dominated the netting
Fundulus kansae 0.900 p.7 Fundulus kansae (plains killifish)
Fundulus notatus 0.900 p.7 Fundulus notatus (blackstripe topminnow)
Gambusia affinis 0.900 p.7 Gambusia affinis (mosquitofish)
Ictalurus punctatus 0.900 p.3 Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) were found to be the most prevalent of the larger game species
Ictiobus bubalus 0.900 p.5 Ictiobus bubalus (smallmouth buffalo)
Lepisosteidae 0.900 p.5 Lepisosteidae (Gars)
Lepisosteus osseus 0.900 p.5 Lepisosteus osseus (longnose gar)
Lepomis cyanellus 0.900 p.7 Lepomis cyanellus (green sunfish)
Lepomis humilis 0.900 p.8 Lepomis humilis (orangespotted sunfish)
Lepomis macrochirus 0.900 p.7 Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill)
Lepomis megalotis 0.900 p.8 Lepomis megalotis (longear sunfish)
Lepomis microlophus 0.900 p.7 Lepomis microlophus (redear sunfish)
Micropterus salmoides 0.900 p.7 Micropterus salmoides (largemouth bass)
Notemigonus crysoleucas 0.900 p.6 Notemigonus crysoleucas (golden shiner)
Notropis lutrensis 0.900 p.3 Redhorse shiners (Notropis lutrensis) dominated the seining sample
Percidae 0.900 p.8 Percidae (Perches and darters)
Percina caprodes 0.900 p.8 Percina caprodes (logperch)
Poeciliidae 0.900 p.7 Poeciliidae (Mosquitofishes)
Pomoxis annularis 0.900 p.8 Pomoxis annularis (white crappie)
Pomoxis nigromaculatus 0.900 p.8 Pomoxis nigromaculatus (black crappie)
Pylodictus olivaris 0.900 p.7 Pylodictus olivaris (flathead catfish)
Roccus chrysops 0.900 p.7 Roccus chrysops (white bass)
Scirpus 0.900 p.4 Small patches of bulrushes (Scirpus ) and various forms of algae were the only aquatics noted
Serranidae 0.900 p.7 Serranidae (Basses)
Black Bullhead 0.850 p.6 ...y stocked from the state fish hatcheries. Ictalurus melas (black bullhead). This species was taken by net and seine …
Black Crappie 0.850 p.8 ...d many indi- viduals were stunted. Pomoxis nigromaculatus (black crappie). Two specimens of this species were taken …
Blackstripe Topminnow 0.850 p.7 ...inodontidae (Killifishes and topminnows) Fundulus notatus (blackstripe topminnow). The only locality in which this t…
Channel Catfish 0.850 p.3 ...e gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum) dominated the netting. Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) were found to be t…
Fathead Minnow 0.850 p.6 ...iddle and lower reaches of the river. Pimephales promelas {fathead minnow). This species is fairly abundant but seem…
Flathead Catfish 0.850 p.6 ...dant in some of the smaller lakes, which apparently have no flathead catfish, than in any other waters. Ictalurus na…
Ghost Shiner 0.850 p.6 ...per part of the river. (See Table 12). Notropis buchanani (ghost shiner). Only one specimen of this species was coll…
Gizzard Shad 0.850 p.3 ...ers (Notropis lutrensis) dominated the seining sample while gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum) dominated the netting…
Golden Shiner 0.850 p.6 ...willingness to fight when caught. Notemigonus crysoleucas (golden shiner). Although this species was taken by net an…
Green Sunfish 0.850 p.7 ...f the lakes than they are in the river. Lepomis cyanellus (green sunfish). This sunfish is common throughout the wat…
Largemouth Bass 0.850 p.7 ...chidae (Black basses and sunfishes) Micropterus salmoides (largemouth bass). The evasive nature of these fish makes …
Longear Sunfish 0.850 p.8 ...b-dominant to the other native sunfish. Lepomis megalotis (longear sunfish). These fish, along with bluegills, are t…
Longnose Gar 0.850 p.5 ...ted Species List Lepisosteidae (Gars) Lepisosteus osseus (longnose gar). This species is probably the dominant one i…
Mimic Shiner 0.850 p.6 ...of the upper part of the Clear Fork. Notropis volucellus (mimic shiner). Only one individual of this species was col…
Orangespotted Sunfish 0.850 p.8 Lepomis humilis (orangespotted sunfish). Under ideal conditions, these sunfish do not attain a ver...
Plains Killifish 0.850 p.7 ...e lower part of the river (See Table 2h). Fundulus kansae (plains killifish). This species was collected from a lake…
Red River Pupfish 0.850 p.7 ...her locality. (See Table 26). Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis (Red River pupfish). This species appears to be the domina…
Redear Sunfish 0.850 p.7 ...ere fully grown, sexually ripe, fish. Lepomis microlophus (redear sunfish). This is one sunfish that generally attai…
River Carpsucker 0.850 p.6 Carpiodes carpio (river carpsucker). These fish were taken both by net and seine. The presence...
Smallmouth Buffalo 0.850 p.5 ...Catostomidae (Suckers and buffalofishes) Ictiobus bubalus (smallmouth buffalo). Most netting stations in the river y…
White Bass 0.850 p.7 ...of eating mosquitos. Serranidae (Basses) Roccus chrysops (white bass) - This species is not indigenous to the Clear …
White Crappie 0.850 p.8 ...es of sunfish, were nearly all stunted. Pomoxis annularis (white crappie). Practically all the bigger waters of the …
Yellow Bullhead 0.850 p.6 ...head catfish, than in any other waters. Ictalurus natalis (yellow bullhead). This species was obtained only by seini…