TPWD 1961 F-4-R-8 #656: Job Completion Report: Evaluation of Rough Fish and Vegetation Control Work in Region 2-A, Project F-4-R-8

--- Page 1 --- JOB COMPLETION REPORT As required by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT TEXAS Federal Aid Project No. F-4-R-8 FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS OF THE WATERS OF REGION 2-A Job No. E-8 Evaluation of Rough Fish and Vegetation Control Work in Region 2-A Project Leader: Leonard D. Lamb H. D. Dodgen Executive Secretary Texas Game and Fish Commission Marion Toole . Eugene A. Walker D-J Coordinator Director, Program Planning March 28, 1962 --- Page 3 --- ABSTRACT Cleburne State Park Lake is located 12 miles southwest of Cleburne, Johnson County, Texas. It was completed in 1937 by the Civilian Conservation Corps and covers 116 acres to a maximum depth of 36 feet. A preliminary net check indicated a need for investigation with shad control as a possibility. A female gizzard shad weighing 5 pounds 9 ounces was taken during this netting. A netting program was started in November 1960 which revealed that threadfin shad composed 60.53 per cent of the net catch. A chemical control for this Species was attempted in November 1961. The creel census that was run for one year prior to the shad control work revealed that the 5,080 fishermen fished 21,341.08 hours to catch 11,236 fish weighing 5,142.06 pounds. The catch per man-hour was 0.52 fish weighing 0.24 pounds. The length of the average fisherman day was 4.20 hours and the majority of the fishermen came from less than 50 miles away. In order that the results of this work may be evaluated, it has been decided to use the unit system where one hour of fishing equals one unit and one pound of fish equals oneunit. Therefore, the unit value of the fishing in Cleburne State Park Lake equals 26,483.14 units. This figure will be compared with a similar value derived from the results of a creel census that will be run for one year following the treatment to determine the value of the treatment in terms of cost per increase in fishing units. --- Page 4 --- JOB COMPLETION REPORT State of Texas Project No. _F-4-R-8 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region 2-A Job No. E-8 Title: Evaluation of Rough Fish and Vegetation Control Work in Region 2-A Period Covered: November 1, 1960-October 31, 1961 Objectives: To evaluate presently used fishery management techniques including selective fish control and aquatic vegetation control, by determining the increase in fish- ing units (one pound of fish equals one unit and one hour of fishing equals one unit) and the cost per unit increase. Techniques Used: A basic survey and inventory of fish species was conducted on Cleburne State Park Lake to determine the physical characteristics of the lake and its watershed. Fish collections were made to determine the species present, their physical condition and relative abundance. All fish captured were identified, weighed, measured and examined to determine sexual maturity, food habits and coefficient of condition. A creel census was conducted on two successive days of each week. One day was a week day and other a weekend day or holiday. The data collected was kept separate to determine the week day fishing pressure and success as compared with that on weekends or holidays. The items to be considered in this creel census are: Fish- ing pressure, fishing methods, rate of catch, length of fishérman day, source of fishing pressure and total fish harvest. Findings: Cleburne State Park Lake was constructed by the Civilian Conservation Corps and was completed in 1937. This 116 acre lake is located in a hilly cedar covered area 12 miles southwest of Cleburne, Johnson County, Texas. The shoreline is rather irregular and there is no cultivated land in the watershed. The water is very clear and affords a maximum depth of 36 feet with an average depth of 13.29 feet. The prelimary net check which indicated a need for management produced a female gizzard shad that measured 20.5 inches in total length and weighed 5 pounds 9 ounces, (Figure No. 1). This is believed to be a world record as the largest specimen of this species previously recorded weighed 3 pounds 7 ounces and was reported from the Ohio River drainage. Schools of small shad were observed and their numbers indicated an investigation should be made to determine their relative abundance. --- Page 5 --- =e Netting A netting program was begun in November 1960 and continted throughout the year. The results of this netting showed that the gizzard shad was not the problem species but did reveal an excessive population of threadfin shad. The results of this survey are shown in table 1. The small size of the threadfin shad allowed them to avoid capture as long as the 14 inch nets were used, but the introduction of one inch mesh nets resulted in the capture of many of this species. The dominance of threadfin shad is quite apparent in table 1 where this species provides 60.53 per cent of the total number and despite their small size provide 28.68 per cent of the total weight. This overabundance led to the recommendation that a chemical control of shad be attempted in November 1961. Creel Census The creel census revealed that there was little fishing during December, January and February. Adverse weather conditions tended to _discourage use of the lake during the winter but fishing became more popular with the advent of warmer weather, An examination of the data in table 2 reveals that bluegill sunfish are the most frequently caught species followed by redear sunfish and largemouth bass. White crappie were not a factor in the catch until October when they became the dominant species. A total of 2,236 fish were caught by the fishermen checked during this creel census. Table 3 presents the data concerning the weight of the fish taken by the fishermen checked during this creel census. Largemouth bass provided the greatest number of pounds of any species taken, 433.52, followed by bluegill sunfish and redear sunfish with 226.04 and 187.99 pounds respectively. A total of 1,023.27 pounds of fish were taken by the 1,011 fishermen interviewed. The data collected on week days was separated from that collected on week- end days or holidays in order that any variations due to the day of the week could be taken into consideration. These data are presented in table 4 and indicate little difference except for heavier fishing pressure on weekends. The weekend fishermen provided 74.38 per cent of the total fishermen checked, fished 74.45 per cent of total hours, and took 75.59 per cent of the total fish caught. The catch per man-hour was slightly higher but the pounds per man-hour was Slightly less for the weekend fisherman. A great majority of the fishermen fished from boats, but the number who used this method on weekends remained rather constant when compared with other weekend figures. The bank fishermen showed a rise in the percentage who fished on week days which was the reverse of the situation among trollers where week- end fishermen accounted for 89.55 per cent of those using this method. Still fishing was the most popular method of fishing and trotlining was the least favored. The total number of fishermen using this lake is a matter of record as fish- ermen are required to obtain a permit before beginning to fish. A total of 5,080 permits were issued between November 1, 1960 and October 31, 1961. Therefore, the 1,011 fishermen contacted represent 19.9 per cent of this number. The data obtained from this creel census has been expanded to give the total fishing pres- sure and fishing success by use of this known percentage. The 5,080 fishermen --- Page 6 --- =3s fished 21,341.08 hours to catch 11,236 fish weighing 5,142.06 pounds. This breaks down into 0.52 fish weighing 0.24 pounds per man-hour of fishing, (table 5). An average fisherman-day was 4.12 hours on week days with 4.20 on weekends for a total of 4.20 hours for the overall average. The source of the fishing pressure was found to be local, with the majority of the fishermen living within a 50 mile radius of the lake. There were very few that came more than 100 miles to fish. A small number were tourists who fished a short time in passing, but the majority were from the immediate vicinity and a great number were repeaters who fished from one to three times per week during favorable weather. This latter group provided the majority of the fish that were caught. The system of evaluation that is being used is to have one pound of fish equal one unit and one man-hour of fishing equal one unit. By this system the unit value of the fishing in Cleburne State Park Lake from November 1, 1960 to October 31, 1961 was 26,483.14 units. This unit value is to be compared with that obtained by a similar creel census.to be made following the shad control work which will help determine the effectiveness of such treatment. omy Prepared by Leonard D. Lamb Approved by Project Leader ootdinator Date ___March 28, 1962 Regional Supervisor --- Page 7 --- “Ppdooed PTAoM & 9q OF peASTTeq SPT 4I *sSaouno sutu ‘fspunod Gg peystem pues JUOT SeyoUT G*Og sem foHBT Yaeg 04849 eUUINgeTO wooly ueyeq *peys Ppuezzts stu, “°T esan3sty --- Page 8 --- Ley 8L°ST 00°00T T7°L92@ 00° 00T 770% T sT BIOL Nl 18°Z S0° eI" SLI ELZ QT'T 60°E 6L° 8 atddea> yortd zo°z €0° 90° 0zz 061 €L° 76°T 6£° v7] atdder> 33 TUM Tey 70° €S° se 901 So°l z8°Z ZZ°E €€ ystyuns 1veu07 06° 6%" £S°% L8 v1 BE°IT e7° OF €7° ST 8ST ystjuns [TT3enTgq BE°e 6€° zy 721 ZS 91°6 OS *7Z 69°8 68 ystjuns 1vepey Bore zO° 80° cel 6471 9S° 97°T 67° ¢ ystjuns use19 IL*€ 61° cc” eST €ST 8e°7 97° IT cere ve yznowreM 02° 97° yy7° 6947 Sz Z8°OT £6°8Z EL°?% Bz sseq YInowesie7 9T°S i Ov" Loe S07@ 82°47 €v° 11 47°T GZ peeyt Inq moTTex O£°? 10° Z0° Sve 022 61° €s° (o) ie T peeyTiIng yoeTg O7°T 10° 90° 89 9LT ec" 6S° 6€° 7] ustyqeo JTouueuy LE°% 06° Gl CE9E oes S6°0% ZO°9S 69° L daeg 08°2 80° £0" OzTT O9€ C8°T €6°7 61° c azeyons pejjodg 78°C LT° 40° SE9l 14] 40° 08 °OT OE° € deyonsdivo 19ATY 10°? €2°T £6°6 9S OvT 89°88 OL°9OL €S°09 029 peys UTFpPeryL €0°% 20” 70° GL ES L9° 18°T oc’ € peys prezzt9 ad PloAy qeN jo JeN FO (°sw3) (wt) YySTtoM (°sqT) TBqIOL “ON wn 392% OOT 3227 OOT qWysTEM ya suey yo qystom jo T BIOL leq *sqy log *ON asel0Ay a3e12Ay queg teg TeIOL queg 190g “T96T “Te 2090390 - 0961 “1 AOqWOAON “SYST Yreq o7eIG SUINGeTD WOTF SUOTIOETTIOD JON TITD JO SIINSOY SUL “T “ON STQPL --- Page 9 --- 9Ez°S 9ST Zot 622% £”7S 86 eee Lyz 7 T 8 LE ST PIO], TTT 6¢T O1T ZL 71 ¢ € 6 8 T z atddeag (oA T T 6 T Ot ystjyuns 1ee3u07 726 Le LY 09 ETE GO? ZLT 88 I Zz ystjuns [1 TSen Tg £9¢ 6T SE 8¢ ect STIt 68 16 ystyuns 1eepey val z el ystjuns use19 T& T L T val 9 Zz yynowsreM 9S c8 TL 06 ce 9€ 647 Ty €T 8 €€ sseq Yjnowesie7 9” A cA 82 8 7] a YstTy3eo peRoUTIng 6T S € z 8 T Ystyqeo Touuvyy cA 4 dieg TTT II STBIOL °220 *4dag °3ny Atnge eunr Key *ady yoiey *qeg cur *20q “AON SaI0gdS T96T “TE 19q93990 ysnozy43 0961 ‘T Jequaaoy ‘snsuag Jea0I19 aya Sutang peyxosyg uswzeystg ey hq oye A1e_ 91eIS ouANqeT[D worz usye_ satoedg yory jo z9equnyn °zZ eTqRyZ --- Page 10 --- LZ°€ZO‘T 8E°7eT 67° TOT eT 671 16°68T O8°9ST ZL°S2T LL°Cttl TE*9S Cor T 62° 9T me 02°77 ST PIOL so*cs 8S°0S LE“T 26'S S7°T ES°ST = 2° T Y1'T atddezg 00°S 60° 60° 78°C OTT LO’ Gore ystjuns 1ee3u07 70°9CS 78°6 66°OT 9S°TT BS°9oL WLS? Of ° 17 SZ° 6S He 07° ystjuns [1 T3enTgq 66°L8T cS ° 2 Ly7'8 LL°4T 9°97 TE *67 7L° 87S GG°SE ystTjuns i1vepey 87°S 89° 08°? ystyuns uaeis €9° 71 62° $o°?% OT’ f6°S £6°S €L° yqnowzeM eS ECY 68°SS L9°SL f6° TTT S6°S?¢ SE°Ov €6° 17 ST°?CE 1L°6 62°9T 99°C? sseq YINowss1e] S7°LS 66° HLS G8°CEe 08°8 €0°9 70°C sprouting IT°¢T B7°E €e°t Oe °T Oc°S of* ystyzeo TeuueyO oo*T 00*T coreg TeqOL *220 *qdeg -Sny Aqnge euner Ary -ady *1eW *qogq *uer *20q *AON Sa1owqds “1961 STE 29qG0390 Y8nNo0zyI O9GT ‘1 JequieAocN ‘snsue) [9019 oy] BuTING peydeyD uowrsYysT_ oyq Aq oye] yregG 27"Ig SUANGeTD Worg usye] setoodg yorg jo ‘spunog ut ‘3YysTeM “E eTQrL --- Page 11 --- 00°92 00°29 00°66T 00°61L 00°9ZT 00°S88 72°0 00°€Z0‘T zS°0O 00°9E7‘Z 00° TZ‘ 4 00° TTO‘T STeIO] LOo°eL 00°61 $S°68 00°09 L8°HL 00° 647T L8°¢Ll 00°72S 86°79 00°18 T8°cs 00*TL9 €2°O 87° EL L£8°TSL €S°0O 68°SL 00°669*T S97 HL 00°Z9OT‘E BE HL 00° ¢SL queg Teg requiny SAV CNUATEM ee “1961 ‘TE 19qG0390-0961 ‘1 tTequeaoy “O96T 943 UO peseq ‘soe8equs0zed Jo suzeq ut €6°97 00°L S7°OT 00°L EL°SZ 00°0S ET*LZ 00°S6T ZL°SE 00°S% 61°72 00°12 SZ°0 75°97 00° TLZ 67°O 20°72 00°LES GS°SZ 00°S80‘T Z9°SZ 00°6SZ que) tog aaquny SAV HAM sututy 4013 SUTT1TOI3 Sutjseo Sutystjz T1138 BuTysTy yueq SuTysty 3voq anoy - 348ned suosied suosiod suosiod suosiod suosiod suosiod ueu sod YsTg Jo Jequny arequny Jequny Jequny iequny Jequny spunog spunog Inoy-uew sed ystg aysneo ysTy Jo azsquny peysty sanoy [eo] peyoeyo uswisysTz [eIOT ‘oye] Ae_q e3eIg eUANGeTD ‘snsudD T9815 TO6I ‘Surtysty skep pueyoom pue skep yeaem Jo uostieduos y "y STqRL --- Page 12 --- Tn nnn ae adytdyttytdEISE SSI NSIssSSSEnSSSAnSSSSS nn *paooez yaed wory usye} SEP TeN}IOe ST UsUTeYsTJ Jo Jequnu [e}0} oy, *eyxPT ey} B3utsN uswzeysTy Jo Jequnu Jej}02 ey} Jo ques Jed 6°61 pequeseidez snsused T9019 ey} BSuTAnp peyooeyo uswrSeYysTF UL x i 00°ZET 00°92 00°61 00°L SUTUTTIOI4 suosied *oN 00°SEE 00°L9 00°09 00°L SUT[[O1} suosied ‘on 00° 100‘ T 00°66T 00°67T 00°0S Butjseo suosized ‘oy 00*Z19‘E 00°6TL 00° 72S 00°S6T ZuTUSTJ I1TIS suoszed ‘on 00°€C€9 00°9ZT 00°18 00°S? SuTYsty yUueq suoszed *oN 00° L477 ° 7 00°S88 00° TL9 00°72 Sutysty yeoq suosied ‘oN 72°O 72°O €c°0O GZ°O anoy-ueuw zed spunog 90°771‘°S LZ°€ZO‘T L8° ISL Ov TLZ ay8neo ysty JO spunog cS °O zS°O €S°0 67°0 anoy-uew zod ystg 00*9EZ* TT 00°9E7‘Z 00°669‘T 00° LES qysneo ysTzZ Jo requny Oc * yA, O27” 61° sXep ueui9ysTy ut sanoy 80° T7ES TZ 00°L7e ‘4 00°Z9T‘E 00°S80‘T peystF sanoy 00°080‘S 0O*TTOST 00° CSL 00°6SZ2 UswTeYysTy TeIOL ¥STPIO} pe eTNoTeg STeIOL sXKep-pusyoom skep-yoom SNSNAO ‘THHYO WOUA VIVE TVNLOV ee “T9961 “TE 19qG0399 -0961 ‘1 aequoAoN ‘oye YAP™ O7BIS eUANGeTD ‘sNsUeD 19219 1961-0961 24} UO peseq sj[NseYy SuTYSTgA peqeTNo Te) YIM r9sy}zESoO]Z sqtnsey Sutystg skeq pueyoom pue skeq Yyoom jo uostieduop y “GS eTqPL