TPWD 1965 F-6-R-12 #957: Job Completion Report: Basic Survey and Inventory of Fish Species Present in the Lower Nueces River, Project No. F-6-R-12, Job No. B-23

--- Page 1 --- JOB COMPLETION REPORT As required by FEDERAL AID IN FISHERIES RESTORATION ACT Federal Aid Project No. F-6-R-12 FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS AND SURVEYS OF THE WATERS OF REGION 5-B Job No. B-23 Basic Survey and Inventory of Fish Species Present in the Lower Nueces River Project Leader: Charles T. Menn J. Weldon Watson Executive Director Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Marion Toole Eugene A. Walker D-J Coordinator Assistant Director for Wildlife @ January 21, 1965 --- Page 2 --- ABSTRACT The basic survey of the Lower Nueces River from Wesley Seale Dam to Nueces Bay revealed that channel and blue catfish, largemouth bass and white and black crappie are the principal game fish species. Rough fish species including alligator, spotted and longnose gars, gizzard shad, smallmouth buffalo, striped mullet, bluegill, freshwater drum, Rio Grande perch and lined sole dominated the netting collections both in numbers and in weight with 88.43 per cent of the total number and 97.04 per cent of the weight. No developmental or management work is presently proposed or recommended. --- Page 3 --- JOB COMPLETION REPORT State of Texas Project No. _F-6-R-12 Name: Fisheries Investigations and Surveys of the Waters of Region 5-B Job No. B-23 Title: Basic Survey and Inventory of Fish Present in the Lower Nueces River Period Covered: January 1, 1964 through December 31, 1964 Objectives: To determine the physical, chemical and ecological conditions and the relative numbers of fish species present in the lower portions of the Nueces River lying within San Patricio, Jim Wells and Nueces Counties. Procedures: Field trips were made during the months of February, May, August and November. On each trip, nine netting collections and 10 seining collections were made. Standard, 125-foot long, gill nets were set overnight at established netting stations. Each fish was weighed in grams and measured in millimeters. Internal examinations were made to determine sex, stage of sexual development and incidence of parasitism. Specimens taken in seining collections were preserved in 10 per cent formaldehyde in the field and taken to the Mathis field office for identifi- cation and tabulation. Water analyses were made on each field trip. Notes were made on pollution, aquatic vegetation and topographical data. Maps prepared by the Texas Highway Department were used to pinpoint netting, seining and water analyses stations. A list of the fish species taken in nets and seines is included in Table 1. The scientific and common names used in this table were taken from Hubbs' --- Page 4 --- Table 1. A list of fish species recorded from Lower Nueces River ___Common Name Alligator gar Spotted gar Longnose gar Ladyfish Finescale menhaden Gizzard shad Striped anchovy Mexican tetra Smallmouth buffalo Pugnose minnow Red shiner Bullhead minnow Channel catfish Blue catfish Tadpole madtom Gulf killifish Sheepshead minnow Mosquitofish Sailfin molly Amazon molly Striped mullet Tidewater silverside White bass Largemouth bass Warmouth Bluegill White crappie Black crappie Fountain darter Leatherjacket Freshwater drum Pinfish Rio Grande perch Naked goby Lined sole _ Scientific Name Lepisosteus spatula Lacépede L. oculatus (Winchell) L. osseus (Linnaeus) Elops saurus Linnaeus Brevoortia gunteri Hildebrand Dorosoma cepedianum (LeSueur) Anchoa hepsetus (Linnaeus) Astyanax mexicanus (Filippi) Ictiobus bubalus (Rafinesque) Opsopoeodus emiliae Hay Notropis lutrensis (Baird and Girard) Pimephales vigilax (Baird and Girard) Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque) I. furcatus (LeSueur) Satan gyrinus (Mitchill) Fundulus grandis Baird and Girard Cyprinodon variegatus Lacépéde Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard) Mollienesia latipinna LeSueur M. formosa (Girard) Mugil cephalus Linnaeus Menidia beryllina (Cope) Roccus chrysops (Rafinesque) Micropterus salmoides (Lacépéde) Chaenobryttus gulosus (Cuvier) Lepomis machrochirus Rafinesque rome annularis Rafinesque » nigromaculatus (LeSueur) Galen fonticola (Jordan and Gilbert) Oligoplites saurus (Bloch and Schneider) Aplodinotus grunniens Rafinesque Lagodon rhomboides (Linnaeus) Cichlasoma cyanogu cyanoguttatum (Baird and Girard) Gobiosoma bosci Lacépéde Achirus lineatus (Linnaeus) --- Page 5 --- Findings: Physical Description That portion of the Nueces River from Wesley Seale Dam, at Lake Corpus Christi, to Nueces Bay on the Texas coast was intensively surveyed during this segment (see map). This section of the river, which is approximately 38 miles in length, flows in a southeasterly direction to Nueces Bay. The average depth varies from approximately 4 to 10 feet, while the average width ranges from about 40 feet below the dam to about 200 feet in the lower reaches of the river. The river banks are sharply cut, indicating flooding in the past. Willows, ash, hackberry, live oak, mesquite, retama, and huisache trees are numerous along the river. Netting Collections Nine netting stations were set up during this survey. They represented the different types of habitat present. An overnight set was made at each station during February, May, August and November. The nets were run the following morning, and data for each fish were recorded. A total of 511 fish of 17 species weighing 963 pounds was taken in the netting collections. Game fish species included channel and blue catfish, white bass, largemouth bass, white and black crappie. Collectively, the game fish comprised 11.57 per cent of the netted specimens and 2.96 per cent of their weight. Tables 2 and 3 show the results of netting by station. A single specimen of white bass was taken below the dam. It apparently came from the lake where they are found in limited numbers. White and black crappie were found in the river, mostly in the lower reaches. Rough fish species including alligator, spotted and longnose gars, gizzard shad, smallmouth buffalo, striped mullet, bluegill, freshwater drum, Rio Grande perch and lined sole dominated the netting collections both in numbers and in weights with 88.43 per cent of the total number and 97.04 per cent of the total weight. Gars of one species or another were taken at all stations and were evenly distributed in the river. Collectively, the three species of gars made up 36.79 per cent of the netting collections by number. Upon examination of their stomachs, shad, silversides, unidentifiable fish remains, grasshoppers, crayfish, and unidentifiable insect remains were found. Visceral round worms were found in several gars. Though gizzard shad were taken at each station, they were more numerous at the lower stations. In the case of smallmouth buffalo, the reverse was true. Table 4 shows the length-weight statistics for fish taken in netting collections. The "K" factors of all fish were considered normal for fish of this area. --- Page 6 --- USTJ owes SOReOTPUT yx €7°88 YUSTa YsSnoy Jue Jeg LS°TT Yystq eweg Jue 19g 00°OOT OTS T? 6€ c9 VE Ov 89 94 TPIOL aTOS pouty yorod apueiry Oly wnip ra eMyserg yotddezs yoelTg gotddezs aatyM TT FSentg xSseq Ujnouesie7 xSSebq SITU JeTTNu pedtz34¢ xe4STFIEO ONT ‘g4STy Jeo Teuueyp oTeysnq YINowyT Tes peus przezzty ystyApety ze3 asousuo 7] ze3 poejqods ze3 2702e3TTIV aquny Teo] Jo queg 190g | G suot}eqs 4961 ‘AOAAINS OTSeg ABATY SodenN JeMoT ‘suotT}eq3s Aq ‘useye YSTF Jo JoqunN °Z eTqPL, --- Page 7 --- pepzlods9r JUSWeANSPOW JUSTOM OU SOJPEOTPUT xx YSTy ewes soJeOTpUT x a 70° L6 usta ysnoy jJUeD 19g 96°C usTg owey queg 19g 00°00T 9°99TT 9° LTT Z0°0 aa) 1°0 1°0 (x85) aTOS peut tone) 9°0 €°0 €°O | yorted epuriy oTYy €O°l O°ZI G°0 4°0 C°6 ZeT 4°O wnip t9s,eMYyssry 97°0 O°€ 7° Tf 8°0 T°0 L°0 getdders yoeTg 9L°0 6°8 L°0 OT 8°z Z°1 6°1 €°T yetddezo 93T4M sO‘0 9°0 1°0 z°0 1‘0 z°0 TIT8en Tg 77°0 Z°S G‘0 6°0 | 9°T 8°T 7°0 ysseq YInowes1e7] SO‘O 9°0 | 9°0 xsseq oITUM 19°€ L° ty 8°0 €°0 9°OT | L°S L°%2 qeT[Nu pedtii¢s 16°0 9°OT 1°9 e°1 cl L°l x4Styqeo antg | SO €°9 7° oT Tel aa) CT 8°0 xUstTyqeo Teuueyp | 96°92 L*60€ €“OL | 6°02 vET | GEE | 7°04 G°8S 9°S9 19°27 Livy oTezgng YInouyTTeUs | so‘L Z°78 6°Ly | T'9T Ge 9°€ z°8 8°0 1°0 a7) 8°0 peys piezzto | £0°0 7°0 7°0 ystyApey Z6°SE 0°61 9°S7 | 8°TY E°LG | 6°0E | 7°92 1°62 6°1S | 6°€6 17 ze8 asousu0'] 68°Z L°€€ 7°Z 9°8 Oz 8°9 T° o's GT €°9 ze3 peqjods 87°61 G°TEZ Z°LS O°ZI €°6I1 | O° 12 | occ | ze3 10e3TTTV qysTeM TeIOL JO JuaD 19g] — SUOTIEIS 4961 ‘AeAINS oTseg AOATY Ssadeny JamoT ‘suotjeqs Aq ‘uaye} YSTF JO spunog “€ STqPL --- Page 8 --- 00°OOT TLOT! 7O7T aIOS pesuTy Aqo38 poyen yortoed epueizyg oty ysTsutd qoyoer [rayjeeT ie 11ep utequnog T1IF8en{g yAnow1eM sseq Yjnowesie7 SPTSISATTS a,emMaptTyT JeT[nu pedtaqs AT[ow uozewy AT TOW UTFTTeS ysTyo .Inbsop MoUUTW peeysdaeys OSTITITTA FIND woj}pew sjodpey, MOUUTW Pe2eyuT [ng ZeuTYSs pey MoUuUTWU asousng Bie] UeOTXO_ Aaoyosue pedtajs peys prezzty Uspeyusll aTeoseUTy UST yApey ze38 poqjods aAaqunyy [e@O7, JO Jueg r3g SUOT }eqS 7961 “Aeaing oTseg TeATY seoenN 19M07 ‘sq[nser BuTUuTeg °¢ aTqey, --- Page 9 --- were found, but they are not a problem at this time. Since there is sufficient flow in the river, aquatic vegetation is not considered a problem and is not likely to become one. Good soil conservation practices have been used in this area, but more are needed to prevent soil pollution. Many landowners have planted coastal bermuda along the river. This practice has been very successful in stabilizing soil. No nutria were seen along the river nor was there any indication of their presence. Discussion; At the present time there is a limited population of largemouth bass and white and black crappie. Many anglers limit their fishing to catfish, however. No flatheads were found, but there is a good channel and blue catfish population. No actual count of fishermen was made, but nearly all of them observed were at one of three places; the Highway 359 crossing, Bazemore Park or the Highway 9 crossing. Presently, there are no commercial fishing camps located along the river, but there are a number of bait stands nearby. Recommendations: A commercial netter is recommended to harvest unlimited numbers of gars and smallmouth buffalo from this portion of the river. Any catfish taken in their nets, however, should be returned to the water immediately. The area game warden has reported that he has taken a number of fish traps out of the river. This work should be continued. For the purpose of keeping a check on the populations, a limited survey and creel census should be made in the future for making management proposals. No developmental or management work is presently proposed or recommended. A} -) ‘ J Prepared by Charles T. Menn Approved by fd /apt_dve Boe Project Leader Coordinator Date _ January 21, 1965 Kenneth C. Jurgens Regional Supervisor --- Page 10 --- HRI STi WESLEY SEALE DAM COLLECTION STATIONS A Seining @ Gill netting a Water analysis as es co Se | Oo 1 2 3 +44 miles CO MATHIS © LOWER NUECES RIVER {SODEM aS ‘we N © ro —{ROBSTOWN —